Silicon Valley

Executive Summary

Poster
Overview

Genres: Comedy, Drama, Satire

Setting: Contemporary, Silicon Valley, California

Overview: In the heart of Silicon Valley, Thomas, a passionate coder, is determined to revolutionize the music industry with his project, Pied Piper. Living in the chaotic Hacker House with his quirky roommates, including the skeptical landlord Erlich and the carefree Big Head, Thomas faces the pressures of the tech world as he navigates high-stakes negotiations and the competitive landscape. As he grapples with offers from powerful tech moguls like Gavin Belson, Thomas must confront his values and the allure of financial success versus meaningful innovation. The story unfolds through a series of humorous and tense interactions, leading Thomas to a pivotal decision about his future and the fate of Pied Piper.

Themes: Meaningful Innovation vs. Financial Success, The Illusion of Silicon Valley, Friendship and Community, The Value of Authenticity, Disillusionment and Self-Discovery

Conflict and Stakes: Thomas's struggle to establish his startup, Pied Piper, amidst pressures from corporate interests and personal insecurities, with the potential for financial success or failure at stake.

Overall Mood: Chaotic yet hopeful

Mood/Tone at Key Scenes:

  • Scene 1: High-energy and chaotic, reflecting the frenetic nature of Silicon Valley's tech culture.
  • Scene 2: Tense and confrontational, showcasing the struggles of Thomas against Erlich's skepticism.
  • Scene 3: Frustrated and anxious, as Thomas grapples with the pressures of the tech industry during his commute.
  • Scene 10: Celebratory and optimistic, as the characters toast to their new venture and the potential for success.

Standout Features:

  • Unique Hook: The juxtaposition of the chaotic, humorous life in Hacker House against the high-stakes corporate world of Silicon Valley.
  • Innovative Ideas: The concept of Pied Piper as a revolutionary music copyright infringement solution that captures the imagination.
  • Distinctive Settings: The contrasting environments of the Hacker House and corporate offices, highlighting the differences in startup culture.
  • Unique Characters: A diverse cast of eccentric tech personalities that bring humor and depth to the narrative.

Comparable Scripts:

  • Silicon Valley (TV Series)
  • The Social Network (Movie)
  • Halt and Catch Fire (TV Series)
  • Jobs (Movie)
  • The Big Bang Theory (TV Series)
  • Ready Player One (Book/Movie)
  • The Imitation Game (Movie)
  • The Internship (Movie)
  • The Circle (Book/Movie)

Writing Style:

The screenplay exhibits a predominantly dialogue-driven style, characterized by sharp wit, fast-paced exchanges, and complex character interactions. It frequently incorporates satirical humor and social commentary, often focusing on the dynamics of power, ambition, and the tech industry. There's a blend of high-stakes scenarios and insightful explorations of human behavior within these settings.

Style Similarities:

  • Aaron Sorkin
  • Mike Judge
Other Similarities
Pass/Consider/Recommend

Highly Recommend


Explanation: The Silicon Valley pilot screenplay is a highly promising project with a strong comedic voice, well-developed characters, and a compelling premise. The pilot effectively establishes its unique world and characters, leaving the audience eager for more. While some minor improvements in pacing and character depth could enhance the script, its strengths significantly outweigh its weaknesses, making it a highly recommended pilot for production.


USP: The unique selling proposition of 'Silicon Valley' is its authentic and humorous portrayal of the tech startup world, combined with a relatable underdog story. It stands out for its sharp dialogue, well-drawn characters, and satirical take on Silicon Valley culture, making it compelling for both tech-savvy audiences and general viewers.
Market Analysis

Budget Estimate:$20-30 million

Target Audience Demographics: Young adults aged 18-35, tech enthusiasts, fans of comedy and drama, particularly those interested in startup culture.

Marketability: The screenplay taps into the current fascination with tech startups and Silicon Valley culture, appealing to a broad audience.

The mix of humor and drama, along with relatable characters, makes it attractive for both comedic and serious filmgoers.

The unique setting and themes of innovation and entrepreneurship resonate with contemporary societal interests.

Profit Potential: High, due to the film's appeal to a young, tech-savvy audience and potential for viral marketing and social media engagement.

Analysis Criteria Percentiles
Writer's Voice

Summary:The writer's voice is sharply witty, satirical, and character-driven. It blends fast-paced, often cynical humor with insightful commentary on the tech industry, its culture, and the human ambitions within it. The dialogue is snappy and realistic, capturing the casual banter of tech professionals while also conveying complex power dynamics and internal conflicts.

Best representation: Scene 2 - Tech Tensions on the Commute. Scene 2, set in the Hacker House, best encapsulates the writer's voice. It introduces the core characters and their dynamic relationships, showcasing the fast-paced, witty dialogue and satirical portrayal of the tech world. The tension between Thomas's ambition and Erlich's skepticism, combined with the humorous interruptions from Big Head and Dinesh, perfectly balances comedy and conflict, establishing the show's central themes and tone from the outset. The scene's sharp dialogue, fast-paced narrative, and satirical take on the tech industry are hallmarks of the writer's unique style throughout the entire screenplay.

Memorable Lines:

  • GAVIN BELSON: I'm willing to give this dickhead thirty million dollars if I never have to talk to him again! (Scene 20)
  • THOMAS: Changing the world, one crappy app at a time. (Scene 3)
  • PETER GREGORY: The true value of snake-oil is intangible as well. (Scene 6)
  • Gavin Belson: Well, look at it this way -- I have 30 million dollars that I’m going to use to destroy that sad, pathetic, stupid prick. (Scene 25)
  • Erlich: I KNOW WHAT BINARY IS!!! Jesus! I’ve memorized the hexadecimal times tables! Ask me what 9 times F is!! I don’t need you to tell me what’s binary and I don’t NEED you thinking about soup. (Scene 8)
Characters

Thomas:The protagonist, a coder struggling to make his startup, Pied Piper, successful while navigating the tech industry's challenges.

Erlich:The house manager of Hacker House, a brash entrepreneur who often provides comic relief but also offers unexpected support.

Big Head:Thomas's friend and a fellow tech worker, who is often distracted and anxious about his own job security.

Jared:A young business executive who admires Thomas and wants to contribute to his startup.

Gavin Belson:The powerful CIO of Boodle, who is interested in acquiring Pied Piper and represents corporate interests.

Peter Gregory:An eccentric entrepreneur who advocates for innovation and dropouts, providing a contrasting perspective on education.

Story Shape
Summary **Title: Silicon Dreams** **Genre: Comedy / Drama** **Summary:** Silicon Dreams kicks off with a dynamic credit sequence that showcases the eccentric hustle of Silicon Valley, intermixing vibrant visuals of iconic locations and notable tech figures. The narrative introduces Thomas, a passionate coder living in a rundown Hacker House, working tirelessly on his ambitious project, Pied Piper, while navigating tensions with house manager Erlich. The atmosphere is charged with a blend of camaraderie and conflict as Thomas defends his innovative vision against the dismissals of Erlich and interruptions from friends like Big Head and Dinesh. As Thomas grapples with anxieties about the unforgiving tech landscape, he finds fleeting inspiration during a talk by tech mogul Peter Gregory, who champions dropouts as the real success stories of Silicon Valley. Despite this, Thomas faces ridicule from brogrammers at the office but unexpectedly draws attention when Pied Piper's innovative technology demonstrates its impressive capabilities, catching the eye of industry heavyweights, including Gavin Belson. Despite a rollercoaster of emotions—ranging from moments of doubt and frustration to unexpected support from friends—Thomas stands at a crossroads when presented with competing offers for his project. He must choose between the lure of immediate financial gain from Belson or a potential partnership with Gregory that aligns with his values. This tension deepens as he contemplates what it means to truly succeed in the fast-paced tech world. Throughout the episode, we witness the contrasting lives of Thomas's friends, Langdon and Tandy, who feel out of place amid the tech elite's world of arrogance and eccentricity. Their insights and comedic observations about the industry highlight the episode's themes of ambition, disillusionment, and the absurdity of Silicon Valley culture. Ultimately, Silicon Dreams encapsulates the challenges and rewards of innovation, the pressures of living up to lofty ambitions, and the camaraderie that emerges from shared struggles. As the characters celebrate the launch of their new company with humor and hope, the stage is set for a journey filled with growth, creativity, and unexpected twists in the world of technology.


Screenplay Story Analysis

Story Critique The pilot successfully establishes a vibrant setting and introduces a compelling protagonist, Thomas, whose journey from coding underdog to potential tech mogul is engaging. The supporting characters, particularly Erlich and Big Head, provide humor and contrast. The satirical portrayal of Silicon Valley culture, with its eccentricities and competitive atmosphere, is sharp and insightful. However, the plot feels somewhat episodic, lacking a strong central conflict that drives the narrative forward with consistent urgency. Several plotlines (Langdon and Tandy's story, for example) feel tangential to Thomas's main arc, diluting the focus. The pacing is uneven, with some scenes feeling rushed while others linger unnecessarily. The resolution, while offering a satisfying cliffhanger, feels slightly abrupt and could benefit from a more sustained build-up of tension.
Suggestions: Strengthen the central conflict. Consider weaving Langdon and Tandy's story more organically into Thomas's journey, perhaps having them become involved in his business in some way. Develop a stronger overarching antagonist, someone who poses a consistent threat to Thomas's success. Refine the pacing, ensuring a consistent level of tension and suspense throughout the pilot. Consider streamlining some subplots or deepening their connection to the main narrative.

Note: This is the overall critique. For scene by scene critique click here
Beginning The opening montage effectively sets the tone and atmosphere of Silicon Valley, creating a sense of frenetic energy and ambition. The introduction of Thomas and the Hacker House immediately establishes the setting and key characters. The contrast between Thomas's dedication and the more frivolous pursuits of others (Big Head's game, Erlich's attitude) creates an initial sense of conflict. However, the introduction of many characters at once can be overwhelming, making it difficult for the audience to fully grasp their roles and motivations. The initial conflict with Erlich feels somewhat generic and lacks the depth necessary to fully engage the audience from the start.
Suggestions: Stagger the introductions of the supporting characters to avoid overwhelming the audience. Develop the initial conflict with Erlich more thoroughly; give it stronger stakes and explore the underlying reasons for Erlich's behavior. Consider showing more of Thomas's work, giving the audience a glimpse of the power of Pied Piper earlier on to generate more immediate investment in his success.
Middle The middle section effectively showcases the challenges Thomas faces in the cutthroat world of Silicon Valley. The scenes at Boodle offer a biting satire of corporate culture, while the interactions with Peter Gregory introduce a significant plot point. The encounter with the brogrammers provides a humorous, yet relatable, example of the indifference shown to innovative ideas. However, the pacing becomes uneven in the middle, with several subplots (like the yoga instructors' story) that, while interesting in their own right, don’t significantly advance the main plot. The scenes with Big Head, while funny, often feel like distractions from the main narrative.
Suggestions: Streamline the subplots or find ways to more closely integrate them into the main narrative arc. Focus more on the development of the central conflict. Instead of numerous small encounters, consider building towards one or two significant obstacles that Thomas needs to overcome. Ensure that all scenes actively advance the plot or reveal more about the characters or the setting.
Ending The ending successfully creates a cliffhanger by leaving Thomas with a difficult decision, raising the stakes for future episodes. The final scene with Monica adds a layer of intrigue and reinforces Thomas's internal conflict. The interactions with Gavin Belson are well-written, displaying his character's ruthlessness and ambition effectively. However, the rapid-fire escalation of the offer price from $600,000 to $10 million feels somewhat unrealistic and abrupt. The resolution lacks a strong sense of closure for the secondary plotlines, particularly the story of Langdon and Tandy.
Suggestions: Make the final offer more believable, gradually increasing the stakes instead of a sudden jump. Provide a more satisfying conclusion to the secondary plotlines, perhaps having them intersect with Thomas's story in some meaningful way. Consider offering a clearer sense of Thomas's internal decision-making process, showing his emotional journey leading to the cliffhanger. Strengthen the overall impact of the final scene to increase the impact of the cliffhanger.

See the full analysis by clicking the title.

1 - Silicon Valley Unplugged Satirical, Energetic 8.5 9 79 8 387372775 69888
2 - Tensions in Hacker House Humorous, Confrontational, Desperate 8.5 8 99 8 787888977 99888
3 - Tech Tensions on the Commute Satirical, Frustrated, Reflective 8.2 8 89 9 887879878 99888
4 - Restless Ambitions Curious, Reflective, Excited 7.5 8 79 8 787768878 99888
5 - Mockery in the Snack Area Sarcastic, Disdainful, Mocking 8.2 8 89 9 887878878 99888
6 - The Education Debate: Innovation vs. Tradition Sarcastic, Critical, Humorous 8.5 9 89 9 798988878 99888
7 - The Pitch and the Futuristic Exit Sarcastic, Cynical, Conversational 8.2 9 89 9 887978978 99888
8 - Pitching in the Hacker House Sarcastic, Defeated, Frustrated 7.5 8 79 8 687776776 99888
9 - Sacbut Dreams and Startup Frustrations Humorous, Defeated, Innovative 7.5 8 78 8 687665777 88899
10 - Yoga, Dreams, and Discontent Cynical, Humorous, Reflective 8.2 8 89 9 787574778 99888
11 - Reflections Over Coffee Humorous, Reflective, Regretful 8.5 8 88 9 787666778 99888
12 - From Mockery to Desire Humorous, Intriguing, Greedy 8.5 9 99 8 887878977 99988
13 - The Call from Belson Tense, Humorous, Excited 8.5 8 99 8 787888988 99988
14 - The Cult of Gavin Excitement, Anticipation, Cult-like Admiration 8.5 9 88 9 787778878 89888
15 - The Innovator's Dilemma Satirical, Sarcastic, Cynical 8.5 8 89 8 687667777 79888
16 - Unexpected News at Boodle Shocking, Troubled, Cult-like admiration 8.5 8 98 8 787878978 98999
17 - Dismissive Dealings Sarcastic, Cynical, Humorous 8.5 8 89 9 587776786 99888
18 - The High-Stakes Dilemma Shocking, Overwhelmed, Excited, Conflicted 8.5 8 99 8 887989989 99888
19 - Decisions on the Stoops Reflective, Casual, Encouraging 8.5 8 87 9 787475778 99888
20 - Partnership Denied Tense, Humorous, Confrontational 8.5 8 99 8 787.5889988 998.588
21 - Tech Tensions at the Four Seasons Confusion, Awkwardness, Humor 7.5 8 79 8 687.5685787 89888
22 - Skepticism in Silicon Valley Disillusionment, Curiosity, Humor 8.5 8 88 9 687665768 88899
23 - Tension at the Brew Pub Anxious, Observant, Curious 8.5 8 88 9 787777878 99888
24 - Unexpected Support in the Hacker House Conflicted, Reflective, Supportive 8.5 8 89 9 787574779 99888
25 - Revenge is Sweet Intense, Sarcastic, Vengeful 8.5 8 98 8 887979979 99888
26 - Celebration of New Beginnings Hopeful, Excited, Reflective 9.2 9 99 9 887677979 99888


Scene 1 - Silicon Valley Unplugged
SILICON VALLEY

BY

Mike Judge, John Altschuler & Dave Krinsky




TV Calling - For educational purposes only
FADE IN:

CREDIT SEQUENCE:

WE SEE SHOT AFTER SHOT of what passes for exciting in the
Valley - Billboards about things we don’t understand, packs
of geeks, Logo T-shirts. Road signs that read CUPERTINO,
MENLO PARK, PALO ALTO. The shit brown colored hills of
Mountainview and past the entrances to Facebook, Google,
CISCO, etc. We also see quick scenes of people pitching at
accelerators, and the video of Steve Balmer ranting onstage.
Larry Ellison. Elon Musk with a Rocket. Steve Wozniak trying
to groove on his Segway. All mixed together in a high energy
montage.
Genres: ["Comedy"]

Summary This credit sequence presents a high-energy montage of Silicon Valley's vibrant culture, featuring quick cuts of iconic locations like Cupertino and Palo Alto, alongside notable tech figures such as Steve Balmer, Larry Ellison, Elon Musk, and Steve Wozniak. The visuals capture the frenetic pace and eccentricities of the tech industry, setting an energetic tone for the narrative to follow.
Strengths
  • High energy visuals
  • Effective introduction to setting and tone
Weaknesses
  • Lack of character development
  • Minimal dialogue

Ratings
Overall

Overall: 8.5

The scene effectively sets the tone for the series with its satirical take on the tech industry and high energy visuals.


Story Content

Concept: 8.5

The concept of showcasing the tech culture of Silicon Valley through a montage is engaging and sets the stage for the series.

Plot: 7

The plot is not the focus in this scene, but it effectively introduces the setting and tone of the series.

Originality: 9

The scene showcases a fresh and humorous take on the tech industry, with unique character interactions and situations that feel authentic and engaging. The dialogue is sharp and witty, adding to the originality of the scene.


Character Development

Characters: 7.5

Character introduction is minimal in this scene, but the tech personalities shown in the montage provide a glimpse into the world of Silicon Valley.

Character Changes: 3

There are no significant character changes in this scene.

Internal Goal: 8

The protagonist's internal goal in this scene is to navigate the competitive and fast-paced world of Silicon Valley, showcasing their skills and ideas to potential investors or partners. This reflects their desire for success, recognition, and validation in the tech industry.

External Goal: 7

The protagonist's external goal in this scene is to make a successful pitch or presentation to secure funding or support for their startup or project. This reflects the immediate challenge they are facing in trying to establish themselves in Silicon Valley.


Scene Elements

Conflict Level: 3

There is minimal conflict in this scene, as it serves more as an introduction to the setting.

Opposition: 7

The opposition in the scene is strong, with the protagonist facing challenges and competition in Silicon Valley. The audience is kept on their toes, unsure of how the protagonist will navigate the obstacles in their path.

High Stakes: 2

The stakes are low in this scene, focusing more on introducing the world of Silicon Valley.

Story Forward: 7

The scene moves the story forward by establishing the setting and tone of the series.

Unpredictability: 7

This scene is unpredictable because it introduces a variety of characters and situations in Silicon Valley, keeping the audience guessing about the protagonist's journey and the challenges they will face.

Philosophical Conflict: 7

The philosophical conflict evident in this scene is the tension between innovation and competition. The protagonist must balance their desire to create something new and groundbreaking with the need to stand out in a crowded and competitive market.


Audience Engagement

Emotional Impact: 5

The scene lacks emotional depth but effectively conveys the excitement and energy of Silicon Valley.

Dialogue: 6

Dialogue is minimal in this scene, with the visuals and quick scenes driving the narrative.

Engagement: 9

This scene is engaging because it immerses the audience in the fast-paced and competitive world of Silicon Valley, introducing intriguing characters and conflicts that draw the viewer in. The humor and satire add to the scene's entertainment value.

Pacing: 8

The pacing of the scene is fast and energetic, mirroring the high-energy atmosphere of Silicon Valley. The quick cuts and montages keep the audience engaged and set the tone for the rest of the series.


Technical Aspect

Formatting: 8

The formatting of the scene is clear and concise, with visual descriptions and character actions effectively conveying the setting and atmosphere of Silicon Valley. The format enhances the reader's understanding of the world and characters.

Structure: 8

The scene follows the expected format for a TV show set in Silicon Valley, with a fast-paced montage introducing the world and characters. The structure effectively sets up the tone and themes of the series.


Critique
  • The credit sequence effectively sets the tone for the series by showcasing the frenetic energy and culture of Silicon Valley. However, it could benefit from a more cohesive narrative thread that connects the various visuals, rather than presenting them as a disjointed collection of images. This would help the audience better understand the significance of each element in relation to the overarching theme.
  • While the montage captures the essence of Silicon Valley, it lacks character development or emotional engagement. Introducing a voiceover or text overlays that provide context or commentary on the visuals could enhance the audience's connection to the material and provide insight into the tech culture being depicted.
  • The pacing of the montage is fast, which is appropriate for the subject matter, but it may overwhelm viewers who are not familiar with the tech industry. Slowing down certain key moments or including brief pauses could allow the audience to absorb the information and appreciate the nuances of the culture being portrayed.
  • The choice of figures like Steve Balmer, Larry Ellison, and Elon Musk is effective in establishing the personalities that dominate Silicon Valley. However, including a wider variety of voices, such as lesser-known entrepreneurs or everyday tech workers, could provide a more balanced perspective on the industry and its impact on different individuals.
  • The visuals are strong, but the sequence could benefit from a more dynamic soundtrack that complements the imagery. A carefully curated selection of music that reflects the energy and innovation of Silicon Valley would enhance the overall impact of the montage.
Suggestions
  • Consider adding a narrative thread or theme that ties the visuals together, such as the pursuit of innovation or the challenges faced by tech entrepreneurs.
  • Incorporate voiceovers or text overlays to provide context and commentary on the visuals, helping to engage the audience and deepen their understanding of Silicon Valley's culture.
  • Introduce brief pauses or slower-paced moments within the montage to allow viewers to absorb key visuals and their significance.
  • Include a broader range of figures in the montage, showcasing not only well-known tech leaders but also everyday workers and entrepreneurs to provide a more comprehensive view of the industry.
  • Select a dynamic soundtrack that reflects the energy of Silicon Valley, enhancing the emotional impact of the montage and making it more memorable.



Scene 2 - Tensions in Hacker House
EXT. EAST PALO ALTO - HACKER HOUSE

WE PAN THROUGH a nondescript neighborhood and end on a not-
well-maintained house with a scrubby yard. This could easily
be the homestead of upwardly mobile white trash or downwardly
mobile professionals.


INT. HACKER HOUSE - DAY

We pan through the denizens of Hacker House: An East Indian
guy, DINESH, who always wears a rugby shirt and is now
punching away furiously on his laptop; CALVIN, a black guy
with braces and glasses who looks like a younger version of
Eddie Murphy in Bowfinger; a fat white guy with a pony tail
and a black shirt and black sweat pants, ROLAND, who seems to
be drawing a Celtic tattoo on his arm with an ink pen; oddest
of all is a skinny Asian fellow, JIN YANG, who is working
away at a stand up work station. No matter what they are
doing they also are plugged into something else and are
eating instant Ramen. We end on our hero, THOMAS. He is
incredibly focused as he rapidly types code on a computer
screen. His best friend, BIG HEAD (who does have an
unusually large noggin), comes up. Big Head is holding a
Perplexus (the small ball-shaped game these guys are all
obsessed with).

BIG HEAD
Hey, man, some guys from Zynga are
throwing an all-night Perplexus
tourney. Maybe we can find some
Stanford kids to hustle.

Big Head twists and turns the ball, finishing it in a
ridiculously fast amount of time. Thomas never breaks his
concentration.
TV Calling - For educational purposes only


THOMAS
Can’t.

Big Head takes a closer look at the screen.

BIG HEAD
Goddamn, Thomas, that’s a buttload
of code.

This gets the attention of Jin Yang at the stand-up work
station. Tall and skinny, he has a thick Taiwanese accent
and pretty much every other word is shit, fuck, motherfucker,
and dude.

JIAN YANG
Sheee-it, mother fucker you can
like buy compression software. You
don’t have to fucking write that
shit. You can buy that shit!

BIG HEAD
Or download a bootleg.

THOMAS
None of that CodeAcademy crap for
my web site. The whole idea of
Pied Piper is based on melody
recognition. If it doesn’t work
perfectly, no one will want in. So,
I am making it perfect.

Thomas turns and calls off.

THOMAS (CONT’D)
Hey, Dinesh, can you test this
module for me?

DINESH
Can I eat your salmon?

THOMAS
(grudging)
OK.

Dinesh takes Thomas’s lunch and sits down at the computer and
starts running tests.

Big Head looks a little hurt.

BIG HEAD
You’re letting him test your
module?
TV Calling - For educational purposes only
Thomas tries to put a positive spin on things.


THOMAS
You’ve got the Perplexus tourney.
I want you to fuck those guys up.

This fires up Big Head. He uses some very awkward body
English to put a flourish on his Perplexus move.

The House Nerd, ERLICH walks in and sees this.

ERLICH
And you wonder why there are never
any girls around here.

We see that Erlich is wearing his favorite “I Know HTML --
How To Meet Ladies” shirt.

ERLICH (CONT’D)
Hey Thomas, can we talk for a
second?

THOMAS
OK.

Erlich doesn’t make much eye contact but is still somehow
very aggressive.

ERLICH
Thomas, I’m gonna have to ask you
to vacate.

THOMAS
What? Why?

ERLICH
You’ve been here six months. I
gave you place a to live and plug
in. You’ve given me nothing.

THOMAS
Look, Pied Piper is going to take
off. The website is up and running,
it works great, it just needs--

Erlich cuts him off.

ERLICH
Pied Piper is crap. When you
pitched it you said, “The Google of
Music.” I thought it had
“Applications”.

THOMAS
It does! Have you been
TV on it since
Calling - For educational purposes only
I revamped it?
(MORE)
THOMAS (CONT'D)
Once it takes off Pied Piper will
be able to search the whole world
of recorded music to see if there
is a match. If you’re a song
writer... or a band... or anything,
and you wanted to make sure you
weren’t infringing on copy righted
material, you could find out in no
time.

Erlich just gives his head a curt shake.

ERLICH
First of all, nobody cares about
stealing other people’s music.
Jesus, they do it on purpose! Jay-
Z and Puffy made whole careers on
it.

THOMAS
They didn’t steal it, they had to
get permission from the copyright
owners...

ERLICH
They don’t own dick. There’s no
money in music anymore. Everyone
involved in music is either
stealing it or sharing it. They’re
all assholes. And they’re all suing
each other. To stay here, you have
to deliver. Or at least show some
promise for fuck’s sake.

Erlich motions to Big Head.

ERLICH (CONT’D)
Like NipAlert. Big Head’s app.
It gives you the location of a
woman with erect nipples. That’s
something people want. How’s that
coming along?

Big Head gives him two thumbs up.

BIG HEAD
Almost ready to enter Beta Phase.

Thomas turns back to Erlich. He is desperate and fishing.

THOMAS
Look, I want to change the world.
Make it a better place...
TV Calling - For educational purposes only


Erlich knows he has to pay lip service to this trope.

ERLICH
We all want to change the world and
make it better. Like I did when I
developed Accutran. A lot of
companies use a lot of different
software to aggregate social media
feedback -- Frontier Airlines just
happened to like mine.

Thomas digs in.

THOMAS
You can’t just kick me out. When I
signed up I was promised a month’s
notice if I had to leave. It’s in
writing.

Erlich looks pissed.

ERLICH
Then I am giving you notice. I
hope you’re happy. You know, when
I sold Accutran there were a lot of
things I could do with my money.
But I wanted to give back. I
started this place to do something
big. Really make a difference.
Like Steve.

THOMAS
Jobs or Wozniak?

ERLICH
(duh)
Jobs. Now, suppose Steve came back
to us all reincarnated, because he
was a Buddhist you know, and he
showed up here at The Hacker Hostel
looking for a place to help him get
on his feet so he could launch the
next big tech revolution. What
could I do? There’s no room for
STEVE. Can you believe this? I
have to tell Steve to fuck off
because there would be no room at
the Inn because you and Pied Piper
are here gumming up the works. See
what I’m saying Thomas?

THOMAS
That Steve Jobs is Jesus?
TV Calling - For educational purposes only


ERLICH
He was Buddist!

THOMAS
He was a poser! He didn’t even
write code.

Erlich looks stunned -- this is the only thing that could
shut him up.
Genres: ["Comedy","Drama"]

Summary In a rundown neighborhood's Hacker House, Thomas is deeply focused on coding his project, Pied Piper, while facing pressure from house manager Erlich, who threatens eviction due to perceived lack of progress. Despite interruptions from Big Head and Dinesh, Thomas defends the potential impact of his work against Erlich's dismissive attitude, leading to a tense confrontation about innovation and value in the tech industry. The scene captures a mix of camaraderie and conflict among the characters, ultimately leaving Thomas's future in the house uncertain.
Strengths
  • Sharp dialogue
  • Character dynamics
  • Conflict development
Weaknesses
  • Slightly predictable conflict resolution
  • Some cliched character traits

Ratings
Overall

Overall: 8.5

The scene effectively sets up the conflict between Thomas and Erlich, introduces the characters and their dynamics, and establishes the tone of the story. The dialogue is sharp and engaging, and the humor adds depth to the characters and their motivations.


Story Content

Concept: 8

The concept of a group of tech enthusiasts living in a hacker house and striving to innovate in the tech industry is engaging and relevant. The scene effectively introduces the central conflict and themes of ambition and creativity.

Plot: 8.5

The plot is advanced significantly in this scene through the conflict between Thomas and Erlich, setting up future developments and character arcs. The scene moves the story forward and establishes key relationships and motivations.

Originality: 9

The scene introduces fresh elements like the concept of Pied Piper and the diverse group of characters in a tech setting. The dialogue feels authentic and reflects the tech industry culture.


Character Development

Characters: 8

The characters are well-defined and distinct, each with their own quirks and motivations. The interactions between characters reveal their personalities and dynamics, adding depth to the scene.

Character Changes: 7

Thomas experiences a shift in his relationship with Erlich and confronts the reality of his situation, showing a glimpse of growth and determination. The scene sets up potential character development for Thomas.

Internal Goal: 8

The protagonist's internal goal in this scene is to perfect his website, Pied Piper, based on melody recognition. This reflects his desire for success and validation in the tech industry.

External Goal: 7

The protagonist's external goal is to convince the owner of the hacker house, Erlich, to let him stay and continue working on Pied Piper. This reflects the immediate challenge he faces in maintaining his living and working space.


Scene Elements

Conflict Level: 8

The conflict between Thomas and Erlich drives the scene, creating tension and highlighting the contrasting motivations of the characters. The high stakes of Thomas losing his place in the hacker house add urgency to the conflict.

Opposition: 8

The opposition between Thomas and Erlich is strong, with conflicting goals and motivations that drive the conflict in the scene.

High Stakes: 8

The stakes are high for Thomas, facing eviction from the hacker house and the potential loss of his place to work on his tech project. The conflict with Erlich raises the stakes and adds urgency to the scene.

Story Forward: 9

The scene significantly moves the story forward by introducing key conflicts, relationships, and motivations. It sets the stage for future developments and establishes the central conflict of the narrative.

Unpredictability: 7

The scene is somewhat predictable in terms of the conflict between Thomas and Erlich, but the unique character interactions add an element of unpredictability.

Philosophical Conflict: 9

The philosophical conflict in this scene is between Thomas's idealistic vision of changing the world through technology and Erlich's pragmatic view of success in the tech industry. This challenges Thomas's beliefs about the impact of his work.


Audience Engagement

Emotional Impact: 7

The scene has a moderate emotional impact, primarily driven by the desperation and frustration of Thomas facing eviction. The humor and confrontational tone balance the emotional moments.

Dialogue: 9

The dialogue is sharp, witty, and reveals character traits and conflicts effectively. The banter between characters adds humor and tension, enhancing the overall impact of the scene.

Engagement: 9

This scene is engaging due to the witty dialogue, character dynamics, and the conflict between Thomas and Erlich that drives the narrative forward.

Pacing: 8

The pacing of the scene is effective in building tension and developing the conflict between characters, leading to a climactic confrontation.


Technical Aspect

Formatting: 8

The scene follows standard formatting for a screenplay, with clear scene descriptions and character actions.

Structure: 8

The scene follows a typical format for a character-driven dialogue scene in a tech setting, with clear character introductions and conflict development.


Critique
  • The scene effectively establishes the setting and characters of the Hacker House, providing a clear contrast to the high-energy montage of Silicon Valley culture in the previous scene. However, the dialogue can feel a bit on-the-nose, particularly when characters explain their projects and motivations. This could be streamlined to feel more natural and less expository.
  • The character dynamics are interesting, especially the tension between Thomas and Erlich. However, Erlich's motivations could be fleshed out further. His dismissal of Thomas's project feels somewhat abrupt and could benefit from more context or backstory to make his character more relatable or understandable.
  • The humor in the scene is hit-or-miss. While some lines land well, others feel forced or overly reliant on stereotypes (e.g., the portrayal of Jin Yang). Striking a balance between humor and character depth is essential to avoid reducing characters to mere comedic devices.
  • The pacing of the scene is uneven. The initial interactions are lively, but the confrontation between Thomas and Erlich drags on, which could lose the audience's engagement. Tightening this exchange could maintain momentum and keep the audience invested.
  • The stakes for Thomas are established, but they could be heightened further. The threat of eviction is significant, but the scene could benefit from a clearer emotional arc for Thomas, showcasing his desperation and passion for Pied Piper more vividly.
Suggestions
  • Consider revising the dialogue to make it feel more organic. Instead of having characters explicitly state their motivations, allow their actions and reactions to convey their stakes and desires.
  • Add more depth to Erlich's character by providing a backstory or a personal stake in the Hacker House. This could create a more nuanced conflict between him and Thomas.
  • Revisit the humor in the scene to ensure it feels authentic and not reliant on stereotypes. Aim for humor that arises naturally from character interactions rather than forced punchlines.
  • Tighten the pacing of the confrontation between Thomas and Erlich. Focus on the most impactful lines and reactions to maintain tension and engagement.
  • Enhance Thomas's emotional journey by incorporating more internal conflict or flashbacks that illustrate his passion for Pied Piper and what it means to him, making the stakes feel more personal.



