The big short
A group of outsiders, armed with unconventional methods, spot the flaws in the housing market and bet against the impending financial collapse.
See other logline suggestionsOverview
Unique Selling Point
What sets 'The Big Short' apart is its unique narrative structure that combines real-life events with a satirical tone, making complex financial concepts understandable to a general audience. The use of celebrity cameos to explain financial jargon adds a layer of entertainment while maintaining the film's educational value. This screenplay not only tells a story of financial collapse but also critiques the systemic failures that allowed it to happen, resonating with audiences concerned about economic justice.
AI Verdict & Suggestions
Ratings are subjective. So you get different engines' ratings to compare.
Hover over verdict cards for Executive Summaries
Highly Recommend
Recommend
Highly Recommend
Story Facts
Genres:Setting: 1979-2008, New York City and various locations across the United States
Themes: Moral Corruption and Systemic Failure in Finance, The Human Cost of Greed and Recklessness, The Power of Individual Insight and Conscience, The Failure of Regulation and Oversight
Conflict & Stakes: The main conflict revolves around the characters' struggle to navigate the corrupt financial system and profit from the impending housing market collapse, with significant financial and ethical stakes involved.
Mood: Tense and urgent, with moments of dark humor.
Standout Features:
- Unique Hook: The film's focus on the real-life events leading to the 2008 financial crisis, told through the eyes of unconventional characters.
- Plot Twist: The realization that the financial system is built on a house of cards, leading to the eventual collapse.
- Innovative Ideas: The use of humor and unconventional storytelling techniques to explain complex financial concepts.
- Distinctive Settings: The contrast between the high-stakes world of finance and the personal lives of the characters.
Comparable Scripts: The Big Short, Margin Call, Too Big to Fail, Inside Job, Wall Street, Billions, The Wolf of Wall Street, Enron: The Smartest Guys in the Room, The Smartest Guys in the Room
Screenplay Video
The video is a bit crude as the tool is still Alpha code. Contact us if there's a problem or with suggestions.
Share Your Analysis
Sharing
Share URL:
Script Level Analysis
This section delivers a top-level assessment of the screenplay’s strengths and weaknesses — covering overall quality (P/C/R/HR), character development, emotional impact, thematic depth, narrative inconsistencies, and the story’s core philosophical conflict. It helps identify what’s resonating, what needs refinement, and how the script aligns with professional standards.
Screenplay Insights
Breaks down your script along various categories.
Story Critique
Characters
Explores the depth, clarity, and arc of the main and supporting characters.
Emotional Analysis
Breaks down the emotional journey of the audience across the script.
Goals and Philosophical Conflict
Logic & Inconsistencies
Scene Analysis
All of your scenes analyzed individually and compared, so you can zero in on what to improve.
Analysis of the Scene Percentiles
- High concept rating (98.56) indicates a strong and engaging premise that is likely to capture audience interest.
- Excellent dialogue rating (94.83) suggests that the screenplay features compelling and authentic conversations, enhancing character development.
- Strong character changes (93.60) imply that characters undergo significant growth, which can resonate well with viewers.
- The originality score (57.79) is relatively low, suggesting the need for more unique elements or twists to differentiate the screenplay from others.
- Formatting score (49.68) indicates potential issues with adherence to industry standards, which could affect readability and professionalism.
- Emotional impact (63.51) could be enhanced to create a deeper connection with the audience, possibly through more poignant character arcs or situations.
The writer appears to be more intuitive, with strengths in dialogue and character development, while showing lower scores in concept and originality.
Balancing Elements- Focus on enhancing the originality and emotional impact to complement the strong dialogue and character development.
- Improve formatting to ensure the screenplay meets industry standards, which can help in gaining attention from producers and agents.
- Consider refining the plot structure to elevate the overall pacing and unpredictability, creating a more engaging narrative.
Intuitive
Overall AssessmentThe screenplay shows strong potential due to its engaging concept and well-crafted dialogue, but it would benefit from improvements in originality, formatting, and emotional depth to reach its full impact.
How scenes compare to the Scripts in our Library
| Percentile | Before | After | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scene Overall | 8.6 | 74 | Casablanca : 8.5 | the black list (TV) : 8.7 |
| Scene Concept | 8.7 | 96 | Vice : 8.6 | Inception : 8.8 |
| Scene Plot | 8.4 | 83 | the boys (TV) : 8.3 | the dark knight rises : 8.5 |
| Scene Characters | 8.5 | 56 | True Blood : 8.4 | Casablanca : 8.6 |
| Scene Emotional Impact | 8.0 | 50 | fight Club : 7.9 | Erin Brokovich : 8.1 |
| Scene Conflict Level | 8.1 | 71 | a few good men : 8.0 | the boys (TV) : 8.2 |
| Scene Dialogue | 8.5 | 93 | a few good men : 8.4 | Easy A : 8.6 |
| Scene Story Forward | 8.6 | 80 | Casablanca : 8.5 | Rambo : 8.7 |
| Scene Character Changes | 7.7 | 82 | Dr. Jekyll and Mr Hyde : 7.6 | Solaris : 7.8 |
| Scene High Stakes | 8.4 | 79 | Vice : 8.3 | Casablanca : 8.5 |
| Scene Unpredictability | 7.56 | 58 | KILLING ZOE : 7.55 | American Hustle : 7.57 |
| Scene Internal Goal | 8.08 | 57 | The Wizard of oz : 8.07 | Blade Runner : 8.09 |
| Scene External Goal | 7.73 | 87 | Lethal Weapon : 7.72 | Avatar : 7.74 |
| Scene Originality | 8.77 | 61 | Erin Brokovich : 8.76 | Casablanca : 8.78 |
| Scene Engagement | 8.98 | 63 | Titanic : 8.97 | Vice : 8.99 |
| Scene Pacing | 8.48 | 79 | Casablanca : 8.47 | Interstellar : 8.49 |
| Scene Formatting | 8.15 | 51 | the pursuit of happyness : 8.14 | There's something about Mary : 8.17 |
| Script Structure | 8.15 | 58 | the pursuit of happyness : 8.14 | Blade Runner : 8.17 |
| Script Characters | 8.00 | 55 | Her : 7.90 | Erin Brokovich : 8.10 |
| Script Premise | 8.00 | 41 | fight Club : 7.90 | glass Onion Knives Out : 8.10 |
| Script Structure | 8.40 | 90 | Casablanca : 8.30 | Blade Runner : 8.50 |
| Script Theme | 8.40 | 70 | the dark knight rises : 8.30 | face/off : 8.50 |
| Script Visual Impact | 7.20 | 16 | Labyrinth : 7.10 | The Good place release : 7.30 |
| Script Emotional Impact | 8.40 | 84 | fight Club : 8.30 | Casablanca : 8.50 |
| Script Conflict | 7.60 | 56 | Casablanca : 7.50 | severance (TV) : 7.70 |
| Script Originality | 8.30 | 67 | Rambo : 8.20 | Casablanca : 8.40 |
| Overall Script | 8.43 | 87 | face/off : 8.42 | Deadpool : 8.45 |
Other Analyses
This section looks at the extra spark — your story’s voice, style, world, and the moments that really stick. These insights might not change the bones of the script, but they can make it more original, more immersive, and way more memorable. It’s where things get fun, weird, and wonderfully you.
Unique Voice
Writer's Craft
Memorable Lines
World Building
Unique Voice
Writer's Craft
Memorable Lines
World Building
Script•o•Scope
Pass / Consider / Recommend Analysis
Gemini
Executive Summary
- The screenplay brilliantly employs non-traditional narrative devices like celebrity explanations to break down complex financial concepts and maintain audience engagement. These segments enhance the film's accessibility and unique voice. high ( Scene 7 (16) Scene 16 (40) Scene 19 (43) Scene 43 (109) )
- Character development is deeply considered, with each character's quirks and motivations driving the narrative forward. Their journeys are compelling, reflecting various responses to the crisis, and enhancing thematic resonance. high ( Scene 12 (12) Scene 11 (27) Scene 28 (28) Scene 13 (33) )
- The screenplay's use of voiceover narration is both effective and entertaining. It adds context, clarifies complex financial issues, and contributes to the film's wry humor and overall tone. medium ( Scene 1 (1) Scene 2 (3) Scene 57 (157) )
- The dialogue is sharp, witty, and often darkly humorous. It successfully conveys the characters' personalities and attitudes towards the crisis, further enriching the story. medium ( Scene 29 (70) Scene 35 (100) Scene 44 (110) )
- The screenplay effectively interweaves multiple storylines, providing a multifaceted perspective on the financial crisis and building suspense as the various characters' paths converge. high
- In a few instances, the screenplay could benefit from a slightly faster pace. Certain scenes with extended character introspection or repetitive dialogue could be shortened or restructured to maintain momentum. low ( Scene 13 (13) Scene 32 (84) )
- Some secondary characters could use more development. While their interactions contribute to the narrative, more background or personal details could add depth and further engage the audience. low
- While the screenplay effectively portrays the motivations of the key players in the financial crisis, a more detailed exploration of the regulatory failures and political factors that contributed to the crisis might enhance the film's scope and impact. medium
- The screenplay's use of irony and satire is particularly effective. It successfully highlights the absurdity of the situation and the moral failings of those involved, adding layers of complexity to the narrative. high
- The screenplay achieves a remarkable balance between educating the audience about complex financial concepts and engaging them emotionally through the characters' struggles and triumphs. It manages to be both intellectually stimulating and deeply human. high
- Oversimplification of complex financial mechanisms While the screenplay uses clever devices to explain complex financial instruments, some nuances and interconnectedness of the financial instruments might be lost to the casual viewer. For example, while CDOs and MBSs are explained, the intricacies of their creation and the role of various financial institutions are simplified for narrative flow. medium
GPT4
Executive Summary
- The screenplay opens with a strong hook that introduces the financial world in an engaging and humorous way, setting the tone for the rest of the film. high ( Scene 1 (1) Scene 1 (2) )
- The use of celebrity cameos to explain complex financial concepts makes the material more relatable and entertaining for the audience. high ( Scene 1 (16) )
- Character arcs are well-developed, particularly Mark Baum's journey, which reflects the moral complexities of profiting from a crisis. high ( Scene 1 (37) )
- The screenplay effectively balances humor with serious themes, allowing for moments of levity amidst the gravity of the subject matter. high ( Scene 1 (92) )
- The conclusion ties together the various character arcs and themes, providing a poignant commentary on the consequences of the financial crisis. high ( Scene 1 (160) )
- Some scenes could benefit from tighter editing to maintain pacing, particularly during exposition-heavy moments. medium ( Scene 1 (28) )
- While the character of Michael Burry is compelling, his backstory could be more fleshed out to enhance audience connection. medium ( Scene 1 (91) )
- The screenplay occasionally relies on financial jargon that may alienate viewers unfamiliar with the subject matter. medium ( Scene 1 (110) )
- Some character motivations could be clearer, particularly in the context of their moral dilemmas. medium ( Scene 1 (144) )
- The pacing in the final act could be improved to build more tension leading up to the climax. medium ( Scene 1 (157) )
- A deeper exploration of the personal lives of the characters could enhance emotional stakes. medium ( Scene 1 (12) )
- More context on the broader economic implications of the crisis could provide a stronger foundation for the narrative. medium ( Scene 1 (45) )
- The impact on everyday people affected by the crisis could be more prominently featured to ground the story. medium ( Scene 1 (118) )
- Additional scenes showing the aftermath of the crisis could provide a more comprehensive view of its consequences. medium ( Scene 1 (134) )
- A clearer resolution for some secondary characters would enhance the overall narrative closure. medium ( Scene 1 (160) )
- The innovative use of visual storytelling techniques, such as breaking the fourth wall, keeps the audience engaged. high ( Scene 1 (16) )
- The screenplay's ability to convey complex financial concepts in an accessible manner is a significant achievement. high ( Scene 1 (37) )
- The emotional weight of the characters' decisions is effectively portrayed, adding depth to the narrative. high ( Scene 1 (92) )
- The screenplay's commentary on systemic corruption and greed resonates strongly with contemporary audiences. high ( Scene 1 (110) )
- The final moments of the screenplay leave a lasting impact, prompting reflection on the consequences of the financial crisis. high ( Scene 1 (160) )
- Character Development While the main characters are well-developed, some secondary characters lack depth and motivation, making it difficult for the audience to connect with them. For example, the motivations of certain bankers and investors could be more clearly defined to enhance the narrative. medium
- Exposition Heavy Scenes Some scenes rely heavily on exposition to convey complex financial concepts, which can feel forced and disrupt the flow of the narrative. For instance, the scenes where characters explain mortgage-backed securities could be streamlined to maintain engagement. medium
Claude
Executive Summary
- The use of Anthony Bourdain and Selena Gomez to explain complex financial concepts, such as collateralized debt obligations (CDOs), is a highly effective and engaging way to make these topics accessible to a general audience. high ( Scene 16 )
- The screenplay effectively contrasts the perspectives of the various characters, with the bullish investor Bruce Miller serving as a foil to Mark Baum's skepticism. This creates a compelling debate that highlights the deeper issues at play. high ( Scene 43 (109) Scene 42 (108) )
- The emotional arc of Mark Baum's character, particularly his reflection on his brother's suicide and his struggle with the moral implications of profiting from the crisis, adds depth and nuance to the narrative. high ( Scene 45 )
- The opening sequence effectively establishes the historical context and introduces the core concept of mortgage-backed securities, setting the stage for the rest of the screenplay. medium ( Scene 1 (1) )
- The introduction of the Brownfield Fund team, particularly the dynamic between Charlie, Jamie, and Ben Rickert, provides an engaging secondary narrative that complements the main storylines. medium ( Scene 28 (79) )
- The transition between the storylines of Michael Burry and the other characters could be smoother, as the screenplay sometimes feels disjointed when shifting between these narratives. medium ( Scene 22 (63) )
- The subplot involving Michael Burry's son's diagnosis with Asperger's Syndrome, while an interesting character detail, could be further developed to have a stronger thematic connection to the overall narrative. medium ( Scene 46 (114) )
- The transition between the Selena Gomez/Richard Thaler explainer scene and the return to the main storyline could be smoother, as it sometimes feels like a disruptive interruption. low ( Scene 37 (97) )
- While the screenplay does explore the broader societal impact of the financial crisis, it could benefit from more explicit commentary or scenes that directly address the human cost and suffering experienced by everyday people. medium ( Scene 58 (149) )
- The screenplay could delve deeper into the moral and ethical dilemmas faced by the characters, particularly Mark Baum, as they grapple with the consequences of their actions and the role they played in the crisis. medium ( Scene 59 (157) )
- The ambiguous ending, where Mark Baum struggles with the decision to sell his positions and profit from the crisis, provides a thought-provoking and nuanced conclusion that leaves the audience to ponder the moral implications. high ( Scene 60 (160) )
- The scene where Mark Baum confronts the CDO manager, Mr. Chau, is a standout moment that effectively captures the underlying issues and tensions at the heart of the financial crisis. high ( Scene 43 (109) )
- The time-lapse sequence depicting the rapid growth of the banking industry leading up to the crisis is a visually striking and impactful way to convey the scale and pace of the events. medium ( Scene 2 (4) )
- Lack of diversity The screenplay's main characters are predominantly white men, with limited representation of other demographics. While the supporting cast includes some characters of color and women, the primary protagonists and decision-makers are mostly middle-aged, white males. This lack of diversity in the central characters may limit the screenplay's appeal to a broader, more diverse audience. medium
- Overuse of Voiceover The screenplay relies heavily on voiceover narration, particularly from the character of Jared Vennett, to provide exposition and context. While the voiceover is generally well-executed and serves an important purpose, an overreliance on this technique can come across as a crutch and may feel like an amateur writing choice. medium
Summary
High-level overview
Title: The Big Short
Summary: Set against the backdrop of the 2008 financial crisis, The Big Short depicts the evolving landscape of the banking industry, beginning in 1979 with the introduction of mortgage-backed securities by Lewis Ranieri at Solomon Brothers. As the financial world shifts, we follow the intersecting lives of various characters—including the socially awkward but brilliant Michael Burry, the cynical Mark Baum, and the ambitious duo Jamie Shipley and Charlie Geller—each noticing the deceptive practices and risks buried within the financial instruments that are driving the housing market to its breaking point.
