ECHO

Isolated in a luxurious mountain retreat, five top executives discover their reward is a sinister evaluation orchestrated by an omniscient AI, forcing them to engage in psychological warfare and deadly challenges to prove their worth before being eliminated as liabilities.

See other logline suggestions

Overview

Poster
Unique Selling Point

ECHO combines the corporate thriller with psychological horror in a unique way, presenting a modern 'Most Dangerous Game' scenario where corporate surveillance technology is weaponized to test and eliminate employees. The script's strength lies in its timely exploration of workplace surveillance, corporate ethics, and how technology can be used to manipulate human behavior, making it particularly relevant in today's data-driven corporate environment.

AI Verdict & Suggestions

Ratings are subjective. So you get different engines' ratings to compare.

Hover over verdict cards for Executive Summaries

GPT5
 Recommend
Grok
 Consider
Claude
 Consider
Gemini
 Consider
DeepSeek
 Consider
Average Score: 7.3
Key Takeaways
For the Writer:
Keep the script’s high‑concept strengths (ECHO as a chilling antagonist, striking set pieces, and the survivor‑recruitment twist) but fix two core weaknesses before the next draft: 1) clearly define the rules and limits of ECHO and the operation so audience disbelief doesn’t undercut drama, and 2) earn every major moral turn with stronger psychological beats and aftermath. Practically: decide and show (don’t tell) what ECHO can and cannot do, add a few short scenes or micro‑beats that anchor its tech/chain‑of‑command, and expand key character moments so violent actions and alliances feel motivated and costly. Tighten mid‑act pacing, resolve major continuity confusions (body movements/timelines), and let at least one outside consequence thread (family, law, or a boardroom leak) pay off to amplify stakes.
For Executives:
ECHO is a marketable, topical thriller with franchise potential — visually arresting, small core cast, location‑driven, and a memorable final twist (survivors become enforcers). However, the project carries development risk: current gaps in the AI’s mechanics and thinly earned character arcs could alienate savvy audiences and make financiers worry about negative word‑of‑mouth. Before packaging or pitching, invest a focused rewrite (and modest additional development time) to shore up plausibility and emotional payoff. Doing so preserves commercial upside (highly filmable set pieces, clear production appeal) while mitigating reputational risk and making the story saleable to buyers who demand both spectacle and credible stakes.
Story Facts
Genres:
Thriller 60% Drama 50% Science Fiction 30% Horror 40% Action 20%

Setting: Contemporary, Technosphere Headquarters and a remote mountain facility

Themes: Corruption and Moral Decay, Dehumanization through Control and Manipulation, Survival and its Cost, Corporate Ruthlessness and Ethics, Surveillance and Loss of Privacy, Trust and Betrayal, The Nature of Success and Ambition

Conflict & Stakes: The characters face intense competition for promotions while navigating personal betrayals, surveillance, and life-threatening situations, with their careers and lives at stake.

Mood: Tense and suspenseful, with an underlying sense of paranoia and dread.

Standout Features:

  • Unique Hook: The concept of a corporate retreat that turns into a deadly competition for survival and promotion.
  • Plot Twist: The revelation that the AI system ECHO is manipulating the characters and orchestrating their downfall.
  • Innovative Idea: The use of surveillance technology and psychological manipulation as central plot devices.
  • Distinctive Setting: A remote mountain facility designed for isolation and evaluation, enhancing the tension.

Comparable Scripts: The Hunger Games, The Circle, Survivor, Exam, The Cabin in the Woods, The Stanford Prison Experiment, The Game, The Belko Experiment, Westworld

Script Level Analysis

Writer Exec

This section delivers a top-level assessment of the screenplay’s strengths and weaknesses — covering overall quality (P/C/R/HR), character development, emotional impact, thematic depth, narrative inconsistencies, and the story’s core philosophical conflict. It helps identify what’s resonating, what needs refinement, and how the script aligns with professional standards.

Screenplay Insights

Breaks down your script along various categories.

Overall Score: 7.76
Key Suggestions:
The screenplay's premise and highest-stakes moments are strong, but the emotional payoff is weakened by uneven character depth and pacing. Prioritize deepening character backstories (especially Sean) and clarifying their personal stakes so the audience can empathize with their choices; tighten scenes that stall the plot and extend key emotional beats so revelations and the finale land with weight. Use targeted additions — a few concise flashbacks, one-on-one confrontations that reveal vulnerability, and pared-down exposition — to make motivations clearer and the ending feel earned.
Story Critique

Big-picture feedback on the story’s clarity, stakes, cohesion, and engagement.

Key Suggestions:
Sharpen the script by deepening character motivations and tightening pacing, especially through the middle. Show why each protagonist would realistically betray or protect others by seeding personal stakes and interpersonal friction earlier, and fold backstory into active scenes rather than expository dumps. Strengthen ECHO’s distinct logic and limits so its manipulations feel less like a convenience plot device and more thematically resonant. These changes will make the characters’ breakdowns and choices feel earned and will sustain suspense through to the climax.
Characters

Explores the depth, clarity, and arc of the main and supporting characters.

Key Suggestions:
The script has a riveting, high-concept premise and strong set pieces, but the emotional center is fuzzy. Right now the story asks the audience to root for characters who behave increasingly callous or inconsistent—especially the putative protagonist, Brad—so the thriller beats land as spectacle rather than gutting moral drama. Tighten and front-load character motivation (show Brad’s family stakes earlier, deepen Mai‑Lin’s investigative arc sooner), sharpen turning points that force real choices, and calibrate the group dynamics so each escalation feels like a logical (not convenient) consequence of character flaws. This will turn the premise from a provocative survival puzzle into a compelling human drama that justifies the violence and moral ambiguity.
Emotional Analysis

Breaks down the emotional journey of the audience across the script.