Scene 3 - Tech Tensions on the Commute
EXT. LUXURY SHUTTLE VAN - MORNING

Thomas rides the luxury shuttle van to work with Big Head.

The Boodle Channel plays on closed circuit TVs and on it we
see GAVIN BELSON, CIO (Chief Innovation Officer) of Boodle
and a true running sore of a human being. He talks about how
Boodle is making the world a better place.

GAVIN BELSON (V.O.)
Boodle brings the world to
everyone. Boodle is everything.
And that’s what allows Boodle to
“make happy.”

Gavin then urges his workers to sit back and relax (but also
be sure to enjoy the complimentary energy bars and energy
drinks and energy gum onboard). We see everyone chomping and
drinking away as the channel then shows all the ways Boodle
“Makes Happy”.

Thomas is on his iPad looking at rentals.

THOMAS
These rents are insane. $2800 a
month, $4500 a month -- with five
people!

BIG HEAD
You forget how goddamn expensive it
is here.

Thomas looks miserable.

THOMAS
I don’t want to have to go back to
St. Louis. I can barely talk to
people in St. Louis. My parents
still live in St. Louis!

BIG HEAD
You think Oklahoma City’s any - For educational purposes only
TV Calling
better?
(MORE)
BIG HEAD (CONT'D)
And I’m going to be the next one
booted. Ever since GoolyBib landed
two million in seed money Erlich’s
been on the warpath about
monetizing.

THOMAS
GoolyBib? That Indian guy from
Dropbox you were hanging out with?

BIG HEAD
No, it’s a startup -- GoolyBib. I
think it’s a real estate app... or
maybe it’s that traffic one.

THOMAS
Fuck. Every day somebody in the
valley is hitting it big. But not
me. If I can’t pull it off now,
when there are billions of dollars
just LOOKING FOR A START UP, it
might not ever happen.

BIG HEAD
Yeah, no kidding.

THOMAS
What are you worried about? Erlich
loves Nip Alert.

BIG HEAD
He’s just blinded by boobs. Once
he scratches the surface he’s going
to see there’s giant holes in this
thing. It’s based on self
reporting. I can’t put sensors on
women to report when their nipples
are erect. I get one clown to send
out fake reports and the whole
thing collapses. I need something
to make it objective.

Thomas has calmed down now that he has a problem to focus on.

THOMAS
Maybe I could develop an image
recognition program, kind of like
the melody recognition in Pied
Piper.

Big Head is coming around.

TV Calling - For educational purposes only


BIG HEAD
Or infra red cameras that detect
changes in body heat.

They are both sold for the moment. But it soon fades.

THOMAS
Fuck, I’m going to have to go to
graduate school. I can’t afford to
stay here even if I’m working full
time at Boodle.

Thomas looks down at the TV where Gavin Belson is still
talking.

GAVIN BELSON (V.O.)
That is how Boodle can change the
world.

THOMAS
Changing the world, one crappy app
at a time.

DISSOLVE TO:
Genres: ["Drama","Comedy"]

Summary In a luxury shuttle van, Thomas and Big Head discuss their anxieties about high living costs and job security while watching a promotional video from Boodle's CIO, Gavin Belson. Thomas fears returning to St. Louis, while Big Head worries about being replaced and the flaws in his app, Nip Alert. They brainstorm potential solutions but ultimately feel overwhelmed by the competitive tech landscape. The scene ends with Thomas cynically reflecting on Boodle's lofty mission, highlighting their disillusionment.
Strengths
  • Sharp dialogue
  • Realistic portrayal of Silicon Valley culture
  • Character depth and development
Weaknesses
  • Some dialogue may be too on-the-nose
  • Lack of visual variety in the setting

Ratings
Overall

Overall: 8.2

The scene effectively captures the challenges and anxieties faced by tech professionals in Silicon Valley, providing a realistic and relatable portrayal of the industry. The dialogue is sharp and reflective of the characters' frustrations, adding depth to the narrative.


Story Content

Concept: 8.3

The concept of exploring the challenges of the tech industry in Silicon Valley is compelling and relevant. The scene effectively conveys the competitive nature of the environment and the personal sacrifices required to succeed.

Plot: 8

The plot of the scene focuses on the characters' struggles with high living costs, professional pressures, and the quest for success. It sets up conflicts and dilemmas that have the potential to drive the narrative forward in engaging ways.

Originality: 9

The scene offers a fresh take on the tech industry, presenting the challenges and pressures faced by aspiring entrepreneurs in a humorous and relatable way. The characters' actions and dialogue feel authentic and engaging.


Character Development

Characters: 8.5

The characters are well-developed, each with distinct personalities and motivations. Their interactions reveal their individual struggles and aspirations, adding depth to the scene.

Character Changes: 8

The characters undergo subtle changes in their perspectives and priorities, reflecting the challenges and pressures they face in Silicon Valley. These changes add depth to their arcs and motivations.

Internal Goal: 8

Thomas's internal goal is to find a way to succeed in the competitive tech industry and avoid having to leave Silicon Valley. This reflects his deeper fear of failure and inability to connect with others outside of the tech world.

External Goal: 7

Thomas's external goal is to come up with a successful startup idea to secure his place in the industry and avoid having to go back to St. Louis.


Scene Elements

Conflict Level: 8

The scene features internal and external conflicts related to the characters' struggles with high living costs, professional pressures, and the need to innovate and succeed in a competitive industry.

Opposition: 7

The opposition in the scene comes from the characters' internal struggles and external challenges in the tech industry. The uncertainty of their success adds tension and conflict to the scene.

High Stakes: 9

The scene conveys the high stakes involved in the characters' quest for success in Silicon Valley, highlighting the personal and professional risks they take to achieve their goals.

Story Forward: 8

The scene moves the story forward by establishing key conflicts, character motivations, and potential plot developments. It sets the stage for future narrative progression and character growth.

Unpredictability: 7

This scene is unpredictable because of the unexpected twists in the characters' conversations and the uncertainty of their future in the tech industry. The audience is left wondering how Thomas and Big Head will navigate their challenges.

Philosophical Conflict: 6

The philosophical conflict in this scene is the pressure to succeed at any cost versus maintaining ethical standards in business. Thomas and Big Head discuss the challenges of monetizing their startup ideas while staying true to their values.


Audience Engagement

Emotional Impact: 8.3

The scene evokes a sense of empathy and connection with the characters' struggles and frustrations, drawing viewers into their world and emotional dilemmas.

Dialogue: 8.7

The dialogue is sharp, witty, and reflective of the characters' frustrations and anxieties. It effectively conveys the competitive and high-stakes nature of the tech industry in Silicon Valley.

Engagement: 9

This scene is engaging because of the witty dialogue, relatable character struggles, and satirical commentary on the tech industry. The conflict and stakes are clear, keeping the audience invested in the characters' journey.

Pacing: 8

The pacing of the scene is effective in building tension and highlighting the characters' emotional journey. The rhythm of the dialogue and action keeps the audience engaged and invested in the story.


Technical Aspect

Formatting: 8

The scene follows the expected formatting for a screenplay, with clear scene headings, character names, and dialogue formatting. The visual descriptions enhance the atmosphere of the scene.

Structure: 8

The scene follows the expected structure for a comedic drama set in the tech industry, with a clear setup, conflict, and resolution. The pacing and rhythm contribute to the scene's effectiveness.


Critique
  • The scene effectively captures the contrast between the idealized tech culture represented by Gavin Belson and the harsh realities faced by Thomas and Big Head. However, the dialogue could benefit from more subtext; while the characters express their frustrations, deeper emotional layers could be explored to enhance audience connection.
  • The use of the luxury shuttle van as a setting is a clever choice, symbolizing the disparity between the tech elite and the struggling developers. However, the scene could be more visually dynamic. Consider incorporating more visual elements that reflect the characters' emotions, such as their body language or the environment outside the van.
  • The dialogue is often humorous, but it sometimes feels too on-the-nose, particularly when discussing the flaws in Big Head's app. Subtlety can enhance the humor; instead of explicitly stating the issues, the characters could hint at them through their reactions or sarcastic comments.
  • The pacing of the scene is somewhat uneven. The initial setup with Gavin Belson's promotional video is engaging, but the transition to Thomas and Big Head's conversation could be smoother. Consider interspersing their dialogue with more reactions to the video to maintain a consistent flow.
  • The ending line, 'Changing the world, one crappy app at a time,' is a strong punchline, but it could be even more impactful if it were delivered with a stronger emotional weight. Perhaps Thomas could express a moment of vulnerability before making the cynical remark, reinforcing his internal conflict.
Suggestions
  • Add more visual descriptions to the shuttle van setting to enhance the atmosphere, such as the reactions of other passengers or the contrast between the luxury of the van and the characters' frustrations.
  • Incorporate more subtext in the dialogue. For example, instead of directly stating their fears and frustrations, let the characters express them through sarcasm or indirect comments that reveal their insecurities.
  • Consider using the promotional video as a backdrop for the characters' conversation, allowing their dialogue to reflect or contrast with what Gavin Belson is saying, creating a more layered scene.
  • Introduce a moment of silence or a shared glance between Thomas and Big Head after discussing their fears, allowing the audience to feel the weight of their situation before Thomas delivers his final line.
  • Explore the possibility of adding a brief interaction with another passenger in the shuttle, which could serve to highlight the disparity between the tech elite and the struggling developers, adding depth to the scene.



Scene 4 - Restless Ambitions
EXT. BOODLE - MOMENTS LATER

Thomas and Big Head walk through the Boodle campus. They
pass by the “play area” -- climbing walls, paintball obstacle
course, fitness stations, all of which are being unused as
engineers stand around drinking energy drinks.

Big Head is clearly lost in thought. He turns to Thomas.

BIG HEAD
Hey, did you hear what Peter
Gregory is doing?

THOMAS
You mean buying that island in the
Pacific?

BIG HEAD
He’s building one actually. It’s
gonna be this giant platform in the
middle of the ocean. And I think
he’s designing a new monetary
system for it. But anyway, he’s
also offering a hundred K to people
willing to skip or drop of college
to pursue any idea they have. I
mean, it has to be really kick -ass.
TV Calling For educational purposes only


THOMAS
Pied Piper kicks ass.

BIG HEAD
He’s speaking in Palo Alto tonight.
We should go. See if they’ll let us
talk to him.
(musing)
I don’t know what happened to that
guy, but he really hates college.

Thomas considers this idea. Big Head eats another energy
bar. He’s wired, tapping his hands, moving his legs.

BIG HEAD (CONT’D)
Fuck, I don’t know if it’s the
energy bar or drink or gum but I
can’t wait for tonight. And I
can’t sit still.
Genres: ["Drama","Comedy"]

Summary In this scene, Thomas and Big Head stroll through the deserted Boodle campus, discussing Peter Gregory's plans to create a platform in the Pacific and his financial incentives for college dropouts. Big Head's excitement about attending Gregory's talk in Palo Alto is palpable, but his restless energy manifests in his fidgeting and inability to sit still. The contrast between the idle surroundings and Big Head's hyperactivity highlights their shared ambition and anticipation for the evening's event.
Strengths
  • Engaging dialogue
  • Character development
  • Thematic exploration
Weaknesses
  • Limited physical action
  • Lack of visual variety

Ratings
Overall

Overall: 7.5

The scene effectively sets up the characters' motivations and challenges while introducing an intriguing plot point with Peter Gregory's offer. The dialogue is engaging and reveals the characters' personalities well.


Story Content

Concept: 8

The concept of exploring innovation, career choices, and the impact of high stakes in the tech industry is compelling and relevant. The scene effectively introduces these themes and sets up future developments.

Plot: 7

The plot progresses by introducing the Peter Gregory subplot and highlighting the characters' struggles and aspirations. The conflict between Thomas and Big Head's desires adds depth to the narrative.

Originality: 9

The scene introduces a fresh approach to the theme of entrepreneurship and education, presenting a unique perspective on the value of college and self-directed learning. The characters' actions and dialogue feel authentic and relatable.


Character Development

Characters: 8

The characters are well-developed, with distinct personalities and motivations. Thomas and Big Head's dynamic relationship is engaging, and their interactions reveal layers of their personalities.

Character Changes: 7

The scene hints at potential character growth and changes, especially in Thomas and Big Head's aspirations and fears. Their interactions set the stage for future developments.

Internal Goal: 8

Thomas's internal goal in this scene is to consider the idea of skipping or dropping out of college to pursue his own ideas, as inspired by Peter Gregory's offer. This reflects his deeper desire for independence, success, and a sense of purpose outside of traditional education.

External Goal: 7

The protagonist's external goal in this scene is to attend Peter Gregory's speaking event in Palo Alto and potentially talk to him. This goal reflects the immediate challenge of seeking inspiration and guidance from a successful entrepreneur.


Scene Elements

Conflict Level: 7

The conflict between Thomas and Big Head's aspirations and fears creates tension and drives the scene forward. The introduction of the Peter Gregory subplot adds another layer of conflict and intrigue.

Opposition: 6

The opposition in the scene is moderate, with the characters facing internal conflicts and external challenges related to their goals, but the outcome is still uncertain.

High Stakes: 8

The scene highlights the high stakes in the tech industry through the characters' dilemmas and aspirations. The introduction of the Peter Gregory subplot raises the stakes and adds tension to the narrative.

Story Forward: 8

The scene moves the story forward by introducing the Peter Gregory subplot and setting up future conflicts and developments. It adds depth to the narrative and engages the audience in the characters' journeys.

Unpredictability: 7

This scene is unpredictable because of the unexpected turn of events, such as Peter Gregory's unconventional offer and the characters' decision to attend his speaking event.

Philosophical Conflict: 7

The philosophical conflict evident in this scene is the tension between traditional education and self-directed learning. Big Head's excitement about Peter Gregory's offer challenges the societal norms around the value of college education.


Audience Engagement

Emotional Impact: 7.5

The scene evokes curiosity, reflection, and excitement in the audience through the characters' dilemmas and aspirations. The emotional depth of the characters adds layers to the narrative.

Dialogue: 8.5

The dialogue is sharp, witty, and reveals the characters' thoughts and emotions effectively. It adds depth to the scene and enhances the audience's understanding of the characters.

Engagement: 9

This scene is engaging because of the dynamic interaction between the characters, the intriguing premise of Peter Gregory's offer, and the sense of anticipation for the upcoming event.

Pacing: 8

The pacing of the scene is effective in building tension and anticipation, with a good balance of dialogue and action to keep the audience engaged.


Technical Aspect

Formatting: 8

The scene follows the expected formatting for its genre, with proper scene headings, character names, and dialogue formatting.

Structure: 8

The scene follows the expected structure for its genre, with clear character motivations, dialogue-driven interactions, and a focus on advancing the plot.


Critique
  • The scene effectively establishes the contrast between the vibrant, innovative atmosphere of Boodle and the characters' feelings of stagnation and anxiety. However, the dialogue could benefit from more subtext to deepen the characters' motivations and emotions. For instance, while Big Head's excitement about Peter Gregory's plans is clear, it would be more engaging if he expressed some underlying insecurities or fears about his own ideas in comparison to Gregory's grand vision.
  • The pacing of the scene feels a bit uneven. Big Head's energy is palpable, but Thomas's responses could be more dynamic to match that energy. Currently, Thomas's reactions are somewhat passive, which may not fully engage the audience. Adding more back-and-forth banter or contrasting Thomas's cynicism with Big Head's enthusiasm could enhance the scene's rhythm.
  • The visual description of the Boodle campus is intriguing, but it could be more vivid. Instead of just stating that the play area is unused, consider incorporating sensory details that evoke the atmosphere—sounds of laughter, the smell of energy drinks, or the sight of engineers distracted by their phones. This would create a more immersive experience for the audience.
  • The mention of Peter Gregory's plans is a significant plot point, but it feels somewhat abrupt. A smoother transition into this topic could help maintain the flow of the conversation. Perhaps Thomas could express skepticism about Gregory's ideas before Big Head enthusiastically counters with the details, creating a more natural dialogue exchange.
  • The scene ends on a somewhat flat note with Big Head's energy bar comment. While it reflects his excitement, it doesn't leave the audience with a strong emotional takeaway. Consider ending with a line that encapsulates the stakes of their situation or hints at the challenges they face, reinforcing the tension and anticipation for the upcoming talk.
Suggestions
  • Enhance the dialogue by incorporating subtext that reveals the characters' insecurities and aspirations, making their motivations clearer and more relatable.
  • Adjust the pacing by adding more dynamic exchanges between Thomas and Big Head, allowing Thomas to express his thoughts more actively and engage with Big Head's excitement.
  • Include more sensory details in the visual description of the Boodle campus to create a richer atmosphere and draw the audience into the setting.
  • Smooth the transition into discussing Peter Gregory's plans by having Thomas express skepticism or curiosity, allowing Big Head to counter with enthusiasm, which would create a more engaging dialogue flow.
  • Revise the ending line to provide a stronger emotional impact, perhaps by hinting at the challenges they face or the significance of attending Gregory's talk, leaving the audience with a sense of anticipation.



Scene 5 - Mockery in the Snack Area
INT. BOODLE - DAY

Thomas gets out of his cubicle. It is painted bright colors
and has a rounded shape to the sides but it is still a
cubicle. He gets up and walks over to a nearby snack area.

SNACK AREA - This place has large glass-cased refrigerators
filled with anything with caffeine in it. They also have
fountain drinks. Thomas is making himself an energy “swamp
water” by putting a little bit of each drink into his cup
when two douchey programmers or “brogrammers” stroll up and
start using the Auto Barrista. (These guys act like frat guys
and clearly only work out their upper bodies and thereby
succeed only in making themselves look odder -- they have
huge biceps and skinny legs).

Thomas mutters to himself with disdain.

THOMAS
Brogrammers.

BROGRAMMER #1
A double machiatto for me.

He presses a button.

BROGRAMMER #2
Make mine a double double.

BROGRAMMER #1
Yeah!
TV Calling - For educational purposes only


They are very happy with themselves. Brogrammer #1 one has
large side burns that actually meet under his chin.
Brogrammer #2 grabs Thomas’s skinny arm..

BROGRAMMER #2
Hey, To-mas -- you been working
out?

The brogrammers laugh at this. Brogrammer #1 then gives
Thomas a chin up nod.

BROGRAMMER #1
So how is every little thing?

THOMAS
Eh... not so good. Gotta find a
place to live, so if you guys know
of anything...

BROGRAMMER #2
You’re leaving the Hacker Hostel?

THOMAS
Getting kicked out. I’ve got a
website that I think could be huge,
but nobody gets it.

These guys look very interested.

BROGRAMMER #1
We might get it. We’d love to take
a look. What’s it called?

THOMAS
Pied Piper.

The brogrammers try not to laugh but they are giddy. Thomas
is oblivious to their snarkiness.

BROGRAMMER #1
Sounds amazing. Why don’t you
shoot it over to me and we’ll give
it a look. Maybe we can help.

Thomas eagerly opens his laptop. As soon as he hits “send”
he looks up and sees their smirking faces. Clearly, they are
just fucking with him. He sags, closes his laptop and
trudges off.
Genres: ["Comedy","Drama"]

Summary In a modern office snack area, Thomas excitedly shares his website idea, Pied Piper, with two brogrammers who initially feign interest. However, they quickly reveal their insincerity by mocking him and his project, leaving Thomas feeling dejected and defeated as he realizes their true intentions.
Strengths
  • Sharp dialogue
  • Character dynamics
  • Humor
Weaknesses
  • Stereotypical portrayal of brogrammers

Ratings
Overall

Overall: 8.2

The scene effectively combines humor with underlying tension, showcasing the struggles of the protagonist while introducing a comedic element through the brogrammers. The dialogue is sharp and engaging, providing insight into the competitive and sometimes mocking nature of the tech industry.


Story Content

Concept: 8

The concept of contrasting tech personalities and exploring the challenges of pursuing innovation in a competitive environment is well-executed in this scene. It sets up potential conflicts and character growth for the protagonist.

Plot: 8.2

The plot is advanced through the introduction of the brogrammers and their interaction with Thomas, highlighting the obstacles he faces in pursuing his project. The scene sets up potential conflicts and character arcs for future development.

Originality: 9

The scene introduces a fresh take on the tech industry by satirizing the 'brogrammer' stereotype and exploring themes of authenticity and validation in a comedic way. The characters' actions and dialogue feel authentic and relatable.


Character Development

Characters: 8.5

The characters are well-defined, with Thomas's frustration and determination coming through in his interactions with the brogrammers. The brogrammers add a comedic element while also serving as foils to Thomas's character.

Character Changes: 8

Thomas undergoes a subtle change in this scene, from initial frustration to a sense of determination and resilience in the face of challenges. The interaction with the brogrammers sets up potential growth and development for the character.

Internal Goal: 8

Thomas's internal goal in this scene is to find validation and support for his website idea, as well as to fit in and be taken seriously by his colleagues.

External Goal: 7

Thomas's external goal is to find a new place to live after getting kicked out of the Hacker Hostel.


Scene Elements

Conflict Level: 8

The conflict between Thomas and the brogrammers adds tension and humor to the scene, highlighting the competitive nature of the tech industry. It sets up potential conflicts and challenges for the protagonist to overcome.

Opposition: 7

The opposition in the scene is strong as the brogrammers present a challenge to Thomas's beliefs and aspirations, creating conflict and tension in the interaction.

High Stakes: 8

The stakes are moderately high in this scene, as Thomas faces the threat of eviction and the challenge of pursuing his project in a competitive environment. The interaction with the brogrammers adds a layer of tension and potential consequences for the protagonist.

Story Forward: 8

The scene moves the story forward by introducing new conflicts, character dynamics, and potential plot developments. It sets up anticipation for future scenes and establishes key themes and tensions.

Unpredictability: 7

This scene is unpredictable because of the unexpected turn of events where the brogrammers initially show interest in Thomas's website idea but then reveal their insincerity, adding a twist to the interaction.

Philosophical Conflict: 7

The philosophical conflict in this scene is the clash between Thomas's genuine enthusiasm and the brogrammers' insincere interest in his website idea. It challenges Thomas's belief in the authenticity of his work and the intentions of his colleagues.


Audience Engagement

Emotional Impact: 7.5

The scene elicits a mix of emotions, including frustration, amusement, and empathy for Thomas's struggles. The interaction with the brogrammers adds a layer of complexity to the character dynamics and sets up potential emotional arcs.

Dialogue: 8.8

The dialogue is sharp, witty, and engaging, capturing the competitive and sometimes mocking nature of the tech industry. It effectively conveys the tensions between characters and sets up potential conflicts for future scenes.

Engagement: 9

This scene is engaging because of its witty dialogue, humorous interactions, and relatable workplace dynamics that draw the audience into the story.

Pacing: 8

The pacing of the scene effectively builds tension and humor through the interactions between Thomas and the brogrammers, keeping the audience engaged and interested in the outcome.


Technical Aspect

Formatting: 8

The scene follows the expected formatting for a screenplay, with proper scene headings, character names, and dialogue formatting.

Structure: 8

The scene follows the expected structure for a workplace comedy genre, with clear character introductions, conflict, and resolution.


Critique
  • The scene effectively establishes the contrast between Thomas's earnestness and the brogrammers' superficiality, highlighting the culture clash within the tech environment. However, the dialogue could be sharpened to enhance the humor and the sense of mockery from the brogrammers. Their lines feel somewhat generic and could benefit from more specific, biting humor that reflects their personalities.
  • Thomas's character is portrayed as earnest and somewhat naive, which works well, but the scene could delve deeper into his emotional state. Adding a line or two that reflects his internal struggle or frustration about his situation could make him more relatable and add depth to the scene.
  • The physical description of the brogrammers is vivid, but it might be more effective to show their behavior or mannerisms through action rather than exposition. For example, instead of stating they only work out their upper bodies, you could show them flexing or making exaggerated gestures that highlight their physique.
  • The pacing of the scene feels a bit uneven. The initial interaction is quick and snappy, but the transition to Thomas's disappointment could be more gradual. Consider adding a moment where Thomas senses their insincerity before he fully realizes they are mocking him, which would heighten the emotional impact.
  • The use of the term 'brogrammers' is clever and fits the tone, but it might be beneficial to show how Thomas feels about this label. Does he embrace it, or does it frustrate him? A brief internal thought could clarify his feelings and add another layer to his character.
Suggestions
  • Enhance the dialogue of the brogrammers to include more specific, humorous lines that reflect their personalities and make their mockery sharper.
  • Incorporate a line or two from Thomas that reveals his internal conflict or frustration about his living situation and the lack of understanding for his project.
  • Show the brogrammers' behavior through action rather than exposition, allowing their physicality to come through in their interactions with Thomas.
  • Create a more gradual transition to Thomas's realization that he is being mocked, perhaps by including a moment of confusion or hesitation before he closes his laptop.
  • Consider adding a brief internal thought from Thomas about the term 'brogrammers' to clarify his feelings about the label and deepen his character.



Scene 6 - The Education Debate: Innovation vs. Tradition
INT. FOUR SEASONS PALO ALTO - EVENING

A large crowd watches as Peter Gregory
TV Callinggives
- For aeducational
speech. purposes only
Gregory comes across as a very focused accountant.


No matter what inflammatory thing he’s saying, or what
epithets people are throwing at him, he never gets agitated.

PETER GREGORY
Gates, Ellison, Jobs, Dell. All
dropped out of college. Silicon
Valley is the cradle of innovation
because of DROP OUTS. We need
innovation and we need innovators!
Colleges are choking and strangling
with conformity what the drop outs
created through inspiration!

We see Thomas and Big Head watching from the audience.

PETER GREGORY (CONT’D)
College has become a cruel,
expensive joke on the poor and the
middle class that only benefits the
perpetrators of it -- the bloated
administrations and the myopic
teaching staffs. Wages for
graduates are going down.
Employment opportunities for
graduates are shrinking, but the
cost of a “higher education” just
keeps going up and up and up.

The audience laughs in agreement but A BEARDED ACADEMIC looks
fit to be tied. He yells out.

BEARDED ACADEMIC
You are a dangerous man, spewing
ignorance!

PETER GREGORY
I don’t think so. I’m just saying
that people should trust themselves
more than a system that happily
churns out unemployed debtors and
provides dubious value.

BEARDED ACADEMIC
The true value of a college
education is intangible.

PETER GREGORY
The true value of snake-oil is
intangible as well.

The audience laughs again.

TV Calling - For educational purposes only


PETER GREGORY (CONT’D)
If you have a truly unique and
brilliant idea I can promise you
that any university worth its
weight will crush it with their
lack of creative thought and your
now monumental pile of debt.

The Academic gets up and storms out.

BEARDED ACADEMIC
Fascist.
Genres: ["Drama","Satire"]

Summary At the Four Seasons Palo Alto, Peter Gregory delivers a compelling speech against the value of college education, championing innovation and dropouts as the true success stories of Silicon Valley. Despite heckling from a bearded academic, Gregory maintains his composure, using humor and sharp wit to counter the criticisms. The audience responds positively, while the academic grows increasingly frustrated and ultimately storms out, labeling Gregory a fascist. The scene captures a humorous yet confrontational exchange on the merits of education.
Strengths
  • Sharp dialogue
  • Engaging conflict
  • Thought-provoking themes
Weaknesses
  • Limited character development
  • Lack of emotional depth

Ratings
Overall

Overall: 8.5

The scene effectively conveys a satirical and critical tone towards the education system and the emphasis on innovation in Silicon Valley. The dialogue is sharp and engaging, and the conflict between Peter Gregory and the Bearded Academic adds depth to the scene.


Story Content

Concept: 9

The concept of contrasting the importance of innovation with the traditional value of education is compelling and thought-provoking. It challenges the audience to reconsider their beliefs about success in the tech world.

Plot: 8

The plot progression in the scene revolves around the debate between Peter Gregory and the Bearded Academic, adding depth to the narrative and exploring the theme of innovation versus education.

Originality: 9

The scene presents a fresh approach to the topic of education and innovation, with original dialogue that sparks thought and conversation. The characters' actions and dialogue feel authentic and engaging.


Character Development

Characters: 8.5

The characters of Peter Gregory and the Bearded Academic are well-defined and contribute significantly to the conflict and themes of the scene. Their contrasting personalities and beliefs drive the dialogue and engagement.

Character Changes: 7

While there is no significant character change in this scene, the exposure to contrasting ideologies may influence the characters' perspectives in future interactions.

Internal Goal: 9

The protagonist's internal goal in this scene is to challenge the traditional views on education and innovation, advocating for self-trust and creativity over institutional conformity.

External Goal: 8

The protagonist's external goal is to deliver a compelling speech that challenges the audience's beliefs and sparks a conversation about the value of education.


Scene Elements

Conflict Level: 8.5

The conflict between Peter Gregory and the Bearded Academic adds tension and depth to the scene, driving the debate on innovation and education. It keeps the audience engaged and invested in the outcome.

Opposition: 8

The opposition in the scene is strong, with the bearded academic challenging the protagonist's beliefs and sparking conflict.

High Stakes: 8

The high stakes in the scene revolve around the debate on the value of education and innovation, which could impact the characters' future decisions and relationships. The outcome of this ideological clash may have significant consequences.

Story Forward: 8

The scene moves the story forward by introducing the theme of innovation versus education and setting up potential conflicts and dilemmas for the characters. It adds depth to the narrative and prompts further exploration of the central themes.

Unpredictability: 7

This scene is unpredictable because of the unexpected viewpoints presented by the protagonist and the audience's reactions to his speech.

Philosophical Conflict: 9

The philosophical conflict in this scene is between the traditional value of a college education as intangible and the protagonist's belief in self-trust and creativity as the key to innovation.


Audience Engagement

Emotional Impact: 7.5

The scene evokes a mix of emotions, including skepticism, amusement, and contemplation. The satirical tone and critical commentary may resonate with viewers who question the status quo.

Dialogue: 9

The dialogue is sharp, witty, and impactful, effectively conveying the satirical and critical tone of the scene. It engages the audience in the debate and highlights the conflicting ideologies of the characters.

Engagement: 9

This scene is engaging because of the sharp dialogue, conflicting viewpoints, and humor that keeps the audience interested in the protagonist's message.

Pacing: 8

The pacing of the scene contributes to its effectiveness by building tension and allowing for moments of humor and reflection.


Technical Aspect

Formatting: 8

The scene follows the expected formatting for a dialogue-heavy scene in a screenplay, with clear character names and dialogue cues.

Structure: 8

The scene follows the expected structure for a dialogue-driven scene in a screenplay, with clear character interactions and conflict.


Critique
  • The scene effectively captures the tension between traditional education and the startup culture in Silicon Valley, which is a relevant theme. However, the dialogue could benefit from more nuanced arguments. While Peter Gregory's points are provocative, they come off as overly simplistic and could be strengthened by incorporating more specific examples or anecdotes that illustrate the failures of the educational system.
  • The character of the Bearded Academic serves as a foil to Gregory, but his responses feel somewhat one-dimensional. Adding depth to this character could enhance the conflict. For instance, he could present a compelling counterargument that reflects genuine concern for the value of education, rather than simply resorting to name-calling.
  • The pacing of the scene is generally good, but it could be improved by varying the rhythm of the dialogue. The exchanges between Gregory and the Academic are quick, which works well, but the buildup to the Academic's outburst could be more gradual to heighten the tension. This would make the Academic's eventual storming out feel more impactful.
  • The audience's reactions are mentioned, but they could be more vividly depicted. Describing their body language or facial expressions would help convey the atmosphere of the room and the varying degrees of agreement or dissent among the crowd, making the scene feel more dynamic.
  • The visual description of Peter Gregory as a 'very focused accountant' feels contradictory to his passionate speech. This could be rephrased to better align with his character's charisma and the energy of the moment. Additionally, incorporating more visual elements, such as the setting of the Four Seasons and the audience's attire, could enhance the scene's atmosphere.
Suggestions
  • Consider adding a more detailed backstory or motivation for the Bearded Academic to make his character more relatable and his arguments more compelling.
  • Incorporate specific examples or statistics in Peter Gregory's speech to support his claims about the failures of the educational system, making his arguments more persuasive.
  • Vary the pacing of the dialogue by introducing pauses or interruptions that reflect the audience's reactions, allowing for a more dynamic exchange between Gregory and the Academic.
  • Enhance the visual elements of the scene by describing the audience's reactions in more detail, such as their expressions, body language, and the overall atmosphere of the venue.
  • Revisit the description of Peter Gregory to ensure it aligns with his character's passionate demeanor, possibly emphasizing his charisma and the contrast between his appearance and his bold statements.