Amidst a backdrop of financial revelry and ignorance from traders, Burry becomes increasingly paranoid about the rise in mortgage fraud and the unsustainable nature of adjustable-rate mortgages. His obsession leads him to the path of shorting the housing market, making significant bets against mortgage-backed securities, which he believes are on the cusp of collapse. Meanwhile, Baum, driven by ethics and a disdain for corrupt banking practices, assembles his team to investigate the impending disaster, armed with humor but weighed down by the grim realities they uncover.
As they delve deeper into the convoluted world of collateralized debt obligations (CDOs) and the misleading ratings that support them, the narrative intercuts with humorous yet poignant commentary on the absurdity of Wall Street's greed and misinformation. Throughout tense meetings and conferences, characters grapple with moral dilemmas while navigating a system rigged against transparency and accountability.
The film culminates in the chaotic collapse of financial institutions, mirroring individual characters' conflicts and failures as the consequences of their choices unfold. The stark contrast between the characters' initial hopes for profit and their inevitable disillusionment paves the way for a critique of the financial system and the human cost of ambition. In the end, the fallout from the housing crisis not only devastates the economy but also drives home the realization that few, if any, faced repercussions for their actions, poignantly highlighting a systemic failure that still resonates today.
The Big Short
Synopsis
In the years leading up to the 2008 financial crisis, a handful of outsiders and misfits in the finance world begin to notice the cracks in the housing market. The story unfolds through the eyes of several key players who, against the backdrop of a booming economy, see the impending doom that most of Wall Street ignores. The narrative is driven by the character of Michael Burry, a socially awkward hedge fund manager with a glass eye, who discovers that the mortgage-backed securities that are being sold as safe investments are actually filled with high-risk subprime loans. Burry decides to bet against the housing market by shorting these securities, a move that puts him at odds with his investors and the financial establishment.
As Burry's conviction grows, we meet Mark Baum, a cynical hedge fund manager who leads a team of analysts at FrontPoint Partners. Baum is driven by a personal tragedy that fuels his distrust of the financial system. He and his team, including Vinny and Danny, begin to investigate the mortgage market, uncovering the rampant fraud and corruption that has led to the creation of toxic financial products. They realize that the big banks are selling these risky securities while claiming they are safe, and they decide to take action by shorting the market as well.
Meanwhile, two young investors, Charlie Geller and Jamie Shipley, stumble upon the same information and seek out the help of Ben Rickert, a former trader who has become disillusioned with Wall Street. Together, they navigate the complexities of the financial system, trying to make sense of the convoluted mortgage-backed securities and collateralized debt obligations (CDOs) that are at the heart of the impending crisis.
As the story progresses, the characters face mounting pressure from their investors and the financial institutions that refuse to acknowledge the looming disaster. The film intersperses humor with the gravity of the situation, using clever visual metaphors and celebrity cameos to explain complex financial concepts to the audience. The tension builds as the characters realize that their bets against the housing market could lead to massive profits, but at the cost of millions of lives affected by the economic collapse.
The climax of the film occurs as the housing market begins to crumble, leading to widespread panic and chaos in the financial world. The characters must confront the moral implications of profiting from the suffering of others, and the film ends with a sobering reflection on the consequences of greed and the fragility of the economy. Ultimately, 'The Big Short' serves as both a cautionary tale and a darkly comedic exploration of the events that led to one of the greatest financial crises in history.
Scene by Scene Summaries
Scene by Scene Summaries
- In 1979, the dull atmosphere of the Solomon Brothers bond trading floor is transformed when Lewis Ranieri introduces the innovative concept of mortgage-backed securities. With a mix of crude humor and intelligence, he captivates skeptical pension fund managers, demonstrating how bundling mortgages can enhance yield while reducing risk. His engaging presentation leads to a significant commitment from the fund managers, marking a pivotal moment in the banking industry.
- In a 1979 strip club, bond traders indulge in a hedonistic lifestyle, oblivious to the financial upheaval brewing beneath the surface. A modern trader's voiceover reflects on how Lewis Ranieri transformed the banking industry, shifting focus to mortgage bonds, while a time-lapse reveals the evolving Manhattan skyline. The narrative foreshadows the 2008 financial crisis, culminating in a stark black screen announcing Lehman Brothers' bankruptcy. Stock footage illustrates the crisis's aftermath, highlighting the disconnect between the traders' revelry and the impending disaster, as the voiceover critiques the ignorance of experts and hints at outsiders who foresaw the collapse.
- During a middle school football game in 1985, 11-year-old Michael Burry showcases his skills until he is tackled, causing his glass eye to fall out. This incident leads to ridicule from opposing players and embarrassment for Michael, despite the support from his parents and coaches. Feeling isolated, he ultimately asks to go home. The scene transitions to adult Michael swimming laps, reflecting on how his childhood experiences and his glass eye affected his social interactions.
- In a waterfront restaurant, Michael Burry overhears a lawyer discussing a lucrative real estate deal, igniting his worries about rising mortgage fraud rates. The following day, he engages with a young analyst, David, urging him to investigate the top-selling mortgage bonds. As Michael's anxiety about the housing market deepens, he isolates himself in his office, preparing for a thorough examination of mortgage brokerage violations, all while heavy metal music underscores his intense focus.
- In a tense and urgent scene, Michael Burry obsessively analyzes a complex mortgage-backed security, uncovering the risks posed by high-risk adjustable-rate mortgages. As his colleagues notice his isolation and fatigue, Burry works late into the night, ultimately deciding to short the housing market based on his alarming findings. The scene captures his internal conflict and determination, setting the stage for his pivotal actions in the looming financial crisis.
- In Lawrence Fields's opulent office, he confidently discusses the housing market, referencing Alan Greenspan's optimistic views. Michael Burry confronts Fields, arguing that the market is saturated with risky subprime adjustable-rate loans that will fail in 2007, rendering mortgage-backed securities worthless. Despite Fields's dismissive attitude and encouragement for Burry to focus on stocks, Burry remains steadfast in his belief that the housing market is on the brink of collapse. The scene culminates in a tense standoff, ending with a freeze frame and a voiceover introducing complex financial terms, highlighting the confusion surrounding Wall Street's practices.
- In this scene, Scarlett Johansson casually explains the complexities of mortgage-backed securities under a small waterfall, highlighting how banks profited and shifted to riskier private mortgage bonds. The scene transitions to Michael Burry in his office, where he expresses urgency about shorting these bonds, recognizing the risks of subprime mortgages. Despite skepticism from Lawrence Fields regarding the practicality of Burry's plan, Burry remains determined to act quickly, culminating in his declaration to get a bank to create a shorting instrument for the mortgage bonds.
- In a tense conference room at Goldman Sachs, Michael Burry challenges the prevailing bullish sentiment by proposing to buy $100 million in credit default swaps on mortgage bonds, betting against the housing market. Despite initial skepticism from the Goldman team, including Lucy Thalia and Deeb Winston, Burry insists that the market is misjudging the stability of housing and expresses concern about the bank's solvency when the bonds fail. After a heated discussion, the Goldman team agrees to a pay-as-you-go structure for the swaps, setting the stage for Burry's unconventional investment strategy.
- Michael Burry, feeling conflicted after a meeting at Goldman Sachs, pushes for a $200 million bet against mortgage bonds with Deutsche Bank. As he navigates the skepticism of sales reps, quick cuts show his mortgage bonds being signed. Alone in a fast food restaurant, he receives a heartfelt message from his family. The scene shifts to a Manhattan nightclub where Deutsche Bank reps celebrate their unexpected success, contrasting Burry's isolation with their revelry, setting the stage for future developments in the unfolding financial drama.
- In a tense phone call, Michael Burry discusses his bold $1.3 billion investment in credit default swaps against the housing market with mentor Lawrence Fields, who expresses deep concern over the unprecedented risk. Despite acknowledging his own nervousness, Michael remains resolute in his strategy, leading to a confrontation between the two. The scene culminates with Michael hanging up and receiving a flurry of alarming emails from anxious investors, highlighting the growing doubts surrounding his decisions.
- In a Manhattan group therapy session, Mark Baum arrives late and derails the discussion with a passionate rant about unethical banking practices, ignoring the therapist's attempts to redirect him to his personal issues. His outburst interrupts a businessman sharing his parenting struggles, leading to tension among the group. Ultimately, Mark abruptly leaves after answering a phone call, leaving the other participants stunned and the session unresolved.
- In the bustling streets of Manhattan, Mark Baum grapples with his disdain for unethical business practices during a phone call. A flashback to his childhood at a Yeshiva reveals his critical nature, as a Rabbi praises his intellect but worries about his skepticism. Back in the present, Mark's wife, Cynthia, expresses concern over his obsessive worldview, leading to a tense exchange where Mark defends his negative outlook. The scene highlights the strain in their relationship as Mark remains steadfast in his beliefs, set against the vibrant yet chaotic backdrop of the city.
- In the bustling streets of Manhattan, Mark Baum grapples with his disdain for the financial system and his own emotional turmoil. Despite Cynthia's concern for his well-being and her suggestions for a simpler life, Mark defensively insists he loves his job. A flashback hints at his troubled past, while their conversation reveals a deep emotional struggle. As Mark's frustration boils over, he confronts another man for a cab, symbolizing his internal conflict and desperation.
- Mark Baum arrives at the Morgan Stanley building and engages in light banter with his team at FrontPoint. After a strange phone call from trader Jared Vennett about shorting housing bonds piques their interest, Mark decides to pursue the lead despite his team's skepticism. The scene blends humor with intrigue as they navigate the corporate culture and potential investment opportunities.