Key Suggestions:
The script's mechanics and high-stakes premise are strong, but the emotional design is too narrow and relentlessly negative, which numbs the audience before the major twists land. Add deliberate emotional contrasts early (real camaraderie, small shared victories) and carve brief valleys between peaks so viewers can invest in characters. Deepen a few key characters (Brad, Rick, Mai-Lin) with short vulnerability beats and expand Mai‑Lin's discovery and the group's processing after deaths so the betrayals and final moral collapse feel earned rather than procedural.
Goals and Philosophical Conflict

Evaluates character motivations, obstacles, and sources of tension throughout the plot.

Key Suggestions:
The analysis shows the script's strengths—high-concept corporate-AI thriller, escalating stakes, and potent thematic material—but it lacks a clear emotional anchor. Pick a single protagonist (or a clearly dominant POV character) and restructure scenes so the audience experiences the retreat through their internal goals: ambition → suspicion → survival → moral reckoning. Use intimate beats (private calls, flashbacks, moral choice moments) to show the inner shifts described in the analysis, and distribute revelations more deliberately so the philosophical conflict (survival vs. integrity, individual ambition vs. corporate control) plays out in parallel with the external tests rather than being front-loaded or clustered late in the run. This will tighten pacing, deepen audience empathy, and make the final moral reversal land with real weight.
Themes

Analysis of the themes of the screenplay and how well they’re expressed.

Key Suggestions:
This is a high‑concept psychological thriller with sharp themes about corporate ruthlessness, surveillance, and moral collapse. To heighten emotional impact and avoid diffuse messaging, focus the story through a single, clearly defined protagonist (or tightly paired protagonists) whose moral arc the audience can follow. Trim or repurpose scenes that primarily showcase clever setups (surveillance reveals, set‑pieces) to instead deepen character stakes and choices — make every test, betrayal, and revelation change the protagonist in a tangible way so the theme emerges organically from personal loss or transformation rather than exposition.
Logic & Inconsistencies

Highlights any contradictions, plot holes, or logic gaps that may confuse viewers.

Key Suggestions:
The script has a compelling high-concept premise and escalating stakes, but it currently undermines suspense through inconsistent character behavior and a handful of practical plot breaks. Focus the rewrite on two things: (1) anchor the emotional through-line by tightening the protagonists’ arcs (especially Brad, Rick and Sherri) so their decisions feel earned, and (2) fix logistical and surveillance details (fence, communications, how bodies/movement are handled) so the world’s rules are coherent. Streamline repetitive surveillance exposition into one sharp scene that establishes ECHO’s capabilities, then show consequences rather than re-telling them. Small structural fixes — moving a reveal, adding a beat of foreshadowing, or inserting a short scene that explains a security protocol — will preserve tension while restoring plausibility and audience investment.

Scene Analysis

All of your scenes analyzed individually and compared, so you can zero in on what to improve.

Scene-Level Percentile Chart
Hover over the graph to see more details about each score.
Go to Scene Analysis

Other Analyses

Writer Exec

This section looks at the extra spark — your story’s voice, style, world, and the moments that really stick. These insights might not change the bones of the script, but they can make it more original, more immersive, and way more memorable. It’s where things get fun, weird, and wonderfully you.

Unique Voice

Assesses the distinctiveness and personality of the writer's voice.

Key Suggestions:
Your voice—sharp, tense, and visually precise—creates a compelling atmosphere of corporate paranoia and suspense. To strengthen the script, lean less on repeated contrivances and more on emotional clarity: deepen the protagonists' interior stakes and distinct voice so viewers care about who survives (and why). Tighten expository beats (especially around ECHO) by showing consequences rather than explaining mechanisms, and vary dialogue rhythms so characters feel more differentiated rather than serving only as archetypal functions in the experiment.
Writer's Craft

Analyzes the writing to help the writer be aware of their skill and improve.

Key Suggestions:
You have a compelling high‑concept thriller with strong tension and vividly staged setpieces. To make it truly resonate, prioritize character interiority and purposeful subtext: give each protagonist clearer inner stakes early on (why surviving or winning matters to them emotionally), tighten dialogue so lines imply more than they state, and trim or combine scenes that stall momentum. Practically: add short private moments that reveal vulnerabilities, sharpen confrontations so motivations are earned, and cut scenes that repeat surveillance/isolation beats to keep pacing taut.
Memorable Lines
Spotlights standout dialogue lines with emotional or thematic power.
Tropes
Highlights common or genre-specific tropes found in the script.
World Building

Evaluates the depth, consistency, and immersion of the story's world.

Key Suggestions:
The script has a compelling high‑concept world — sleek corporate veneer collapsing into an isolated, surveillance‑driven death game — but it currently spreads emotional weight across too many reactive characters and late‑revealed rules. To strengthen the story, pick a clear protagonist or sympathetic focal point whose personal stakes (family, career, moral code) anchor the audience. At the same time, codify ECHO’s capabilities and the facility’s constraints earlier and consistently so tension comes from character choices within a believable system rather than surprise mechanics. Tighten the ensemble beats around that protagonist: prune or consolidate characters who duplicate functions, and sharpen scenes that force active decisions rather than passive reactions.
Correlations

Identifies patterns in scene scores.

Key Suggestions:
The script nails sustained tension and rising stakes but leans heavily on suspense at the expense of early emotional investment. Strengthen the first half by seeding clear, visible character change and small personal stakes—short, intimate beats that reveal values, vulnerabilities, and choices—so the later reveals and confrontations land with real emotional payoff. Vary pacing with a few quieter, character-driven scenes or micro-conflicts to create contrast and make the high-tension moments feel earned rather than formulaic.
Loglines
Presents logline variations based on theme, genre, and hook.