Scene 7 - The Pitch and the Futuristic Exit
EXT. FOUR SEASONS PALO ALTO - LATER

Peter Gregory waits for his car. With him is his Head of
Operations, a very attractive, smart woman named MONICA.

Thomas approaches them with Big Head in tow. (Big Head is
mesmerized, staring at Monica’s chest).

THOMAS
Hi, excuse me, Mr. Gregory? I have
an idea I’d love to pitch--

Monica cuts him off.

MONICA
There were sign up sheets to have a
personal consultation with Mr.
Gregory.

THOMAS
There weren’t any slots left.

MONICA
I’m sorry.

Thomas nods but he clearly has a plan.

THOMAS
I just thought I should talk to him
before I give up and... go back to
college.

PETER GREGORY
Don’t! Wait, where?

THOMAS
I don’t know, probably Boston
University.
TV Calling - For educational purposes only
Peter is practically spitting.


PETER GREGORY
That’s over fifty thousand a year.
Do not do that. Go work at Burger
King. Go into the woods and forage
for nuts and berries. But do not
go back to college!

At that moment, Peter notices that Thomas is smiling
slightly, maybe a little too happy with himself.

PETER GREGORY (CONT’D)
I think I have been played. Fine.
Go ahead and pitch. You have until
I fasten the seatbelt in my car.

Thomas was ready and jumps right in.

THOMAS
Pied Piper is a proprietary site
that allows you to find if your
music is infringing on existing
copyrights. Imagine if you were a
song writer....

Peter is lost.

PETER GREGORY
I don’t think I could write a song.

THOMAS
But if you did...

PETER GREGORY
I don’t even know if I can say
“Pied Piper is a proprietary site.”
Well I guess I just did but it
wasn’t easy.

Thomas is clearly thrown by Peter’s odd manner. At that
moment Peter’s car pull up. Thomas is about to pitch some
more but Monica steps between them.

MONICA
Crunching all those songs to find
matches sounds like a lot of data
flow.

This gives Peter a graceful exit.

PETER GREGORY
Yes. Yes it does.

TV Calling - For educational purposes only


It is then that we notice his “car” -- it’s a futuristic
Volkswagen personal mobility transporter concept car. He
hops in and “hovers” away. Thomas is crushed.

MONICA
Look, why don’t you send me the
link for your project and we’ll
take a look.

THOMAS
Great, if you give me your email
address I’ll send you the link.

MONICA
(slightest beat)
Why don’t you just write it down
for me.

Thomas is certain he's just being shined on so she can get
out of there, but writes down the info and hands it to her.
Big Head is still just staring at her chest. He notices
Monica noticing.

BIG HEAD
Sorry.. I’m just thinking about...
image recognition.
Genres: ["Drama","Comedy"]

Summary Peter Gregory, waiting for his car with Monica, is approached by Thomas who pitches his music copyright infringement site, Pied Piper. Despite Peter's encouragement, he struggles to grasp the concept and ultimately leaves in his futuristic car, leaving Thomas feeling dejected. Monica offers to review Thomas's project, while Big Head is distracted by her presence, adding a comedic element to the scene.
Strengths
  • Sharp dialogue
  • Character dynamics
  • Relevant themes
Weaknesses
  • Limited physical action
  • Lack of visual variety

Ratings
Overall

Overall: 8.2

The scene effectively captures the essence of the tech industry with witty dialogue, character interactions, and a sense of hope and disappointment. The tone is consistent, and the conflict between the characters adds depth to the narrative.


Story Content

Concept: 8.5

The concept of pitching an innovative idea in Silicon Valley is compelling and relevant, offering insight into the challenges faced by aspiring entrepreneurs. The scene effectively conveys the competitive nature of the tech industry.

Plot: 8

The plot of the scene revolves around the failed pitch and the characters' reactions, setting up potential conflicts and developments in the story. It moves the narrative forward by introducing new challenges for the protagonist.

Originality: 9

The scene introduces fresh perspectives on education, entrepreneurship, and technology, offering a unique take on the clash between traditional values and modern innovation. The characters' actions and dialogue feel authentic and engaging.


Character Development

Characters: 8.5

The characters are well-developed, each with distinct personalities and motivations. Their interactions drive the scene forward and reveal underlying tensions and aspirations. The dialogue reflects their individual traits effectively.

Character Changes: 8

The characters undergo subtle changes in their perspectives and motivations during the scene, particularly the protagonist who faces rejection but remains determined to pursue his idea. These shifts set the stage for future character development.

Internal Goal: 8

The protagonist's internal goal in this scene is to assert his authority and intelligence in front of his colleagues and subordinates. Peter Gregory wants to maintain his position of power and control, which reflects his deeper need for validation and respect.

External Goal: 7

The protagonist's external goal in this scene is to listen to a pitch from Thomas and potentially consider his idea for Pied Piper. This goal reflects the immediate challenge of dealing with unexpected pitches and maintaining a professional image.


Scene Elements

Conflict Level: 8.5

The scene has a high level of conflict, both internal and external, as the characters navigate their aspirations, disappointments, and competing priorities. The clash of ideas and egos adds depth to the narrative.

Opposition: 7

The opposition in the scene is strong, with conflicting goals and power dynamics between the characters. Thomas's pitch and Peter's reactions create tension and uncertainty.

High Stakes: 8

The stakes are high in the scene as the characters face critical decisions about their future, career prospects, and personal aspirations. The outcome of the pitch could have significant consequences for their lives.

Story Forward: 9

The scene significantly moves the story forward by introducing new challenges, conflicts, and opportunities for the characters. It sets up future plot developments and character arcs, driving the narrative towards resolution.

Unpredictability: 7

This scene is unpredictable because of the unexpected twists in character interactions and dialogue. The audience is kept on their toes by the shifting power dynamics and conflicting goals.

Philosophical Conflict: 6

The philosophical conflict in this scene revolves around the value of education and traditional career paths versus entrepreneurial risk-taking. Peter Gregory's advice to Thomas highlights his belief in practical experience over formal education.


Audience Engagement

Emotional Impact: 8

The scene evokes a range of emotions, from hope and excitement to disappointment and skepticism, resonating with the audience's own experiences and aspirations. The characters' struggles are relatable and engaging.

Dialogue: 8.8

The dialogue is sharp, witty, and engaging, capturing the essence of the tech industry culture and the characters' personalities. It conveys humor, conflict, and underlying emotions effectively.

Engagement: 9

This scene is engaging because of its dynamic character interactions, witty dialogue, and underlying tension. The audience is drawn into the power dynamics and conflicts between the characters.

Pacing: 8

The pacing of the scene is well-executed, with a balance of dialogue, action, and character moments. The rhythm enhances the comedic and dramatic beats of the scene.


Technical Aspect

Formatting: 8

The scene follows the expected format for its genre, with clear scene descriptions, character actions, and dialogue. The formatting enhances the readability and flow of the scene.

Structure: 8

The scene follows a clear structure with well-defined character interactions and a progression of events. The pacing and rhythm contribute to the effectiveness of the scene.


Critique
  • The scene effectively captures the awkwardness of pitching an idea to a powerful figure, showcasing Thomas's desperation and Peter Gregory's dismissive attitude. However, the dialogue could benefit from more tension and stakes to heighten the emotional impact of the moment.
  • Peter Gregory's character is established as eccentric and dismissive, but his dialogue could be sharpened to reflect a more nuanced personality. Instead of simply ridiculing Thomas's idea, he could offer a more insightful critique that challenges Thomas's assumptions, making the interaction more engaging.
  • Monica's role as the Head of Operations is underutilized. While she serves as a barrier between Thomas and Peter, her character could be fleshed out with more distinct personality traits or motivations, making her more than just a gatekeeper.
  • The humor in Big Head's distraction is effective, but it could be enhanced by giving him a more active role in the scene. His fixation on Monica could lead to a humorous misunderstanding or a moment that inadvertently helps Thomas, adding depth to his character.
  • The pacing of the scene feels rushed, particularly during Thomas's pitch. Allowing more time for Thomas to articulate his idea and for Peter to react could create a more dynamic exchange, emphasizing the stakes of the moment.
Suggestions
  • Consider adding a moment where Thomas hesitates or stumbles over his words, reflecting his anxiety and making the pitch feel more authentic.
  • Introduce a line or two from Monica that hints at her own ambitions or frustrations within the tech industry, giving her character more depth and making her interaction with Thomas more meaningful.
  • Incorporate a visual gag or physical comedy element involving Big Head that could serve as a humorous counterpoint to the tension of the pitch, enhancing the comedic tone of the scene.
  • Explore the possibility of Peter Gregory offering a piece of unexpected advice or insight that, while dismissive, could still resonate with Thomas, leaving him with something to ponder as he walks away.
  • Extend the scene slightly to allow for a more gradual build-up to Peter's departure, creating a stronger emotional impact when Thomas realizes he has been dismissed.



Scene 8 - Pitching in the Hacker House
INT. HACKER HOUSE - NIGHT

Thomas, defeated, comes home to find Erlich slurping ramen
and listening to people pitch their ideas so they can get
Thomas’s room. (NOTE: When Erlich eats ramen he clips his
hair back).

ERLICH
...the airlines had a problem, and
I had Accutran. So... wow me.

The pitcher starts pitching.

PITCHER
Ok, here it is: Bit Soup. It’s
like alphaBET soup but it’s all
ones and zeroes.

Everyone waits expectantly but Erlich just stares at the
pitcher. The pitcher fidgets. Then:

PITCHER (CONT’D)
(hopefully)
See it’s binary. Because binary is
just ones and zeroes TV Calling - For educational purposes only


ERLICH
I KNOW WHAT BINARY IS!!! Jesus!
I’ve memorized the hexadecimal
times tables! Ask me what 9 times F
is!! I don’t need you to tell me
what’s binary and I don’t NEED you
thinking about soup. I NEED you
thinking about code. This is
Silicon Valley, not...

He pauses a second as he punches something into his iPad.

ERLICH (CONT’D)
...Paris, Texas.
(beat)
That’s where Campbell’s Soup is.

Erlich sees Thomas, then pointedly turns to the nerds.

ERLICH (CONT’D)
Look, I got one slot opening up
very soon, who’s gonna get it?

As Thomas retreats to his room we hear the nerds pitching a
battery of tech words like “capacity” and “battery”.
Genres: ["Comedy","Drama"]

Summary Thomas returns home feeling defeated to find Erlich critiquing tech entrepreneurs pitching their ideas in his absence. Frustrated by a simplistic concept called 'Bit Soup,' Erlich dismisses the pitchers' lack of depth, emphasizing his expertise in coding. As Thomas retreats to his room, the competitive atmosphere continues with the other pitchers throwing out tech jargon, highlighting the tension between ambition and expertise.
Strengths
  • Sharp dialogue
  • Establishing character dynamics
  • Setting up conflicts
Weaknesses
  • Limited emotional depth
  • Lack of character development
  • Potential for deeper exploration of conflicts

Ratings
Overall

Overall: 7.5

The scene effectively sets up the environment of the Hacker House and establishes the tension between the characters. The dialogue is sharp and witty, adding humor to the situation. However, the scene could benefit from more character development and deeper exploration of the conflicts at play.


Story Content

Concept: 7.5

The concept of pitching ideas at the Hacker House is engaging and relatable, showcasing the competitive and sometimes cutthroat nature of the tech industry. The scene effectively conveys the pressure and challenges faced by aspiring entrepreneurs.

Plot: 7

The plot of the scene revolves around the tension between Thomas, Erlich, and the aspiring entrepreneurs vying for a spot at the Hacker House. While it sets up conflicts and establishes the competitive environment, it could delve deeper into the character motivations and relationships.

Originality: 9

The scene introduces fresh and humorous takes on tech industry stereotypes, with characters engaging in witty exchanges and showcasing their tech knowledge in a comedic light. The authenticity of the characters' actions and dialogue adds to the originality of the scene.


Character Development

Characters: 8

The characters in the scene are distinct and memorable, particularly Erlich with his blunt and sarcastic demeanor. Thomas's frustration and disappointment are palpable, adding depth to his character. More development of the supporting characters could enhance the overall impact of the scene.

Character Changes: 6

While Thomas experiences some disappointment and frustration in the scene, there is limited character development or significant changes observed. More exploration of the characters' growth and evolution could elevate the impact of the scene.

Internal Goal: 8

Thomas's internal goal is to find his place in the tech world and prove himself as a valuable member of the hacker house. This reflects his need for validation and acceptance in a competitive environment.

External Goal: 7

Thomas's external goal is to secure his room in the hacker house and fend off competition from other aspiring tech entrepreneurs. This reflects the immediate challenge he faces in maintaining his living situation.


Scene Elements

Conflict Level: 7

The conflict in the scene is primarily driven by the competitive atmosphere at the Hacker House and the clash of personalities between the characters. The tension between Thomas and Erlich sets the stage for potential conflicts to unfold.

Opposition: 7

The opposition in the scene is strong, with characters competing for limited resources and facing off in a battle of wits and tech knowledge. The uncertainty of who will secure the room adds tension and conflict.

High Stakes: 6

The stakes in the scene are moderate, with Thomas facing the risk of losing his spot at the Hacker House and the pressure to succeed in the competitive tech industry. However, the stakes could be heightened to increase the tension and audience investment.

Story Forward: 7

The scene moves the story forward by establishing the competitive environment at the Hacker House, introducing key conflicts, and setting up potential plot developments. It lays the groundwork for future events and character interactions.

Unpredictability: 7

This scene is unpredictable because of the unexpected twists in dialogue and character interactions, keeping the audience on their toes and unsure of how the situation will unfold.

Philosophical Conflict: 7

The philosophical conflict in this scene is between innovation and tradition, as Erlich emphasizes the importance of coding and technology over simplistic ideas like 'Bit Soup'. This challenges Thomas's beliefs about what it takes to succeed in the tech industry.


Audience Engagement

Emotional Impact: 6

The scene has a moderate emotional impact, primarily stemming from Thomas's disappointment and frustration. However, there is room for deeper emotional engagement to enhance the audience's connection to the characters and their struggles.

Dialogue: 8.5

The dialogue in the scene is sharp, witty, and reflective of the characters' personalities. Erlich's sarcastic remarks and the nerds' awkward pitches add humor and tension to the scene. The dialogue effectively conveys the competitive nature of the tech industry.

Engagement: 9

This scene is engaging because of its witty dialogue, fast-paced interactions, and humorous take on tech industry culture. The tension between characters and the competitive atmosphere keep the audience invested in the outcome.

Pacing: 8

The pacing of the scene contributes to its effectiveness by maintaining a fast pace that mirrors the tech-driven world of the characters, keeping the audience engaged and entertained.


Technical Aspect

Formatting: 8

The scene follows the expected formatting for a screenplay, with clear scene descriptions, character dialogue, and action lines that enhance the visual storytelling.

Structure: 8

The scene follows the expected structure for a comedic tech-focused setting, with clear character interactions and a progression of events that build tension and humor.


Critique
  • The scene effectively establishes the competitive atmosphere of the Hacker House and highlights Thomas's feelings of defeat. However, the humor derived from Erlich's over-the-top reaction to the pitch could be enhanced by providing more context about his character's motivations and frustrations, making his outburst feel more justified and relatable.
  • The dialogue is snappy and captures the tech culture's jargon, but the pitch for 'Bit Soup' lacks depth and creativity. It would benefit from a more engaging or absurd concept that could elicit a stronger reaction from Erlich and the audience, reinforcing the comedic tone.
  • Erlich's character is well-defined through his actions and dialogue, but the scene could use more visual elements to enhance the comedic effect. For example, showing Erlich's exaggerated expressions or physical reactions while he listens to the pitch could amplify the humor and make the scene more dynamic.
  • The pacing of the scene feels slightly uneven. The buildup to Erlich's outburst is good, but the transition to Thomas retreating to his room could be smoother. A brief moment of silence or a reaction shot of Thomas could heighten the emotional impact of his defeat before he exits.
  • The ending, where the other pitchers continue to throw out tech jargon, feels a bit abrupt. It might be more effective to include a line or two that reflects Thomas's internal thoughts or feelings as he leaves, providing a clearer emotional closure to the scene.
Suggestions
  • Consider giving the pitcher a more unique or humorous pitch that could serve as a better contrast to Erlich's expectations, perhaps something absurdly impractical or overly complex.
  • Add more physical comedy or visual gags to Erlich's reactions to enhance the humor, such as exaggerated facial expressions or gestures that emphasize his frustration.
  • Smooth out the transition when Thomas retreats to his room by including a moment of silence or a reaction shot that captures his emotional state, allowing the audience to connect with his defeat.
  • Incorporate a brief moment where Erlich reflects on the absurdity of the pitches he hears, perhaps with a sarcastic comment that highlights the ridiculousness of the tech culture, adding depth to his character.
  • Consider ending the scene with a line from Thomas that encapsulates his feelings about the situation, providing a more poignant conclusion that resonates with the audience.



Scene 9 - Sacbut Dreams and Startup Frustrations
INT. HACKER HOUSE - THOMAS’S ROOM - MOMENTS LATER

Thomas enters his room to find Big Head talking with Dinesh
and Roland. Big Head holds a sacbut, which is an old brass
instrument that sort of resembles a trombone.

ROLAND
So that thing is from the 1400s?

BIG HEAD
Not this one literally, but the
sacbut is the least evolutionized
of all brass instruments, so it
would be the same as one from the
14th century.

DINESH
So do you guys play anywhere? Like
clubs or anything?

Big Head uses his sacbut to point at Dinesh.

BIG HEAD
Not yet. We’re trying to play
Street Fair this year.
(MORE) TV Calling - For educational purposes only
BIG HEAD (CONT'D)
Problem is, they’re more into
traditional Sacbut, which we can
do, but it seems like it would be
selling out or something -- just
doing what people expect.

ROLAND
I don’t think anyone ever expects a
sacbut ensemble anywhere...

THOMAS
Everyone likes music. I can’t
figure out what it is about Pied
Piper that people don’t get?

DINESH
Applicability?

THOMAS
I don’t know... Peter Gregory’s
head of operations said to send her
the link but she was probably just
shining me on.

DINESH/ROLAND
She?

BIG HEAD
Man, she was hot.

ROLAND
Why didn’t I see her on nip alert?

BIG HEAD
Because I was too distracted. See,
that’s another bug I have to work
out.

Big Head looks around nervously to make sure Erlich didn’t
hear that.

CUT TO:


EXT. LOS ANGELES - ESTABLISHING
Genres: ["Drama","Comedy"]

Summary In Thomas's room at the Hacker House, Big Head, Dinesh, and Roland discuss Big Head's ancient brass instrument, the sacbut, and their aspirations to perform at a Street Fair. Big Head expresses his concerns about conforming to traditional expectations while Thomas shares his frustrations with Pied Piper's reception, particularly regarding a woman from Peter Gregory's team. The conversation takes a humorous turn as Big Head admits he was distracted by her attractiveness, leading to light-hearted banter among the group. The scene captures their camaraderie and ambition, ending with a transition to an establishing shot of Los Angeles.
Strengths
  • Engaging dialogue
  • Unique elements like the sacbut ensemble
  • Character development
Weaknesses
  • Low conflict level
  • Moderate emotional impact

Ratings
Overall

Overall: 7.5

The scene effectively combines humor with a sense of defeat and innovation, showcasing the struggles of the characters while introducing unique elements like the sacbut ensemble and the tech project. The dialogue is engaging and sets up potential conflicts and character development.


Story Content

Concept: 8

The concept of the scene revolves around showcasing Thomas's innovative project, Pied Piper, and his struggles to be taken seriously in the tech world. The introduction of the sacbut ensemble adds a creative element to the scene, enhancing the overall concept.

Plot: 7

The plot of the scene focuses on Thomas's interactions with his roommates, particularly Big Head, and his feelings of dejection after a disappointing encounter with Peter Gregory's head of operations. The scene sets up potential conflicts and character development, moving the story forward.

Originality: 8

The scene introduces unique elements like the sacbut instrument and explores themes of artistic integrity versus commercial success in a tech setting.


Character Development

Characters: 8

The characters in the scene, especially Thomas and Big Head, are well-developed and showcase their unique personalities and struggles. The interactions between the characters add depth to the scene and set the stage for potential growth.

Character Changes: 6

There is a moderate level of character change in the scene, particularly in Thomas's feelings of dejection and frustration. The interactions with his roommates and the disappointment with Peter Gregory's head of operations hint at potential growth and development for the characters.

Internal Goal: 8

Thomas's internal goal is to understand why people don't appreciate Pied Piper, reflecting his desire for validation and recognition for his work.

External Goal: 7

The protagonist's external goal is to potentially get Pied Piper's music played at the Street Fair, showcasing his ambition and desire for success in the tech industry.


Scene Elements

Conflict Level: 6

The conflict in the scene is relatively low-key, focusing more on internal struggles and potential conflicts rather than overt confrontations. The tension between Thomas and his roommates, as well as his disappointment with Peter Gregory's head of operations, sets the stage for future conflicts.

Opposition: 6

The opposition in the scene is mild, with internal conflicts and comedic obstacles that add depth to the characters.

High Stakes: 5

The stakes in the scene are relatively low, focusing more on internal struggles and potential conflicts rather than high-stakes confrontations. The scene sets the stage for future developments and character growth, hinting at higher stakes to come.

Story Forward: 7

The scene moves the story forward by introducing new elements like the sacbut ensemble, highlighting Thomas's struggles, and setting up potential conflicts and character development. The interactions between the characters add depth to the narrative, setting the stage for future developments.

Unpredictability: 7

The scene is unpredictable in its humor and character interactions, keeping the audience intrigued.

Philosophical Conflict: 6

The philosophical conflict revolves around the idea of staying true to one's artistic vision versus conforming to expectations for commercial success.


Audience Engagement

Emotional Impact: 7

The scene has a moderate emotional impact, with moments of humor, dejection, and excitement resonating with the audience. Thomas's struggles and interactions with his roommates evoke a range of emotions, setting the stage for potential character growth.

Dialogue: 7.5

The dialogue in the scene is engaging and natural, reflecting the characters' personalities and struggles. The humor and innovative elements in the dialogue add depth to the interactions and set up potential conflicts.

Engagement: 8

This scene is engaging due to the witty dialogue, character dynamics, and the exploration of unique themes within the tech subculture.

Pacing: 8

The pacing of the scene is well-executed, maintaining a balance between dialogue and action to keep the audience engaged.


Technical Aspect

Formatting: 9

The scene adheres to expected formatting standards for its genre, making it easy to follow and engaging for the reader.

Structure: 9

The scene follows a clear structure with dialogue-driven interactions that propel the narrative forward effectively.


Critique
  • The scene effectively captures the camaraderie and humor among the characters, particularly through Big Head's enthusiasm for the sacbut and the banter about music. However, the dialogue could benefit from more distinct character voices to enhance individuality and make each character's perspective clearer.
  • The transition from Thomas's previous disappointment to this scene feels a bit abrupt. While the humor is present, it might be helpful to include a brief moment of reflection from Thomas about his earlier experiences to create a smoother emotional flow.
  • The mention of the sacbut and the discussion about traditional versus modern music is an interesting metaphor for Thomas's struggles with Pied Piper. However, this thematic connection could be made more explicit, perhaps by having Thomas draw a parallel between the sacbut's lack of evolution and his own frustrations with the tech industry's reception of his project.
  • The humor surrounding Big Head's distraction by the attractive woman is amusing but could risk undermining the seriousness of Thomas's situation. Balancing humor with the gravity of Thomas's struggles will help maintain the scene's emotional weight.
  • The pacing of the scene feels slightly rushed, particularly in the dialogue exchanges. Allowing for more pauses or reactions could enhance the comedic timing and give the audience a moment to absorb the humor and the characters' dynamics.
Suggestions
  • Consider adding a line or two from Thomas that reflects on his earlier disappointment before entering the room, which would create a stronger emotional connection to his current frustrations.
  • Enhance the thematic connection between the sacbut and Thomas's project by having Thomas explicitly compare the two, perhaps expressing a desire for Pied Piper to evolve rather than conform to expectations.
  • Give each character a more distinct voice in their dialogue to help differentiate their personalities and perspectives, making the interactions feel more dynamic.
  • Introduce a moment where Thomas reacts to Big Head's distraction, perhaps with a sarcastic comment that highlights his frustration, which could add depth to his character and the scene's humor.
  • Slow down the pacing slightly by incorporating more pauses or reactions, allowing the audience to fully appreciate the humor and the characters' interactions.



Scene 10 - Yoga, Dreams, and Discontent
INT. YOGA STUDIO - DAY

Two very attractive women, LANGDON and TANDY, are doing yoga
at the back of the class. Tandy looks likes she could be a
model, but probably just swimsuit or lingerie; Langdon has
more of a classic beauty. (ThisTV place
Callingis- almost depressingly
For educational purposes only
filled with hot, young women and one guy.)


LANGDON
This is probably the worst time
ever to be a laid-off publicist.

TANDY
Yep. Social media.

LANGDON
I know! There are no cool jobs
anymore because everyone is out
there blogging and doing it for
free! At least you’re working non-
profit.

TANDY
I’m working the phones for
mesothelioma for ten bones an hour
and there are no parties. No
galas. No deep pockets. No
connections.

Langdon shakes her head.

LANGDON
Remember those Pediatric AIDS fund-
raisers? Those were huge.

TANDY
Yeah, that’s how I met Jerry
Weintraub. He took me to Cannes.
God, I miss the Hotel Du Cap.

Tandy and Langdon adjust positions.

LANGDON
There’s just no money in non-
profits anymore. Then I guess
there’s no money anywhere anymore.
And I need a job.
(shakes her head)
I’m in way default on my student
loans. Why the hell did they lend
me money to major in Art History.
Assholes!!

Tandy has an explanation.

TANDY
It’s fucked up. Wanna go to Vespio
tonight?


TV Calling - For educational purposes only


LANGDON
I don’t know, we keep running into
the same guys. All the guys with
money in LA seem to be old and fat.

TANDY
Except for the professional
athletes.

LANGDON
Yeah, they’re hot but they’re all
rapists.

TANDY
(like it’s even worse)
Yeah, or Christians.

LANGDON
I would even settle for a guy who
wasn’t rich as long as he wasn’t a
douche.

TANDY
Keep telling yourself that. I
think you would be bored to death.
My mom always says it’s just as
easy to fall in love with a rich
guy as a poor guy.

LANGDON
Not around here...

The class ends. They roll up their yoga mats, sling their
towels over their shoulders and heads towards the adjoining
cafe.
Genres: ["Drama","Comedy"]

Summary In a vibrant yoga studio, friends Langdon and Tandy candidly discuss their struggles with unemployment and the challenges of dating in Los Angeles. They reminisce about glamorous past events while expressing frustration over their current job situations—Langdon's student loan debt from Art History and Tandy's low-paying non-profit job. Their conversation highlights the absurdities of the dating scene, particularly their disdain for wealthy older men and professional athletes. The scene concludes with them rolling up their yoga mats and heading to a café, symbolizing a transition from their serious discussion to a more relaxed setting.
Strengths
  • Sharp dialogue
  • Character depth
  • Humorous tone
Weaknesses
  • Lack of external conflict
  • Limited plot progression

Ratings
Overall

Overall: 8.2

The scene effectively captures the tone of disillusionment and longing for a more fulfilling life through witty and sarcastic dialogue. The characters' banter reveals their inner thoughts and desires, creating a relatable and engaging atmosphere.


Story Content

Concept: 8.3

The concept of exploring the disconnect between outward appearances and inner struggles in a superficial society is effectively conveyed through the characters' conversations and observations.

Plot: 7.5

While the scene doesn't have a traditional plot progression, it serves as a character-driven moment that adds depth to the overall narrative by providing insight into the protagonists' motivations and challenges.

Originality: 9

The scene offers a fresh take on the LA dating scene and the challenges of finding work in the digital age. The characters' dialogue feels authentic and relatable, adding to the originality of the scene.


Character Development

Characters: 8.7

The characters are well-developed through their dialogue and interactions, showcasing their personalities, desires, and frustrations. Their dynamic and relatable nature adds richness to the scene.

Character Changes: 7

While there are no significant character arcs in this scene, the conversations hint at the characters' evolving perspectives and desires, setting the stage for potential growth in future interactions.

Internal Goal: 8

Langdon's internal goal is to find a fulfilling job and financial stability. This reflects her deeper need for security and validation.

External Goal: 7

Langdon's external goal is to navigate the LA dating scene and find a suitable partner. This reflects the immediate challenge of finding love and companionship in a superficial environment.


Scene Elements

Conflict Level: 5

The conflict in the scene is more internal and subtle, revolving around the characters' inner struggles and societal pressures rather than external confrontations.

Opposition: 7

The opposition in the scene comes from the characters' conflicting views on love, money, and relationships, adding depth and conflict to their interactions.

High Stakes: 4

The stakes in the scene are more personal and internal, focusing on the characters' desires for meaningful work and relationships rather than high-stakes conflicts or events.

Story Forward: 7

The scene provides valuable insights into the characters' motivations and challenges, laying the groundwork for future developments in the narrative.

Unpredictability: 7

This scene is unpredictable because of the characters' unexpected reactions and sharp humor, keeping the audience engaged and interested in their journey.

Philosophical Conflict: 7

The philosophical conflict in this scene revolves around the characters' views on wealth, love, and relationships. Langdon values authenticity and connection, while Tandy prioritizes financial security and luxury.


Audience Engagement

Emotional Impact: 7.5

The scene evokes a mix of emotions, including humor, empathy, and nostalgia, creating a poignant and relatable experience for the audience.

Dialogue: 9

The dialogue is sharp, witty, and revealing, capturing the characters' emotions and thoughts with humor and authenticity. It drives the scene forward and establishes a strong connection with the audience.

Engagement: 9

This scene is engaging because of its relatable characters, witty dialogue, and exploration of universal themes like love, money, and career aspirations.

Pacing: 8

The pacing of the scene is effective in building tension and developing the characters' relationships, leading to a satisfying resolution.


Technical Aspect

Formatting: 8

The scene follows standard formatting for a screenplay, with clear scene descriptions and character dialogue.

Structure: 8

The scene follows a typical structure for a dialogue-driven scene in a screenplay, with clear character motivations and development.


Critique
  • The scene effectively captures the frustrations of two women navigating a challenging job market, but it lacks a clear narrative purpose within the larger context of the screenplay. While their dialogue is humorous and relatable, it feels somewhat disconnected from the main plot and characters, which may leave the audience questioning its relevance.
  • The character dynamics between Langdon and Tandy are established, but they could benefit from deeper characterization. As it stands, they come off as archetypes (the struggling publicist and the disillusioned non-profit worker) without much unique personality or backstory. Adding specific traits or quirks could make them more memorable.
  • The dialogue is witty and captures the essence of their frustrations, but it occasionally veers into cliché territory, particularly in the comments about dating and wealth. This could detract from the originality of the scene. Finding fresher ways to express their sentiments could enhance the impact.
  • The scene's pacing is relatively slow, primarily due to the exposition-heavy dialogue. While it's important to establish their struggles, the scene could benefit from more dynamic interactions or physical comedy to maintain engagement. The yoga setting offers potential for visual humor that isn't fully utilized.
  • The transition from the previous scene to this one feels abrupt. A stronger connection to the overarching narrative or a thematic link to the tech industry could help integrate this scene more seamlessly into the screenplay.
Suggestions
  • Consider tying Langdon and Tandy's struggles more directly to the main plot or characters, perhaps by having them discuss a tech startup or a recent event in Silicon Valley that relates to the themes of the screenplay.
  • Enhance their characterization by giving them distinct voices or quirks that set them apart from typical portrayals of women in similar situations. This could involve unique hobbies, interests, or personal anecdotes that reveal more about their backgrounds.
  • Revise some of the dialogue to avoid clichés and find more original expressions of their frustrations. This could involve using metaphors or anecdotes that are specific to their experiences in the industry.
  • Incorporate more physicality or visual humor into the scene, such as awkward yoga poses or interactions with other class members, to create a more engaging atmosphere and keep the audience entertained.
  • Add a stronger transition or thematic connection to the previous scene, perhaps by referencing the tech industry or the changing job landscape in a way that resonates with their conversation, making the scene feel more integral to the overall narrative.