- In a conference room, Jared Vennett presents a risky investment opportunity involving mortgage bonds to Mark Baum and his team, using a Jenga game to illustrate the bond structure and the risks of lower-rated tranches. Initially skeptical, Mark and his team become increasingly engaged as Jared reveals the deceptive nature of the bonds and introduces collateralized debt obligations (CDOs). The scene is marked by a mix of skepticism, humor, and intrigue, culminating in Mark's eager request for clarification on the investment's complexities.
- In a high-end kitchen, Anthony Bourdain creatively repurposes unsold fish into a seafood stew, drawing a parallel to the transformation of worthless mortgage bonds into seemingly valuable collateralized debt obligations (CDOs). The scene shifts to a conference room where financial analysts Mark, Jared, and Danny discuss the risks of these financial instruments. Jared illustrates the instability of CDOs by pulling blocks from a tower, leading to a dramatic collapse that symbolizes the looming crisis in the housing market. The tone blends urgency with dark humor, highlighting the mismanagement of financial products and foreshadowing disaster.
- In the Frontpoint office, Vinny, Danny, and Porter express skepticism about Mark's trust in banker Vennett, whom they suspect is manipulating them. Mark argues for an investigation into the housing market, believing it holds profit potential due to banks' mismanagement. Despite initial hesitations, Mark's enthusiasm convinces the team to pursue the investigation, setting the stage for a risky yet adventurous opportunity.
- Jamie Shipley and Charlie Geller struggle to connect with women at a high-end Chelsea dance club, facing rejection due to Jamie's poor dancing and Charlie's awkwardness. After leaving the club, they attend a meeting at JP Morgan, where a young banker, Chris, informs them that their fund does not meet the necessary capital requirements for an ISDA agreement, leaving them feeling embarrassed and out of place. Their hopes are briefly reignited by a brochure about Jared Vennett's prediction of a housing market collapse, but they ultimately leave the meeting dejected and contemplating their next steps.
- In a hot garage in Boulder, Colorado, Jamie and Charlie celebrate their financial success, having turned $110,000 into $30 million by betting against unlikely events. However, they face challenges in securing an ISDA from banks in New York City and consider reaching out to their neighbor, Ben Rickert, a former trader with a pessimistic view of the financial system. The scene shifts to Ben's home, where his paranoia about global issues contrasts with Jamie and Charlie's humor and optimism. The tension escalates as they navigate their financial predicament, culminating in their ejection from the JP Morgan lobby by security.
- Porter and Danny navigate Miami Airport, reflecting on a past trip and their current mission, which Porter finds pointless while Danny remains optimistic. They explore an unfinished subdivision filled with abandoned model houses, sparking their curiosity. At a real estate seminar, the leader's outrageous claim that anyone can become a millionaire without capital leaves Porter appalled, while Danny eagerly takes notes. They decline a sales pitch for a CD set and the next day discover an empty ranch house, highlighting the theme of abandonment and contrasting their differing attitudes.
- Danny encounters a tattooed man at a ranch house who is worried about losing his home due to his landlord's mortgage issues. After advising the man to speak with his landlord, Danny and his partner Porter explore an abandoned ranch house, uncovering remnants of its former occupants and a shocking alligator in the backyard pool. The scene shifts to Danny dining at a Cuban restaurant while Porter is on a phone call, highlighting the tension and absurdity of the situation.
- In a tense meeting at Scion's nearly empty office, Mike Burry defends his significant mortgage bet against skeptical investors Lawrence Fields and Martin Blaine from Metro Capital. Despite Burry's confidence in identifying a housing bubble, Fields and Blaine express doubts about his ability to predict economic trends and warn of potential investor panic. The confrontation escalates as they demand their money back, leaving Burry in a precarious position amidst the backdrop of financial turmoil.
- Mark tours upscale homes with a real estate agent and a younger agent, who discuss the current downturn in the housing market and the motivations of sellers under financial pressure. As they drive through a neighborhood filled with luxurious homes and For Sale signs, Mark expresses curiosity about the market and indicates his interest in consulting a mortgage broker, reflecting his cautious approach to potential opportunities amidst the uncertainty.
- In a South Beach hotel bar, Mark, Danny, and Porter engage with mortgage brokers Black and Maroon about the current mortgage industry. They discuss the rise of adjustable-rate mortgages and risky lending practices, including NINJA loans, revealing the brokers' confidence in securing loans without proper verification. The conversation is casual and humorous, highlighting the ethical implications of their practices while contrasting the upscale setting with the serious nature of their discussion.
- In a tense hotel lobby and bar, Mark confronts brokers Maroon and Black about their unethical financial practices, particularly targeting immigrants and profiting from subprime loans. He seeks to understand their tactics while expressing concern for a dancer at a strip club, who reveals her precarious financial situation with multiple loans and properties. Despite Mark's warnings about the risks of refinancing, the dancer remains skeptical, highlighting the unresolved conflict of the scene.
- In a tense scene set in Miami Airport, Mark confidently directs his colleagues, Porter and Danny, to gather financial data, convinced a bubble is forming in the market. He makes a critical call to Vinny, discussing a $50 million investment in low-rated mortgage-backed securities, Garabaldi IV. Meanwhile, at the gym, Jared Vennett humorously reflects on his rising status in the hedge fund world during a call with Vinny, who seeks clarity on their financial strategies. The scene highlights the urgent and uncertain atmosphere surrounding their investment decisions, leaving the audience in suspense about the potential risks.
- In a gym, Jared confidently discusses his control over the dark market of swaps with Vinny, hinting at a potential 50 million deal. The scene transitions to Ben Rickert's home office in Boulder, where he expresses skepticism about the security of his communications during a call with Jamie and Charlie. The tension between Jared's assertive market manipulation and Ben's concerns about privacy highlights the conflicting dynamics of the trading world.
- In a Greenwich Village loft, Jamie and Charlie discuss the alarming complexities of CDOs with Ben, who expresses his fear about their implications. They reveal that CDOs are more dangerous than initially perceived, with Ben calling them 'the perfect scam.' The scene shifts to Anthony Bourdain in a kitchen, where he uses a seafood stew metaphor to illustrate the chaotic mix of bad mortgages and financial instruments, emphasizing the absurdity of the situation. The tension builds as the characters grapple with the dire realities of the financial crisis.
- In a Greenwich Village office, Ben expresses skepticism about shorting worthless collateralized debt obligations (CDOs) but is persuaded by Charlie and Jamie to help secure an ISDA agreement for their trading strategy. Despite his disdain for Wall Street, Ben ultimately agrees to assist them, leading to a celebratory moment for Charlie and Jamie as they high five in excitement over their risky financial venture.
- Ben arrives at Kennedy Airport in a flu mask, meeting Charlie and Jamie who are eager yet anxious about their investment. At Deutsche Bank, they sign an ISDA contract, marking their acquisition of $12 million in credit default swaps. While Charlie and Jamie seek excitement, Ben reassures them of their successful investment, emphasizing the need to wait for the impending financial crisis. The scene captures a tense yet matter-of-fact atmosphere, culminating in a thought-provoking quote from David Foster Wallace.
- In a tense scene set in Midtown New York City, Mark Baum rushes to gather information about the alarming rise in mortgage delinquencies. Despite the surge in defaults, Vinny Daniel reveals that subprime mortgage bond prices are inexplicably increasing, creating confusion among financial analysts. As they discuss the situation, they learn that Deutsche Bank is demanding more collateral and rating agencies have yet to downgrade any bonds. The scene captures the urgency and anxiety surrounding the impending financial crisis, leaving the characters grappling with the bizarre market dynamics.
- In this scene, Mark vents his frustrations about America's corruption to a cab driver, who humorously agrees but declines a job offer. Meanwhile, Vinny observes a tense meeting with risk managers trying to persuade Kathy Tao to sell their swaps. Mark instructs Vinny to bluntly dismiss their proposal when Kathy leaves. The scene shifts to Michael Burry, who expresses his own frustration over disappointing quarterly returns, highlighting the overall tension and discontent with the financial system.
- In a tense yet tender scene, Michael Burry is absorbed in business news about rising defaults, causing frustration for his wife as she tries to discuss their son Nicholas's social issues. Despite his initial distraction, Michael acknowledges the need for an evaluation for Nicholas, who is creatively engaged with his toy crane. The scene highlights the strain in their communication but ends on a positive note as Michael praises Nicholas's intelligence, fostering a moment of connection between father and son.
- In a tense office confrontation, Georgia Hale from a rating agency defends her agency's ratings of subprime bonds against probing questions from Mark and Vinny of FrontPoint Partners. As they challenge her assertions about the integrity of the ratings process, Georgia reveals the cynical reality that banks can simply seek ratings from competitors if denied. The discussion escalates into accusations of hypocrisy, leaving the moral complexities of the financial industry unresolved.
- In a tense cab ride, Vinny worries about an upcoming meeting with Vennett while Mark proposes a bold strategy to short the rating agencies. Meanwhile, in the chaotic Brownfield office, Charlie and Jamie grapple with the irrational rise in CDO values amidst rising mortgage delinquencies. Charlie suggests buying more swaps to counter the banks' guessing game on CDO values, but Jamie strongly opposes the idea, leaving their conflict unresolved as frustration mounts.
- In a tense conference room at Frontpoint Partners, Jared Vennett faces an angry group—Mark, Vinny, Danny, and Porter—who accuse him of ruining their investment and threaten to report him. Despite their fury, Jared remains calm, suggesting that the financial crisis stems from ignorance rather than fraud. He proposes they attend the American Securitization Forum in Vegas to confront the 'dumb money' in the market, leaving the group with mixed feelings about the trip.
- In a vibrant scene set in Las Vegas, living statues at the Venetian Hotel come to life as hip hop music plays, transitioning to the bustling casino floor of Caesar's Palace. Ben guides Charlie and Jamie through the American Securitization Forum, discussing complex financial terms while Jamie showcases his research. Mark Baum and his team express skepticism about the conference attendees and their motives, with humorous commentary from Vinny. Jared Vennett advises the group to remain discreet about their short position, highlighting the tension and superficiality of the environment as they gather information.
- At a Las Vegas shooting range, Charlie and Jamie from Brownfield engage in shooting alongside Bear Stearns representatives. While Charlie expresses serious concerns about the performance of CDOs, the Bear Reps dismiss his worries, prioritizing fun and profit instead. Amidst the casual atmosphere and politically incorrect targets, Jamie checks his phone for insights from his brother's ex-girlfriend at the SEC, hinting at a strategic pivot back to business. The scene highlights the tension between the lighthearted outing and the serious financial implications of their work.
- In a tense ballroom setting, the CEO of Option One addresses bankers about the mortgage market's resilience despite subprime losses. Mark challenges the CEO's optimistic claims, asserting there's a zero percent chance of losses being contained at 5%, before leaving for a phone call. Meanwhile, Mike Burry grapples with investor withdrawals and doubts about the market's integrity, highlighting the conflict between corporate optimism and financial reality.
- In a dynamic scene, Michael passionately plays heavy metal drums in his basement, losing himself in the music until he breaks his drumsticks, while his wife checks on him from upstairs. Meanwhile, at a trade show, Ben and Charlie express frustration over high swap pricing during negotiations with a Merrill representative, highlighting the shifting market. Concurrently, Jamie discusses housing bond concerns with her college friend Evie, who reveals the SEC's budget cuts and her disillusionment with the agency. The scene culminates with Evie being playfully pulled into the pool by a banker, leaving Jamie feeling disturbed by the carefree attitude surrounding serious financial issues.
- In a casino restaurant, Jamie, Ben, and Charlie discuss the rising prices at Bear's and the SEC's inattention to the housing market. Charlie proposes a risky investment strategy to bet against AA-rated tranches of CDOs, which Jamie supports, excited by the potential payoff. They meet with bank representatives who surprisingly agree to their proposal, leading to a moment of celebration. However, Ben warns them about the moral implications and potential human cost of their actions, creating tension among the trio. The scene shifts from light-hearted banter to a serious reflection on their decisions, ending with Ben leaving, concerned about the consequences, while Jamie and Charlie are left to grapple with the reality of their choices.
- In a tense meeting at a Japanese restaurant, Mark Baum confronts Mr. Chau, a CDO manager, about the complexities and risks of collateralized debt obligations (CDOs) and synthetic CDOs. As Mark's agitation grows, he uncovers the alarming reality that the market for insuring mortgage bonds far exceeds the actual mortgages, leading him to a shocking realization about the impending collapse of the financial system. The scene captures Mark's disheveled appearance and urgent demeanor against Mr. Chau's calmness, culminating in a freeze frame of Mark's disoriented expression.
- In a bustling casino, Selena Gomez captivates a crowd at a blackjack table, winning hand after hand while explaining synthetic CDOs to Dr. Thaler. As her success breeds overconfidence among onlookers, they begin placing complex bets on her continued winning streak. However, when the dealer ultimately wins, shock and disappointment ripple through the crowd, highlighting the dangers of extrapolation bias and the pitfalls of betting on perceived stability.
- In this tense scene, Mark confronts Mr. Chau at the Tabemasu Asian Restaurant, expressing his disdain for Chau's unethical business practices while grappling with his own moral conflicts. Mark warns Chau about the transient nature of wealth and dismisses him as an idiot before leaving, instructing Jared to undermine Chau's success. The scene transitions to the next morning outside Caesar's Palace, where the aftermath of a night of excess is depicted through the contrasting appearances of the characters, highlighting their differing fortunes.
- In an elegant seating area of Cynthia's clothing boutique, Mark expresses his concerns about the economy and the potential for profit amidst collapse, prompting a moral debate with Cynthia. As they discuss guilt and personal loss, Cynthia reveals her brother Paul's suicide, leading to a vulnerable exchange where both confront their shared pain. The scene culminates in a poignant moment as they hold hands, acknowledging their struggles and the weight of their pasts.
- In a pediatric psych center's waiting area, Mike arrives late to find his son Nicholas engrossed in play. His wife expresses concern about Nicholas potentially having Asperger's Syndrome, prompting Mike to research the condition. As he learns more, he consults a med school friend who suggests that a diagnosis could be liberating. Inspired, Mike takes bold action at work to protect investors from fraud, leading to chaos as his email triggers a flurry of responses, including a legal threat from a colleague. The scene captures Mike's internal struggle with his son's future and his own identity amidst rising tensions.
- In a New York City loft office, Charlie and Jamie anxiously monitor the news about the financial crisis, learning that the second-largest mortgage lender has gone bankrupt. Jamie urges Charlie to focus on business news, while in another office, Vinny, Danny, and Porter dismiss the reports as delusional. Mark, emerging from a meeting with Kathy, refuses her demand to sell their shorts, asserting that the situation is not their problem. The scene captures the growing tension and uncertainty as the financial market begins to unravel.
- In a tense scene set in a NYC loft, Charlie expresses his anxiety about the global banking crisis to his mother over the phone. After the call, he and Jamie discuss the alarming situation surrounding Bear Stearns and the fraudulent activities linked to CDOs. They approach their friend Casey, a junior finance reporter, hoping to convince him to expose the issue. However, Casey is hesitant, prioritizing his job security over their urgent concerns. Despite Jamie's impassioned pleas, Casey ultimately refuses to pursue the story, leaving Charlie and Jamie frustrated as they exit the newsroom.
- In a tense scene set in the Scion offices, Mike Burry reviews Bear Stearns' financial troubles while fielding calls from Goldman Sachs representatives. Lucy Thalia explains a systems failure affecting her communications, but her vague responses frustrate Mike, leading her to abruptly hang up. Deeb Winston then calls to discuss Mike's financial positions, but Mike quickly realizes Goldman Sachs' ulterior motives in their net short position, prompting him to dismiss Deeb as well. The scene highlights Mike's skepticism towards the financial system and his isolation in navigating these complex interactions.
- In a bustling trading office, Mark receives urgent updates about a financial market downturn, particularly concerning subprime bonds. Danny warns him of significant defaults, while Jared, speaking from a bathroom at Deutsche Bank, reveals that no one is buying CDOs or mortgage bonds anymore. Mark realizes the gravity of the situation as the atmosphere grows tense and somber. The scene culminates with Mark encountering a distraught young woman who has just been fired, underscoring the emotional toll of the impending crisis.
- In a tense meeting at Morgan Stanley, Mark confronts Kathy Tao about the company's alarming financial troubles. Despite her attempts to downplay the situation, Kathy reveals the extent of their risky contracts and significant losses, leaving her terrified as Mark questions the potential fallout and the risk of a bank run. The scene captures the high stakes and anxiety surrounding the impending financial crisis.
- In a late-night Manhattan restaurant, Mark and Vinny engage in a heated debate with Porter and Danny over the looming bankruptcy of Morgan Stanley. While Porter fears financial ruin and Vinny advocates for caution by suggesting shorting bank stocks, Mark aggressively insists on holding their positions, dismissing any notion of responsibility. The confrontation escalates, revealing a stark divide between Mark's ambition and Vinny's caution, culminating in Mark's firm declaration, 'I’ll say when we sell,' leaving the tension unresolved.
- In a tense scene, Jamie discusses Bear Stearns' financial troubles and the risk of collapse with Charlie, who is frantic about their inability to sell their swaps. Meanwhile, Mike, in his office, decides to unwind his $1.3 billion position as he grapples with the impending crisis. The contrasting settings of a lively spin class and a somber office underscore the urgency and anxiety surrounding the financial turmoil.
- In a humorous and chaotic scene set in the Powder Monkey Pub in Exmouth, Ben attempts to sell $200 million worth of securities over the phone while dealing with poor reception and eavesdropping patrons. Dressed casually in sweatpants, he engages in a lighthearted conversation with potential buyers, drawing laughter from the pub-goers. Meanwhile, Jamie and Charlie discuss their gratitude towards Ben for his help in securing $80 million from the deal. The scene blends tension with comedy as Ben navigates the unusual setting, ultimately leading to Jamie and Charlie contemplating their next strategic move.
- In a tense debate at a Deutsche Bank conference, Mark Baum passionately critiques the financial system, arguing that Wall Street's greed has led to widespread fraud. As Bear Stearns' stock crashes, the audience's anxiety grows, contrasting with Bruce Miller's bullish optimism. A young banker challenges Miller's confidence, highlighting the shifting sentiment in the room. The scene culminates in chaos as Mark sardonicly declares 'Boom,' signaling the impending financial crisis.
- In a tense scene, Alan Greenspan arrives at an auditorium expecting a large audience but finds only six attendees, highlighting the disconnect amid a national financial crisis. Meanwhile, chaos erupts outside Lehman Brothers HQ as employees flee with their belongings following the company's bankruptcy. Charlie, eager to witness the turmoil firsthand, receives an ID tag from a distressed Lehman employee. The scene shifts to the Frontpoint office, where Vinny frantically manages the fallout while Danny, overwhelmed by the situation, fears he is having a heart attack. As tension escalates, Porter calls for an ambulance, underscoring the urgency of the crisis.
- In a chaotic scene at Lehman Brothers, a diminutive executive urges departing employees to avoid the press as Jamie and Charlie navigate the disarray of the abandoned trading floor. Charlie expresses disappointment at the state of the office, while outside St. Patrick's Cathedral, Danny discusses his health scare with Vinny and Porter, who receives urgent news from Mark about the financial crisis. The scene concludes with Mike reflecting on the emotional toll of the business as he sorts through his mail and listens to a warning voicemail.
- In a poignant scene, the fallout of the housing crisis is depicted through various characters and settings. Burry's former assistant stocks shelves in a mini-mart, while Marlene and the Younger Agent attend a seminar promoting real estate opportunities amidst the crisis. A man with a tattooed head struggles with his family's living situation, now residing in their car. Mike reflects on his deteriorating relationships and the nature of authority in finance through voiceover. Maroon searches for new opportunities at a job fair, and Jared Vennett at Deutsche Bank contemplates the moral implications of his controversial success. The scene captures the somber realities of the financial crisis and its impact on individuals.
- On the roof garden of an Upper East Side apartment, Mark speaks with Vinny about the impending bailout, expressing skepticism about its effectiveness and the tendency of society to blame immigrants and the poor for economic issues. Vinny reacts with anger, while Jared's voiceover highlights the lack of accountability in the financial system, noting that only one banker faced consequences. The scene contrasts the serene setting with the heavy conversation, ending with a stark reminder of the failure to hold the powerful accountable.
- On the roof garden of an Upper East Side apartment, Mark grapples with a moral dilemma during a tense phone call with Vinny about selling their investment fund. Despite his initial reservations about losing their ethical standing, Mark ultimately succumbs to Vinny's pressure and agrees to sell, motivated by the prospect of nearly a billion dollars in profit. The scene concludes with text overlays that reveal the devastating aftermath of the financial collapse, highlighting the significant losses faced by various characters.
📊 Script Snapshot
What's Working
Where to Focus
📊 Understanding Your Percentile Rankings
Your scores are compared against professional produced screenplays in our vault (The Matrix, Breaking Bad, etc.). The percentile shows where you rank compared to these films.
Example: A score of 8.5 in Originality might be 85th percentile (strong!), while the same 8.5 in Conflict might only be 50th percentile (needs work). The percentile tells you what your raw scores actually mean.
Hover over each axis on the radar chart to see what that category measures and why it matters.
Analysis: The screenplay effectively develops its characters, showcasing their complexities and transformations throughout the narrative. Key strengths include the depth of Michael Burry's character and the moral dilemmas faced by Mark Baum. However, some characters could benefit from more nuanced arcs to enhance audience engagement.
Key Strengths
- Michael Burry's character arc is compelling, showcasing his analytical prowess and emotional struggles. His journey from isolation to a deeper understanding of the financial crisis adds depth to the narrative.
- Mark Baum's transformation from a cynical analyst to a more introspective character grappling with moral dilemmas is impactful. His emotional journey resonates with the audience.
Analysis: The screenplay effectively establishes a compelling premise centered around the financial crisis and the characters who navigate its complexities. However, there are areas for enhancement, particularly in character development and emotional depth, which could further engage the audience.
Key Strengths
- The screenplay's premise effectively sets up a narrative that intertwines personal and financial stakes, making the story relatable and engaging.
Areas to Improve
- Some character arcs lack depth and emotional resonance, which could detract from audience engagement and investment in their journeys.
Analysis: The screenplay effectively captures the complexities of the financial crisis through a well-structured narrative that intertwines multiple character arcs. The pacing is generally strong, maintaining audience engagement while building tension. However, certain plot points could benefit from further development to enhance clarity and emotional impact.
Key Strengths
- The intertwining character arcs provide depth and insight into the financial crisis, making the narrative engaging and relatable.
Areas to Improve
- Some financial concepts may confuse viewers unfamiliar with the subject matter, potentially detracting from the overall clarity of the plot.
Analysis: The screenplay effectively conveys its themes of greed, corruption, and the consequences of financial malpractice, resonating deeply with audiences through its character arcs and narrative structure. However, there are opportunities to refine the clarity and integration of these themes to enhance emotional impact and thematic coherence.
Key Strengths
- The exploration of greed and its consequences is compelling, particularly through the character arcs of Michael Burry and Mark Baum, who embody the struggle against systemic corruption.
Analysis: The screenplay effectively captures the chaotic and morally complex world of finance leading up to the 2008 crisis. Its visual imagery is vivid and impactful, translating well into visual storytelling that highlights character arcs and thematic elements. The use of humor and sharp dialogue enhances the narrative, though there are opportunities for deeper emotional resonance and visual creativity.
Key Strengths
- The vivid descriptions of the trading floor and the chaotic atmosphere of the financial world effectively convey the high stakes and tension of the narrative. Scenes like the strip club party and the conference room presentations stand out for their energy and humor.
Analysis: The screenplay effectively elicits emotional responses through its complex characters and their arcs, particularly in the context of the financial crisis. However, there are opportunities to enhance emotional depth by further exploring character vulnerabilities and the consequences of their actions on personal relationships.
Key Strengths
- The character arcs of Michael Burry and Mark Baum effectively illustrate the emotional toll of the financial crisis, allowing audiences to connect with their struggles and moral dilemmas.
Areas to Improve
- Some emotional moments could be enhanced by exploring the characters' vulnerabilities and the impact of their decisions on personal relationships, particularly in scenes involving family dynamics.
Analysis: The screenplay effectively presents conflict and stakes through the lens of the financial crisis, showcasing the moral corruption and human cost of greed. However, there are opportunities to enhance narrative tension by deepening character arcs and integrating more personal stakes. The characters' emotional journeys could be more pronounced, allowing the audience to connect more deeply with their struggles.
Key Strengths
- The screenplay effectively captures the moral corruption within the financial industry, particularly through characters like Michael Burry and Mark Baum, who challenge the status quo.
Analysis: The screenplay 'The Big Short' excels in originality and creativity by presenting a complex narrative that intertwines real-life events with character-driven storytelling. Its unique approach to exploring the financial crisis through the perspectives of diverse characters offers fresh insights into the systemic failures of the banking industry.
Expand to see detailed analysis
View Complete AnalysisScreenplay Story Analysis
Note: This is the overall critique. For scene by scene critique click here
-
Character Mark Baum
Description Mark's extreme cynicism and anger, while consistent, occasionally feels exaggerated and veers into caricature. His sudden bursts of righteous fury, while serving the plot, don't always feel organically motivated by his character's emotional arc. The sudden shift between his rage and his vulnerability feels jarring.
( Scene 28 Scene 30 Scene 36 ) -
Character Jared Vennett
Description Jared's slick and somewhat cynical persona is generally consistent, but his moments of almost comical callousness (especially in the scene where he rips off the other characters) feel slightly overplayed for comedic effect, disrupting the film's overall tone at times.
( Scene 37 Scene 94 Scene 156 ) -
Character Michael Burry
Description Burry's eccentricities are established early on, but the degree to which he’s depicted as socially awkward and detached sometimes feels excessive and used as a plot device to explain his actions rather than a consequence of his personality. His sudden shifts in behavior sometimes lack smooth transitions.