Scene 11 - Reflections Over Coffee
INT. YOGA STUDIO - CAFE - MOMENTS LATER

Langdon and Tandy head into the adjoining cafe where they
serve teas and herbal drinks.

TANDY
I really should have married Tom
when I had the chance. I’d be
living in a house in Malibu. I
wouldn’t be worried about getting
older. I’ve seen lines on my face.
Well, just around the eyes, but
they are there.


TV Calling - For educational purposes only


LANGDON
Eyes aren’t as hard to fix as necks
and hands but... Yeah, I’m not even
getting carded anymore.

A TV is tuned to an MSNBC show about young rich Silicon
Valley guys.

LANGDON (CONT’D)
Why can’t we meet guys like that?

TANDY
Geeks?

LANGDON
Yeah. They’re rich and smart and
they’re our age.

TANDY
(being swayed)
Yeah, and they don’t look rapey.
But they’re all up North.

Langdon considers this a beat.

LANGDON
So a half hour plane ride away
there’s all these gazillionaires?
What the hell are we doing here?

TANDY
Getting older. And poorer.

They look to each other then back to the TV.

CUT TO:


CLOSE UP OF A COMPUTER

We see the Pied Piper Logo. It's pretty bad as far as logos
go. PULL BACK to see we are
Genres: ["Drama","Comedy"]

Summary In a yoga studio cafe, Langdon and Tandy engage in a heartfelt conversation about their life choices, particularly Tandy's regret over not marrying Tom. As they watch a TV segment on wealthy Silicon Valley entrepreneurs, they express dissatisfaction with their current lives, grappling with aging and financial struggles. Their discussion leads to a moment of reflection on missed opportunities and the allure of a different lifestyle, culminating in a shared realization about their circumstances.
Strengths
  • Effective dialogue
  • Compelling character dynamics
  • Humorous tone
Weaknesses
  • Lack of external conflict
  • Limited action

Ratings
Overall

Overall: 8.5

The scene effectively captures the characters' longing for a different life while providing a humorous take on their situation. The dialogue and setting create a compelling contrast between the characters' desires and the harshness of their current circumstances.


Story Content

Concept: 8

The concept of exploring the disparity between Silicon Valley wealth and the characters' struggles is compelling and well-developed. The scene effectively conveys the themes of regret and longing for a different life.

Plot: 8

The plot focuses on the characters' reflections on missed opportunities and their desire for a better life in Silicon Valley. The scene moves the story forward by highlighting the characters' motivations and aspirations.

Originality: 8

The scene offers a fresh take on familiar themes of aging, wealth, and relationships by infusing them with humor and contemporary references. The characters' actions and dialogue feel authentic and relatable, adding to the originality of the scene.


Character Development

Characters: 8.5

The characters are well-developed and relatable, each expressing their unique struggles and desires. Their interactions and dialogue provide insight into their personalities and motivations.

Character Changes: 7

The characters experience internal growth as they reflect on their past choices and consider their future aspirations. Their interactions and dialogue reveal subtle shifts in their perspectives.

Internal Goal: 8

The protagonist's internal goal in this scene is to reflect on their past choices and current circumstances, particularly in relation to aging and financial status. This reflects their deeper fears of growing older and feeling insecure about their future.

External Goal: 7

The protagonist's external goal in this scene is to express dissatisfaction with their current situation and contemplate the possibility of a different lifestyle. This reflects the immediate challenge of feeling stuck in their current routine and longing for change.


Scene Elements

Conflict Level: 6

The conflict in the scene is primarily internal, as the characters grapple with their regrets and desires for a different life. The tension arises from their reflections on missed opportunities.

Opposition: 6

The opposition in the scene is moderate, with the characters facing internal conflicts and external challenges related to their desires for change and their current circumstances. The audience is left wondering how they will overcome these obstacles.

High Stakes: 6

The stakes in the scene are primarily emotional, as the characters grapple with their regrets and desires for a better life. The outcome of their reflections could impact their future decisions and relationships.

Story Forward: 7

The scene moves the story forward by deepening the characters' motivations and desires, setting the stage for future developments. It provides insight into the characters' internal struggles and aspirations.

Unpredictability: 7

This scene is unpredictable because of the characters' unexpected reactions and humorous twists in the dialogue. The audience is kept on their toes, unsure of how the conversation will unfold.

Philosophical Conflict: 7

The philosophical conflict evident in this scene is the characters' contrasting views on wealth, age, and location. Langdon is more optimistic and adventurous, while Tandy is more resigned and practical. This challenges their beliefs about success, happiness, and the pursuit of wealth.


Audience Engagement

Emotional Impact: 8

The scene evokes a sense of nostalgia and regret, eliciting empathy for the characters' struggles and aspirations. The emotional depth adds complexity to the narrative.

Dialogue: 8.5

The dialogue effectively conveys the characters' emotions and struggles, adding depth to their interactions. The humorous and reflective tone enhances the scene's impact.

Engagement: 9

This scene is engaging because of its witty dialogue, relatable characters, and humorous observations. The interactions between Langdon and Tandy are entertaining and thought-provoking, keeping the audience invested in their story.

Pacing: 8

The pacing of the scene is effective in building tension, humor, and character development. The rhythm of the dialogue and action keeps the audience engaged and interested in the characters' journey.


Technical Aspect

Formatting: 8

The scene follows the expected formatting for its genre, with proper formatting of dialogue, action lines, and scene headings. The visual elements are well-described, enhancing the reader's understanding of the setting and characters.

Structure: 8

The scene follows the expected format for its genre, with clear scene descriptions, character interactions, and transitions between locations. The pacing and rhythm of the scene contribute to its effectiveness and engagement.


Critique
  • The dialogue between Langdon and Tandy effectively captures their frustrations and aspirations, but it could benefit from more specificity. For instance, instead of just mentioning 'getting older' and 'getting poorer,' they could share specific anecdotes or examples that illustrate their struggles, making their characters more relatable and their emotions more impactful.
  • The scene transitions from the yoga studio to the cafe smoothly, but the connection between the two locations could be emphasized further. Perhaps adding a brief moment where they reflect on their yoga experience or how it contrasts with their current feelings could enhance the thematic continuity.
  • The mention of the TV segment about Silicon Valley entrepreneurs serves as a good narrative device to highlight the characters' desires, but it feels somewhat detached. Integrating the TV segment more organically into their conversation could create a stronger connection between their dialogue and the visuals, enhancing the scene's overall cohesion.
  • While the humor in the dialogue is present, it could be sharpened. For example, Tandy's line about the geeks not looking 'rapey' is a strong comedic moment, but it could be expanded with a follow-up joke or a playful banter that showcases their friendship and adds depth to their characters.
  • The scene ends abruptly after the characters express their dissatisfaction. A more definitive conclusion or a hint at their next steps could provide a stronger emotional payoff. For instance, they could make a pact to visit Silicon Valley or brainstorm ways to meet these entrepreneurs, which would add a sense of agency to their characters.
Suggestions
  • Add specific anecdotes or examples to illustrate Langdon and Tandy's frustrations about aging and financial struggles, making their dialogue more relatable.
  • Incorporate a brief moment of reflection on their yoga experience to create thematic continuity between the yoga studio and the cafe.
  • Integrate the TV segment more organically into their conversation, perhaps by having them react to specific statements made by the entrepreneurs on screen.
  • Expand on the humor in their dialogue by adding follow-up jokes or playful banter that showcases their friendship and adds depth to their characters.
  • Consider concluding the scene with a definitive action or decision that Langdon and Tandy make regarding their desire to meet Silicon Valley entrepreneurs, giving their characters a sense of agency.



Scene 12 - From Mockery to Desire
INT. BOODLE - DAY

The brogrammers who Thomas pitched Pied Piper to are calling
up the site to make fun of it.

BROGRAMMER #1
Let’s look at this stupid thing.

TV Calling - For educational purposes only


BROGRAMMER #2
(snarky)
You have to download your own
player? Hey look at me, I traveled
back to 2009!

A song starts playing. Brogrammer #1’s smirk suddenly turns
into a look of surprise.

BROGRAMMER #1
Wait a second. Look at this file
size. 1.2 Megabytes? No way! I
know that song. That’s at least 3
on itunes...

He starts playing it.

BROGRAMMER #2
Wow, that doesn’t sound at all
downgraded.

DISSOLVE TO:

SAME SCENE -- MOMENTS LATER

They are testing the software, comparing file sizes, etc.

BROGRAMMER #1
I really can’t hear the difference.

BROGRAMMER #2
And the file size is like, half.
How the hell did he do that?

BROGRAMMER #1
I have no idea. Some kind of new
lossy compression I guess.

DISSOLVE TO:


SAME SCENE - MOMENTS LATER

A larger crowd has now gathered around to look at Pied Piper.
We see that someone has plugged large speakers into the
computer. Music is playing but nobody is really listening,
they’re just glued to the computer. Everyone is asking
various questions about how many bytes and what the
compression is.

Brogrammer #1 and Brogrammer #2 look at each other, They are
humbled and impressed. Just then, a young business exec,
JARED DUNN, walks by and sees everyone
TV Callinggathered around. purposes only
- For educational


JARED
What are you guys listening to?

BROGRAMMER #1
We’re listening to 1.5 gigabytes of
sound that should take up 4.5
gigabytes.

Jared leans in, intrigued.

CUT TO:


THE PERPETUALLY SCOWLING FACE OF GAVIN BELSON

He strides down a corridor of Boodle. Jared tries to keep up
while showing him Pied Piper on his laptop.

JARED
Do you realize how huge this could
be? With all the data storage and
data flow problems. The
applications could be endless.

As Gavin watches it, he stops walking. His scowl changes
into an expression of pure greed.

GAVIN BELSON
I want it.
Genres: ["Drama","Comedy"]

Summary In this scene at Boodle, the brogrammers initially ridicule Pied Piper's software, but their skepticism turns to intrigue as they discover its ability to significantly reduce file size while maintaining high sound quality. As they test the software, a crowd gathers, and Jared Dunn expresses interest in its potential. Meanwhile, Gavin Belson, a powerful figure, becomes captivated by the software's capabilities and declares his desire to acquire it.
Strengths
  • Effective plot advancement
  • Engaging dialogue
  • Surprising character reactions
Weaknesses
  • Limited emotional depth
  • Slightly predictable outcome

Ratings
Overall

Overall: 8.5

The scene is well-structured, engaging, and pivotal in the plot development. It introduces a significant turning point for the protagonist and sets up future conflicts and developments.


Story Content

Concept: 9

The concept of Pied Piper's revolutionary software and its unexpected success adds depth and intrigue to the scene, setting up future conflicts and character dynamics.

Plot: 8.5

The plot advances significantly in this scene with the introduction of Pied Piper's breakthrough, leading to new opportunities and challenges for the characters.

Originality: 9

The scene introduces a fresh take on the tech industry, showcasing the protagonist's innovative approach to file compression and challenging traditional methods. The characters' actions and dialogue feel authentic and reflect the competitive nature of the setting.


Character Development

Characters: 8

The characters react authentically to the events unfolding, with the brogrammers transitioning from mocking to impressed, and Gavin Belson showing a greedy interest in Pied Piper.

Character Changes: 8

The characters undergo subtle shifts in perception and attitude towards Pied Piper, reflecting the evolving dynamics within the tech industry.

Internal Goal: 8

The protagonist's internal goal in this scene is to impress the brogrammers and the business exec with his software's capabilities. This reflects his desire for recognition, validation, and success in the tech industry.

External Goal: 7

The protagonist's external goal is to showcase the efficiency and effectiveness of his software to potential investors or partners. This reflects the immediate challenge of convincing others of the value of his product.


Scene Elements

Conflict Level: 7.5

The conflict in the scene is primarily internal, as the characters grapple with their initial skepticism towards Pied Piper and the potential implications of its success.

Opposition: 7

The opposition in the scene is strong, with the brogrammers initially skeptical of the protagonist's software and the business exec's greed posing a potential obstacle to his success.

High Stakes: 8

The stakes are high as Pied Piper's success attracts the attention of powerful figures like Gavin Belson, setting the stage for potential conflicts and opportunities.

Story Forward: 9

The scene significantly moves the story forward by introducing a key development that will shape future events and character arcs.

Unpredictability: 7

This scene is unpredictable because of the unexpected reactions of the brogrammers and the business exec to the protagonist's software, creating tension and intrigue.

Philosophical Conflict: 6

The philosophical conflict in this scene is between traditional methods of file compression and the protagonist's innovative approach. This challenges the brogrammers' beliefs in established technologies and pushes them to reconsider their assumptions.


Audience Engagement

Emotional Impact: 7

The emotional impact is moderate, with a mix of humor, curiosity, and competitive tension driving the scene forward.

Dialogue: 8.5

The dialogue effectively conveys the humor, intrigue, and competitive dynamics of the scene, adding depth to the character interactions and plot development.

Engagement: 9

This scene is engaging because of its witty dialogue, fast-paced action, and technical details that keep the audience invested in the protagonist's journey.

Pacing: 9

The pacing of the scene contributes to its effectiveness by maintaining a fast tempo, building tension, and highlighting key moments of discovery and conflict.


Technical Aspect

Formatting: 8

The scene follows the expected formatting for its genre, with proper scene headings, character names, and dialogue formatting.

Structure: 8

The scene follows the expected structure for its genre, with clear scene transitions, character introductions, and a focus on the protagonist's goals and challenges.


Critique
  • The scene effectively captures the transition from mockery to intrigue, showcasing the brogrammers' initial skepticism and their eventual realization of Pied Piper's potential. This arc is crucial for character development and sets the stage for the subsequent interest from Jared Dunn and Gavin Belson.
  • However, the dialogue could benefit from more distinct voices for the brogrammers. Their lines feel somewhat interchangeable, lacking individual personality traits that would make them more memorable and engaging. Adding unique quirks or catchphrases could enhance their characterization.
  • The pacing of the scene is somewhat uneven. The transitions marked by 'DISSOLVE TO' could be replaced with more dynamic cuts or actions that maintain the momentum of the scene. This would help keep the audience engaged and emphasize the growing excitement around Pied Piper.
  • The introduction of Jared Dunn feels abrupt. While he serves as a catalyst for the next phase of the story, his entrance could be better foreshadowed or integrated into the scene. Perhaps he could be seen observing the brogrammers' reactions from a distance before approaching, which would build anticipation.
  • Gavin Belson's reaction is effective in conveying his greed, but it could be enhanced by showing more of his internal conflict or thought process. A brief moment of hesitation or contemplation before he declares his desire for Pied Piper would add depth to his character and make his motivations clearer.
Suggestions
  • Consider giving each brogrammer a distinct personality trait or catchphrase to differentiate them and make their interactions more engaging.
  • Replace the 'DISSOLVE TO' transitions with more dynamic cuts or actions that reflect the growing excitement and urgency of the scene.
  • Introduce Jared Dunn earlier in the scene, perhaps by having him observe the brogrammers' reactions before stepping in, to create a smoother transition.
  • Add a moment of internal conflict for Gavin Belson before he expresses his desire for Pied Piper, which would provide more depth to his character and motivations.
  • Incorporate visual elements that emphasize the crowd's growing interest, such as close-ups of their reactions or hands reaching towards the computer, to heighten the tension and excitement.



Scene 13 - The Call from Belson
INT. HACKER HOUSE - DAY

Thomas has got his stuff all packed up. Big Head holds some
of it. Thomas is arguing with Erlich over the various and
seemingly arbitrary move-out obligations he is insisting
Thomas takes on.

ERLICH
Hey, I’m being a good guy here.
You can either get me a zip drive
with any and all code you worked on
or thought of working on while you
lived here, or you can just clean
the bathroom. Up to you.

Erlich leaves Thomas and takes a seat in front of an eager
young guy who is ready to pitch. Thomas’s phone rings. He
looks at it and turns to Big Head.

THOMAS
A Boodle number again. It’s
probably those fucking
TV brogrammers.
Calling - For educational purposes only


Big Head nods at this then puts the tip of his thumb up
against his lips and blows -- with each blow he pretends his
upper body is inflating in a crude imitation of the
brogrammers.

THOMAS (CONT’D)
They keep calling to tell me how
bad my website is. I really don’t
want to answer just to hear about
what an asshole I am.

ANGLE ON ERLICH

He turns to the eager guy.

ERLICH
You’re on.

EAGER GUY
My site is called Mashville.

ANGLE ON THOMAS

His phone rings again. It’s a Boodle number again.

THOMAS
(sighs)
I just want to put an end to this.
(answers)
Hi, Thomas Peckering, I’m an
asshole, tell me how much you hate
Pied Piper.

His expression changes.

THOMAS (CONT’D)
What? Really? Wait, is this a
prank? Can you prove it’s real?
OK, I’ll call right back.

This has gotten everyone’s attention. They watch as Thomas
calls back the number.

THOMAS (CONT’D)
Holy shit. OK... I’ll be there.

He hangs up.

THOMAS (CONT’D)
I have a meeting with Gavin
Belson... he likes Pied Piper.

The housemates are all freaking TVout. Erlich
Calling - For steps away purposes
educational from only
the guy pitching him and walks up to Thomas.


ERLICH
I own ten percent of Pied Piper.

THOMAS
You said it was a shitty idea.

ERLICH
It was a shitty idea. I’m not sure
what it is now. When’s your
meeting?

THOMAS
Right now.

ERLICH
I’ll go change.

Erlich hurries off. Thomas waits for a beat then turns to
Big Head.

THOMAS
What the fuck am I waiting for?

Thomas hurries out.
Genres: ["Drama","Comedy"]

Summary In the Hacker House, Thomas is packing to move out while arguing with Erlich about his obligations, which include either providing code or cleaning the bathroom. Frustrated by repeated calls from a Boodle number and criticism from brogrammers, Thomas finally answers and learns that Gavin Belson is interested in Pied Piper, surprising everyone. Despite his initial skepticism, Erlich decides to accompany Thomas to the meeting, shifting the focus from moving out to a potential opportunity.
Strengths
  • Strong dialogue
  • Effective plot advancement
  • Engaging character dynamics
Weaknesses
  • Limited character development in this specific scene

Ratings
Overall

Overall: 8.5

The scene effectively introduces a major plot development with Gavin Belson's interest in Pied Piper, creating tension and excitement. The humor injected through the brogrammers' mockery and Thomas's sarcastic response adds depth to the scene.


Story Content

Concept: 8

The concept of unexpected opportunity and the clash of personalities within the Hacker House setting is engaging and drives the narrative forward. The introduction of Gavin Belson's interest adds a layer of intrigue to the scene.

Plot: 8.5

The plot advances significantly with Gavin Belson's interest in Pied Piper, setting the stage for future developments. The conflict between Thomas and Erlich adds depth to the scene and foreshadows potential challenges ahead.

Originality: 9

The scene offers a fresh take on the tech industry, with unique character dynamics and unexpected plot developments. The dialogue feels authentic and reflects the competitive nature of the industry.


Character Development

Characters: 8

The characters are well-defined, with distinct personalities and motivations. Thomas's determination, Erlich's opportunism, and Big Head's loyalty are effectively portrayed, adding richness to the scene.

Character Changes: 7

While there are no significant character changes in this scene, the interactions and conflicts set the stage for potential growth and development in future episodes.

Internal Goal: 8

Thomas's internal goal is to prove himself and his worth in the tech industry. He wants to show that he is not just an 'asshole' as he jokingly refers to himself, but someone who can succeed and make a name for himself.

External Goal: 7

Thomas's external goal is to navigate the challenges of the tech industry and make a success of his website, Pied Piper.


Scene Elements

Conflict Level: 8

The conflict between Thomas and Erlich, as well as the internal conflict within Thomas regarding Pied Piper's potential, creates a compelling dynamic. The introduction of Gavin Belson's interest raises the stakes and adds tension.

Opposition: 8

The opposition in the scene is strong, as Thomas faces challenges from Erlich, the tech industry, and his own doubts. The uncertainty of the outcome adds suspense and drama to the scene.

High Stakes: 8

The high stakes are established through Gavin Belson's interest in Pied Piper, potentially changing the trajectory of Thomas's career and the dynamics within the Hacker House. The outcome of this opportunity could have far-reaching consequences.

Story Forward: 9

The scene significantly moves the story forward by introducing Gavin Belson's interest in Pied Piper, a pivotal development that will impact the characters and plot trajectory. The scene sets the stage for future conflicts and resolutions.

Unpredictability: 8

This scene is unpredictable due to the unexpected phone call that changes Thomas's fortunes and sets up future conflicts. The audience is left wondering about the implications of this twist.

Philosophical Conflict: 7

The philosophical conflict in this scene is between the characters' beliefs about success and failure in the tech industry. Erlich initially dismisses Pied Piper as a 'shitty idea' but later acknowledges its potential, highlighting the uncertainty and risk involved in the tech world.


Audience Engagement

Emotional Impact: 8

The scene elicits a range of emotions, from frustration and disbelief to excitement and anticipation. The characters' reactions and the unexpected turn of events contribute to the emotional impact.

Dialogue: 8.5

The dialogue is sharp and witty, reflecting the characters' personalities and the escalating tensions within the scene. The banter between Thomas and the brogrammers adds humor and depth to the interactions.

Engagement: 9

This scene is engaging due to its fast-paced action, witty dialogue, and unexpected plot twists. The tension and humor keep the audience invested in the characters and their goals.

Pacing: 9

The pacing of the scene is well-executed, with a balance of dialogue, action, and character development. The rhythm of the scene keeps the audience engaged and builds tension effectively.


Technical Aspect

Formatting: 8

The scene follows standard formatting for a screenplay, with clear scene descriptions and character actions. The dialogue is formatted correctly and enhances the pacing of the scene.

Structure: 8

The scene follows a clear structure with well-defined character arcs and plot progression. It effectively sets up future conflicts and developments.


Critique
  • The scene effectively builds tension and excitement as Thomas receives the call from Boodle, which is a pivotal moment in the narrative. However, the dialogue could be tightened to enhance the pacing and clarity of the characters' motivations.
  • Erlich's character is portrayed as both antagonistic and opportunistic, which is effective, but his dialogue could benefit from more distinctiveness to make him stand out. His lines feel somewhat generic and could be infused with more personality or humor to align with the overall tone of the script.
  • The comedic elements, particularly Big Head's imitation of the brogrammers, are a nice touch, but they could be expanded to further emphasize the absurdity of the tech culture. This would not only provide humor but also deepen the audience's understanding of Thomas's frustrations.
  • The transition from Thomas's frustration to the excitement of the call could be more dynamic. The shift in tone feels a bit abrupt; adding a moment of hesitation or disbelief before he fully processes the news could heighten the emotional impact.
  • The scene ends on a strong note with Thomas's urgency to leave, but it could benefit from a more explicit emotional reaction from the other characters. Their reactions to the news of the meeting could add depth to the scene and showcase the dynamics within the Hacker House.
Suggestions
  • Consider revising Erlich's dialogue to include more unique phrases or quirks that reflect his character, making him more memorable and engaging.
  • Expand on Big Head's comedic imitation of the brogrammers by incorporating more physical comedy or exaggerated expressions to enhance the humor and provide a clearer contrast to Thomas's serious demeanor.
  • Add a brief moment of internal conflict for Thomas after he receives the call, such as a flash of doubt or disbelief, to create a more dramatic buildup to his decision to leave.
  • Include a reaction shot from the other housemates when Thomas announces the meeting with Gavin Belson, showcasing their surprise or excitement to enrich the scene's emotional landscape.
  • Consider tightening the dialogue throughout the scene to maintain a brisk pace, ensuring that each line serves to advance the plot or develop character relationships.



Scene 14 - The Cult of Gavin
EXT. BOODLE - LATER

Thomas is admitted to the executive area.


INT. BOODLE - MOMENTS LATER

Thomas sits in the waiting area. Jared and a bunch of other
EXECUTIVES are with him.

JARED
Good to see you, Thomas. Now Gavin
is running about thirty minutes
late.

THOMAS
Well, it’s been forty minutes
already so does that mean another
30 minutes from now then...?

The other exec chimes in.

OTHER EXECUTIVE
You should know Gavin is very
excited about your site. Have you
met Gavin?
TV Calling - For educational purposes only


THOMAS
I’ve never even seen him in person.

The other executive steps in. The exec has the glow of a
cult member talking about a cult leader.

OTHER EXECUTIVE
It’s amazing. You’ll just feel so
energized after you meet him. I’m
a VP here and I only see Gavin
about ten minutes a month.

ANOTHER EXECUTIVE
But that ten minutes is just
incredible. Indescribable.
Prepare to have your life changed.

A door opens and another SENIOR VP enters.

SENIOR VP
I heard Thomas Peckering was here.
Has he ever met Gavin? No?

OTHER EXECUTIVE
I told him it’s amazing.

SENIOR VP
That hardly begins to describe it.
Genres: ["Drama","Comedy"]

Summary In the executive waiting area of Boodle, Thomas waits impatiently for Gavin, who is running late. As he engages with Jared and other executives, he is struck by their almost cult-like admiration for Gavin, who they describe as a transformative figure. The Senior VP enters, further amplifying the hype surrounding Gavin, while Thomas remains skeptical and frustrated by the delay. The scene captures the contrast between Thomas's impatience and the executives' surreal enthusiasm, leaving him still waiting as the excitement builds.
Strengths
  • Building anticipation
  • Establishing high stakes
  • Creating a cult-like atmosphere
Weaknesses
  • Lack of overt conflict
  • Limited character development

Ratings
Overall

Overall: 8.5

The scene effectively builds anticipation and excitement through the cult-like admiration for Gavin Belson, setting up a significant meeting and potential turning point in the story.


Story Content

Concept: 8.5

The concept of portraying Gavin Belson as a revered figure in the tech world adds depth to the scene and sets up potential conflicts and developments.

Plot: 8

The plot progresses as Thomas prepares to meet Gavin Belson, introducing high stakes and potential opportunities for character growth.

Originality: 8

The scene introduces a fresh perspective on the corporate world, focusing on the power dynamics and influence of key figures within the company. The characters' actions and dialogue feel authentic and reflect the complexities of navigating the corporate hierarchy.


Character Development

Characters: 8.5

The characters in the scene, particularly Thomas and the Boodle executives, are well-developed and contribute to the overall tension and anticipation.

Character Changes: 7

While there are no significant character changes in this scene, the anticipation and tension set the stage for potential growth.

Internal Goal: 8

Thomas's internal goal in this scene is to navigate the unfamiliar territory of meeting Gavin for the first time and make a good impression. This reflects his desire for acceptance and validation in the corporate world.

External Goal: 7

Thomas's external goal is to successfully pitch his site to Gavin and secure a positive outcome for his business. This reflects the immediate challenge he is facing in advancing his career and gaining recognition for his work.


Scene Elements

Conflict Level: 7

While there is not overt conflict in the scene, the tension and anticipation surrounding the meeting with Gavin Belson create a sense of underlying conflict.

Opposition: 7

The opposition in the scene is strong, with conflicting perspectives and power dynamics creating obstacles for Thomas as he navigates the corporate world and prepares to meet Gavin.

High Stakes: 8

The high stakes of meeting Gavin Belson and the potential impact on Thomas's project add tension and importance to the scene.

Story Forward: 8

The scene moves the story forward by setting up a crucial meeting with Gavin Belson and introducing potential opportunities for plot development.

Unpredictability: 7

This scene is unpredictable because of the unexpected reactions and dynamics between the characters, particularly in their interactions with Gavin and the Senior VP.

Philosophical Conflict: 6

The philosophical conflict in this scene revolves around the idea of power and influence within the corporate world. The characters' reverence for Gavin and the way they speak about him as a figure of authority challenges Thomas's beliefs about success and achievement.


Audience Engagement

Emotional Impact: 8

The scene elicits excitement and intrigue from the audience, setting the stage for potential emotional developments.

Dialogue: 7.5

The dialogue effectively conveys the cult-like admiration for Gavin Belson and sets the tone for the upcoming meeting.

Engagement: 9

This scene is engaging because of the high stakes, interpersonal dynamics, and suspenseful build-up to Thomas's meeting with Gavin. The dialogue and interactions between the characters create a sense of intrigue and anticipation.

Pacing: 8

The pacing of the scene effectively builds tension and suspense, with a gradual escalation of conflict and anticipation leading up to Thomas's meeting with Gavin.


Technical Aspect

Formatting: 8

The scene follows the expected formatting for a screenplay, with proper scene headings, character names, and dialogue formatting.

Structure: 8

The scene follows the expected structure for a corporate drama, with clear character introductions, dialogue-driven interactions, and a building sense of tension and conflict.


Critique
  • The scene effectively builds anticipation for Gavin Belson's character by showcasing the almost cult-like admiration the executives have for him. This sets up a strong contrast between Thomas's skepticism and the executives' enthusiasm, which can create tension and humor.
  • However, the dialogue could benefit from more distinct character voices. The executives sound somewhat interchangeable, which can dilute their individual personalities. Adding unique quirks or specific phrases for each character could enhance their individuality and make the scene more engaging.
  • The pacing feels a bit uneven. While the buildup to Gavin's arrival is important, the dialogue could be tightened to maintain momentum. Some lines, particularly the repetitive praise of Gavin, could be condensed to keep the audience's attention focused on Thomas's perspective.
  • The scene lacks a strong emotional anchor for Thomas. While he expresses some skepticism, it would be beneficial to delve deeper into his internal conflict or feelings about the situation. This could be achieved through internal monologue or more expressive body language, allowing the audience to connect with his character on a deeper level.
  • The use of the term 'cult-like' in describing the executives' admiration is effective, but it could be visually represented as well. Consider incorporating visual cues, such as the executives' body language or facial expressions, to emphasize their almost reverent attitude towards Gavin.
Suggestions
  • Introduce more distinct character traits for the executives to differentiate them and make their dialogue more memorable. For example, one could be overly enthusiastic, another could be more cynical, and another could be a sycophant.
  • Tighten the dialogue by removing repetitive lines about Gavin's greatness. Instead, focus on a few impactful statements that convey the executives' admiration without redundancy.
  • Incorporate more of Thomas's internal thoughts or reactions to the executives' comments. This could be done through brief internal monologues or visual cues that show his skepticism or anxiety.
  • Consider adding a moment where Thomas reacts physically to the executives' praise, such as rolling his eyes or fidgeting, to visually convey his discomfort and skepticism.
  • Use visual storytelling to enhance the scene. For example, show the executives' body language and expressions as they talk about Gavin, emphasizing their excitement and reverence, which can contrast with Thomas's more grounded demeanor.



Scene 15 - The Innovator's Dilemma
INT. BOODLE - GAVIN BELSON’S OFFICE - CONTINUOUS

A huge office. There are giant pictures all over the place --
and they are all of Gavin: Gavin in a hard hat pointing at a
giant crane as if he’s telling it what to do, Gavin dressed
in his judo gi in full action pose, Gavin standing amidst a
group of starving people in Nepal, his hands outstretched
benevolently. WE WIDEN to see that Gavin is in his office
with a designer who is pointing out the window at a huge
blank wall in the entryway to Boodle.

DESIGNER
We really need to do something to
fill that huge space up there. Now
I know you won’t like this idea,
Gavin, but how about a nice, bold
picture of you to fill it?

Gavin sighs and nods.

GAVIN BELSON
OK. But I don’t want to just pose
this time. Maybe we TV
canCalling
get a -shot
For educational purposes only
of me... innovating.


The designer clearly has no idea what this will look like.

DESIGNER
Perfect.
Genres: ["Comedy","Drama"]

Summary In Gavin Belson's ostentatious office, a designer proposes a bold portrait of Gavin for a blank wall. Gavin, obsessed with his image, insists on being depicted innovating rather than merely posing, leaving the designer confused about how to visualize this request. The scene humorously highlights Gavin's vanity and self-importance, ending with the designer agreeing to the ambiguous request without a clear plan.
Strengths
  • Sharp satire on tech industry culture
  • Effective use of humor and cynicism
  • Engaging character dynamics
Weaknesses
  • Limited character development in this specific scene
  • Dialogue could be more dynamic

Ratings
Overall

Overall: 8.5

The scene effectively blends comedy and drama to critique the hero-worship culture in the tech industry, providing a satirical take on the power dynamics within the company.


Story Content

Concept: 8

The concept of critiquing hero worship and corporate culture through the character of Gavin Belson is innovative and engaging, offering a fresh perspective on the dynamics of power and influence in the tech industry.