( Scene 12 Scene 13 Scene 14 )
-
Description The montage of people rejecting Jared's trade feels somewhat abrupt and doesn't fully convey the difficulty of his initial sales pitch. A more detailed portrayal of his struggles would make his eventual success with Mark Baum more impactful.
( Scene 38 ) -
Description The explanation of how Jared manipulates the swaps market feels rushed. The audience needs a clearer understanding of his strategy and its ethical implications. This plot point would benefit from clearer explanation and perhaps visual aids.
( Scene 76 Scene 77 ) -
Description The Selena Gomez/Richard Thaler explanation of synthetic CDOs is effective as a comedic and simplifying device, but it undermines the complexities of the financial instruments they were meant to clarify. The method of explanation may seem incongruous to those familiar with the subject matter.
( Scene 109 )
-
Description The mechanics of the credit default swaps and how they react to the changing market conditions aren't always clearly explained, leading to some narrative confusion. Specifically, the fact that the value of the swaps increases even as the underlying assets decline requires a clearer exposition of these financial instruments and their dynamics.
( Scene 76 Scene 83 Scene 94 )
-
Description The bond trader's crude joke in scene 2 feels somewhat out of place and tonally inconsistent with the rest of the film's dialogue, which is generally more sophisticated and nuanced. The joke, though funny, seems out of character.
( Scene 2 (2) ) -
Description The mortgage brokers' dialogue, while entertaining, occasionally feels overly cartoonish and relies too heavily on slang and stereotypes. The level of openness and direct confession about their practices is questionable, especially the "NINJA loans" comment.
( Scene 70 (70) )
-
Element Celebrity Explanations
( Scene 16 (16) Scene 40 (40) Scene 109 (109) )
Suggestion Streamline the celebrity explanations of complex financial concepts. While engaging, they could be condensed or integrated into the main narrative more organically. Consider using a single expert to explain multiple aspects, reducing the reliance on multiple celebrities. -
Element Repetitive scenes of panic/chaos
( Scene 83 Scene 120 Scene 125 Scene 143 )
Suggestion The scenes depicting the market's collapse could be streamlined to avoid repetitive portrayals of panic. Focus on showing the impact of the collapse on different characters and their reactions without excessive repetition of similar scenes.
Mark - Score: 82/100
Role
Protagonist
Character Analysis Overview
Michael - Score: 84/100
Role
Protagonist
Character Analysis Overview
Vinny - Score: 73/100
Role
Supporting Character
Character Analysis Overview
Jamie - Score: 82/100
Character Analysis Overview
Charlie - Score: 80/100
Role
Protagonist
Character Analysis Overview
Danny - Score: 59/100
Character Analysis Overview
Porter - Score: 64/100
Role
Supporting Character
Character Analysis Overview
Theme Analysis Overview
Identified Themes
| Theme | Theme Details | Theme Explanation | Primary Theme Support | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Moral Corruption and Systemic Failure in Finance
40%
|
The film depicts the creation and proliferation of complex financial instruments like mortgage-backed securities and CDOs, highlighting the reckless lending practices, fraudulent activities, and regulatory failures that fueled the housing bubble and its subsequent collapse.
|
This theme explores the ethical dilemmas faced by individuals within the financial industry who prioritize profit over responsibility, leading to widespread damage and suffering. It questions the integrity of the system and those who benefit from its flaws. |
This is the central theme, driving the narrative and shaping the overall message of the film.
|
||||||||||||
Strengthening Moral Corruption and Systemic Failure in Finance
|
|||||||||||||||
|
The Human Cost of Greed and Recklessness
30%
|
The film portrays the devastating consequences of the financial crisis on ordinary individuals and families, including foreclosures, job losses, and emotional distress. It juxtaposes the opulent lifestyles of Wall Street professionals with the suffering of those who bear the brunt of the crisis.
|
This theme explores the human consequences of financial decisions made without consideration for the wider societal impact. It highlights the suffering of those who lost their homes, jobs, and financial security due to the actions of others. |
This theme strengthens the primary theme by providing a human face to the abstract concept of systemic failure, demonstrating the real-world suffering caused by the industry's moral failings.
|
||||||||||||
|
The Power of Individual Insight and Conscience
20%
|
The film features characters who recognize the flaws in the financial system and attempt to profit from them, such as Michael Burry and Mark Baum. Their stories are intertwined with moments of moral conflict, where personal gain clashes with ethical considerations.
|
This theme shows how some individuals, despite the pervasive corruption, can perceive the truth and act upon it. It explores the complexities of moral choices within a corrupt system. |
This theme offers a counterpoint to the systemic failure, showing that individual action, however limited, can expose the truth and potentially mitigate the damage. It serves as a subtle note of hope amidst the overwhelming corruption.
|
||||||||||||
|
The Failure of Regulation and Oversight
10%
|
The film critiques the regulatory bodies and rating agencies that failed to adequately oversee the financial industry, allowing the housing bubble to inflate and the crisis to unfold.
|
This theme highlights the lack of effective oversight and the collusion between financial institutions and regulatory bodies, which contributed significantly to the crisis. |
This theme supports the primary theme by highlighting a crucial factor in the systemic failure: the lack of accountability and enforcement of regulations.
|
||||||||||||
Screenwriting Resources on Themes
Articles
| Site | Description |
|---|---|
| Studio Binder | Movie Themes: Examples of Common Themes for Screenwriters |
| Coverfly | Improving your Screenplay's theme |
| John August | Writing from Theme |
YouTube Videos
| Title | Description |
|---|---|
| Story, Plot, Genre, Theme - Screenwriting Basics | Screenwriting basics - beginner video |
| What is theme | Discussion on ways to layer theme into a screenplay. |
| Thematic Mistakes You're Making in Your Script | Common Theme mistakes and Philosophical Conflicts |
Emotional Analysis
Emotional Variety
Critique
- The screenplay exhibits a range of emotions, but certain scenes feel repetitive in their emotional tone, particularly those focused on humor or tension without sufficient variation.
- Scenes such as 1 and 2 rely heavily on humor and excitement, while others like 3 and 4 delve into sadness and empathy, creating a disjointed emotional experience.
- The emotional landscape could benefit from more nuanced transitions between different emotional states, particularly in scenes that deal with the consequences of the financial crisis.
Suggestions
- Introduce moments of vulnerability or introspection in scenes that are primarily comedic or light-hearted, such as adding a reflective moment for characters in scenes 1 and 2.
- Incorporate contrasting emotions in key scenes, such as blending moments of joy with underlying sadness or tension, particularly in scenes like 5 and 6.
Emotional Intensity Distribution
Critique
- Emotional intensity is unevenly distributed, with peaks in scenes like 10 and 55, while others, such as 1 and 2, lack significant emotional weight.
- Scenes 31 and 50 create a sense of urgency and dread, but the emotional buildup in earlier scenes does not adequately prepare the audience for these climactic moments.
- The screenplay could benefit from a more gradual build-up of emotional intensity leading to key moments of crisis.
Suggestions
- Balance emotional intensity by reducing the stakes in scenes that feel overwhelming, such as 10, while increasing tension in earlier scenes like 3 and 4 to create a more cohesive emotional arc.
- Consider restructuring scenes to allow for emotional peaks to be followed by quieter moments, providing the audience with a chance to process the emotional weight.
Empathy For Characters
Critique
- Empathy is strong for characters like Michael Burry and Mark Baum, particularly in scenes that explore their internal struggles, but weaker for secondary characters who lack depth.
- Scenes such as 3 and 45 effectively evoke empathy through personal struggles, while others, like 1 and 2, focus more on humor, diluting emotional connection.
- The emotional journey of supporting characters could be enhanced to create a more rounded narrative.
Suggestions
- Add backstory or emotional depth to secondary characters in scenes like 1 and 2 to enhance audience empathy, allowing viewers to connect with their struggles.
- Incorporate moments of vulnerability for characters like Vinny and Danny in scenes 17 and 52, allowing the audience to see their fears and motivations.
Emotional Impact Of Key Scenes
Critique
- Key scenes such as 55 and 56 deliver strong emotional impacts, but others, like 1 and 2, feel underwhelming in their emotional resonance.
- The climactic moments in scenes 55 and 60 effectively convey the gravity of the financial crisis, while earlier scenes lack the emotional punch needed to build anticipation.
- Some pivotal scenes could benefit from heightened emotional stakes to leave a lasting impression on the audience.
Suggestions
- Enhance emotional impact in key scenes by restructuring dialogue to heighten stakes and urgency, particularly in scenes like 55 and 60.
- Consider adding visual or auditory elements, such as music or sound design, to amplify the emotional weight of critical moments.
Complex Emotional Layers
Critique
- Many scenes present emotions in a straightforward manner, lacking the complexity that could deepen audience engagement, particularly in scenes like 1 and 2.
- Scenes such as 3 and 4 effectively explore multiple emotional layers, but others, like 5 and 6, could benefit from additional sub-emotions to create a richer experience.
- The screenplay sometimes misses opportunities to explore the interplay of emotions, particularly in scenes dealing with moral dilemmas.
Suggestions
- Introduce sub-emotions in scenes like 5 and 6, such as regret or guilt, to create a more nuanced emotional experience for the audience.
- Encourage characters to express conflicting emotions in key scenes, such as joy mixed with sadness, to enhance the complexity of their emotional journeys.
Additional Critique
Character Development
Critiques
- Some characters, particularly secondary ones, lack depth and emotional resonance, making it difficult for the audience to connect with their journeys.
- Scenes like 1 and 2 focus heavily on humor, which detracts from the emotional development of characters who could otherwise evoke empathy.
- The emotional arcs of supporting characters could be better integrated into the main narrative to create a more cohesive story.
Suggestions
- Develop backstories for secondary characters in scenes like 1 and 2, allowing viewers to understand their motivations and struggles.
- Incorporate moments of vulnerability for characters like Vinny and Danny in scenes 17 and 52, allowing the audience to see their fears and motivations.
Emotional Transitions
Critiques
- The transitions between emotional states can feel abrupt, particularly in scenes that shift from humor to serious themes without adequate buildup.
- Scenes like 1 and 2 could benefit from smoother transitions to maintain emotional engagement and coherence.
- The emotional flow of the screenplay sometimes disrupts the audience's connection to the characters and their journeys.
Suggestions
- Implement smoother emotional transitions between scenes, particularly in those that shift from light-hearted moments to serious themes, such as in scenes 1 and 2.
- Consider using visual or auditory cues to signal emotional shifts, helping the audience navigate the emotional landscape more effectively.
| Goals and Philosophical Conflict | |
|---|---|
| internal Goals | Throughout the script, the protagonist grapples with a complex web of internal goals that transition from seeking personal validation and success in the financial industry to confronting ethical dilemmas surrounding the exploitation inherent in those same industries. This evolution reflects a deepening awareness of the repercussions of his actions on society and his relationships, particularly regarding his family's acceptance and his complications as a father. |
| External Goals | The protagonist's external goals evolve from simply navigating the high-stakes world of finance towards actively working to profit from the impending financial collapse through strategic investments and shorts. This trajectory showcases his progression from a player in the system to someone who seeks to challenge and expose its underlying corruptions. |
| Philosophical Conflict | The overarching philosophical conflict intertwines the pursuit of capitalist success against the moral implications of one's choices in a corrupt financial market: Ethical Accountability vs. Unchecked Ambition. This conflict highlights the struggle to reconcile personal gain with societal impact. |
Character Development Contribution: The internal and external goals contribute significantly to the protagonist's development by presenting a clear trajectory of moral awakening, highlighting the transformation from a self-serving trader to a more ethically aware individual who grapples with personal and societal responsibilities.
Narrative Structure Contribution: The structured portrayal of the protagonist's evolving goals drives the plot forward, weaving through escalating tensions and crises that mirror the broader economic collapse while revealing the individual’s stakes in the turbulent financial landscape.
Thematic Depth Contribution: These conflicts and goals deepen the thematic fabric of the screenplay, emphasizing the consequences of greed, the moral obligations of those in power, and the emotional toll of the systemic failures on both personal and societal levels.
Screenwriting Resources on Goals and Philosophical Conflict
Articles
| Site | Description |
|---|---|
| Creative Screenwriting | How Important Is A Character’s Goal? |
| Studio Binder | What is Conflict in a Story? A Quick Reminder of the Purpose of Conflict |
YouTube Videos
| Title | Description |
|---|---|
| How I Build a Story's Philosophical Conflict | How do you build philosophical conflict into your story? Where do you start? And how do you develop it into your characters and their external actions. Today I’m going to break this all down and make it fully clear in this episode. |
| Endings: The Good, the Bad, and the Insanely Great | By Michael Arndt: I put this lecture together in 2006, when I started work at Pixar on Toy Story 3. It looks at how to write an "insanely great" ending, using Star Wars, The Graduate, and Little Miss Sunshine as examples. 90 minutes |
| Tips for Writing Effective Character Goals | By Jessica Brody (Save the Cat!): Writing character goals is one of the most important jobs of any novelist. But are your character's goals...mushy? |
Scene Analysis
📊 Understanding Your Percentile Rankings
Your scene scores are compared against professional produced screenplays in our vault (The Matrix, Breaking Bad, etc.). The percentile shows where you rank compared to these films.