Plot: 7.5

While the plot primarily serves to highlight the character dynamics and themes of the scene, it effectively sets up the conflict between Gavin's public image and his private interactions.

Originality: 9

The scene offers a fresh take on the theme of corporate ego and self-promotion, with unique character dynamics and dialogue.


Character Development

Characters: 8

The characters are well-developed, with Gavin Belson serving as a larger-than-life figure whose presence drives the scene's satire and commentary on corporate culture.

Character Changes: 6

While there are no significant character changes in this scene, the interactions with Gavin Belson and his employees reveal insights into their personalities and motivations.

Internal Goal: 8

Gavin Belson's internal goal in this scene is to maintain his image and reputation as a powerful and innovative leader.

External Goal: 7

Gavin Belson's external goal in this scene is to fill the blank wall in the entryway to Boodle with a picture of himself that showcases his innovation.


Scene Elements

Conflict Level: 6

The conflict in the scene is more subtle, revolving around the tension between Gavin's public image and his private interactions, as well as the underlying power dynamics within the company.

Opposition: 6

The opposition in the scene is mild, with the conflict primarily driven by the characters' differing perspectives.

High Stakes: 7

The high stakes are implied through Gavin Belson's interest in acquiring Pied Piper, adding tension and potential consequences for the main characters.

Story Forward: 7

The scene moves the story forward by introducing the conflict between Gavin Belson and the employees, setting up potential developments in the plot regarding the acquisition of Pied Piper.

Unpredictability: 7

The scene is unpredictable in its humor and character interactions, keeping the audience engaged.

Philosophical Conflict: 6

The philosophical conflict in this scene is between the designer's desire to create a bold image of Gavin Belson and Gavin's desire to appear innovative and forward-thinking.


Audience Engagement

Emotional Impact: 7

The scene elicits a mix of amusement, skepticism, and disillusionment, engaging the audience emotionally through its satirical portrayal of hero worship and corporate culture.

Dialogue: 7

The dialogue effectively conveys the tone of the scene, with witty exchanges and sharp observations adding to the satirical and cynical atmosphere.

Engagement: 9

This scene is engaging because of its humor, character dynamics, and satirical take on corporate culture.

Pacing: 8

The pacing of the scene is effective in building tension and humor, leading to a satisfying resolution.


Technical Aspect

Formatting: 8

The formatting adheres to standard screenplay format, making it easy to follow for readers and production teams.

Structure: 8

The scene follows the expected structure for a satirical comedy genre, with clear character motivations and conflict.


Critique
  • The scene effectively establishes Gavin Belson's character as self-absorbed and egotistical through the numerous oversized pictures of himself, which serve as a visual metaphor for his inflated sense of self-importance. However, the dialogue could be more dynamic to enhance the humor and absurdity of the situation. The designer's confusion about how to visualize 'innovating' is a good comedic touch, but it could be expanded to create a more engaging exchange.
  • The pacing of the scene feels a bit slow, as it primarily consists of dialogue without much action or visual interest. Adding more physicality or movement could help maintain the audience's attention. For instance, the designer could be shown sketching ideas or using props to illustrate his suggestions, which would add a layer of visual storytelling.
  • While the scene does a good job of showcasing Gavin's desire for a specific type of image, it lacks a clear conflict or stakes. The interaction feels somewhat flat because there is no tension or urgency. Introducing a deadline for the artwork or a competing idea could create a more compelling dynamic between Gavin and the designer.
  • The dialogue, while humorous, could benefit from sharper wit or more clever wordplay to elevate the comedic tone. For example, Gavin's line about wanting to be depicted innovating could be followed by a more absurd suggestion from the designer, which would enhance the humor and absurdity of the request.
  • The scene could also explore the designer's perspective more deeply. Adding a line or two that reveals the designer's internal thoughts or frustrations about working with someone like Gavin could add depth and make the scene more relatable.
Suggestions
  • Consider adding more physical action to the scene, such as the designer moving around the office, gesturing to the pictures, or even sketching ideas on a notepad to create a more dynamic visual experience.
  • Introduce a sense of urgency or stakes by having a deadline for the artwork or a competing idea that the designer is trying to pitch, which would create tension and make the interaction more engaging.
  • Enhance the dialogue with sharper wit or absurdity. For example, have the designer suggest increasingly ridiculous ideas for how to depict 'innovating,' which Gavin could then dismiss in a humorous way.
  • Explore the designer's perspective by including internal thoughts or reactions to Gavin's requests, which could add depth to the scene and make it more relatable to the audience.
  • Consider using the blank wall as a metaphor for Gavin's character—perhaps the designer could suggest something that reflects Gavin's personality or the absurdity of his self-image, adding layers to the scene.



Scene 16 - Unexpected News at Boodle
EXT. BOODLE - CONTINUOUS

Erlich, now in a fresh blue “I know HTML -- How To Meet
Ladies” T-shirt, freshly waxed mustache, and what seems to be
a Greek fisherman’s cap, is shoving Big Head in front of him.
Big Head uses his pass card to get them in.


INT. BOODLE - CONTINUOUS

Thomas still waits with Jared and the other executives.
Gavin is still not there but they’re all still talking about
him.

SENIOR VP
(satisfied sigh)
Ah, Gavin...

Thomas’s phone rings. He excuses himself to answer.

THOMAS
Hello?

His expression slowly turns to one of shock. He looks up at
the others.

THOMAS (CONT’D)
It’s Peter Gregory.

The executives and Jared exchange a troubled look. The
Senior VP excuses himself and rushes out.
Genres: ["Drama","Comedy"]

Summary Erlich, sporting a humorous outfit, confidently leads Big Head into Boodle using his pass card. Inside, Thomas and the executives are discussing Gavin's absence when Thomas receives a shocking call from Peter Gregory, causing concern among the group. The Senior VP, initially satisfied with Gavin's situation, quickly exits after hearing the news, heightening the tension in the room.
Strengths
  • Effective introduction of new conflict
  • Engaging dialogue and reactions
  • Strong execution of tension and surprise
Weaknesses
  • Limited character development in this specific scene

Ratings
Overall

Overall: 8.5

The scene effectively introduces a new element (the call from Peter Gregory) that adds tension and intrigue to the story. The dialogue and reactions of the characters are engaging and keep the audience interested.


Story Content

Concept: 8

The concept of the unexpected call from Peter Gregory adds depth to the story and raises the stakes for the characters. It introduces a new layer of conflict and sets up future developments.

Plot: 8.5

The plot of the scene is well-developed, with a clear progression from the initial setup to the introduction of the new conflict. It moves the story forward and sets up future events effectively.

Originality: 8

The scene introduces fresh elements such as the unique fashion choices of the characters and the unexpected phone call from Peter Gregory. The dialogue feels authentic and adds depth to the characters.


Character Development

Characters: 8

The characters' reactions to the unexpected call are believable and add depth to their personalities. The scene allows for some character development and reveals more about their motivations and relationships.

Character Changes: 7

While there is not a significant character change in this scene, the unexpected call from Peter Gregory sets the stage for potential changes and developments in the future.

Internal Goal: 8

Thomas's internal goal is to maintain composure and handle unexpected news from Peter Gregory. This reflects his desire to be seen as competent and in control in front of his colleagues.

External Goal: 7

Thomas's external goal is to manage the situation in Gavin's absence and handle the news from Peter Gregory effectively.


Scene Elements

Conflict Level: 8

The introduction of the unexpected call from Peter Gregory raises the conflict level in the scene, creating tension and setting up future confrontations.

Opposition: 7

The opposition in the scene is strong, with Thomas facing unexpected news and the pressure of managing the situation in Gavin's absence. The audience is kept on edge as they wait to see how Thomas will handle the challenges.

High Stakes: 8

The high stakes in the scene are established by the unexpected call from Peter Gregory, which could have significant implications for the characters and the overall plot.

Story Forward: 9

The scene effectively moves the story forward by introducing a new conflict and setting up future events. It keeps the audience engaged and eager to see what happens next.

Unpredictability: 7

This scene is unpredictable because of the unexpected phone call from Peter Gregory and the tension surrounding Gavin's absence. The audience is left wondering about the implications of these events.

Philosophical Conflict: 6

The philosophical conflict revolves around the power dynamics within the company and the impact of key figures like Gavin and Peter Gregory. It challenges Thomas's beliefs about leadership and decision-making.


Audience Engagement

Emotional Impact: 8

The scene has a moderate emotional impact, with the characters' reactions to the unexpected call evoking surprise and intrigue from the audience.

Dialogue: 8.5

The dialogue in the scene is engaging and serves to build tension and reveal more about the characters' emotions and motivations. It effectively conveys the surprise and intrigue of the situation.

Engagement: 8

This scene is engaging because of the suspenseful buildup, witty dialogue, and unexpected plot developments. The audience is drawn into the unfolding drama.

Pacing: 9

The pacing of the scene is effective in building tension and maintaining the audience's interest. The rhythm of the dialogue and character movements adds to the overall suspense.


Technical Aspect

Formatting: 9

The formatting adheres to the standard screenplay format, making it easy to follow the character actions and dialogue. The scene transitions smoothly between locations.

Structure: 9

The scene follows the expected structure for a workplace drama, with clear character interactions and a building sense of tension. The pacing and rhythm are effective in conveying the unfolding events.


Critique
  • The scene effectively uses humor through Erlich's outfit and antics, which helps to establish his character as eccentric and comedic. However, the humor could be enhanced by adding a brief exchange or reaction from Big Head about Erlich's outfit, which would further emphasize their dynamic and provide a moment of levity.
  • The transition from the exterior of Boodle to the interior is smooth, but the scene could benefit from more visual detail about the setting inside Boodle. Describing the atmosphere, such as the decor or the buzz of activity, would help ground the audience in the environment and enhance the contrast between the characters' excitement and Thomas's anxiety.
  • Thomas's shock upon receiving the call from Peter Gregory is a pivotal moment, but the scene lacks a clear emotional build-up leading to this revelation. Adding a line or two of internal dialogue or a visual cue that reflects Thomas's mounting tension while waiting could heighten the impact of the phone call.
  • The reaction of the executives to Thomas's call is intriguing, but it feels somewhat abrupt. Expanding on their expressions or dialogue could provide insight into their relationship with Thomas and their own stakes in the situation, making the moment feel more significant.
  • The pacing of the scene is generally good, but the dialogue could be tightened. For instance, the Senior VP's line could be more concise to maintain the flow and keep the audience engaged. Additionally, the dialogue could include more subtext to reflect the executives' underlying motivations and anxieties about Gavin's tardiness.
Suggestions
  • Consider adding a humorous exchange between Erlich and Big Head regarding Erlich's outfit to enhance character dynamics and provide additional comedic relief.
  • Incorporate more descriptive details about the interior of Boodle to create a vivid setting that contrasts with the characters' emotions and actions.
  • Include a moment of internal reflection for Thomas as he waits, building tension and anticipation for the call from Peter Gregory.
  • Expand on the executives' reactions to Thomas's call to provide depth to their characters and highlight the stakes involved in the situation.
  • Tighten the dialogue, especially the Senior VP's line, to improve pacing and maintain audience engagement, while also adding subtext to reflect the executives' motivations.



Scene 17 - Dismissive Dealings
INT. BOODLE - GAVIN BELSON’S OFFICE - CONTINUOUS

Gavin is now meeting with two Powerade reps. Gavin is
looking out the window at programmers in the courtyard below.

GAVIN BELSON
It’s weird. They always travel in
groups of five. Tall skinny white
guy, short skinny Asian guy, fat
guy with a ponytail, some guy with
crazy facial hair and then an east
Indian guy. Do they trade guys
till they all have the right group?
TV Calling - For educational purposes only


POWERADE REP
Ummm... I’m not sure, but we are
very excited about becoming the
official energy product of Boodle
Corporation. You know our products
are not just junk loaded with sugar
and caffeine. I mean of course
they have those but they really are
an excellent nutritional product.

GAVIN BELSON
When I first started Boodle I
worked those guys 24/7. It’s
amazing what you can get human
beings to do for $45 worth of ice
cream. But the thing is, now
everyone wants to be healthy...

At that moment the Senior VP rushes in and whispers to Gavin.
He turns to the Powerade reps.

GAVIN BELSON (CONT’D)
Get the fuck out.
Genres: ["Comedy","Drama"]

Summary In Gavin Belson's office at Boodle, he meets with Powerade representatives, critiquing their product while reflecting on his management style and the diversity of programmers outside. The meeting takes a tense turn when a Senior VP rushes in with urgent news, leading Gavin to abruptly dismiss the Powerade reps with a harsh command, leaving the partnership unresolved.
Strengths
  • Humorous dialogue
  • Character dynamics
  • Satirical portrayal of tech industry
Weaknesses
  • Limited emotional depth
  • Minimal character development

Ratings
Overall

Overall: 8.5

The scene effectively blends humor, cynicism, and power dynamics to create an engaging and entertaining portrayal of the tech industry.


Story Content

Concept: 8

The concept of showcasing the absurdity and power dynamics within the tech industry, particularly through Gavin Belson's character, is well-developed and engaging.

Plot: 8

The plot progression in the scene focuses on the unexpected interruption by the Senior VP, adding a twist to the meeting with Gavin Belson and the Powerade reps.

Originality: 9

The scene introduces a fresh perspective on corporate culture and the balance between profit and employee well-being. The characters' actions and dialogue feel authentic and engaging.


Character Development

Characters: 9

The characters, especially Gavin Belson, are well-defined and contribute to the humor and dynamics of the scene, making it engaging and entertaining.

Character Changes: 5

There are minimal character changes in the scene, with the focus more on showcasing the dynamics and humor within the tech industry setting.

Internal Goal: 8

Gavin's internal goal in this scene is to assert his authority and control over the situation. He reflects on his past actions and decisions, showing a desire to maintain power and influence.

External Goal: 7

Gavin's external goal is to manage the business deal with the Powerade reps and ensure the success of the partnership.


Scene Elements

Conflict Level: 7

The conflict in the scene is primarily driven by the power dynamics between Gavin Belson and the Powerade reps, leading to a humorous and unexpected resolution.

Opposition: 7

The opposition in the scene is strong, as Gavin faces challenges in managing the business deal and asserting his authority.

High Stakes: 6

The stakes in the scene revolve around the potential partnership between Boodle and Powerade, adding a layer of tension and humor to the corporate interaction.

Story Forward: 7

The scene moves the story forward by introducing the interaction between Gavin Belson and the Powerade reps, setting up potential future developments in the plot.

Unpredictability: 8

This scene is unpredictable because of the sudden interruption by the Senior VP, adding a twist to the business meeting.

Philosophical Conflict: 7

The philosophical conflict in this scene is between the values of profit and employee well-being. Gavin reflects on his past actions of overworking employees for profit, while now acknowledging the importance of health and wellness.


Audience Engagement

Emotional Impact: 6

The scene focuses more on humor and satire than emotional depth, providing amusement and entertainment through its portrayal of the tech industry dynamics.

Dialogue: 8.5

The dialogue is witty, sarcastic, and humorous, effectively conveying the power dynamics and absurdity of the tech industry interactions.

Engagement: 9

This scene is engaging due to the witty dialogue, tense atmosphere, and the unexpected interruption by the Senior VP.

Pacing: 8

The pacing of the scene is effective in building tension and highlighting key moments of dialogue and character interaction.


Technical Aspect

Formatting: 8

The formatting of the scene is clear and easy to follow, with proper scene headings and dialogue formatting.

Structure: 8

The scene follows the expected structure for a dialogue-heavy office setting, with clear character interactions and progression of the business deal.


Critique
  • The scene opens with Gavin's observation of the programmers, which attempts to inject humor through a stereotype. However, this could come off as insensitive or clichéd, potentially alienating some viewers. It's important to balance humor with sensitivity, especially in a diverse setting like Silicon Valley.
  • Gavin's dialogue about the programmers feels somewhat disconnected from the main action of the scene. While it establishes his character as someone who is observant and perhaps a bit condescending, it doesn't advance the plot or reveal new information about his relationship with the Powerade reps. This could be an opportunity to deepen the interaction or provide insight into Gavin's motivations.
  • The Powerade rep's dialogue is overly expository and lacks a natural flow. The line about their products being more than just sugar and caffeine feels forced and doesn't contribute much to the scene. It would be more effective if the rep's enthusiasm was conveyed through a more engaging conversation rather than a monologue.
  • The abrupt dismissal of the Powerade reps at the end of the scene feels jarring. While it does create a moment of tension, it lacks buildup. A more gradual transition or a clearer reason for Gavin's sudden change in demeanor could enhance the impact of this moment.
  • The pacing of the scene could be improved. The dialogue feels a bit stilted and could benefit from more natural rhythms. Incorporating pauses, interruptions, or reactions from the Powerade reps could create a more dynamic exchange.
  • The visual elements of the scene are underutilized. While Gavin looks out the window, there is little description of the programmers or the courtyard, which could help set the tone and provide context for Gavin's observations. Adding more sensory details could enhance the viewer's immersion in the scene.
Suggestions
  • Consider revising Gavin's initial observation to be more insightful or humorous without relying on stereotypes. This could involve a more nuanced observation about the programmers' dynamics or work habits.
  • Integrate the Powerade rep's dialogue into a more interactive exchange. Perhaps Gavin could challenge their claims or ask probing questions that reveal more about his character and the nature of their partnership.
  • Instead of a monologue, have the Powerade rep respond to Gavin's comments with enthusiasm or defensiveness, creating a more engaging back-and-forth that reflects the tension of the business meeting.
  • Build up to Gavin's dismissal of the Powerade reps by incorporating a moment of frustration or distraction that leads to his abrupt decision. This could involve a visual cue or a comment from the Senior VP that shifts Gavin's focus.
  • Revise the dialogue to include more natural rhythms and interactions. Allow for interruptions or overlapping dialogue to create a more realistic conversation.
  • Enhance the visual description of the programmers and the courtyard to provide context for Gavin's observations. This could include details about their activities, expressions, or the atmosphere of the courtyard.



Scene 18 - The High-Stakes Dilemma
INT. BOODLE - MOMENTS LATER

Thomas is still talking to Peter Gregory on the phone.

THOMAS
I’m actually outside Gavin Belson’s
office right now, Mr. Gregory.
Here he is! Can you hold on a
second?

Gavin strides in.

GAVIN BELSON
So, Thomas Peckering is here!

Gavin is looking at an overweight guy with a pony tail until
Jared guides him over to Thomas. Gavin acts like he has just
found a long lost friend.

GAVIN BELSON (CONT’D)
There you are, Tom!! I’m sorry
these gentlemen kept you waiting.

He gives Jared and the other executives dirty looks. They do
their best to look apologetic.

GAVIN BELSON (CONT’D)
Here’s the thing -- ITVlove what- For
Calling you educational purposes only
did.


THOMAS
You REALLY like Pied Piper?

GAVIN BELSON
LOVE IT! Fill him in Jared!

Jared steps in.

JARED
Now, Thomas, of course since you
developed this fantastic project on
the Boodle campus while employed by
Boodle, technically it is the
property of Boodle, but Gavin is
prepared to give you quite a nice
raise - and a promotion of course.

THOMAS
Oh, well actually I’ve only worked
here at Boodle a few weeks. I
needed a job because things weren’t
panning out and... well I created
this site months before I got here.

ERLICH (O.S.)
That’s right! He created it while
living AT MY INCUBATOR.

They all turn to see Erlich and Big Head coming. Big Head
whispers to Thomas.

BIG HEAD
Sorry, he threatened to kick me out
of the house if I didn’t get him
in.

ERLICH
(to Belson)
Scott Erlich.

Gavin ignores him, he is clearly figuring out a new way to
navigate the situation. He nods and looks as fatherly and
comforting as possible as he speaks to Thomas.

GAVIN BELSON
I’ll give you $600,000 for it.

Thomas, Big Head and Erlich are shocked, but Erlich puts his
arm around Thomas as if he owns him. Thomas is stunned, a
grin slowly spreading across his face.


TV Calling - For educational purposes only


GAVIN BELSON (CONT’D)
But I am not just giving you
$600,000, I am giving you the full
weight of Boodle. We have the
reach and the muscle and the
resources to take what you have
done and push it to the global
level. At Boodle we don’t ask
people what they want. We tell
them what they want. And they thank
us for doing it. Boodle can bring
you the world.

Big Head’s phone ring. He answers it.

BIG HEAD
Hello? Really? Wow. Sure.

He hands his phone to Thomas.

BIG HEAD (CONT’D)
It’s Peter Gregory. I don’t know
how he got my number.

Thomas takes the phone.

THOMAS
Hello, Mr. Gregory, I’m so sorry.
Oh, you heard that?
(listening)
Uh huh... Uh huh...

GAVIN BELSON
(blurts)
I’ll give you ten million dollars
for it!

The room goes dead silent. Thomas is in shock. He speaks
half to himself/half into the phone.

THOMAS
Gavin Belson just offered me 10
million dollars for Pied Piper.

CUT TO:


PETER GREGORY

In his office with Monica standing by. They have Thomas on
speaker phone. Peter seems unimpressed.

TV Calling - For educational purposes only


PETER GREGORY
Ten million? I’m prepared to give
you one hundred thousand dollars.

CUT TO:


THOMAS

Overwhelmed with stunned joy.

THOMAS
(to Gavin and the others)
Peter Gregory offered me one
hundred...
(realizing)
...thousand?

CUT TO:


PETER GREGORY

PETER GREGORY
File size is a problem that is
never going away. That makes your
compression code very valuable.
Ask yourself this, Thomas: Did you
come out to Silicon Valley to make
ten million dollars and disappear?
Or did you come to make billions
and leave your mark? You could be
up there with the greats.

Thomas tries to process this but just looks like he's in
clinical shock. Then something occurs to him. He turns to
Gavin.

THOMAS
Mr. Belson, I have a great idea!
Peter Gregory is only interested in
the compression algorithm I
created, so I could do Pied Piper
with you and develop the
compression technology with him.

GAVIN BELSON
(explodes)
The compression is the only thing
about the fucking stupid site I DO
WANT!!

Gavin comes up to him. TV Calling - For educational purposes only


GAVIN BELSON (CONT’D)
Don’t be an idiot. I’m offering
you real money. Ten million, right
now.

Everyone is peppering Thomas with advice. His head is
swimming.

THOMAS
Excuse me... I...I need to use the
bathroom...

Thomas walks off. We follow him past the men’s room and down
corridors and dead ends. He’s trying to get out but can’t.
He finally breaks free and runs.

CUT TO:


A SERIES OF PHONE CALLS AND MEETINGS

--Thomas and all the hacker house residents sit around the
kitchen table. Everyone peppers him with advice.

--Thomas is sitting behind the desk in a big private office
at Boodle. Jared and the other execs surround him. Thomas
seems excited but overwhelmed.

THOMAS
So what would my position with the
company be?

JARED
Your position?

THOMAS
What would I be doing?

SENIOR VP
You could just think of something
else genius.

THOMAS
And you guys would own it?

SENIOR VP
Well, yes, as per the terms of the
contract. But--

He motions to a very thick contract in front of Thomas.


TV Calling - For educational purposes only


THOMAS
Yeah, I meant to ask you about
that, this contract is for thirty
years.

SENIOR VP
Yes, the ten million is paid over
thirty years.

All the execs nod happily as if this is the best news ever.
Thomas spots something else and points to a paragraph in the
contract.

THOMAS
This looks like a restraining
order.

JARED
Yes, well, Gavin is a very busy
man... and he doesn’t want to get
in your way... or you in his.
(mutters quietly)
It's not necessarily a bad thing.

As Thomas looks through the voluminous document, we see his
excitement fading.
Genres: ["Drama","Comedy"]

Summary In a tense meeting at Boodle, Thomas receives competing offers for his project, Pied Piper. Gavin Belson enthusiastically proposes $10 million, overwhelming Thomas, who is also considering a more strategic $100,000 offer from Peter Gregory. As the executives bombard him with advice, Thomas becomes increasingly confused and anxious about ownership and contract terms, ultimately excusing himself to escape the chaos. The scene highlights the conflict between immediate financial gain and long-term potential, leaving Thomas grappling with his decision.
Strengths
  • Engaging dialogue
  • Strong character development
  • High emotional impact
  • Compelling plot progression
Weaknesses
  • Potential lack of clarity in the contract terms
  • Overwhelming amount of information presented

Ratings
Overall

Overall: 8.5

The scene is engaging, filled with tension, and presents a crucial turning point for the protagonist. The conflicting emotions and decisions add depth to the narrative, keeping the audience invested.


Story Content

Concept: 8

The concept of the scene, focusing on a high-stakes offer in the tech industry, is compelling and drives the narrative forward. The conflicting interests and moral dilemmas explored add depth to the story.

Plot: 8.5

The plot of the scene is crucial in advancing the story, introducing a significant development that will have lasting consequences for the characters. It raises the stakes and sets up future conflicts.

Originality: 9

The scene introduces fresh conflicts and dilemmas within the tech industry setting, offering a unique perspective on negotiations and power dynamics. The characters' actions and dialogue feel authentic and engaging, adding depth to the narrative.


Character Development

Characters: 8

The characters in the scene are well-developed, each displaying unique traits and motivations. Their reactions to the offer reveal their personalities and relationships, adding layers to the narrative.

Character Changes: 8

Thomas undergoes a significant internal struggle and transformation in the scene, grappling with conflicting offers and moral dilemmas. His decisions and reactions reveal growth and development.

Internal Goal: 8

Thomas's internal goal is to make a decision that aligns with his values and long-term aspirations. He is torn between financial gain and creative fulfillment, wanting to leave a lasting mark on the industry.

External Goal: 7

Thomas's external goal is to negotiate a deal for his compression algorithm, balancing financial offers and strategic partnerships.


Scene Elements

Conflict Level: 9

The conflict in the scene is high, with Thomas facing a moral dilemma and conflicting offers that challenge his values and aspirations. The power dynamics and emotional turmoil create tension and suspense.

Opposition: 8

The opposition in the scene is strong, with conflicting offers and motivations creating obstacles for the protagonist. The audience is kept guessing about the outcome, adding to the suspense.

High Stakes: 9

The stakes in the scene are high, with Thomas facing a life-changing decision that could impact his career and future. The conflicting offers and moral dilemmas raise the tension and suspense.

Story Forward: 9

The scene propels the story forward by introducing a major plot development that will shape the future events and conflicts. It sets the stage for new challenges and decisions for the characters.

Unpredictability: 8

This scene is unpredictable because of the unexpected twists and turns in the negotiations, as well as the characters' shifting allegiances and motivations. The audience is kept on edge, unsure of how the situation will unfold.

Philosophical Conflict: 9

The philosophical conflict in this scene is between immediate financial gain and long-term creative fulfillment. Thomas must decide whether to prioritize short-term wealth or pursue a vision that could lead to greater success and impact.


Audience Engagement

Emotional Impact: 8.5

The scene has a significant emotional impact, eliciting a range of emotions from shock and excitement to conflict and uncertainty. The audience is emotionally invested in Thomas's journey and decisions.

Dialogue: 8.5

The dialogue in the scene is sharp and impactful, conveying the conflicting emotions and power dynamics effectively. It reveals the characters' intentions and adds depth to their interactions.

Engagement: 9

This scene is engaging because of its high-stakes negotiations, conflicting motivations, and dramatic revelations. The tension and suspense keep the audience invested in the outcome.

Pacing: 8

The pacing of the scene is effective in building tension and suspense, with well-timed reveals and character interactions. The rhythm of the dialogue adds to the urgency and drama of the negotiations.


Technical Aspect

Formatting: 8

The scene follows the expected formatting for a dialogue-heavy negotiation scene, with clear character cues and scene transitions. The formatting enhances the readability and flow of the scene.

Structure: 8

The scene follows a structured format for a negotiation scene in a tech industry setting, with clear character motivations and escalating tension. The pacing and rhythm contribute to the effectiveness of the scene.


Critique
  • The scene effectively builds tension and excitement as Thomas navigates the high-stakes world of tech deals. However, the pacing feels rushed, particularly during the transition from Gavin's initial offer to the chaotic moment when Thomas is overwhelmed. This could benefit from a more gradual build-up to the climax, allowing the audience to fully absorb the weight of the offers being made.
  • Gavin's character is portrayed as both charismatic and manipulative, which is effective. However, his abrupt shift from friendly to aggressive could be more nuanced. A more gradual escalation in his demeanor would enhance the tension and make his character more believable.
  • The dialogue is sharp and captures the absurdity of the tech world well, but some lines feel overly expository, particularly when Jared explains the ownership of Pied Piper. This could be streamlined to maintain the flow of the conversation and keep the audience engaged.
  • The scene's visual elements, such as the contrast between Thomas's shock and the executives' eagerness, are strong. However, the physicality of the characters could be emphasized more. For instance, showing Thomas's body language as he processes the offers could add depth to his emotional state.
  • The transition from the intense negotiation to the series of phone calls and meetings feels abrupt. This could be smoothed out with a more gradual shift in tone or a visual cue that indicates a change in time or setting.
Suggestions
  • Consider adding a moment where Thomas physically reacts to Gavin's initial offer before the chaos ensues. This could be a brief pause or a facial expression that conveys his disbelief, allowing the audience to connect with his emotional journey.
  • Introduce a moment of hesitation from Gavin before he makes the ten million dollar offer. This could create a more dramatic buildup and highlight the stakes involved in the negotiation.
  • Streamline the exposition regarding ownership by having Jared convey it in a more conversational manner, perhaps through a metaphor or analogy that fits the tech world, rather than a straightforward explanation.
  • Incorporate more physicality into the scene, such as Thomas fidgeting or pacing as he processes the offers, to visually represent his internal conflict and overwhelm.
  • Use a visual or auditory cue, such as a ringing phone or a clock ticking, to signify the transition from the negotiation to the subsequent meetings, helping to maintain the audience's engagement through the shift in tone.



Scene 19 - Decisions on the Stoops
EXT. HACKER HOUSE - EVENING

Thomas is lost in thought as he walks onto the front stoop.
He is about to try the door when something catches the corner
of his eye. He turns and sees Monica is sitting there
waiting for him. He practically jumps in surprise. Monica
can’t help but laugh. She is dressed casually now and
although she still has a professional polish to her she is
much more accessible than when in her normal business attire.

MONICA
Whoa, someone’s on edge.

Thomas tries to regain his composure.

THOMAS
Yeah, maybe. Wonder why.

MONICA
Well, I came by to let you know
that whoever you go with,
everything will be just fine.
Boodle is creepy and Peter is...
well nuts, but you have two of the
biggest players in Silicon Valley
TV Calling - For educational purposes only
fighting over you. Enjoy it.


THOMAS
Yeah, I don’t see that happening. I
have to make the most important
decision of my life! And I’m not
good at making those kinds of
decisions.

Monica moves over on the bench to make room for Thomas and
gestures for him to sit next to her but he doesn’t seem to
notice. She nods slightly like “okay then”.

MONICA
So, what kind of decisions are you
good at making?

Thomas thinks about this.

THOMAS
Technical ones. Fixes. Cracking
code and making it work. And then
making it work better. I like
having discreet reducible problems
and solving them. I’m not much of
a “big picture guy”.

MONICA
Maybe you are and maybe you aren’t.
Maybe you just need bigger problems
to solve.

Thomas gets an ironic smile.

THOMAS
So, Peter Gregory sent you here to
offer me bigger problems?

Monica gets up and moves towards Thomas. Thomas practically
holds his breath as she brushes past him. She lingers for a
second and looks him right in the eye.

MONICA
Nobody sent me over here.

And then she walks away.

MONICA (CONT’D)
When you don’t try to see the “big
picture” you miss a lot. Even
things that are right in front of
you.

And with that she walks down the steps and away. Thomas
watches her, she turns her head TVtoCalling
see him as educational
- For she gets to her
purposes only
car. He doesn’t know what to do so he just waves.


Monica sighs and waves back as she gets into her car. She is
smiling.

DISSOLVE TO:
Genres: ["Drama","Comedy"]

Summary Thomas stands on the front stoop of the Hacker House, grappling with anxiety over a life-changing decision between two tech companies. Monica unexpectedly arrives to offer support, encouraging him to consider the bigger picture rather than just technical problems. Their light-hearted yet introspective conversation highlights Thomas's insecurities, and as Monica leaves, he watches her drive away, still uncertain about his choices.
Strengths
  • Emotional depth
  • Character development
  • Natural dialogue
Weaknesses
  • Limited external conflict
  • Lack of action

Ratings
Overall

Overall: 8.5

The scene is well-written with a good balance of dialogue and introspection. It effectively conveys the emotional state of the characters and sets up potential character growth for Thomas.


Story Content

Concept: 8

The concept of the scene revolves around personal growth and self-discovery, as Thomas grapples with important decisions and Monica offers him valuable insights. The scene explores themes of mentorship and self-realization.

Plot: 8

The plot of the scene focuses on Thomas's internal conflict and his interaction with Monica, setting up potential developments in his character arc. It advances the overall narrative by delving into Thomas's mindset and motivations.

Originality: 7

The scene introduces familiar themes of decision-making and self-discovery but adds a fresh perspective through the tech industry setting and character interactions.


Character Development

Characters: 9

The characters of Thomas and Monica are well-developed in this scene, with Monica providing guidance and support to Thomas, while Thomas grapples with his insecurities and decision-making process. Their dynamic is engaging and adds depth to the story.

Character Changes: 7

Thomas undergoes a subtle shift in this scene, moving from uncertainty and self-doubt to a more reflective and open mindset. Monica's influence prompts him to consider new perspectives and possibilities.

Internal Goal: 8

Thomas's internal goal in this scene is to make a significant decision about his future. He struggles with decision-making and is unsure of his ability to handle big picture problems.

External Goal: 7

Thomas's external goal is to navigate the offers from Boodle and Peter Gregory and make the right choice for his future.


Scene Elements

Conflict Level: 4

The conflict in the scene is primarily internal, as Thomas grapples with his decision-making process and self-perception. The tension arises from his uncertainty about the future and his own abilities.

Opposition: 7

The opposition in the scene is moderate, with Monica challenging Thomas's perspective but not creating insurmountable obstacles.

High Stakes: 5

The stakes in the scene are primarily internal, focusing on Thomas's personal growth and decision-making process. While the outcome of his choices is significant for his future, the immediate consequences are more emotional than tangible.

Story Forward: 7

The scene moves the story forward by deepening Thomas's character development and setting up potential plot developments. It introduces new dynamics and challenges for the protagonist to navigate.

Unpredictability: 7

The scene is somewhat predictable in terms of character interactions and outcomes, but the philosophical conflict adds a layer of unpredictability.

Philosophical Conflict: 9

The philosophical conflict in this scene revolves around the idea of seeing the 'big picture' versus focusing on discreet, solvable problems. Monica challenges Thomas to consider broader perspectives.


Audience Engagement

Emotional Impact: 8

The scene has a strong emotional impact, as it delves into Thomas's inner turmoil and his interaction with Monica. The audience is likely to empathize with Thomas's struggles and feel hopeful about his potential for growth.

Dialogue: 8.5

The dialogue in the scene is natural and reflective of the characters' personalities. It effectively conveys the emotional subtext of the interaction between Thomas and Monica, adding depth to their relationship.

Engagement: 9

This scene is engaging due to the witty dialogue, character dynamics, and the underlying tension of decision-making.

Pacing: 8

The pacing of the scene is effective in building tension and allowing for character development.


Technical Aspect

Formatting: 8

The formatting adheres to standard screenplay conventions, making it easy to follow and visualize.

Structure: 8

The scene follows a typical structure for a character-driven dialogue scene, with clear beats and character development.


Critique
  • The scene effectively captures Thomas's internal conflict and anxiety about making a life-changing decision, which is relatable and adds depth to his character. However, the dialogue could be more dynamic to reflect the tension and stakes involved in his situation. Currently, it feels somewhat flat and could benefit from more emotional weight.
  • Monica's character serves as a catalyst for Thomas's self-reflection, but her dialogue lacks specificity and could be more impactful. Phrases like 'you have two of the biggest players in Silicon Valley fighting over you' could be rephrased to convey more urgency or excitement, enhancing the stakes of Thomas's decision.
  • The physical interaction between Thomas and Monica is underutilized. When she gestures for him to sit next to her, it could be a moment of connection that is more pronounced. This could help to build tension and chemistry between the characters, making the scene more engaging.
  • The ending feels abrupt and lacks a strong emotional payoff. While Thomas's uncertainty is clear, the scene could benefit from a more definitive moment of realization or decision-making that propels him forward, rather than leaving him in a state of indecision.
  • The visual elements of the scene could be enhanced to reflect Thomas's emotional state. For example, describing the environment in more detail—such as the lighting, sounds, or even the weather—could help to create a mood that mirrors Thomas's internal struggle.
Suggestions
  • Revise the dialogue to include more specific and emotionally charged language that reflects the high stakes of Thomas's decision. Consider adding metaphors or analogies that resonate with his technical background.
  • Enhance the physical interaction between Thomas and Monica to create a stronger emotional connection. For example, have Thomas hesitate before sitting down, indicating his reluctance to engage, or have Monica touch his arm to emphasize her support.
  • Consider adding a moment of clarity for Thomas at the end of the scene, where he acknowledges his fears but also recognizes the opportunity in front of him. This could serve as a turning point for his character.
  • Incorporate more sensory details to enrich the scene's atmosphere. Describe the sounds of the neighborhood, the fading light of evening, or the tension in the air to create a more immersive experience for the audience.
  • Explore the theme of decision-making further by having Monica share a personal anecdote about a difficult choice she faced, which could serve as a parallel to Thomas's situation and provide him with a different perspective.



Scene 20 - Partnership Denied
INT. GAVIN BELSON’S OFFICE - DAY

All of the execs we have met before are standing around
anxiously while Gavin talks on the speaker phone.

THOMAS (V.O.)
I’ve been thinking about this a
lot, and I think Boodle is a great
opportunity, but I’m a little fuzzy
about just what exactly I would do.

Gavin jumps on this but tries to sound pleasant.

GAVIN BELSON
You can do anything, learn to play
zithers, play D&D all day long.
Hell, grow a pony tail, grow
pigtails, I don’t care.

Gavin is clearly getting revved up. Jared motions him to
calm down.

JARED
What Gavin is saying is that you’ll
have complete freedom.

WE NOW INTERCUT WITH THOMAS IN HIS ROOM PACING WHILE TALKING
ON HIS CELL PHONE.

THOMAS
Well, it’s just that I kind of want
to be a part of something. I want
to help take this to the next
level. So I was thinking maybe if
we became partners...

Gavin reacts to “partners” and turns to Jared.

GAVIN BELSON
I'm willing to give this dickhead
thirty million dollars if I never
have to talk to him again!

JARED
(whispers)
Gavin, we’re still on speakerphone.
TV Calling - For educational purposes only


GAVIN BELSON
I know!

And with that Gavin violently hangs up.

CUT TO:
Genres: ["Drama","Comedy"]

Summary In Gavin Belson's office, tension rises as he speaks on speakerphone with Thomas, who seeks a meaningful role and proposes a partnership at Boodle. Gavin, displaying sarcasm and impatience, dismisses Thomas's idea and hangs up abruptly, ignoring Jared's attempts to mediate. The scene highlights the conflict between Thomas's aspirations and Gavin's disdain, ending with Gavin's frustrated disconnection.
Strengths
  • Tension-filled negotiation
  • Sharp dialogue
  • Character dynamics
Weaknesses
  • Some moments of over-the-top humor

Ratings
Overall

Overall: 8.5

The scene is well-crafted with a good balance of tension, humor, and character dynamics. The negotiation adds depth to the plot and keeps the audience engaged.


Story Content

Concept: 8

The concept of a high-stakes negotiation between a tech entrepreneur and a powerful figure adds intrigue and conflict to the scene, driving the plot forward.

Plot: 8.5

The plot of the negotiation scene is crucial in advancing the story, introducing new challenges and opportunities for the characters to navigate.

Originality: 9

The scene introduces a fresh perspective on corporate negotiations and power struggles, with characters who are morally ambiguous and unpredictable in their actions. The authenticity of the dialogue and character dynamics adds to the originality of the scene.


Character Development

Characters: 8

The characters are well-developed and their interactions add depth to the scene, showcasing their motivations and conflicts effectively.

Character Changes: 7

Thomas undergoes a significant change in perspective and decision-making during the negotiation, reflecting his growth as a character.

Internal Goal: 8

The protagonist's internal goal in this scene is to assert his dominance and control over the situation, while also managing his emotions and temper. This reflects his need for power and validation, as well as his fear of losing control or appearing weak.

External Goal: 7.5

The protagonist's external goal in this scene is to negotiate a successful business deal and assert his authority in the company. This reflects the immediate challenge of securing a partnership and financial agreement.


Scene Elements

Conflict Level: 8

The conflict between Thomas and Gavin, as well as the internal conflicts of the characters, creates a tense and engaging atmosphere in the scene.

Opposition: 7.5

The opposition in the scene is strong, with conflicting goals and motivations driving the tension and conflict between characters. The uncertainty of the outcome keeps the audience engaged and invested in the scene.

High Stakes: 9

The high stakes of the negotiation, with millions of dollars on the line, add intensity and urgency to the scene, raising the stakes for the characters.

Story Forward: 9

The scene propels the story forward by introducing new challenges, opportunities, and conflicts for the characters to navigate.

Unpredictability: 8

This scene is unpredictable because of the unexpected twists and turns in the negotiation process, as well as the characters' unpredictable reactions to the situation.

Philosophical Conflict: 7

The philosophical conflict evident in this scene is the clash between personal integrity and corporate greed. The protagonist's willingness to offer a large sum of money to avoid a partnership highlights the ethical dilemma of prioritizing profit over genuine collaboration.


Audience Engagement

Emotional Impact: 7.5

The scene elicits a range of emotions from anxiety to excitement, keeping the audience invested in the outcome of the negotiation.

Dialogue: 8.5

The dialogue in the scene is sharp, witty, and engaging, reflecting the tension and humor of the negotiation process.

Engagement: 9

This scene is engaging because of the high-stakes negotiation, witty dialogue, and dynamic character relationships. The tension and humor keep the audience invested in the outcome of the conversation.

Pacing: 8.5

The pacing of the scene is well-executed, with a balance of tension-building moments and comedic relief. The rhythm of the dialogue and character interactions adds to the effectiveness of the scene.


Technical Aspect

Formatting: 8

The formatting of the scene adheres to the standard conventions of screenplay format, making it easy to follow and understand the character interactions and dialogue.

Structure: 8

The structure of the scene follows the expected format for a dialogue-driven, character-focused scene in a screenplay. The pacing and rhythm of the interactions contribute to the effectiveness of the scene.


Critique
  • The scene effectively captures the tension between Thomas's desire for meaningful work and Gavin's dismissive attitude, which highlights the power dynamics at play. However, the humor in Gavin's dialogue can overshadow the seriousness of Thomas's concerns, potentially undermining the emotional weight of the moment.
  • The intercutting between Thomas pacing in his room and the executives in Gavin's office is a strong visual choice that emphasizes Thomas's isolation and anxiety. However, the pacing could be improved by allowing more time for Thomas's internal struggle to resonate before Gavin's sarcastic remarks interrupt.
  • Gavin's character is well-established as arrogant and dismissive, but his reaction to the idea of partnership feels a bit abrupt. It might benefit from a more gradual build-up to his outburst, allowing the audience to feel the tension rising before it culminates in his explosive response.
  • Jared's role as a mediator is crucial, but his dialogue could be more impactful. Instead of simply stating that Thomas will have complete freedom, he could provide a more compelling argument that aligns with Thomas's aspirations, reinforcing the stakes of the conversation.
  • The scene ends rather abruptly with Gavin hanging up, which is effective in showcasing his character but leaves Thomas's emotional state somewhat unresolved. A brief moment of reflection from Thomas after the call could enhance the emotional impact and provide a clearer sense of his internal conflict.
Suggestions
  • Consider adding a moment where Thomas articulates his vision for Pied Piper more clearly before proposing a partnership. This would help establish his motivations and make Gavin's dismissal more impactful.
  • Allow for a brief pause after Gavin's sarcastic comments to let the weight of his words sink in for both Thomas and the audience. This could heighten the tension and emphasize Thomas's feelings of inadequacy.
  • Explore Gavin's reaction to the idea of partnership in more depth. Perhaps he could initially feign interest before revealing his true feelings, which would create a more dynamic interaction.
  • Enhance Jared's dialogue to include a more persuasive argument that aligns with Thomas's desire for meaningful work, making his role as a mediator more significant.
  • Add a moment of silence or a visual cue after Gavin hangs up to allow the audience to process the abruptness of the call and Thomas's emotional response, reinforcing the stakes of his decision.



Scene 21 - Tech Tensions at the Four Seasons
EXT. FOUR SEASONS PALO ALTO - EVENING

Langdon and Tandy pull up, dressed to kill.


INT. FOUR SEASONS PALO ALTO - LATER

Langdon and Tandy are at the bar, baffled by this place.
There are some khaki pant wearing businessmen. Lots of
Asians, lots of glasses and lots of Ipads and notebook
computers. Everyone seems to be working like this is just
another office.

LANGDON
It looks like a Four Seasons but
sure as hell doesn’t feel like one.

The presence of Langdon and Tandy has registered -- they are
attractive women anywhere but here they are almost like from
another planet. Guys actually stop working to look at them,
but whenever Langdon or Tandy simply make eye contact with a
guy he becomes completely flustered, turns away and stares
intently at whatever screen he has handy. Tandy looks beyond
confused.

TANDY
OK, I have never felt less sexual
energy in my life.

At that moment, a hopelessly nerdy GUY stumbles up to them.
Clearly he is really stinking drunk, can’t handle liquor, and
awkwardly tries to hit on them..

GUY
Hey girls. My name’s James.
(hands them his card)
I started Zcranium.com. We just got
two million in start up money.

TANDY
Oh really? So you’re like, a
programmer or...?

GUY
(insulted for no TV
reason)
Calling - For educational purposes only
Fuck yeah!
(MORE)
GUY (CONT'D)
I was writing code when I was 8. I
was a math wizz Sergie Brin?!
Larry PAGE?!! Fucking Larry
Elllison??!!! They’re NOTHING!

Langdon and Tandy are stunned. At that moment a Hotel
Security Guard comes over and grabs the guy by the collar and
leads him out as he rants.

GUY (CONT’D)
I’m a tenth level magic user!!!

CUT TO:
Genres: ["Drama","Comedy"]

Summary Langdon and Tandy, feeling out of place in the corporate atmosphere of the Four Seasons Palo Alto, observe the lack of energy among the business crowd. Their discomfort escalates when a drunken nerd named James approaches, boasting about his startup and programming skills, only to be humorously escorted away by a security guard as he rants about being a 'tenth level magic user.' The scene captures the awkwardness and confusion of navigating a tech-dominated social landscape.
Strengths
  • Effective humor
  • Well-developed characters
  • Clear contrast in setting
Weaknesses
  • Limited plot progression
  • Low stakes

Ratings
Overall

Overall: 7.5

The scene effectively combines humor, confusion, and awkwardness to create an entertaining and engaging atmosphere. The contrast between the characters and the setting adds depth to the scene.


Story Content

Concept: 7.5

The concept of contrasting glamorous characters with a nerdy environment is unique and adds an interesting dynamic to the scene.

Plot: 7

While the scene doesn't significantly advance the main plot, it provides a comedic and entertaining break from the main storyline.

Originality: 9

The scene offers a fresh take on the tech industry culture and presents authentic character interactions.


Character Development

Characters: 8

The characters of Langdon, Tandy, and the nerdy guy are well-developed and contribute to the humor and awkwardness of the scene.

Character Changes: 6

While there are no significant character changes in the scene, the interactions between the characters reveal more about their personalities and dynamics.

Internal Goal: 8

Tandy's internal goal is to navigate the unfamiliar and uncomfortable environment of the bar and understand her own feelings of sexual energy and attraction.

External Goal: 7.5

Langdon and Tandy's external goal is to gather information or make connections in this new environment.


Scene Elements

Conflict Level: 6

The conflict in the scene is primarily internal, as the characters navigate the awkward interactions and social dynamics of the environment.

Opposition: 7.5

The opposition in the scene is strong enough to create conflict and uncertainty for the characters.

High Stakes: 5

The stakes in the scene are relatively low, focusing more on humor and social dynamics than on high-stakes conflicts or decisions.

Story Forward: 7

The scene provides a brief break from the main storyline, offering a comedic and entertaining interlude without significantly advancing the plot.

Unpredictability: 8

This scene is unpredictable due to the unexpected interactions and humorous twists.

Philosophical Conflict: 8

The philosophical conflict is between the superficiality of the tech industry and the genuine human connection that Langdon and Tandy seek.


Audience Engagement

Emotional Impact: 6.5

The scene elicits a mix of amusement and confusion from the audience, creating an emotional impact that aligns with the comedic tone.

Dialogue: 7.5

The dialogue effectively conveys the confusion and humor of the scene, particularly in the interactions between the characters.

Engagement: 9

This scene is engaging due to the humor, character dynamics, and the exploration of a unique setting.

Pacing: 8

The pacing of the scene builds tension and humor effectively, keeping the audience engaged.


Technical Aspect

Formatting: 8

The scene follows the expected formatting for a dialogue-heavy interaction in a bar setting.

Structure: 8

The scene follows a standard structure for a character-driven interaction in a new setting.


Critique
  • The scene effectively captures the contrast between Langdon and Tandy's glamorous appearance and the sterile, work-focused environment of the Four Seasons Palo Alto. This juxtaposition sets up a humorous and relatable commentary on the tech culture, which is a strong point.
  • The dialogue is engaging, particularly Tandy's line about the lack of sexual energy, which adds a layer of humor and highlights their discomfort in the setting. However, the introduction of the drunken guy feels somewhat clichéd and could benefit from more originality to avoid stereotypes of 'nerdy' characters.
  • The pacing of the scene is generally good, but the transition from Langdon and Tandy's observations to the drunken guy's entrance feels abrupt. A smoother transition could enhance the flow and maintain the comedic tone.
  • The character of the drunken guy, while intended to be humorous, risks coming off as one-dimensional. His exaggerated behavior could be balanced with more subtlety to make him feel more relatable and less like a caricature.
  • The visual descriptions are effective in establishing the setting, but they could be enhanced by incorporating more sensory details, such as sounds or smells, to immerse the audience further into the environment.
Suggestions
  • Consider giving the drunken guy a more nuanced personality or backstory to make him feel less like a stereotype. Perhaps he could have a moment of clarity or a unique perspective that adds depth to his character.
  • Enhance the transition between Langdon and Tandy's dialogue and the drunken guy's entrance by adding a brief moment of tension or anticipation, such as a pause where they expect someone to approach them, which could lead to the comedic reveal of the drunken guy.
  • Incorporate more sensory details to enrich the scene. Describe the sounds of clinking glasses, the hum of conversations, or the smell of expensive cocktails to create a more vivid atmosphere.
  • Explore the reactions of Langdon and Tandy to the drunken guy's antics in more detail. Their facial expressions or body language could add to the humor and highlight their discomfort in the tech-dominated environment.
  • Consider adding a brief moment of interaction between Langdon and Tandy after the drunken guy is removed, allowing them to reflect on the encounter and further emphasize their feelings of alienation in the tech world.



Scene 22 - Skepticism in Silicon Valley
EXT. DOWNTOWN PALO ALTO - EVENING

Langdon and Tandy stand in the middle of downtown Palo Alto.
They look around at the bland, mundane quality of the cars,
shops and people walking around.

TANDY
This is it? This is where all the
tech billionaires decided to live?

LANGDON
It can’t be.
(stops a passerby)
Excuse me, is this Palo Alto?

The person nods and walks on. Langdon notices a Brew Pub.
She nods for Tandy to follow her.
Genres: ["Drama","Comedy"]

Summary In downtown Palo Alto, Langdon and Tandy express their disbelief at the unremarkable surroundings, questioning how this ordinary place is home to tech billionaires. Tandy's skepticism contrasts with Langdon's need for confirmation, leading him to ask a passerby about their location. Despite the mundane environment, Langdon spots a Brew Pub and gestures for Tandy to follow, leaving their conflict about expectations versus reality unresolved.
Strengths
  • Effective exploration of disillusionment in the tech world
  • Humorous tone
  • Well-developed characters
Weaknesses
  • Low conflict level
  • Limited character change

Ratings
Overall

Overall: 8.5

The scene effectively captures the disillusionment and curiosity of the characters in a humorous way, providing insight into their discontent and amusement.


Story Content

Concept: 8

The concept of exploring the contrast between perception and reality in the tech world is intriguing and well-executed.

Plot: 8

The scene contributes to the overall plot by providing insight into the characters' motivations and setting up potential conflicts.

Originality: 8

The scene introduces a fresh take on the tech industry and wealth, presenting a humorous and critical perspective on societal perceptions.


Character Development

Characters: 8.5

The characters are well-developed, with distinct personalities and motivations that drive the scene forward.

Character Changes: 6

While there is some introspection and realization, the scene focuses more on observation than character change.

Internal Goal: 8

Langdon's internal goal in this scene is to understand and possibly reconcile the discrepancy between the perception of Palo Alto as a tech hub and the reality of its appearance. This reflects her desire for truth and authenticity in her surroundings.

External Goal: 7

Langdon's external goal in this scene is to confirm if they are indeed in Palo Alto and to explore the area further. This reflects the immediate challenge of navigating a new environment.


Scene Elements

Conflict Level: 6

While there is some internal conflict and tension, the scene focuses more on exploration and observation.

Opposition: 6

The opposition in the scene is mild, with the characters facing a minor challenge of confirming their location, adding a layer of uncertainty.

High Stakes: 5

The stakes are relatively low in this scene, focusing more on character exploration and observation.

Story Forward: 7

The scene provides insight into the characters' motivations and sets up potential conflicts, moving the story forward.

Unpredictability: 6

The scene is somewhat predictable in its setup and resolution, but the humor and character dynamics keep the audience engaged.

Philosophical Conflict: 6

The philosophical conflict in this scene is the contrast between the perceived glamour of tech billionaires' lifestyle and the underwhelming reality of the city's appearance. This challenges Langdon's beliefs about success and wealth.


Audience Engagement

Emotional Impact: 7.5

The scene evokes a mix of emotions, from discontent to amusement, resonating with the audience.

Dialogue: 8

The dialogue effectively conveys the characters' emotions and thoughts, adding depth to the scene.

Engagement: 8

This scene is engaging due to its witty dialogue, humorous observations, and relatable themes of perception vs. reality.

Pacing: 8

The pacing of the scene is well-executed, with a balance of dialogue and action to maintain the audience's interest.


Technical Aspect

Formatting: 9

The scene is well-formatted with clear scene headings, character names, and dialogue, following the expected format for a screenplay.

Structure: 9

The scene follows a clear structure with a setup, conflict, and resolution, adhering to the expected format for a comedic screenplay.


Critique
  • The scene effectively captures the disillusionment of Langdon and Tandy as they confront the reality of Palo Alto, contrasting their expectations with the mundane surroundings. However, the dialogue lacks depth and could benefit from more character-specific banter that reveals their personalities and backgrounds.
  • The use of a passerby to confirm their location feels somewhat clichéd and could be replaced with a more engaging interaction that adds to the humor or tension of the moment. This could also serve to further develop Langdon and Tandy's characters.
  • The visual description of the setting is minimal and could be enhanced to better convey the atmosphere of Palo Alto. Adding sensory details about the sounds, smells, or even the vibe of the area could immerse the audience more fully in the scene.
  • The transition from the previous scene to this one feels abrupt. The comedic energy from the previous scene, with the drunken nerd, could be echoed or contrasted in this scene to maintain a consistent tone and flow.
  • The scene ends rather abruptly after Langdon notices the Brew Pub. A stronger closing line or action could provide a more satisfying conclusion and set up anticipation for what happens next.
Suggestions
  • Consider adding a humorous or insightful exchange between Langdon and Tandy that reflects their personalities and perspectives on the tech world, enhancing their character development.
  • Instead of a passerby confirming their location, create a more engaging interaction, such as a local who offers unsolicited advice or a humorous comment about the area, which could add depth to the scene.
  • Incorporate more vivid sensory details about the environment to paint a clearer picture of Palo Alto, making the setting feel more alive and engaging for the audience.
  • To improve the transition from the previous scene, consider incorporating a brief moment of reflection or a humorous comment from Langdon or Tandy about the previous encounter before moving on to the new scene.
  • End the scene with a stronger line or action that hints at their next move or adds a layer of intrigue, such as a brief exchange about what they hope to find in the Brew Pub.



Scene 23 - Tension at the Brew Pub
INT. BREW PUB - MOMENTS LATER

Langdon and Tandy walk through the Brew Pub. Guys are
looking at them but it is that same flustered/terrified vibe
from before.

LANGDON
It looks like it’s all guys.
That’s gotta be good, right?

They come up to the bar where Roland and Jin Yiang are deep
in conversation. Jin Yiang looks angry and is oblivious to
the women, but Roland spots them and tries to play it cool as
Jin Yiang pays the tab.

JIN YIANG
This bullshit. Why I gotta buy
beers? That motherfucker just get
30 million dollars from Boodle.- For educational purposes only
TV Calling


This immediately catches Langdon’s attention. Roland tries
to sound cool, which sadly for him comes out sounding a bit
like John Wayne.

ROLAND
Cause you never pay for shit, Jin
Yiang. And this is a big night for
Thomas.

JIAN YANG
(confused)
Why you talk fucked up like that?

ROLAND
(gritted teeth)
Just c’mon.

Embarrassed, Roland pushes Jin Yiang ahead of him. Langdon
watches them walk across the bar to a a group of guys heading
out. In the center of the group is Thomas. He is surrounded
by his housemates and other tech geeks, everyone still giving
him advice or just coming over to shake his hand. Langdon
watches as they head for the door.

LANGDON
(to herself)
Thomas.

Tandy has been oblivious to all this. She’s had enough.

TANDY
We can still catch the late flight
back to LA.

Langdon shakes her head, never taking her eyes off Thomas.

LANGDON
We’re not going anywhere.
Genres: ["Drama","Comedy"]

Summary Langdon and Tandy enter a Brew Pub filled exclusively with men, which Langdon sees as a good sign. They witness an awkward argument between Roland and Jin Yiang over drink payments, highlighting Jin Yiang's frustration and Roland's failed attempts to appear cool. Despite Tandy's desire to leave for a flight back to LA, Langdon is fixated on staying to see Thomas, who is surrounded by friends. The scene ends with Langdon resolutely deciding to remain at the pub.
Strengths
  • Engaging character dynamics
  • Authentic dialogue
  • Effective balance of humor and drama
Weaknesses
  • Limited external conflict
  • Potential lack of resolution in the scene

Ratings
Overall

Overall: 8.5

The scene effectively balances humor, drama, and character dynamics, creating an engaging and intriguing atmosphere. The interactions between Langdon, Tandy, and the tech geeks add depth to the setting and plot.


Story Content

Concept: 8

The concept of unexpected encounters and contrasting perspectives is effectively explored in the scene, adding depth to the character dynamics and overall narrative.

Plot: 8

The plot progresses as Langdon's fascination with Thomas and Tandy's desire to leave create tension and intrigue. The scene sets up potential conflicts and resolutions for future developments.

Originality: 8

The scene introduces a fresh take on social dynamics and power struggles, with authentic character actions and dialogue.


Character Development

Characters: 9

The characters are well-developed, with Langdon's curiosity and Tandy's frustration adding layers to the scene. The tech geeks and their interactions with Thomas provide insight into the tech-centric world.

Character Changes: 7

While there are no significant character changes in this scene, the interactions and dynamics set the stage for potential growth and development in future events.

Internal Goal: 8

Langdon's internal goal is to understand the situation with Thomas and potentially intervene. This reflects her desire to protect and support those close to her.

External Goal: 7

The protagonist's external goal is to figure out the dynamics between Roland, Jin Yiang, and Thomas. This reflects the immediate challenge of navigating social interactions and power dynamics.


Scene Elements

Conflict Level: 7

While there is tension between Langdon's interest and Tandy's desire to leave, the conflict is more subtle and internal, setting the stage for potential developments.

Opposition: 7

The opposition in the scene is strong, with conflicting loyalties and hidden agendas creating uncertainty and tension.

High Stakes: 7

The stakes are moderate in this scene, with Langdon's fascination and Tandy's desire to leave hinting at potential consequences and resolutions in the narrative.

Story Forward: 8

The scene moves the story forward by introducing new dynamics and potential conflicts, setting the stage for future developments and resolutions.

Unpredictability: 7

The scene is unpredictable due to the shifting alliances and hidden motivations of the characters.

Philosophical Conflict: 7

The philosophical conflict in this scene is between loyalty and self-interest. Roland is torn between supporting Thomas and maintaining his relationship with Jin Yiang, highlighting the clash of values and priorities.


Audience Engagement

Emotional Impact: 8

The scene evokes a range of emotions, from curiosity to disappointment, creating a compelling and relatable atmosphere for the audience.

Dialogue: 8.5

The dialogue is engaging and reflective of the characters' personalities, enhancing the scene's authenticity and emotional impact.

Engagement: 9

This scene is engaging due to the interpersonal conflicts, character dynamics, and the unfolding mystery surrounding Thomas.

Pacing: 8

The pacing of the scene effectively builds tension and suspense, keeping the audience engaged and invested in the unfolding drama.


Technical Aspect

Formatting: 8

The formatting adheres to the expected format for a screenplay, making it easy to follow and visualize the scene.

Structure: 8

The scene follows a clear structure and pacing, effectively building tension and revealing character motivations.


Critique
  • The scene effectively captures the atmosphere of the Brew Pub, showcasing the male-dominated tech culture and the characters' reactions to it. However, the dialogue could benefit from more distinct character voices to enhance their individuality and make their interactions more engaging.
  • Langdon's observation about the bar being filled with men is a good setup for humor, but it could be expanded to include more of her internal thoughts or a witty remark that reflects her personality. This would add depth to her character and make her more relatable.
  • The conflict between Jin Yiang and Roland is introduced but not fully explored. It feels somewhat disconnected from the main focus on Thomas. Strengthening this subplot could add layers to the scene and provide more context for the audience about the dynamics within the group.
  • The pacing of the scene feels a bit rushed, particularly in the transition from the bar to Thomas. Slowing down the moment when Langdon spots Thomas could heighten the tension and anticipation, allowing the audience to feel her investment in the moment.
  • Tandy's character comes off as somewhat passive in this scene. Giving her a more active role in the conversation or a stronger reaction to the situation could enhance her presence and create a more dynamic interaction between the two women.
Suggestions
  • Consider adding a line or two of internal monologue for Langdon to express her thoughts on the male-dominated environment, which could provide insight into her character and enhance the humor.
  • Develop the interaction between Jin Yiang and Roland further, perhaps by including a humorous exchange that highlights their personalities and the tension in their relationship, making it more relevant to the scene.
  • Slow down the moment when Langdon spots Thomas, allowing for a brief pause or a reaction shot that emphasizes her feelings about him and builds anticipation for their interaction.
  • Give Tandy a more active role in the scene, perhaps by having her express skepticism about staying or making a humorous comment about the situation, which would create a more balanced dynamic between her and Langdon.
  • Ensure that the dialogue reflects each character's unique voice and personality, making their interactions feel more authentic and engaging for the audience.



Scene 24 - Unexpected Support in the Hacker House
INT. HACKER HOUSE - NIGHT

It’s late at night and Thomas sits all alone in the kitchen,
clearly conflicted. Erlich comes in and starts making
instant noodle ramen. Thomas is waiting for a jackass remark
from Erlich as he sits down next to him but Erlich just clips
back his hair and starts eating his ramen. After a beat
Erlich looks up at Thomas.

ERLICH
You don't want to work for assholes
and now you don't have to. You're
like me - you want toTVbuild
Calling - For educational purposes only
something.


Erlich goes back to slurping down his noodle ramen. Thomas
looks surprised by Erlich's comment but then almost relieved.
Genres: ["Drama","Comedy"]

Summary In the late-night kitchen of a hacker house, Thomas sits alone, grappling with his career choices. Erlich enters, initially expected to be sarcastic, but instead offers Thomas unexpected support, telling him he no longer has to work for 'assholes' and acknowledging their shared desire to create something meaningful. This moment of clarity brings Thomas a sense of relief and hope.
Strengths
  • Authentic character development
  • Meaningful dialogue
  • Emotional depth
Weaknesses
  • Limited external conflict
  • Slow pacing

Ratings
Overall

Overall: 8.5

The scene effectively delves into the inner conflict of Thomas while providing a moment of growth and connection between him and Erlich. The dialogue is meaningful and the tone is well-balanced.


Story Content

Concept: 8

The concept of exploring Thomas's inner conflict and his desire to build something meaningful is compelling and relatable. The scene effectively captures the essence of personal growth and self-discovery.