Example: A score of 8.5 in Dialogue might be 85th percentile (strong!), while the same 8.5 in Conflict might only be 50th percentile (needs work). The percentile tells you what your raw scores actually mean.
Hover over each axis on the radar chart to see what that category measures and why it matters.
Scenes are rated on many criteria. The goal isn't to try to maximize every number; it's to make you aware of what's happening in your scenes. You might have very good reasons to have character development but not advance the story, or have a scene without conflict. Obviously if your dialogue is really bad, you should probably look into that.
| Story Content | Character Development | Scene Elements | Audience Engagement | Technical Aspects | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Click for Full Analysis | Tone | Overall | Concept | Plot | Originality | Characters | Character Changes | Internal Goal | External Goal | Conflict | Opposition | High stakes | Story forward | Twist | Emotional Impact | Dialogue | Engagement | Pacing | Formatting | Structure | |
| 1 - The Birth of Mortgage-Backed Securities | Sarcastic, Informative, Humorous | 8.5 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 6 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | |
| 2 - The Reckless Rise | Informative, Reflective, Critical | 8.5 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 5 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | |
| 3 - The Game and the Eye | Reflective, Emotional, Introspective | 8.5 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 5 | 7 | 4 | 6 | 7 | 9 | 7 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | |
| 4 - The Awakening of Concern | Serious, Analytical, Intense | 8.5 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | |
| 5 - The Awakening of Michael Burry | Intense, Analytical, Foreboding | 8.5 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | |
| 6 - Clash of Perspectives | Serious, Assertive, Confident | 8.5 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | |
| 7 - The Urgency of Risk | Serious, Informative, Intense | 8.5 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 7 | 7 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | |
| 8 - Betting Against the Bull | Serious, Confident, Tense | 9.2 | 10 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 10 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | |
| 9 - The Bet Against the Tide | Serious, Intense, Excited | 8.5 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | |
| 10 - Risky Bets | Tense, Serious, Confrontational | 8.5 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 7.5 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 7 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 8.5 | 8 | 8 | |
| 11 - Disruption in Therapy | Intense, Emotional, Confrontational | 8.5 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | |
| 12 - A Walk Through Doubt | Dark, Intense, Critical | 8.5 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | |
| 13 - Fractured Reflections | Intense, Reflective, Emotional | 8.5 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | |
| 14 - A Curious Call | Sarcastic, Cynical, Humorous | 8.5 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 6 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | |
| 15 - The Jenga Revelation | Condescending, Informative, Sarcastic | 9.2 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 10 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | |
| 16 - From Fish to Financial Collapse | Intense, Informative, Foreboding | 9.2 | 10 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 7.5 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 8.5 | 8 | 8 | |
| 17 - Trusting the Unknown | Serious, Analytical, Determined | 8.5 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | |
| 18 - Awkward Encounters and Harsh Realities | Nervous, Awkward, Light-hearted | 7.5 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 6 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 5 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | |
| 19 - High Stakes and Paranoia | Humorous, Paranoid, Informative | 8.5 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | |
| 20 - Abandoned Aspirations | Sarcastic, Disillusioned, Curious | 7.5 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | |
| 21 - Home Uncertainty | Tense, Suspenseful, Mysterious | 8.5 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | |
| 22 - Confrontation in the Office | Serious, Tense, Defensive | 8.5 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | |
| 23 - Navigating Opportunity in a Downturn | Reflective, Observational, Satirical | 8.5 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 6 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | |
| 24 - Lending Laughter: A Casual Chat on Risky Mortgages | Informative, Casual, Humorous | 8.5 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 5 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | |
| 25 - Exposing Exploitation | Intense, Confrontational, Informative | 8.5 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | |
| 26 - Navigating Financial Turbulence | Intense, Confrontational, Suspenseful | 8.5 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 9 | 7 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | |
| 27 - Negotiations and Paranoia | Intense, Suspenseful, Confrontational | 8.5 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | |
| 28 - The Perfect Scam: A Culinary Metaphor for CDOs | Serious, Informative, Shocking | 8.5 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | |
| 29 - The Reluctant Agreement | Sarcastic, Humorous, Cynical | 8.5 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | |
| 30 - The Calm Before the Storm | Tense, Suspenseful, Foreboding | 8.5 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | |
| 31 - Rising Defaults, Confounding Markets | Tense, Confused, Urgent | 8.5 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | |
| 32 - Frustration on Two Fronts | Urgency, Anger, Sarcasm, Tension | 8.5 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | |
| 33 - A Moment of Distraction | Serious, Concerned, Reflective | 8.5 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 5 | 7 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | |
| 34 - The Ratings Dilemma | Confrontational, Intense, Cynical, Serious | 9.2 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | |
| 35 - Tensions in the Financial Crisis | Urgent, Frustrated, Cynical | 8.5 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | |
| 36 - Confrontation in the Conference Room | Intense, Confrontational, Cynical | 9.2 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 10 | 9 | 8 | 7 | 10 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 7 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | |
| 37 - Skepticism in Sin City | Sarcastic, Cynical, Confrontational | 8.5 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 7 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | |
| 38 - Guns and CDOs: A Misfire in Vegas | Sarcastic, Confrontational, Humorous | 8.5 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | |
| 39 - Confronting Optimism: A Clash in the Ballroom | Tense, Serious, Confrontational | 8.5 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | |
| 40 - Rhythms of Frustration | Intense, Confrontational, Skeptical | 8.5 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 9 | 7 | 9 | 9 | 7 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | |
| 41 - The High Stakes of Morality | Serious, Concerned, Reflective | 8.5 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | |
| 42 - The Unraveling Truth | Tense, Confrontational, Informative | 8.5 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 7.5 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8.5 | 8 | 8 | |
| 43 - The High Stakes of Overconfidence | Informative, Humorous, Cynical | 8.5 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 7.5 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 6 | 8 | 9 | 8.5 | 8 | 8 | |
| 44 - Confrontation at Tabemasu | Sarcastic, Cynical, Intense, Humorous | 8.5 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | |
| 45 - Shared Grief in an Upscale Boutique | Intense, Emotional, Reflective | 9.2 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 10 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 10 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | |
| 46 - Navigating Uncertainty | Intense, Emotional, Reflective | 9.2 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 10 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | |
| 47 - Tensions Rise as the Financial Crisis Unfolds | Tense, Serious, Confrontational | 9.2 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 10 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | |
| 48 - The Reluctant Reporter | Anxious, Panicked, Frustrated | 8.5 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | |
| 49 - The Weight of Transparency | Tense, Confrontational, Suspenseful | 9.2 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 7.5 | 10 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 8.5 | 8 | 8 | |
| 50 - Market Collapse: A Moment of Realization | Tense, Serious, Foreboding | 8.5 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | |
| 51 - Financial Reckoning | Tense, Serious, Anxious | 9.2 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 10 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | |
| 52 - Tensions at Midnight | Intense, Confrontational, Tense | 9.2 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 7.5 | 9 | 8 | 10 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | |
| 53 - Panic in the Financial Sector | Tense, Worrisome, Disappointment | 8.5 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 7 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | |
| 54 - Securities and Shenanigans | Tense, Serious, Anxious | 8.5 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | |
| 55 - The Tipping Point | Serious, Critical, Reflective | 9.2 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 7 | 10 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | |
| 56 - Crisis Unfolds | Tense, Panic, Chaotic | 8.5 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | |
| 57 - Aftermath of Collapse | Tense, Reflective, Somber | 8.5 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 9 | 8 | 7 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | |
| 58 - The Cost of Opportunity | Serious, Reflective, Regretful | 8.5 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | |
| 59 - Disillusion on the Roof | Resigned, Sarcastic, Critical | 8.5 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | |
| 60 - The Weight of Profit | Tense, Resigned, Skeptical | 9.2 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 10 | 9 | 8 | 10 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | |
Summary of Scene Level Analysis
Here are insights from the scene-level analysis, highlighting strengths, weaknesses, and actionable suggestions.
Some points may appear in both strengths and weaknesses due to scene variety.
Tip: Click on criteria in the top row for detailed summaries.
Scene Strengths
- Sharp dialogue that contributes to character development and engagement
- Strong character dynamics that allow for tension-filled interactions
- Effective use of visuals and voiceover to convey complex information and themes
- Compelling plot progression that maintains audience interest
- Emotional depth that adds gravitas to the story and themes
Scene Weaknesses
- Limited character development in certain scenes, leading to one-dimensional portrayals
- Heavy reliance on technical dialogue, potentially alienating general audiences
- Lack of significant external conflict in some sections, reducing tension
- Some exposition-heavy moments that can disrupt pacing
- Potential for audience confusion due to complex financial terminology
Suggestions
- Deepen character development across all scenes, ensuring each character has a clear arc and motivations
- Simplify technical dialogue where possible or provide context to make it accessible to all audiences
- Introduce more physical action or external conflicts to heighten tension and engagement
- Reduce reliance on exposition by showing rather than telling through action and character interactions
- Consider alternative visual storytelling methods to break up dialogue-heavy sections and enhance engagement
Scene 1 - The Birth of Mortgage-Backed Securities
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 2 - The Reckless Rise
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 3 - The Game and the Eye
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 4 - The Awakening of Concern
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 5 - The Awakening of Michael Burry
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 6 - Clash of Perspectives
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 7 - The Urgency of Risk
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 8 - Betting Against the Bull
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 9 - The Bet Against the Tide
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 10 - Risky Bets
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 11 - Disruption in Therapy
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 12 - A Walk Through Doubt
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 13 - Fractured Reflections
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 14 - A Curious Call
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 15 - The Jenga Revelation
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 16 - From Fish to Financial Collapse
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 17 - Trusting the Unknown
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 18 - Awkward Encounters and Harsh Realities
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 19 - High Stakes and Paranoia
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 20 - Abandoned Aspirations
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 21 - Home Uncertainty
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 22 - Confrontation in the Office
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 23 - Navigating Opportunity in a Downturn
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 24 - Lending Laughter: A Casual Chat on Risky Mortgages
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 25 - Exposing Exploitation
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 26 - Navigating Financial Turbulence
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 27 - Negotiations and Paranoia
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 28 - The Perfect Scam: A Culinary Metaphor for CDOs
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 29 - The Reluctant Agreement
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 30 - The Calm Before the Storm
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 31 - Rising Defaults, Confounding Markets
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 32 - Frustration on Two Fronts
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 33 - A Moment of Distraction
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 34 - The Ratings Dilemma
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 35 - Tensions in the Financial Crisis
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 36 - Confrontation in the Conference Room
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 37 - Skepticism in Sin City
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 38 - Guns and CDOs: A Misfire in Vegas
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 39 - Confronting Optimism: A Clash in the Ballroom
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 40 - Rhythms of Frustration
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 41 - The High Stakes of Morality
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 42 - The Unraveling Truth
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 43 - The High Stakes of Overconfidence
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 44 - Confrontation at Tabemasu
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 45 - Shared Grief in an Upscale Boutique
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 46 - Navigating Uncertainty
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 47 - Tensions Rise as the Financial Crisis Unfolds
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 48 - The Reluctant Reporter
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 49 - The Weight of Transparency
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 50 - Market Collapse: A Moment of Realization
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 51 - Financial Reckoning
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 52 - Tensions at Midnight
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 53 - Panic in the Financial Sector
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 54 - Securities and Shenanigans
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 55 - The Tipping Point
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 56 - Crisis Unfolds
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 57 - Aftermath of Collapse
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 58 - The Cost of Opportunity
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 59 - Disillusion on the Roof
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Scene 60 - The Weight of Profit
The #1 Rule of Screenwriting: Make your reader or audience compelled to keep reading.
“Grab ‘em by the throat and never let ‘em go.”
The scene level score is the impact on the reader or audience to continue reading.
The Script score is how compelled they are to keep reading based on the rest of the script so far.
Sequence Analysis
📊 Understanding Your Percentile Rankings
Your sequence scores are compared against professional produced screenplays in our vault (The Matrix, Breaking Bad, etc.). The percentile shows where you rank compared to these films.
Example: A score of 8.5 in Plot Progress might be 85th percentile (strong!), while the same 8.5 in Stakes might only be 50th percentile (needs work). The percentile tells you what your raw scores actually mean.
Hover over each axis on the radar chart to see what that category measures and why it matters.