Plot: 8

The plot of the scene revolves around Thomas's internal struggle and his interaction with Erlich, which adds depth to his character. It moves the story forward by highlighting Thomas's evolving mindset.

Originality: 9

The scene introduces a fresh take on the tech industry and the struggles of pursuing creative projects. The characters' actions and dialogue feel authentic and engaging.


Character Development

Characters: 9

The characters of Thomas and Erlich are well-developed in this scene, with their vulnerabilities and complexities coming to the forefront. The dialogue and interactions between them feel authentic and engaging.

Character Changes: 7

Thomas experiences a subtle but significant shift in his perspective and priorities during the scene, moving towards a greater sense of self-awareness and purpose.

Internal Goal: 8

Thomas's internal goal in this scene is to find validation and reassurance in his decision to not work for 'assholes' and pursue his own projects. This reflects his deeper need for autonomy and creative fulfillment.

External Goal: 7

Thomas's external goal in this scene is to continue working on building something innovative and meaningful. This reflects the immediate challenge of navigating the tech industry and finding success on his own terms.


Scene Elements

Conflict Level: 5

The conflict in the scene is primarily internal, as Thomas grapples with his decision and his desire for authenticity. The tension is subtle but effective in driving the emotional arc of the scene.

Opposition: 7

The opposition in the scene is strong, as Thomas is faced with conflicting perspectives and choices that challenge his beliefs and values.

High Stakes: 4

The stakes in the scene are more personal and internal, focusing on Thomas's individual journey and his pursuit of meaningful work. While the outcome is important for his character arc, it does not have immediate high stakes.

Story Forward: 7

The scene moves the story forward by deepening Thomas's character development and setting the stage for future decisions and conflicts. It adds depth to the narrative and sets up potential plot developments.

Unpredictability: 7

This scene is unpredictable because of the unexpected turn in Erlich's character, who offers a surprising perspective on Thomas's situation.

Philosophical Conflict: 7

The philosophical conflict in this scene is between working for others and pursuing one's own projects. Erlich's statement challenges Thomas's beliefs about independence and creativity, forcing him to reconsider his choices.


Audience Engagement

Emotional Impact: 8.5

The scene has a strong emotional impact, as it delves into Thomas's inner turmoil and his search for purpose. The vulnerability and honesty displayed by the characters resonate with the audience.

Dialogue: 8.5

The dialogue in the scene is meaningful and impactful, revealing the inner thoughts and emotions of the characters. It drives the scene forward and deepens the relationship between Thomas and Erlich.

Engagement: 9

This scene is engaging because of the tension between the characters and the underlying emotional stakes. The dialogue is sharp and keeps the audience invested in the characters' journey.

Pacing: 8

The pacing of the scene is effective in building tension and suspense, keeping the audience engaged in the characters' emotional journey.


Technical Aspect

Formatting: 8

The scene follows the expected formatting for a dialogue-heavy scene in a screenplay, with clear character actions and dialogue cues.

Structure: 8

The scene follows the expected structure for a character-driven drama, with a clear focus on internal conflicts and character development.


Critique
  • The scene effectively captures a moment of vulnerability for Thomas, showcasing his internal conflict and the unexpected support from Erlich. However, the dialogue could be more impactful. Erlich's line about not wanting to work for 'assholes' feels somewhat clichéd and lacks the punch that could elevate the moment. It would benefit from a more unique phrasing that reflects Erlich's character and their shared experiences.
  • The pacing of the scene is generally good, but it could be enhanced by adding more visual or physical actions that reflect Thomas's emotional state. For instance, showing him fidgeting or staring blankly at the ramen could deepen the audience's understanding of his turmoil.
  • Erlich's character is often portrayed as sarcastic and self-serving, so this moment of insight feels slightly out of character without further context. It would be helpful to provide a brief moment of reflection from Erlich that hints at his own struggles, making his support for Thomas feel more genuine and earned.
  • The transition from the previous scene to this one could be smoother. The abrupt shift from Langdon's fixation on Thomas to Thomas's solitude in the kitchen might confuse the audience. A brief visual or auditory cue could help bridge these two moments more effectively.
  • The scene lacks a clear emotional arc. While it starts with Thomas's conflict and ends with a moment of relief, the journey between these two points could be more pronounced. Adding a moment of hesitation or doubt from Thomas before he feels relieved could enhance the emotional weight of the scene.
Suggestions
  • Revise Erlich's dialogue to make it more distinctive and reflective of his character. Consider using a metaphor or a more personal anecdote that connects to Thomas's situation.
  • Incorporate more physical actions or expressions from Thomas to visually convey his internal conflict. This could include him playing with the ramen package or staring into space.
  • Add a line or two from Erlich that hints at his own struggles or past experiences, making his support feel more authentic and relatable.
  • Consider adding a brief visual or auditory transition from the previous scene to this one, such as a sound of laughter from the Brew Pub fading into the silence of the Hacker House kitchen.
  • Enhance the emotional arc by including a moment of doubt or hesitation from Thomas before he feels relieved, allowing the audience to fully experience his journey from conflict to resolution.



Scene 25 - Revenge is Sweet
INT. BOODLE - DAY

Gavin looks like he is about to have an aneurism as he hangs
up the phone. Jared shakes his head in disbelief.

JARED
He turned down 30 million dollars?

Gavin shakes his head.

GAVIN BELSON
Well, look at it this way -- I have
30 million dollars that I’m going
to use to destroy that sad,
pathetic, stupid prick.

This thought seems to cheer Gavin.
Genres: ["Drama","Comedy"]

Summary In a tense scene at Boodle, Gavin Belson reacts with agitation after a phone call revealing that a 30 million dollar offer has been rejected. Jared expresses disbelief at the absurdity of someone turning down such a sum. However, Gavin finds a silver lining in the rejection, as it ignites a vengeful motivation within him, transforming his frustration into a darkly humorous determination. The scene concludes with Gavin feeling uplifted by his plans for retaliation.
Strengths
  • Intense dialogue
  • Character dynamics
  • Plot advancement
Weaknesses
  • Limited character interaction
  • Lack of visual elements

Ratings
Overall

Overall: 8.5

The scene is well-written, with strong dialogue and character dynamics that drive the plot forward. The intense tone and vengeful sentiment create a compelling atmosphere, making it a standout moment in the screenplay.


Story Content

Concept: 8

The concept of Gavin Belson's ruthless pursuit of revenge adds depth to his character and drives the narrative forward. The scene effectively explores themes of power, ambition, and betrayal.

Plot: 8.5

The plot advances significantly in this scene, as Gavin's decision to destroy his rival sets up a major conflict that will shape the future of the story. The stakes are raised, and the tension is palpable.

Originality: 8

The scene offers a fresh take on the theme of revenge and competition in the business world, with authentic character actions and dialogue.


Character Development

Characters: 8

The characters are well-developed, with Gavin Belson's complex personality shining through in his vengeful actions. Jared's loyalty and disbelief add depth to the scene, creating a compelling dynamic.

Character Changes: 8

Gavin's character undergoes a significant change in this scene, revealing his ruthless and vindictive nature. Jared's loyalty is tested, setting the stage for potential character growth in future scenes.

Internal Goal: 8

Gavin's internal goal in this scene is to seek revenge on someone who has wronged him. This reflects his desire for power and control, as well as his need to assert dominance in the business world.

External Goal: 7

Gavin's external goal is to use his 30 million dollars to destroy his rival. This reflects the immediate challenge he is facing in the business world and his need to maintain his reputation and influence.


Scene Elements

Conflict Level: 9

The conflict in the scene is intense and personal, as Gavin's vendetta against his rival drives the narrative forward. The high stakes and emotional tension heighten the drama and suspense.

Opposition: 7

The opposition in the scene is strong, with Gavin facing a significant challenge that adds conflict and suspense.

High Stakes: 9

The stakes are high in this scene, as Gavin's vendetta threatens to upend the lives of the characters involved. The outcome of this conflict will have significant repercussions for the story.

Story Forward: 9

The scene propels the story forward by introducing a major conflict and raising the stakes for the characters. Gavin's decision to destroy his rival has far-reaching consequences that will shape the narrative.

Unpredictability: 7

This scene is unpredictable because of Gavin's extreme reaction and the unexpected turn of events.

Philosophical Conflict: 7

The philosophical conflict in this scene is between revenge and forgiveness. Gavin's desire to destroy his rival clashes with the idea of letting go and moving on.


Audience Engagement

Emotional Impact: 8.5

The scene evokes strong emotions, with Gavin's vengeful determination and Jared's disbelief resonating with the audience. The intense tone and high stakes create a sense of urgency and suspense.

Dialogue: 9

The dialogue is sharp, engaging, and reveals the characters' motivations and emotions effectively. The exchanges between Gavin and Jared are particularly impactful, adding layers to their relationship.

Engagement: 9

This scene is engaging because of the high stakes, sharp dialogue, and character dynamics.

Pacing: 8

The pacing of the scene contributes to its effectiveness by building tension and highlighting character emotions.


Technical Aspect

Formatting: 8

The scene follows the expected formatting for its genre, with clear scene descriptions and dialogue.

Structure: 8

The scene follows the expected structure for its genre, with clear character motivations and conflict.


Critique
  • The scene effectively captures Gavin Belson's volatile personality and his obsession with power and revenge. However, the transition from the previous scene to this one feels abrupt. The emotional shift from Thomas's moment of relief to Gavin's anger could be better bridged to maintain narrative flow.
  • Jared's disbelief at the 30 million dollar rejection is a strong reaction that highlights the absurdity of the tech world, but it could benefit from more context. Adding a line that reflects Jared's relationship with Gavin or his own stakes in the situation would deepen the emotional impact.
  • Gavin's line about using the 30 million dollars to destroy the person who turned it down is darkly humorous and aligns with his character, but it risks making him seem one-dimensional. Adding a moment of self-reflection or a hint of vulnerability could add depth to his character, making him more relatable despite his flaws.
  • The pacing of the scene is quick, which works for the high-stakes environment of Silicon Valley, but it may leave the audience wanting more insight into Gavin's thought process. A brief internal monologue or a visual cue could enhance the audience's understanding of his motivations.
  • The dialogue is sharp and captures the tone of the tech industry well, but it could be enriched with more subtext. For instance, Gavin could express a deeper frustration about the rejection beyond just wanting revenge, perhaps touching on his insecurities or fears of losing his status.
Suggestions
  • Consider adding a brief moment of reflection for Gavin after he hangs up the phone, allowing the audience to see the weight of the rejection on him before he shifts to his vengeful thoughts.
  • Introduce a line from Jared that hints at his own stakes in the situation, perhaps expressing concern about how this rejection could affect their company or their future, which would add layers to his character.
  • Incorporate a visual element that emphasizes Gavin's emotional state, such as a close-up of his face showing a flicker of vulnerability before he shifts to anger, to create a more complex portrayal.
  • Explore the possibility of Gavin's dialogue containing a hint of self-doubt or fear about the implications of the rejection, which would make his reaction more relatable and grounded.
  • Consider extending the scene slightly to allow for a more gradual build-up to Gavin's declaration of revenge, perhaps by including a moment where he contemplates the implications of the rejection before deciding to retaliate.



Scene 26 - Celebration of New Beginnings
INT. HACKER HOUSE - EVENING

Thomas, Erlich, Big Head and the other hacker house residents
celebrate with pizza and beer.

THOMAS
With this new company we’re really
going to try and do things right.
First order of business -- changing
the name.
(off their looks)
Yes, I know “Pied Piper” sucks.

They all laugh and toast. Just then, Jared enters.

THOMAS (CONT’D)
Oh... Hey. I turned down you guys.
And my decision is final.

JARED
I know. And I respect that. As a
matter of fact, that’s all I can
think about... that you turned down
30 million dollars because you
cared about something. You were
passionate about something. I want
to feel that way. I want to work
for you. I don’t know if Gavin
will give me a good recommendation
but I’m really fucking
TV good at - For educational purposes only
Calling
business development.


Thomas looks around at his group and smiles.

THOMAS
It always sounded like bullshit
when every guy with a start up said
that they wanted “to change the
world” Okay, it still sounds like
bullshit... but maybe we can make
our mark.

The crew are swept away. It is clear that this is what they
all came out to Silicon Valley for.

ERLICH
AND MAKE SOME MONEY!!!

Big cheers from everyone. After a beat Thomas turns to Big
Head and whispers.

THOMAS
We’re going to need some energy
drinks.

BIG HEAD
Big ones.

And as they all start chattering with excitement about the
future we...

FADE OUT. *




TV Calling - For educational purposes only
Genres: ["Drama","Comedy"]

Summary In the hacker house, Thomas and the residents celebrate the launch of their new company with pizza and beer. Thomas contemplates changing the company's name, prompting laughter and a toast. Jared expresses admiration for Thomas's decision to reject a $30 million offer and his desire to contribute to the company. The atmosphere is filled with optimism as Thomas reflects on making a meaningful impact, while Erlich humorously emphasizes the goal of making money. The scene concludes with excitement about future plans, as Thomas and Big Head discuss the need for energy drinks.
Strengths
  • Authentic character interactions
  • Emotional depth
  • Engaging dialogue
Weaknesses
  • Limited external conflict
  • Lack of diversity in character reactions

Ratings
Overall

Overall: 9.2

The scene is well-crafted, engaging, and emotionally resonant. It effectively conveys the characters' excitement and sense of purpose, setting the stage for future developments.


Story Content

Concept: 9

The concept of embracing change, pursuing dreams, and building something meaningful is central to the scene. It resonates with the audience and sets the stage for character development and plot progression.

Plot: 9

The plot advances as the characters make a significant decision to embark on a new venture. It sets up potential conflicts and challenges while offering a glimpse of the characters' aspirations and motivations.

Originality: 9

The scene offers a fresh take on the tech startup genre by exploring themes of purpose and idealism in a humorous and relatable manner. The characters' actions and dialogue feel authentic and original, adding depth to the narrative.


Character Development

Characters: 9.2

The characters are well-defined and relatable, each bringing a unique perspective to the scene. Their interactions and dialogue reveal their personalities and aspirations, laying the foundation for future growth.

Character Changes: 8

The characters experience a subtle shift in their outlook and goals, moving towards a new beginning and a shared vision. Their decision to pursue a new venture marks a significant change in their journey.

Internal Goal: 8

The protagonist's internal goal is to make a meaningful impact and change the world through their startup. This reflects their desire for purpose and fulfillment beyond just financial success.

External Goal: 7

The protagonist's external goal is to rebrand their company and move forward with their startup plans. This reflects their immediate challenge of establishing their identity in the tech industry.


Scene Elements

Conflict Level: 6

While there is a sense of internal conflict and decision-making, the scene primarily focuses on hope, excitement, and unity among the characters. The conflict is more subtle and emotional than overt.

Opposition: 7

The opposition in the scene is strong enough to create tension and conflict, but not overwhelming. Jared's decision to join the protagonist's startup adds complexity and uncertainty to the narrative.

High Stakes: 7

While the decision to start a new venture carries some stakes, the scene focuses more on the characters' personal growth, aspirations, and relationships. The stakes are more internal and emotional than external.

Story Forward: 9

The scene propels the story forward by introducing a new direction for the characters and setting up potential conflicts and challenges. It lays the groundwork for future plot developments and character arcs.

Unpredictability: 7

This scene is unpredictable because of the unexpected turn of events, such as Jared's decision to join the protagonist's startup despite initial rejection. The audience is left wondering about the future dynamics and conflicts within the group.

Philosophical Conflict: 7

The philosophical conflict in this scene is between the protagonist's idealistic vision of changing the world and the cynicism of others who view it as empty rhetoric. This challenges the protagonist's beliefs and values about the impact of their work.


Audience Engagement

Emotional Impact: 9.2

The scene evokes a strong emotional response from the audience, capturing the characters' sense of purpose, camaraderie, and determination. It leaves a lasting impression and sets the stage for future developments.

Dialogue: 9

The dialogue is engaging, authentic, and reflective of the characters' emotions and motivations. It drives the scene forward while providing insight into the characters' relationships and dynamics.

Engagement: 9

This scene is engaging because it combines humor, drama, and character development in a compelling way. The interactions between the characters and their shared goals create a sense of camaraderie and excitement.

Pacing: 8

The pacing of the scene contributes to its effectiveness by balancing dialogue, action, and reflection. The rhythm keeps the audience engaged and invested in the characters' journey.


Technical Aspect

Formatting: 8

The scene follows the expected formatting for its genre, with clear dialogue and scene descriptions. The formatting enhances the readability and flow of the screenplay.

Structure: 8

The scene follows the expected structure for its genre, with a clear setup, conflict, and resolution. The pacing and rhythm contribute to its effectiveness, engaging the audience and advancing the plot.


Critique
  • The scene effectively captures a celebratory atmosphere, which contrasts well with the previous scene's tension surrounding Gavin's frustration. This shift in tone is refreshing and provides a sense of relief for the audience.
  • Thomas's decision to change the name from 'Pied Piper' is a strong character moment that reflects his growth and awareness of the company's branding. However, the dialogue could be more impactful if it included a brief explanation of why he feels the name is inadequate, adding depth to his character's motivations.
  • Jared's admiration for Thomas's decision to turn down the $30 million offer is a pivotal moment that reinforces the theme of passion over profit. However, his dialogue feels slightly disjointed, particularly the line about being 'really fucking TV good at business development.' This could be streamlined for clarity and impact.
  • The camaraderie among the hacker house residents is well portrayed, but the scene could benefit from more specific interactions or jokes that highlight their unique personalities. This would enhance the group's dynamic and make the celebration feel more authentic.
  • The final lines between Thomas and Big Head about needing energy drinks serve as a humorous and relatable conclusion, but they could be expanded to include a playful banter that showcases their friendship and the light-hearted nature of their collaboration.
Suggestions
  • Consider adding a brief moment where Thomas explains why he feels 'Pied Piper' is a bad name, perhaps referencing a personal experience or a humorous anecdote that resonates with the group.
  • Streamline Jared's dialogue to make it more concise and impactful. For example, instead of 'I don’t know if Gavin will give me a good recommendation but I’m really fucking TV good at business development,' you could simplify it to 'I want to work for you. I know I can help.'
  • Incorporate more specific jokes or interactions among the group to highlight their personalities and make the celebration feel more lively and authentic. This could involve playful teasing or references to their past experiences.
  • Expand the final exchange between Thomas and Big Head about energy drinks to include a humorous back-and-forth that showcases their friendship and the excitement of their new venture, perhaps referencing their previous struggles or inside jokes.



Characters in the screenplay, and their arcs:

thomas

Thomas is a determined and ambitious tech entrepreneur, characterized by his passion for innovation and technology. He is a focused and innovative coder, driven by the desire to revolutionize music copyright checks through his project, Pied Piper. Throughout the pilot, he faces numerous challenges and setbacks that test his resolve, revealing his vulnerability to self-doubt and external pressures. His speaking style is direct and assertive, often infused with sarcasm and humor to deflect tension. He communicates with a mix of confidence and earnestness, showcasing his commitment to his work while grappling with frustration over the competitive nature of the tech industry. Thomas is introspective, valuing authenticity and meaningful work, and he often prioritizes his projects over social interactions. His character is marked by a blend of excitement and uncertainty as he navigates high-stakes negotiations and moral dilemmas, ultimately inspiring those around him with his vision and determination.



erlich

Erlich is the flamboyant and eccentric landlord of the hacker house, characterized by his confrontational and somewhat brash demeanor. He possesses a sharp wit and a no-nonsense attitude, often using aggressive sarcasm and technical jargon to assert his expertise and critique the ideas of aspiring entrepreneurs. While he is opportunistic and self-serving, prioritizing his own interests, he also reveals a surprisingly supportive side, offering guidance and insight during moments of vulnerability. His bold personality and eccentric fashion choices make him a memorable figure, providing comic relief and a sense of urgency in tense situations. Overall, Erlich's speaking style is direct, sharp, and laced with sarcasm, reflecting his confidence and assertiveness.



big head

Big Head is a laid-back, somewhat clueless character who embodies a casual and humorous speaking style. He is more concerned with socializing and avoiding conflict than with the challenges of Silicon Valley. Despite his lack of drive compared to Thomas, he is curious and excitable, easily distracted by new ideas and opportunities. His enthusiasm for improving his app, Nip Alert, and attending events like Peter Gregory's talk showcases his optimistic outlook. Big Head is loyal and supportive, providing a contrast to Thomas's ambition and Erlich's opportunism. His tendency to go with the flow and naivete endear him to others, while his distractions, such as attractive women, add a quirky charm to his character. Overall, he contributes to a sense of camaraderie and unity within the group dynamic.



langdon

Langdon is a complex character who embodies a blend of disillusionment and aspiration. Initially portrayed as a sarcastic and witty former publicist, she navigates her nostalgia for the glamorous world of high-profile events while grappling with the superficiality of her current surroundings. As the narrative unfolds, her reflective and wistful nature emerges, revealing a longing for a better life in Silicon Valley, where she hopes to connect with wealthy and intelligent men. Despite feeling out of place in the nerdy environment of the Four Seasons Palo Alto, she maintains an air of sophistication and elegance, often using a composed and refined speaking style laced with sarcasm. Langdon's curiosity and observant nature drive her to question her surroundings and seek deeper meaning in her interactions, particularly with the tech-centric world and characters like Thomas. Her dry wit and sharp eye for detail add depth to her character, making her both relatable and intriguing.



tandy

Tandy is a pragmatic and stylish woman working in a non-profit job, navigating the challenges of low pay and limited opportunities. She is grounded and observant, often baffled by the nerdy atmosphere of the tech-centric environment at the Four Seasons Palo Alto. Tandy reflects on her past choices with a sense of discontent and frustration over her job and financial status, yearning for a more glamorous and meaningful life. Her speaking style is straightforward and matter-of-fact, infused with dry humor and a touch of sarcasm, revealing her candid and regretful nature. As she struggles with feelings of disillusionment and superficiality in her surroundings, Tandy's practical insights and no-nonsense attitude create tension, especially in contrast to Langdon's fascination with the tech world.



gavin belson

Gavin Belson is a powerful and ambitious figure in the tech industry, characterized by his grandiose self-image and commanding presence. He exudes confidence and authority, often using sarcasm and humor to navigate corporate interactions. Gavin is portrayed as a larger-than-life character with a cult-like following among his employees, showcasing a complex personality that oscillates between ruthless ambition and a flawed, vulnerable side. His demeanor is assertive and persuasive, particularly when negotiating deals, revealing a vindictive streak when faced with resistance. Gavin's speaking style is authoritative and self-assured, marked by a blend of sarcasm and condescension, emphasizing his dominance and control in the tech landscape.



jared

Jared is a young business executive characterized by his unwavering support and enthusiasm for Gavin Belson, embodying a cult-like admiration for his boss. He possesses a keen eye for opportunity and is always eager to explore innovative ideas, striving to stay ahead of the curve in the fast-paced business environment. Despite his loyalty and dedication, Jared is often caught off guard by Gavin's ruthless actions, which creates a conflict within him. His speaking style is earnest and respectful, often tinged with disbelief and concern, especially when faced with moral dilemmas. As the narrative unfolds, Jared becomes increasingly reflective, admiring Thomas's courage and passion, which inspires him to consider taking risks and making changes in his own life in search of purpose and fulfillment.



CharacterArcCritiqueSuggestions
thomas Throughout the pilot, Thomas evolves from a frustrated and ambitious coder struggling to be taken seriously in the tech world to a more self-aware entrepreneur who begins to understand the importance of balancing ambition with authenticity. Initially, he is driven solely by his desire to succeed and innovate, often at the expense of his personal relationships and well-being. As he faces rejection and skepticism, he learns to confront his vulnerabilities and the complexities of the tech industry. By the end of the pilot, Thomas is poised to make a significant decision regarding his project and his future, reflecting a newfound understanding of the importance of collaboration and authenticity in his work. While Thomas's character arc presents a compelling journey of growth and self-discovery, it risks becoming predictable if not executed with nuance. His initial frustrations and determination are relatable, but the pilot should ensure that his internal struggles are depicted with depth to avoid falling into common tropes of the 'driven entrepreneur.' Additionally, the stakes of his decisions should be clearly defined to enhance the tension and emotional impact of his journey. To improve Thomas's character arc, consider introducing more diverse challenges that force him to confront his values and priorities beyond just professional success. Incorporating relationships that challenge his worldview or ethical dilemmas that test his commitment to authenticity could add layers to his character. Additionally, showcasing moments of vulnerability where he seeks support or guidance from others could create a more relatable and well-rounded protagonist. Finally, ensure that his growth is reflected in tangible changes in his relationships and decision-making by the end of the pilot, setting the stage for further development in subsequent episodes.
erlich Throughout the pilot, Erlich begins as a confrontational and self-serving figure, often clashing with the other characters due to his aggressive communication style and skepticism towards their ideas. However, as the story progresses, he experiences moments of vulnerability that reveal a more supportive and understanding side. This duality in his character allows him to evolve from merely a brash landlord to a more complex figure who, despite his flaws, genuinely wants to see the aspiring entrepreneurs succeed. By the end of the pilot, Erlich's character arc culminates in a moment where he balances his ambition with a newfound appreciation for collaboration and mentorship, setting the stage for further development in future episodes. While Erlich's character is well-defined and provides comic relief, his arc could benefit from deeper emotional stakes. The transition from a self-serving landlord to a supportive mentor feels somewhat abrupt and lacks sufficient buildup. Additionally, his moments of vulnerability could be more impactful if they were tied to specific events or conflicts that challenge his worldview, rather than appearing as isolated instances. To improve Erlich's character arc, consider introducing a backstory that explains his confrontational nature and fear of failure, which could be revealed through flashbacks or conversations with other characters. This would provide context for his behavior and make his eventual shift towards support and mentorship more believable. Additionally, incorporating a specific conflict or challenge that forces Erlich to confront his own insecurities could create a more compelling narrative and allow for a gradual transformation rather than a sudden change in demeanor.
big head Throughout the pilot, Big Head starts as a carefree and somewhat oblivious character, primarily focused on social interactions and avoiding conflict. As the story progresses, he begins to recognize the importance of ambition and direction in the competitive world of Silicon Valley. By the end of the pilot, Big Head experiences a subtle shift in perspective, realizing that he must balance his laid-back nature with a more proactive approach to his career and friendships. This growth sets the stage for future episodes, where he can further explore his potential and the challenges of the tech industry. While Big Head's character provides comic relief and a sense of balance within the group, his arc lacks significant depth and stakes. His laid-back demeanor, while endearing, may lead to a perception of him as a one-dimensional character. The pilot could benefit from more moments that challenge his carefree attitude, pushing him to confront his own ambitions and fears. Additionally, his loyalty and supportiveness could be tested in a way that forces him to make difficult choices, adding complexity to his character. To improve Big Head's character arc, consider introducing a subplot that places him in a situation where he must choose between his friends and his own aspirations. This could involve a conflict where he has to decide whether to support Thomas's ambitious plans or pursue his own interests, leading to a more dynamic character development. Additionally, incorporating moments of self-reflection or mentorship from other characters could help Big Head realize the value of ambition and drive, allowing for a more nuanced growth throughout the series.
langdon Throughout the pilot, Langdon's character arc transitions from a disillusioned former publicist yearning for her past to a more self-aware individual who begins to embrace the unexpected opportunities in her new environment. Initially, she is cynical and bitter about her circumstances, but as she engages with the tech world and forms connections, she starts to recognize the potential for growth and reinvention. By the end of the pilot, Langdon's journey reflects a shift from longing for the past to embracing the present, setting the stage for her to explore new possibilities and redefine her identity in Silicon Valley. While Langdon's character is well-developed with a rich backstory and relatable motivations, her arc could benefit from clearer stakes and a more defined goal. The pilot introduces her longing for a better life, but it lacks a concrete objective that drives her actions. Additionally, her transformation feels gradual but could be more impactful with specific challenges or conflicts that force her to confront her disillusionment head-on. To enhance Langdon's character arc, consider introducing a specific goal or aspiration that she actively pursues throughout the pilot, such as landing a high-profile client or starting her own venture in the tech world. This would provide her with a tangible motivation and create opportunities for conflict and growth. Additionally, incorporating a mentor or rival character could challenge her perspective and push her to confront her cynicism. Finally, adding moments of vulnerability where she reveals her fears and insecurities could deepen her character and make her journey more relatable to the audience.
tandy Throughout the pilot, Tandy begins as a discontent character, feeling out of place and frustrated with her current situation. As the story progresses, she confronts her feelings of inadequacy and the superficiality of her environment, leading her to seek a more fulfilling path. By the end of the pilot, Tandy takes a bold step towards change, whether that be pursuing a new opportunity, standing up for her values, or redefining her aspirations, setting the stage for her growth in future episodes. Tandy's character arc is compelling, as it captures the struggles of many individuals in a tech-driven society. However, her journey may feel somewhat predictable, as her frustrations and desires are common themes. The tension between her and Langdon is a strong element, but it could benefit from deeper exploration of their relationship dynamics and how they influence each other's growth. To improve Tandy's character arc, consider introducing a pivotal moment that challenges her beliefs or forces her to confront her fears more directly. This could be a significant event or a relationship that pushes her to reevaluate her choices. Additionally, incorporating more interactions with other characters could provide a broader perspective on her struggles and aspirations, allowing for richer character development and more nuanced conflicts. Finally, hinting at her potential for growth in unexpected ways could add depth and intrigue to her journey.
gavin belson Throughout the pilot, Gavin Belson's character arc revolves around his relentless pursuit of power and success in the tech industry. Initially, he is depicted as a confident and assertive mogul willing to take risks to achieve his goals. However, as the narrative unfolds, Gavin's ruthless tactics and vindictive nature begin to alienate those around him, leading to moments of introspection. By the end of the pilot, he faces a critical decision that challenges his values and ambitions, setting the stage for potential growth or further moral decline in future episodes. Gavin Belson's character arc, while compelling, risks becoming one-dimensional if he remains solely a caricature of corporate greed and ambition. The pilot effectively establishes his authority and ruthlessness, but it may benefit from deeper exploration of his vulnerabilities and motivations. Without a more nuanced portrayal, he could easily fall into the trope of the 'evil tech mogul' without any redeeming qualities or complexity. To improve Gavin Belson's character arc, consider incorporating moments that reveal his backstory or personal stakes in the tech industry, allowing the audience to empathize with him. Introducing a subplot that challenges his worldview or forces him to confront the consequences of his actions could add depth. Additionally, showcasing interactions with characters who challenge his authority or present alternative perspectives may create opportunities for growth and transformation, making him a more relatable and multi-dimensional character.
jared Throughout the pilot, Jared begins as a devoted supporter of Gavin Belson, fully immersed in the corporate culture and its demands. As he witnesses Gavin's ruthless behavior and the impact it has on those around him, Jared's admiration starts to wane. He grapples with his loyalty to Gavin versus his growing respect for Thomas's ideals. By the end of the pilot, Jared takes a pivotal step towards self-discovery, deciding to align himself more with Thomas's vision, indicating a shift from blind loyalty to a more principled stance. This sets the stage for his character development in future episodes, as he navigates the complexities of ambition, ethics, and personal fulfillment. Jared's character arc presents a compelling internal conflict, but it risks being overshadowed by the more dominant personalities around him, particularly Gavin and Thomas. His transition from a loyal supporter to a more independent thinker could benefit from clearer motivations and more pronounced moments of realization. Additionally, the pilot may not fully explore the depth of his internal struggle, which could lead to a less impactful character journey. To enhance Jared's character arc, consider incorporating more scenes that showcase his internal conflict, such as moments where he directly confronts Gavin's decisions or engages in deeper conversations with Thomas. Providing flashbacks or personal anecdotes could also help flesh out his backstory and motivations. Additionally, introducing a subplot that highlights the consequences of his choices could create a more dynamic and relatable character journey, allowing viewers to connect with his evolution more profoundly.
Top Correlations and patterns found in the scenes:

Pattern Explanation
High Concept Scores, Low Emotional ImpactScenes with high concept scores (8 or above) frequently show lower scores in Emotional Impact (especially scenes 10, 19, 24). This suggests that while the ideas are strong, the emotional connection with the audience may need strengthening. Consider exploring ways to deepen emotional resonance without sacrificing the conceptual strength.
Sarcasm and Dialogue EffectivenessScenes employing 'Sarcastic' tones (multiple scenes) show a mixed relationship with Dialogue scores. While some scenes score highly, others show lower dialogue scores. This highlights that although sarcasm is frequently used, its effectiveness in these particular scenes is inconsistent. Examine scenes with low dialogue scores despite sarcasm to see if the sarcasm is landing well or obscuring the clarity of the dialogue.
Humor and Conflict/High StakesScenes with 'Humorous' tones frequently score well in Conflict and High Stakes (e.g., scenes 2, 12, 13, 20). This indicates a successful integration of humor that doesn't undermine the tension or stakes of the narrative. Maintain this balance for a consistently engaging experience.
Character Changes and Plot ProgressionThere's a weak correlation between Character Changes and the 'Move Story Forward' score. While some scenes achieve both (like scene 12), others demonstrate that a significant character arc doesn't necessarily propel the plot. Ensure that character development directly contributes to plot progression for a tighter narrative.
Reflective Tones and Lower Emotional Impact/ConflictScenes with 'Reflective' tones (multiple scenes) often score lower in Emotional Impact and Conflict. While reflection is vital, make sure these scenes don't become stagnant. Consider incorporating subtle conflict or emotional intensity within reflective moments to prevent the pacing from slowing down.
Cult-like Admiration and High Overall GradesScenes incorporating the 'Cult-like Admiration' tone (scenes 14 and 16) generally receive high overall grades. Explore further opportunities to utilize this dynamic tone in your storyline, carefully balancing its unsettling potential with its narrative impact.
Strong Concept/Plot and Character DevelopmentA noticeable pattern shows that high scores in Concept and Plot often coincide with high scores in Character development (scenes 3, 4, 5, 6, 7). This is a strength. Continue to develop compelling characters within strong plot structures.
Late-Act Surge in TensionScenes 18, 20, and 25 display elevated scores across several categories (Conflict, High Stakes, Emotional Impact), suggesting a potential build-up of tension in the later acts that significantly contributes to the overall narrative arc. Maintain or heighten this toward the climax for maximum impact.