Sequences are analyzed as Hero Goal Sequences as defined by Eric Edson—structural units where your protagonist pursues a specific goal. These are rated on multiple criteria including momentum, pressure, character development, and narrative cohesion. The goal isn't to maximize every number; it's to make you aware of what's happening in each sequence. You might have very good reasons for a sequence to focus on character leverage rather than plot escalation, or to build emotional impact without heavy conflict. Use these metrics to understand your story's rhythm and identify where adjustments might strengthen your narrative.
| Sequence | Scenes | Overall | Momentum | Pressure | Emotion/Tone | Shape/Cohesion | Character/Arc | Novelty | Craft | Momentum | Pressure | Emotion/Tone | Shape/Cohesion | Character/Arc | Novelty | Craft | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plot Progress | Pacing | Keep Reading | Escalation | Stakes | Emotional | Tone/Visual | Narrative Shape | Impact | Memorable | Char Leverage | Int Goal | Ext Goal | Originality | Readability | Plot Progress | Pacing | Keep Reading | Escalation | Stakes | Reveal Rhythm | Emotional | Tone/Visual | Narrative Shape | Impact | Memorable | Char Leverage | Int Goal | Ext Goal | Subplots | Originality | Readability | |||
| Act One Overall: 8.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1 - The Genesis of Crisis | 1 – 2 | 8.5 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 7 | 8 |
| 2 - Burry's Awakening | 3 – 5 | 8.5 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
| 3 - The $1.3 Billion Gamble | 6 – 10 | 8.5 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
| 4 - Baum's Disillusionment | 11 – 13 | 8.5 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 8 |
| 5 - The FrontPoint Opportunity | 14 – 15 | 8.5 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
| Act Two A Overall: 8.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1 - Decoding CDOs and Committing to the Bet | 16 – 17 | 8.5 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 8 | 8 |
| 2 - Brownfield's Wall Street Hustle | 18 – 19 | 6.5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 7 |
| 3 - Miami Ground Zero Investigation | 20 – 21 | 7.5 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 8 |
| 4 - Burry Under Fire | 22 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
| 5 - Unmasking Mortgage Fraud | 23 – 25 | 8.5 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
| 6 - Executing the Big Short | 26 – 30 | 8.5 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 6 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 8 |
| 7 - Weathering the Storm | 31 – 33 | 8.5 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
| Act Two B Overall: 8.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1 - Rating Agency Revelation | 34 – 36 | 8.5 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
| 2 - Vegas Truth Hunt | 37 – 44 | 8.5 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 8 |
| 3 - Moral Reckonings & Market Moves | 45 – 46 | 8.5 | 9 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 8 |
| 4 - Collapse & Containment | 47 – 51 | 8.5 | 9 | 7 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 7 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 8 |
| Act Three Overall: 9 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1 - Holding the Line | 52 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 6 | 8 |
| 2 - Fire Sale Frenzy | 53 – 54 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
| 3 - Truth Bombs on Wall Street | 55 | 8.5 | 9 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 8 |
| 4 - Lehman's Funeral & Cardiac Arrest | 56 – 57 | 7.5 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 6 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 5 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 8 |
| 5 - Aftermath Montage | 58 | 8.5 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 9 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 9 |
| 6 - The Moral Reckoning | 59 – 60 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 6 | 8 | 9 |
Act One — Seq 1: The Genesis of Crisis
The sequence opens with Lewis Ranieri introducing mortgage-backed securities to skeptical pension fund managers in 1979, framing bundled mortgages as low-risk investments. It then jumps to bond traders' excessive lifestyles and uses time-lapse visuals of Manhattan's evolving skyline to show Wall Street's unchecked growth. Through voiceover and stock footage of the 2008 crisis aftermath, it highlights systemic ignorance while teasing that a few outsiders detected the impending disaster.
Dramatic Question
- (1, 2) The humor and irreverence in the dialogue effectively capture the culture of Wall Street during this era, making the sequence entertaining.high
- (1, 2) The use of voiceover narration provides clarity and insight into complex financial concepts, making them accessible to the audience.high
- (3, 4) The visual metaphors and time-lapse shots create a dynamic representation of the financial landscape, enhancing engagement.medium
- (1) The introduction of Lewis Ranieri as a pivotal character sets up the narrative's exploration of innovation in finance.high
- (5, 6, 7) The use of stock footage effectively grounds the narrative in reality, illustrating the consequences of the financial practices discussed.medium
- (1, 2) The emotional stakes for the characters are not clearly established, which could enhance audience investment in their journeys.high
- The pacing could be tightened to maintain momentum, particularly in the transition between scenes.medium
- (3) The transition from the strip club scene to the skyline montage feels abrupt; a smoother connection could enhance flow.medium
- (4) The voiceover could include more personal stakes or anecdotes to deepen the emotional connection to the characters.high
- Clarifying the implications of the mortgage-backed securities earlier could help set up the stakes for the audience.medium
- A deeper exploration of the personal motivations of key characters is needed to create emotional resonance.high
- A clearer foreshadowing of the consequences of the financial practices discussed would heighten tension.medium
- More character interactions could help establish relationships and dynamics that will be important later.medium
- A stronger thematic statement about the moral implications of the financial system could enhance depth.medium
- The sequence could benefit from a more explicit connection to the present-day implications of the events being discussed.low
{
"impact": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence is visually engaging and emotionally resonant, effectively setting the stage for the narrative.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Enhance character emotional stakes to increase audience connection.",
"Incorporate more dynamic visuals to elevate the cinematic experience."
]
},
"pacing": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The pacing is generally good, but some transitions could be smoother.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Trim any redundant dialogue or scenes to maintain momentum.",
"Ensure that each scene builds toward the next."
]
},
"stakes": {
"score": 6,
"explanation": "The stakes are introduced but could be made more immediate and personal for the characters.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Clarify the consequences of failure for the characters.",
"Tie emotional stakes to external goals to enhance urgency."
]
},
"escalation": {
"score": 6,
"explanation": "While the sequence builds tension, it could benefit from more pronounced stakes as the narrative progresses.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Introduce conflicts or challenges that escalate the stakes for the characters.",
"Create a sense of urgency in the dialogue and action."
]
},
"originality": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The sequence presents familiar themes in a fresh way, though some elements feel conventional.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Introduce more unique character traits or situations.",
"Experiment with narrative structure to enhance originality."
]
},
"readability": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence is well-formatted and clear, with engaging dialogue and descriptions.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Ensure consistent formatting throughout for clarity.",
"Consider breaking up longer paragraphs for easier reading."
]
},
"memorability": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The humor and unique presentation make the sequence memorable, though it could use stronger emotional beats.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Highlight key moments that resonate emotionally with the audience.",
"Ensure that each scene contributes to a cohesive narrative arc."
]
},
"revealRhythm": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The sequence reveals information at a good pace, but could benefit from more impactful moments.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Space out key revelations to build suspense.",
"Ensure emotional beats are timed effectively."
]
},
"narrativeShape": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence has a clear structure, introducing characters and concepts effectively.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Consider adding a more defined climax to enhance narrative shape.",
"Ensure transitions between scenes feel seamless."
]
},
"emotionalImpact": {
"score": 6,
"explanation": "While the sequence is engaging, it lacks strong emotional highs or lows.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Incorporate moments of vulnerability or conflict to deepen emotional impact.",
"Ensure that stakes resonate on a personal level."
]
},
"plotProgression": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The sequence introduces key concepts and characters, advancing the plot toward the financial crisis.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Clarify character motivations to strengthen plot advancement.",
"Ensure each scene builds on the last to maintain momentum."
]
},
"subplotIntegration": {
"score": 5,
"explanation": "Subplots are not yet integrated, which could enhance the narrative complexity.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Introduce secondary characters that intersect with the main plot.",
"Ensure subplots align thematically with the main narrative."
]
},
"tonalVisualCohesion": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The tone is consistent, blending humor with serious themes effectively.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Strengthen visual motifs to enhance tonal cohesion.",
"Ensure that humor complements rather than detracts from serious moments."
]
},
"externalGoalProgress": {
"score": 6,
"explanation": "The external goals are introduced, but the urgency of achieving them is not fully realized.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Create obstacles that challenge characters' external goals.",
"Increase the stakes associated with their financial innovations."
]
},
"internalGoalProgress": {
"score": 4,
"explanation": "The internal goals of characters are not yet clear, which may hinder audience investment.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Clarify characters' internal struggles to enhance emotional depth.",
"Use dialogue to reveal personal stakes."
]
},
"characterLeveragePoint": {
"score": 5,
"explanation": "While characters are introduced, their arcs are not yet fully developed, limiting emotional engagement.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Deepen character backstories to enhance their arcs.",
"Introduce moments of vulnerability to create connection."
]
},
"compelledToKeepReading": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence creates curiosity about the characters and the unfolding crisis, motivating the audience to continue.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"End with a stronger hook or cliffhanger to enhance momentum.",
"Raise unanswered questions that compel the audience to read on."
]
}
}
Act One — Seq 2: Burry's Awakening
Childhood flashbacks establish Michael Burry's outsider status and analytical nature. As an adult, he overhears a real estate conversation triggering his investigation into mortgage fraud. He obsessively analyzes mortgage-backed securities, uncovering high-risk subprime loans while isolating himself from colleagues. The sequence culminates with Burry privately confirming the housing market's instability.
Dramatic Question
- (8, 9) The portrayal of Michael's childhood and his glass eye effectively sets up his character's isolation and uniqueness.high
- (12) The dialogue between Burry and the young analyst showcases Burry's analytical mind and foreshadows his critical insights into the mortgage market.high
- (10, 11) The contrast between Burry's social awkwardness and the lively party atmosphere highlights his disconnection from the world around him.medium
- (13) The visual representation of complex mortgage data reflects Burry's deep dive into the financial crisis, engaging the audience with its intensity.high
- The use of voiceover provides insight into Burry's thoughts, enhancing character depth and audience connection.medium
- (10) The dialogue at the party could be tightened to avoid redundancy and enhance clarity.high
- (12) Burry's conversation with the analyst could benefit from more dynamic exchanges to better showcase his character.medium
- (13) The internal monologue could be streamlined to maintain pacing and focus on key insights.medium
- (9) The transition from the football field to the pool could be more fluid to enhance narrative flow.medium
- Consider adding more visual metaphors to reinforce the themes of isolation and financial complexity.low
- A clearer emotional arc for Burry could enhance audience connection and investment in his journey.high
- More explicit stakes regarding the financial crisis could heighten tension and urgency.medium
- Additional character interactions could provide more context for Burry's relationships and challenges.medium
- A stronger thematic link between Burry's personal struggles and the financial crisis could deepen the narrative.medium
- More humor could balance the serious themes and enhance engagement.low
{
"impact": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence effectively engages the audience through character depth and thematic exploration.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Enhance visual storytelling to create a more immersive experience.",
"Incorporate more dynamic interactions to elevate emotional stakes."
]
},
"pacing": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The pacing is generally smooth, though some scenes could be tightened.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Trim redundant dialogue to maintain momentum.",
"Ensure each scene contributes to the overall pacing."
]
},
"stakes": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The stakes are present but could be more clearly defined and urgent.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Clarify the consequences of Burry's discoveries.",
"Heighten the urgency of the financial crisis."
]
},
"escalation": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "Tension builds as Burry uncovers the truth, but could be heightened with more immediate stakes.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Introduce a ticking clock element to increase urgency.",
"Add more obstacles to Burry's discoveries to enhance tension."
]
},
"originality": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The sequence presents familiar themes in a fresh way, though some elements feel conventional.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Introduce more unique character interactions.",
"Explore unconventional narrative structures."
]
},
"readability": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence is clear and well-structured, though some dialogue could be more concise.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Streamline dialogue for clarity.",
"Ensure transitions are smooth for better flow."
]
},
"memorability": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence contains strong character moments and thematic depth, making it memorable.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Highlight key emotional beats to create a stronger impact.",
"Ensure each scene contributes to a cohesive narrative arc."
]
},
"revealRhythm": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "Revelations about the financial crisis are well-paced but could be more impactful.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Space out key revelations for greater suspense.",
"Ensure each reveal builds on the previous one."
]
},
"narrativeShape": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence has a clear structure, with a beginning, middle, and end that flows well.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Refine transitions between scenes for smoother narrative flow.",
"Ensure each scene builds on the previous one to maintain momentum."
]
},
"emotionalImpact": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "Emotional highs are present but could be amplified for greater resonance.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Deepen character relationships to enhance emotional stakes.",
"Highlight key moments of vulnerability for stronger impact."
]
},
"plotProgression": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The sequence advances Burry's journey and sets up the financial crisis, though it could be more impactful.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Clarify Burry's motivations to strengthen plot advancement.",
"Introduce more conflict to heighten narrative tension."
]
},
"subplotIntegration": {
"score": 6,
"explanation": "Subplots are present but could be better integrated into Burry's journey.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Weave subplots more tightly with Burry's main arc.",
"Ensure secondary characters enhance the primary narrative."
]
},
"tonalVisualCohesion": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The tone is consistent, blending humor with serious themes effectively.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Enhance visual motifs to reinforce thematic elements.",
"Ensure tone aligns with character arcs throughout the sequence."
]
},
"externalGoalProgress": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "Burry's external goal of uncovering the truth is clear, but could be more urgent.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Introduce more immediate consequences for his discoveries.",
"Clarify the stakes involved in his actions."
]
},
"internalGoalProgress": {
"score": 6,
"explanation": "Burry's internal journey is present but could be more pronounced.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Highlight Burry's emotional struggles more clearly.",
"Integrate his internal conflicts with external actions."