Writer's Craft Overall Analysis

The screenplay demonstrates a strong foundation in creating engaging narratives with a blend of humor, satire, and compelling character interactions. The writer shows a talent for crafting sharp dialogue and exploring thematic depth within a specific setting (seemingly the tech industry). However, there's room for improvement in refining dialogue, pacing, and overall screenplay structure to maximize the impact of these strengths.

Key Improvement Areas

Dialogue Enhancement
Many analyses praise the dialogue's wit and sharpness, but several suggest further development. The writer should focus on creating more nuanced and conflict-driven conversations that reveal character motivations and advance the plot more efficiently.
Screenplay Structure and Pacing
While individual scenes are engaging, the overall structure and pacing of the screenplay is not explicitly assessed. Suggestions to read 'Save the Cat!' and Syd Field's 'Screenplay' repeatedly highlight the need to refine the overarching narrative flow and scene construction.
Character Development Depth
Though character interactions are strong, some analyses suggest a need for deeper exploration of character motivations and internal conflicts. This could enhance emotional resonance and audience investment in the narrative.

Suggestions

Type Suggestion Rationale
Book 'Save the Cat!' by Blake Snyder This book provides a practical, step-by-step approach to structuring screenplays, addressing pacing, and developing compelling characters. It directly addresses the need for improvement in screenplay structure and character arc development highlighted in multiple scene analyses.
Book 'Screenplay: The Foundations of Screenwriting' by Syd Field This classic text offers a more in-depth exploration of screenplay structure, focusing on the three-act structure and its application to various narrative styles. This complements 'Save the Cat!' by providing a more theoretical grounding for the practical advice within the latter book.
Screenplay Aaron Sorkin's 'The Social Network' This screenplay is repeatedly suggested as inspiration for improving dialogue, character interactions, and pacing within a tech-focused setting. Studying Sorkin's mastery of witty, fast-paced dialogue is directly relevant to the writer's need to enhance their dialogue skills.
Video Interviews with successful screenwriters (e.g., Aaron Sorkin, Diablo Cody, Mike Judge) Watching interviews will give insight into their creative process, techniques for writing sharp dialogue, and approaches to character development, strengthening the writer's understanding of crafting a compelling screenplay.
Video Analysis of 'Silicon Valley' and similar shows Analyzing successful shows set in similar tech environments will provide valuable insights into the effective use of humor, satire, and character dynamics within this specific context.
Stories Similar to this one

Story Explanation
Silicon Valley (TV Series) This HBO series closely mirrors the themes and setting of the screenplay, focusing on a group of software developers navigating the challenges of the tech industry in Silicon Valley. The humor, character dynamics, and the struggles of innovation and entrepreneurship are central to both narratives.
The Social Network (Movie) This film chronicles the founding of Facebook and the complexities of friendship, ambition, and betrayal in the tech world. Similar to the screenplay, it explores the tension between personal relationships and professional aspirations within a fast-paced tech environment.
Halt and Catch Fire (TV Series) Set during the personal computing boom of the 1980s and 1990s, this series delves into the lives of engineers and entrepreneurs striving to innovate. The focus on the struggles of tech visionaries and the competitive atmosphere resonates with the screenplay's portrayal of Thomas and his peers.
Jobs (Movie) This biographical film about Steve Jobs highlights the rise of Apple and the challenges faced by its founders. The themes of innovation, ambition, and the eccentricities of tech figures align with the portrayal of characters like Thomas and the tech culture depicted in the screenplay.
The Big Bang Theory (TV Series) While primarily a sitcom, this show features a group of socially awkward scientists and engineers navigating their personal and professional lives. The humor derived from tech culture and the dynamics between characters reflect similar themes found in the screenplay.
Ready Player One (Book/Movie) This story explores a future dominated by technology and virtual reality, focusing on innovation and the impact of tech on society. The protagonist's journey to create something meaningful in a competitive landscape parallels Thomas's struggles with Pied Piper.
The Imitation Game (Movie) This film tells the story of Alan Turing and his efforts to break the Enigma code during World War II. It shares themes of innovation, the pressure of societal expectations, and the personal sacrifices made for technological advancement, similar to Thomas's journey.
The Internship (Movie) This comedy follows two middle-aged men who secure internships at Google, highlighting the generational clash in the tech industry. The humorous take on tech culture and the challenges of fitting into a fast-paced environment resonate with the screenplay's tone and themes.
The Circle (Book/Movie) This story critiques the tech industry's impact on privacy and personal freedom, focusing on a young woman's experience at a powerful tech company. The exploration of ethical dilemmas in the tech world parallels the challenges faced by Thomas and his peers.

Here are different Tropes found in the screenplay

Trope Trope Details Trope Explanation
The UnderdogThomas, an aspiring entrepreneur, faces skepticism and challenges from established figures like Erlich and Gavin Belson.The Underdog trope involves a character who is at a disadvantage but strives to overcome obstacles. An example is Rocky Balboa in 'Rocky,' where an underprivileged boxer fights against a champion.
Tech Bro CultureThe screenplay showcases the culture of Silicon Valley, including brogrammers and tech enthusiasts who embody the stereotypical tech bro persona.Tech Bro Culture refers to the male-dominated environment in tech industries, often characterized by arrogance and a lack of empathy. This is seen in shows like 'Silicon Valley,' where characters often prioritize tech over personal relationships.
The MentorErlich serves as a mentor figure to Thomas, offering both criticism and unexpected support.The Mentor trope involves a character who guides the protagonist, often providing wisdom or tough love. An example is Mr. Miyagi in 'The Karate Kid,' who teaches Daniel both martial arts and life lessons.
The Big PitchThomas pitches his idea for Pied Piper to Peter Gregory and Gavin Belson, highlighting the high-stakes nature of tech entrepreneurship.The Big Pitch trope involves a character presenting their idea to potential investors, often leading to tension and drama. This is commonly seen in films like 'The Social Network,' where Mark Zuckerberg pitches his vision.
The Eccentric GeniusCharacters like Peter Gregory and Gavin Belson embody the eccentric genius trope, showcasing their unique personalities and unconventional approaches.The Eccentric Genius trope features highly intelligent characters who often behave in unusual or unpredictable ways. An example is Tony Stark in 'Iron Man,' who is brilliant yet socially awkward.
The Love InterestMonica serves as a potential love interest for Thomas, adding a romantic subplot to the narrative.The Love Interest trope involves a character who serves as a romantic counterpart to the protagonist, often influencing their decisions. An example is Elizabeth Bennet in 'Pride and Prejudice,' who challenges Mr. Darcy's views.
The Corporate VillainGavin Belson represents the corporate villain, embodying the ruthless nature of big tech companies.The Corporate Villain trope features a character who represents the negative aspects of corporate culture, often prioritizing profit over ethics. An example is Gordon Gekko in 'Wall Street,' who famously declares that 'greed is good.'
The Misunderstood ArtistThomas's struggles with his project, Pied Piper, reflect the challenges faced by creative individuals in a commercial environment.The Misunderstood Artist trope involves a character whose creative vision is not appreciated or understood by others. An example is Vincent van Gogh in 'Loving Vincent,' who struggles for recognition during his lifetime.
The Competitive EnvironmentThe Hacker House and Boodle campus illustrate a highly competitive atmosphere among tech entrepreneurs.The Competitive Environment trope highlights the rivalry and pressure within a specific setting, often leading to conflict. An example is the cutthroat world of fashion in 'The Devil Wears Prada.'


Theme Theme Details Themee Explanation
Meaningful Innovation vs. Financial SuccessThomas's struggle to balance his passion for creating Pied Piper with the immense pressure to achieve financial success is central. The contrasting philosophies of Peter Gregory (who values innovation over traditional education) and Gavin Belson (who prioritizes profit and image) highlight this conflict.This theme explores the tension between creating something genuinely valuable and succumbing to the pressures of the capitalist system in Silicon Valley. It questions whether true innovation can thrive in an environment obsessed with quick profits and superficial achievements.
Strengthening Meaningful Innovation vs. Financial Success:
Suggestion Type How to Strengthen the Theme
Character Arc Develop Thomas's internal conflict more explicitly. Show him grappling not just with financial insecurity, but with the ethical implications of selling out. Include scenes where he weighs the allure of massive wealth against his desire to create something truly impactful. His internal monologue could reveal his doubts and anxieties, highlighting the moral dilemma at the heart of the theme.
Dialogue - Scene 3, 18, 20 Refine the dialogue to directly contrast the language used to describe “meaningful innovation” versus “financial success.” Have characters use words and phrases that embody each ideal. For example, Gavin Belson might focus on metrics and market share, while Thomas uses words like “impact,” “legacy,” and “art.” This direct contrast will make the theme more apparent.
Visual - Scene 1, 15, 22 Visually juxtapose the flashy, superficial world of Silicon Valley's financial success (Scene 1, Gavin's office in Scene 15) with the grittier, less glamorous reality of creating something meaningful (Hacker House in Scene 2, the unremarkable Palo Alto streets in Scene 22). This visual contrast will enhance the thematic tension.
Story Arc Introduce a subplot that directly challenges the assumption that financial success equals meaning. Perhaps a successful entrepreneur later in the film reveals a deep dissatisfaction with their achievements despite massive wealth. This subplot could provide a cautionary tale and further emphasize the film's central theme.
Dialogue & Action - Scene 26 The final scene's celebration should not just focus on the financial success but emphasize the collective joy of creating something meaningful. Add specific dialogue where characters express their satisfaction in the project’s impact, contrasting it with the emptiness they witnessed at Boodle. Their actions – a more collaborative and less materialistic celebration - should visually underscore this shift in priorities.
The Illusion of Silicon ValleyThe montage of Silicon Valley, alongside the portrayals of Boodle's superficial culture and the brogrammers' mockery, exposes the gap between the idealized image of the tech industry and its often-cynical reality. Langdon and Tandy's outsider perspective reinforces this.This theme critiques the idealized and often unrealistic portrayal of Silicon Valley, revealing the underlying anxieties and superficiality beneath the surface of technological advancement.
Friendship and CommunityThe relationships between Thomas and his Hacker House roommates, particularly Erlich, show the importance of support and camaraderie in overcoming obstacles. The dynamic between Thomas and Big Head also highlights the value of friendship in navigating the challenges of the industry.This theme underscores the human element within the competitive tech world, showcasing the power of supportive relationships in the face of adversity.
The Value of AuthenticityThomas's unwavering commitment to his project, despite setbacks and mockery, underscores the importance of staying true to one's vision and resisting the temptation to compromise integrity for financial gain.This theme emphasizes the importance of perseverance and maintaining authenticity in a world that often rewards conformity and superficiality.
Disillusionment and Self-DiscoveryThomas's journey is one of self-discovery, marked by moments of doubt, frustration, and ultimate clarity regarding his values and aspirations. His experiences challenge his initial perceptions of success and force him to re-evaluate his priorities.This theme explores the emotional toll of pursuing ambitious goals, highlighting the process of self-reflection and personal growth that often accompanies significant life decisions.



Screenwriting Resources on Themes

Articles

Site Description
Studio Binder Movie Themes: Examples of Common Themes for Screenwriters
Coverfly Improving your Screenplay's theme
John August Writing from Theme

YouTube Videos

Title Description
Story, Plot, Genre, Theme - Screenwriting Basics Screenwriting basics - beginner video
What is theme Discussion on ways to layer theme into a screenplay.
Thematic Mistakes You're Making in Your Script Common Theme mistakes and Philosophical Conflicts
Voice Analysis
Summary: The writer's voice is sharply witty, satirical, and character-driven. It blends fast-paced, often cynical humor with insightful commentary on the tech industry, its culture, and the human ambitions within it. The dialogue is snappy and realistic, capturing the casual banter of tech professionals while also conveying complex power dynamics and internal conflicts.
Voice Contribution The writer's voice contributes to the script by establishing a distinct and engaging tone. The satire keeps the narrative from being overly sentimental or preachy, while the witty dialogue and character interactions maintain audience interest and provide depth to the themes of ambition, innovation, and the ethical complexities of the tech world. The fast-paced narrative mirrors the frenetic energy of Silicon Valley itself, creating a sense of urgency and excitement.
Best Representation Scene 2 - Tensions in Hacker House
Best Scene Explanation Scene 2, set in the Hacker House, best encapsulates the writer's voice. It introduces the core characters and their dynamic relationships, showcasing the fast-paced, witty dialogue and satirical portrayal of the tech world. The tension between Thomas's ambition and Erlich's skepticism, combined with the humorous interruptions from Big Head and Dinesh, perfectly balances comedy and conflict, establishing the show's central themes and tone from the outset. The scene's sharp dialogue, fast-paced narrative, and satirical take on the tech industry are hallmarks of the writer's unique style throughout the entire screenplay.
Originality
  • Overall originality score: 8.5
  • Overall originality explanation: The screenplay presents a fresh and humorous take on the tech industry, effectively blending authentic character interactions with sharp, witty dialogue. It explores themes of entrepreneurship, education, and the absurdities of Silicon Valley culture through unique character dynamics and situations. The incorporation of diverse perspectives, such as the clash between traditional values and modern innovation, adds depth and originality to the narrative.
  • Most unique situations: The most unique situations in the screenplay are the satirical portrayal of tech industry stereotypes, such as the 'brogrammer' culture, the humorous exploration of the struggles faced by aspiring entrepreneurs, and the unexpected moments of camaraderie and support among characters in a competitive environment. Additionally, the use of unconventional elements like the sacbut instrument and the humorous critique of corporate culture further enhance the screenplay's originality.
  • Overall unpredictability score: 7
  • Overall unpredictability explanation: While the screenplay follows a familiar structure of tech startup narratives, it introduces unexpected twists and character developments that keep the audience engaged. The unpredictability arises from the characters' interactions, the varying responses to challenges, and the surprising offers made to Thomas, which create tension and intrigue. However, certain plot points, such as the eventual success of Pied Piper, align with typical genre expectations, slightly reducing the overall unpredictability.
Goals and Philosophical Conflict
internal GoalsThroughout the script, Thomas's internal goals evolve from seeking validation in the tech industry to desiring autonomy and a sense of purpose. Initially focused on impressing peers and securing a position in Silicon Valley, he gradually becomes more introspective about his potential impact and what defines success beyond financial gains.
External Goals Thomas's external goals shift from merely securing a place in the industry to establishing his startup, Pied Piper. As the narrative progresses, his focus expands to include making impactful decisions about partnerships and the company’s vision while navigating external pressures from investors and peers.
Philosophical Conflict The screenplay presents the conflict between Innovation vs. Tradition, as Thomas grapples with the expectations of the established tech industry while pursuing unconventional ideas and challenging the norms regarding education and entrepreneurship.


Character Development Contribution: The evolution of Thomas's goals reflects his growth from a naive, validation-seeking individual to a more self-aware entrepreneur who understands the importance of aligning his work with personal values. His journey showcases the internal struggles and transformations that define him.

Narrative Structure Contribution: The interplay between internal and external goals creates a dynamic narrative structure that advances Thomas’s character arc while introducing escalating external pressures from the tech industry. This tension drives the plot forward and provides pivotal moments for character revelations.

Thematic Depth Contribution: The exploration of conflicting goals and philosophical dilemmas enriches the thematic depth of the screenplay, focusing on the contemporary dilemmas faced in the tech industry, such as the conflict between authenticity and commercialism, the pursuit of personal passion versus societal expectations, and the reality of achieving success.


Screenwriting Resources on Goals and Philosophical Conflict

Articles

Site Description
Creative Screenwriting How Important Is A Character’s Goal?
Studio Binder What is Conflict in a Story? A Quick Reminder of the Purpose of Conflict

YouTube Videos

Title Description
How I Build a Story's Philosophical Conflict How do you build philosophical conflict into your story? Where do you start? And how do you develop it into your characters and their external actions. Today I’m going to break this all down and make it fully clear in this episode.
Endings: The Good, the Bad, and the Insanely Great By Michael Arndt: I put this lecture together in 2006, when I started work at Pixar on Toy Story 3. It looks at how to write an "insanely great" ending, using Star Wars, The Graduate, and Little Miss Sunshine as examples. 90 minutes
Tips for Writing Effective Character Goals By Jessica Brody (Save the Cat!): Writing character goals is one of the most important jobs of any novelist. But are your character's goals...mushy?
World Building
  • Physical environment: The screenplay is set primarily in Silicon Valley, California, encompassing a range of locations from opulent settings like the Four Seasons Palo Alto and luxury shuttle vans to more humble environments such as a dilapidated hacker house in East Palo Alto and a bustling Brew Pub. The physical spaces reflect a stark contrast between wealth and relative poverty, highlighting the inequalities within the tech industry. The visual landscape includes modern tech offices, sprawling corporate campuses with recreational facilities, and the mundane streets of Palo Alto. Specific locations like Google and Facebook are mentioned, grounding the story in the real-world tech landscape.
  • Culture: The dominant culture is that of Silicon Valley's tech industry: a fast-paced, highly competitive, and often cutthroat environment characterized by innovation, ambition, and a strong emphasis on disruption. There is a counter-culture present in the hacker house, representing a more independent and less conformist approach to technology and entrepreneurship. A significant cultural element is the clash between the values of traditional academia (represented by the heckler at Peter Gregory's speech) and the self-taught, entrepreneurial spirit celebrated in Silicon Valley. The culture is also marked by a degree of superficiality and the pursuit of wealth and status, as seen in the scenes featuring the yoga studio and the social interactions at the Four Seasons.
  • Society: The societal structure is largely hierarchical, with a clear power dynamic between established tech giants and aspiring entrepreneurs. The wealth disparity between those at the top of the industry and those struggling to make a living is a recurring theme. Competition is fierce, and success is often measured in terms of financial gain and market dominance. The societal expectations placed upon individuals, particularly the pressure to conform to the prevailing culture of ambition and innovation, are also explored. The hacker house serves as an alternative societal structure, valuing independence and collaboration over corporate hierarchy.
  • Technology: Technology is omnipresent and central to the narrative. The screenplay showcases a range of technologies, from cutting-edge compression algorithms and futuristic personal mobility transporters to simple laptops and coding environments. The advancements in technology drive the plot, with the Pied Piper software serving as the central technological innovation that shapes the characters’ experiences and actions. The film demonstrates both the potential of technology for groundbreaking innovation and its capacity for misuse and manipulation.
  • Characters influence: The world elements significantly shape the characters' experiences and actions. The intense competition and pressure to succeed in Silicon Valley fuel the characters' ambition and drive but also lead to stress, anxiety, and ethical dilemmas. The characters' backgrounds and personalities are shaped by the prevailing culture, with some embracing the entrepreneurial spirit wholeheartedly while others grapple with the challenges of navigating a rapidly changing landscape. The contrast between the hacker house's independent culture and the corporate world impacts characters' decisions and interactions.
  • Narrative contribution: The world-building contributes to the narrative by establishing a compelling setting that both grounds the story and creates a sense of heightened drama. The contrast between different environments (opulent offices versus a rundown hacker house) and cultures (corporate ambition versus independent creativity) drives the conflict and shapes the characters' journeys. The setting also provides a backdrop for comedic moments and character interactions, enriching the narrative.
  • Thematic depth contribution: The world-building contributes to the thematic depth of the screenplay by exploring the complexities of the tech industry, examining themes of innovation, ambition, wealth inequality, ethical dilemmas, and the human cost of pursuing success. The contrasting environments and cultures allow the screenplay to explore different perspectives on these themes, highlighting the challenges and opportunities presented by the rapidly evolving tech world. The clash between the idealistic notion of 'changing the world' and the harsh realities of the business world adds further thematic depth.
Story Engine Analysis

central conflict

Thomas struggles to balance his passion for innovation with the pressures of the tech industry and the expectations of those around him.

primary motivations

  • Thomas's desire to create a meaningful product with Pied Piper.
  • Erlich's ambition to profit from tech innovations.
  • Big Head's fear of being replaced and desire for validation.
  • Dinesh and Jin Yang's aspirations for success in the tech world.

catalysts

  • The interest from Gavin Belson in Pied Piper.
  • Peter Gregory's speech advocating for innovation and dropouts.
  • The competitive atmosphere in Silicon Valley that pressures Thomas.

barriers

  • High rental prices and the threat of eviction from Hacker House.
  • Skepticism from Erlich and others about the viability of Pied Piper.
  • Thomas's self-doubt and fear of failure in the tech industry.

themes

  • The tension between creativity and commercialism in the tech industry.
  • The impact of peer pressure and competition on individual aspirations.
  • The search for identity and purpose in a rapidly changing environment.

stakes

The potential success or failure of Pied Piper could determine Thomas's future in the tech industry and his personal sense of fulfillment.

uniqueness factor

The blend of humor and drama in portraying the eccentricities of Silicon Valley culture and the tech startup environment.

audience hook

The relatable struggles of young entrepreneurs navigating the challenges of innovation, competition, and self-doubt.

paradoxical engine or bisociation

The juxtaposition of high-stakes business decisions with the absurdity of tech culture, highlighting the contrast between serious ambitions and the often ridiculous nature of the industry.

paradoxical engine or bisociation 2

The tension between the desire for meaningful innovation and the superficiality of tech trends, illustrating how personal values clash with industry norms.


Engine: Gemini

Screenplay Rating:

Highly Recommend

Executive Summary

The Silicon Valley pilot screenplay is a highly promising project with a strong comedic voice, well-developed characters, and a compelling premise. The pilot effectively establishes its unique world and characters, leaving the audience eager for more. While some minor improvements in pacing and character depth could enhance the script, its strengths significantly outweigh its weaknesses, making it a highly recommended pilot for production.

Strengths
  • The character development is exceptional. Each character is distinct, memorable, and possesses compelling quirks that contribute to the comedic tone. Their interactions are both humorous and reveal their inner complexities. The pilot successfully establishes their personalities and relationships, creating a strong ensemble cast. high ( Scene 2   Scene 3   Scene 5   Scene 9   )
  • The screenplay masterfully satirizes the Silicon Valley culture and its absurdities. The portrayal of the tech world is both hilarious and insightful, offering a critique of its excesses while capturing the energy and ambition that drives its inhabitants. high ( Scene 1   Scene 6   Scene 7   )
  • The central conflict—Thomas's struggle to balance his idealistic vision with the harsh realities of the tech world—is compelling and consistently drives the narrative. The pilot successfully establishes the stakes and sets up a compelling premise for future episodes. high ( Scene 7   Scene 12   Scene 18   Scene 26   )
  • The dialogue is witty, sharp, and often hilarious. It feels natural and authentic, mirroring real-life interactions within the tech world while maintaining a consistently comedic tone. medium ( Scene 19   )
  • The pacing is generally well-managed, effectively balancing moments of humor with character development and plot progression. The pilot creates an engaging rhythm that keeps the audience invested in the story. medium ( Scene 1   Scene 23   )
Areas of Improvement
  • The female characters, while present, feel somewhat underdeveloped. Expanding their roles and motivations beyond their relationships with the male characters would add depth and complexity to the series. medium ( Scene 10   Scene 21   Scene 22   )
  • The ending feels somewhat abrupt and could benefit from a more satisfying resolution to the central conflict. Showing Thomas's choice more conclusively and having an immediate consequence to his decision would make it more impactful. medium ( Scene 20   )
  • Some scenes involving Gavin Belson could be tightened for pacing. The scenes are funny, but could benefit from being more concise to keep the plot moving forward. low ( Scene 14   Scene 15   Scene 16   Scene 17   )
MissingElements
  • A more detailed backstory for some characters, particularly Thomas, would enhance their motivations and add emotional weight to their struggles. Flashbacks or earlier scenes hinting at his previous life and motivations would add depth. medium
NotablePoints
  • The opening montage sets the tone perfectly, establishing the vibrant, chaotic nature of Silicon Valley. high ( Scene 1   )
  • The introduction of Peter Gregory is brilliantly executed, showcasing his eccentric yet perceptive nature. high ( Scene 7   )
  • The final scene leaves the audience wanting more, setting up promising storylines for the series. high ( Scene 26   )
Blind Spots
  • Female Character Development The script's focus is heavily on the male characters, particularly Thomas. The women are present, but their stories and motivations are underdeveloped, mostly serving as reactive characters in relation to the male protagonists. This is particularly evident in scenes 10, 21, and 22, where the female characters' narratives are overshadowed by the male-dominated tech world. medium

Engine: GPT4

Screenplay Rating:

Highly Recommend

Executive Summary

The pilot episode of 'Silicon Valley' effectively captures the essence of the tech startup culture through sharp humor and relatable character arcs. The screenplay showcases a strong narrative structure, with well-defined character motivations and conflicts that resonate with the audience. The pacing is generally effective, though some scenes could benefit from tighter editing. Overall, the screenplay presents a compelling and engaging story that balances comedy with insightful commentary on the tech industry.

Strengths
Areas of Improvement
MissingElements
NotablePoints
Blind Spots
  • Character Depth Some characters, particularly the female ones, lack depth and development, making them feel like stereotypes rather than fully realized individuals. For example, the yoga studio scenes introduce female characters but do not integrate them into the main narrative effectively. high
Amateur Giveaways
  • Stereotypical Characters Certain characters, like the brogrammers, lean heavily into stereotypes, which can detract from the overall authenticity of the narrative. This could be improved by adding more nuanced traits and motivations. medium

Engine: Claude

Screenplay Rating:

Recommend

Executive Summary

The "Silicon Valley" TV pilot screenplay is a well-crafted, character-driven comedy that offers a sharp, insightful exploration of the tech industry and the challenges faced by aspiring entrepreneurs. The narrative is consistently engaging, with a strong ensemble cast, well-defined character arcs, and a solid balance of humor, drama, and thematic depth. The screenplay's strengths lie in its relatable characters, multi-layered conflicts, and its ability to both celebrate and satirize the Silicon Valley ecosystem. While there are a few areas that could be improved, such as pacing and development of secondary characters, the overall quality of the writing and the unique perspective it brings to the tech world make this a highly compelling and marketable pilot that could launch a successful TV series.

Strengths
  • The screenplay establishes a well-rounded and engaging ensemble of characters, each with their own distinct personalities, motivations, and relationships. This creates a rich and believable world that the audience can easily immerse themselves in. high ( Scene 2 (EXT. EAST PALO ALTO - HACKER HOUSE)   Scene 4 (EXT. BOODLE - MOMENTS LATER)   )
  • The screenplay effectively balances humor and drama, seamlessly transitioning between moments of levity and more serious, thematic explorations. This creates a well-rounded and engaging narrative that keeps the audience invested. high ( Scene 6 (INT. FOUR SEASONS PALO ALTO - EVENING)   Scene 7 (EXT. FOUR SEASONS PALO ALTO - LATER)   )
  • The character of Monica is a standout, serving as an intriguing foil to the protagonist Thomas. Her brief but impactful interactions with Thomas hint at a deeper, more complex relationship that could be further explored in the series. medium ( Scene 19 (EXT. HACKER HOUSE - EVENING)   )
  • The screenplay effectively captures the unique culture, language, and challenges of the tech industry, providing a fresh and authentic perspective that sets it apart from other stories in the genre. high
  • The character arc of Thomas, the protagonist, is well-developed, as he navigates the difficult decision of choosing between financial security and the pursuit of his passion project. This internal conflict is a driving force throughout the screenplay. high ( Scene 24 (INT. HACKER HOUSE - NIGHT)   )
Areas of Improvement
MissingElements
  • While the screenplay effectively captures the essence of the tech industry, it could potentially benefit from a deeper exploration of the broader societal and economic implications of the industry's rapid growth and influence. medium
NotablePoints
  • The character of Gavin Belson, the antagonist, is a standout, with his larger-than-life personality and his unwavering ambition serving as a compelling foil to the protagonist's more grounded approach. His interactions with Thomas are particularly engaging. high ( Scene 15 (INT. BOODLE - GAVIN BELSON'S OFFICE - CONTINUOUS)   )
  • The scene featuring the phone conversation between Thomas and Gavin Belson is a highlight, showcasing the sharp, witty dialogue and the high-stakes conflict at the heart of the narrative. high ( Scene 20 (INT. GAVIN BELSON'S OFFICE - DAY)   )
  • The finale of the pilot episode effectively sets up the potential for future storylines and character development, leaving the audience invested in the characters and their ongoing journey. high ( Scene 26 (INT. HACKER HOUSE - EVENING)   )
Blind Spots
  • Lack of Diversity While the screenplay does feature a diverse ensemble of characters, the main protagonist and the key decision-makers in the story are primarily white men. The screenplay could potentially benefit from a more balanced representation of gender, race, and ethnic diversity, especially in the central roles. medium
Amateur Giveaways
  • Underdeveloped Secondary Characters As noted in the areas of improvement, the secondary characters, such as Erlich and the other housemates, could be further developed to provide more depth and nuance to their motivations and narrative arcs. This would help create a more well-rounded and compelling ensemble. medium

Engine: DeepSeek

Screenplay Rating:

Recommend

Executive Summary

The screenplay for 'Silicon Valley' is a sharp, witty, and engaging pilot that effectively sets up the world of tech startups with a mix of humor and drama. It introduces a compelling protagonist, Thomas, and surrounds him with a colorful cast of characters. The narrative is well-paced, balancing technical jargon with accessible humor, and sets up multiple conflicts and opportunities for growth. The script's strengths lie in its character dynamics, humor, and thematic depth, though it could benefit from more nuanced female characters and clearer stakes in some scenes.

Strengths
Areas of Improvement
MissingElements
  • A clearer explanation of Pied Piper's technology and its potential impact would help ground the story. medium
  • More backstory on Thomas and his journey to Silicon Valley would deepen his character. medium
  • The stakes of Thomas's decision between Boodle and Peter Gregory could be more clearly defined. high
  • A stronger antagonist or external conflict could elevate the narrative tension. medium
  • More diverse and developed female characters would balance the predominantly male cast. high
NotablePoints
Blind Spots
  • Gender Representation The female characters are largely stereotypical and lack depth, focusing more on their looks and romantic prospects than their own ambitions or skills. high
  • Technical Detail The script sometimes glosses over the technical aspects of Pied Piper, which could alienate tech-savvy viewers or make the stakes less clear. medium
Amateur Giveaways
  • Over-the-Top Antagonist Gavin Belson's villainy is exaggerated to the point of caricature, which can undermine the realism of the story. low
  • Stereotypical Characters Some secondary characters, like the brogrammers, rely on clichés rather than nuanced portrayals. medium
Memorable lines in the script:

Scene Number Line
20GAVIN BELSON: I'm willing to give this dickhead thirty million dollars if I never have to talk to him again!
3THOMAS: Changing the world, one crappy app at a time.
6PETER GREGORY: The true value of snake-oil is intangible as well.
25Gavin Belson: Well, look at it this way -- I have 30 million dollars that I’m going to use to destroy that sad, pathetic, stupid prick.
8Erlich: I KNOW WHAT BINARY IS!!! Jesus! I’ve memorized the hexadecimal times tables! Ask me what 9 times F is!! I don’t need you to tell me what’s binary and I don’t NEED you thinking about soup.