]
},
"characterLeveragePoint": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "Burry's character is tested through social interactions and his discoveries, though more depth could be added.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Explore Burry's internal conflicts more deeply.",
"Add more external challenges to test his character."
]
},
"compelledToKeepReading": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence creates curiosity about Burry's journey and the financial crisis.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Introduce cliffhangers or unresolved questions to heighten suspense.",
"Ensure each scene leaves the audience wanting more."
]
}
}
Act One — Seq 3: The $1.3 Billion Gamble
Burry confronts Lawrence Fields about his plan but faces skepticism about betting against 'safe' mortgages. After a celebrity cameo explains the financial mechanics, Burry pitches Goldman Sachs on credit default swaps, securing an initial deal. He rapidly expands his bet to multiple banks, investing $1.3 billion. The sequence ends with furious investor backlash as Burry holds his ground against mounting pressure.
Dramatic Question
- (6, 7, 8) The dialogue effectively conveys the complexity of financial concepts while maintaining viewer engagement through humor and relatable explanations.high
- (9, 10) The introduction of character dynamics and the reactions of Burry's investors add depth to the narrative and highlight the tension surrounding his decisions.high
- (7) Scarlett Johansson's cameo serves as a memorable and humorous way to explain complex financial terms, making the material accessible to the audience.high
- (8, 19) The contrast between Burry's serious demeanor and the celebratory atmosphere of the bankers effectively highlights the disconnect in the financial world.medium
- (25) The tension in Burry's conversation with Lawrence Fields showcases the stakes of his investment strategy and his determination to follow through.high
- (6, 10) Clarify the emotional stakes for Burry and his investors to enhance the tension and urgency of the situation.high
- (19) The dialogue could be tightened to avoid redundancy and maintain momentum, particularly in the exchanges between Burry and the sales reps.medium
- (25) Strengthen the emotional impact of Burry's internal conflict by providing more insight into his motivations and fears.high
- (8, 19) Introduce more visual motifs or recurring themes to enhance cohesion and reinforce the narrative's tone.medium
- (7) Consider varying the pacing of the explanations to maintain engagement and prevent information overload.medium
- A clearer depiction of the personal stakes for Burry and his investors could enhance emotional engagement.high
- More exploration of the moral implications of profiting from the impending crisis would deepen the narrative's complexity.medium
- A stronger sense of urgency or a ticking clock element could heighten tension throughout the sequence.medium
{
"impact": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence effectively combines humor and tension, making complex financial concepts engaging and memorable.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Incorporate more visual storytelling elements to enhance emotional resonance."
]
},
"pacing": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence flows well, but some scenes could be tightened to maintain momentum.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Trim redundant dialogue to enhance pacing."
]
},
"stakes": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The stakes are present but could be more clearly defined to enhance tension.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Clarify the consequences of Burry's actions to heighten emotional stakes."
]
},
"escalation": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "Tension builds as Burry's conviction grows, but could be heightened with clearer stakes.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Introduce more immediate consequences for Burry's decisions to increase urgency."
]
},
"originality": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence presents a fresh take on financial drama through humor and unique character perspectives.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Explore more unconventional storytelling techniques to enhance originality."
]
},
"readability": {
"score": 9,
"explanation": "The sequence is well-formatted and clear, with engaging dialogue and pacing.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Maintain clarity in complex explanations to ensure audience understanding."
]
},
"memorability": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The use of humor and celebrity cameos makes this sequence stand out, but emotional stakes could be clearer.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Strengthen the emotional payoff at the end of the sequence to enhance memorability."
]
},
"revealRhythm": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "Revelations about the financial system are well-timed, but could be spaced more effectively.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Adjust the pacing of information delivery to maintain engagement."
]
},
"narrativeShape": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence has a clear structure, but could benefit from a more pronounced climax.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Add a moment of crisis or revelation to heighten the narrative arc."
]
},
"emotionalImpact": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "Emotional highs are present, but could be amplified to resonate more strongly with the audience.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Deepen the emotional stakes surrounding Burry's decisions to enhance impact."
]
},
"plotProgression": {
"score": 9,
"explanation": "The sequence significantly advances the plot by establishing Burry's strategy and the reactions of those around him.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Ensure that each scene builds on the last to maintain narrative momentum."
]
},
"subplotIntegration": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "Secondary characters are introduced, but their arcs could be more integrated into Burry's journey.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Weave subplots more tightly into the main narrative to enhance cohesion."
]
},
"tonalVisualCohesion": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The tone is consistent, but visual motifs could be more pronounced to enhance thematic depth.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Incorporate recurring visual elements that symbolize the financial crisis."
]
},
"externalGoalProgress": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "Burry's external goal of shorting the market is clear and well-defined.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Clarify the obstacles he faces to enhance the sense of challenge."
]
},
"internalGoalProgress": {
"score": 6,
"explanation": "Burry's internal conflict is present but could be more pronounced to enhance emotional depth.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Provide more insight into Burry's motivations and fears to deepen his internal journey."
]
},
"characterLeveragePoint": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "Burry's determination is evident, but more internal conflict could deepen his character arc.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Explore Burry's emotional journey more explicitly to enhance character development."
]
},
"compelledToKeepReading": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The tension and stakes create a strong pull to continue, but clearer emotional stakes could enhance this further.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Introduce cliffhangers or unresolved questions to heighten narrative drive."
]
}
}
Act One — Seq 4: Baum's Disillusionment
Mark Baum disrupts therapy with rants about predatory banking, revealing deep-seated anger. Flashbacks to his religious schooling show early pattern-spotting tendencies. Tensions escalate during a street argument with his wife Cynthia, where he rejects her pleas for work-life balance and confronts trauma from his brother's suicide.
Dramatic Question
- (28, 30) Mark's candidness in therapy reveals his internal conflict and sets the stage for his character arc.high
- (29, 31) The juxtaposition of Mark's cynical view of society against the upbeat music and visuals creates a strong tonal contrast.high
- (32, 34) The dialogue between Mark and Cynthia effectively conveys the strain in their relationship, adding emotional depth.high
- (28) The therapy session could be more focused to avoid feeling like a tangent; streamline dialogue to maintain momentum.high
- (30) The transition between scenes could be smoother to enhance flow; consider tightening the intercutting.medium
- (31) Clarify the stakes of Mark's actions and beliefs to heighten tension and urgency in his narrative arc.high
- (33) The emotional weight of Mark's brother's death could be more explicitly tied to his current actions and mindset.medium
- (34) Mark's reaction to Cynthia's suggestions could be more visceral to better illustrate his internal struggle.medium
- () A clearer depiction of the external consequences of Mark's internal conflict is needed to enhance stakes.high
- () More visual metaphors could be employed to reinforce the themes of greed and corruption.medium
{
"impact": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence is emotionally engaging, particularly through Mark's therapy session and interactions with Cynthia.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Increase the emotional stakes by showing more of the consequences of Mark's actions."
]
},
"pacing": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The pacing is generally good, but some scenes could be tightened for better flow.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Trim redundant dialogue to maintain momentum."
]
},
"stakes": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The stakes are present but could be more clearly defined to enhance tension.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Clarify the specific consequences of Mark's actions on both personal and professional levels."
]
},
"escalation": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "Tension builds through Mark's internal conflict, but external stakes could be heightened to match.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Introduce more immediate external pressures that reflect the urgency of the financial situation."
]
},
"originality": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The sequence presents familiar themes in a fresh way, particularly through its character-driven approach.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Introduce more unexpected elements to keep the audience engaged."
]
},
"readability": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence is clear and well-structured, with engaging dialogue and effective scene transitions.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Ensure consistent formatting and clarity in scene descriptions."
]
},
"memorability": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence stands out for its character depth and humor, making it memorable.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Strengthen the climax of the sequence to leave a lasting impression."
]
},
"revealRhythm": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "Revelations about Mark's character and the financial system are well-paced, but could be more impactful.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Space out emotional beats to allow for greater impact."
]
},
"narrativeShape": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence has a clear structure, with a beginning, middle, and end that effectively convey Mark's journey.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Ensure each scene transitions smoothly to maintain narrative flow."
]
},
"emotionalImpact": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The emotional stakes are palpable, particularly in Mark's interactions with Cynthia.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Deepen the emotional resonance by exploring Mark's grief more thoroughly."
]
},
"plotProgression": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The sequence advances Mark's character arc and sets up future conflicts, but could clarify how these developments impact the overall plot.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Make connections between Mark's personal journey and the impending financial crisis more explicit."
]
},
"subplotIntegration": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "Subplots involving Mark's family add depth, but could be more tightly woven into the main narrative.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Integrate family dynamics more directly into Mark's professional challenges."
]
},
"tonalVisualCohesion": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The tonal contrast between humor and seriousness is effective, creating a unique viewing experience.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Enhance visual motifs that reflect the themes of greed and corruption."
]
},
"externalGoalProgress": {
"score": 6,
"explanation": "Mark's external goals are somewhat clear, but the stakes could be raised to enhance urgency.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Clarify the immediate consequences of Mark's actions in the financial world."
]
},
"internalGoalProgress": {
"score": 6,
"explanation": "Mark's internal conflict is present but could be more pronounced in his actions and decisions.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Show more of how Mark's grief influences his professional choices."
]
},
"characterLeveragePoint": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "Mark's character is tested through his interactions and internal struggles, but could benefit from more external challenges.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Introduce more conflict in Mark's professional life to parallel his personal struggles."
]
},
"compelledToKeepReading": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence effectively builds curiosity about Mark's next steps and the unfolding financial crisis.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Introduce a cliffhanger or unresolved question to heighten anticipation for the next sequence."
]
}
}
Act One — Seq 5: The FrontPoint Opportunity
Baum arrives at Morgan Stanley, brushes off corporate pleasantries, and learns from his team about Jared Vennett's misdirected call regarding mortgage shorts. Skeptical but intrigued by the ABX index mention, Baum greenlights a meeting. Vennett uses a Jenga demonstration to explain the fragility of mortgage-backed securities and CDOs, hooking Baum's team with the profit potential.
Dramatic Question
- (36, 37) The dialogue is sharp and humorous, effectively showcasing character personalities and dynamics.high
- (38, 39) The use of visual metaphors, like the Jenga game, simplifies complex financial concepts for the audience.high
- (35) The introduction of Kathy Tao adds depth to Mark's character and highlights the pressures of the financial world.medium
- (37) The sequence effectively builds tension as the characters begin to realize the implications of their findings.high
- The blend of comedy and drama keeps the audience engaged while addressing serious themes.high
- (36) Clarify the stakes involved in the characters' decisions to pursue the shorting strategy, as the urgency feels somewhat muted.high
- (39) Enhance the emotional weight of the characters' realizations about the financial crisis to deepen audience connection.medium
- Streamline some dialogue to avoid redundancy and maintain pacing, particularly in the conference room scenes.medium
- (38) Introduce more visual cues or metaphors to reinforce the gravity of the financial concepts being discussed.medium
- Ensure that character motivations are clear and compelling, particularly for secondary characters like Vinny and Porter.medium
- A stronger emotional connection to the consequences of the financial crisis could enhance audience investment.high
- More background on the characters' personal stakes in the financial system would deepen the narrative impact.medium
- A clearer depiction of the financial system's absurdities could heighten the satirical elements of the screenplay.medium
{
"impact": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence is engaging and visually striking, with strong character dynamics and humor that resonate with the audience.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Increase the emotional stakes to enhance audience connection.",
"Incorporate more visual metaphors to reinforce key themes."
]
},
"pacing": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence flows smoothly, maintaining momentum throughout.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Trim redundancies to enhance pacing.",
"Add urgency to key moments to maintain engagement."
]
},
"stakes": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The stakes are present but could be clearer and more compelling to enhance audience investment.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Clarify the specific losses or pain that will occur if the goal isn\u2019t met.",
"Tie external risks to internal costs for deeper resonance."
]
},
"escalation": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "Tension builds as the characters uncover more about the financial system, though some moments could be heightened.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Add more conflict or urgency to the characters' discussions.",
"Introduce a ticking clock element to increase stakes."
]
},
"originality": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The sequence feels fresh in its approach to financial themes, though some elements are familiar.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Add unique structural moves or unexpected twists to enhance originality.",
"Reinvent visual presentation to elevate the sequence."
]
},
"readability": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence is clear and well-formatted, with strong rhythm and engaging dialogue.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Ensure clarity in transitions to maintain flow.",
"Consider varying sentence structure for added dynamism."
]
},
"memorability": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence features memorable dialogue and visual metaphors that stand out, though some elements could be more impactful.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Clarify the turning point or climax of the sequence.",
"Strengthen visual or thematic through-lines to increase cohesion."
]
},
"revealRhythm": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "New revelations arrive at effective intervals, though some could be spaced more strategically.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Restructure reveals for better suspense or narrative tension.",
"Ensure that important information is spaced effectively."
]
},
"narrativeShape": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence has a clear beginning, middle, and end, effectively guiding the audience through the characters' discovery.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Enhance the structural arc by adding a midpoint or climax.",
"Ensure that each scene transitions smoothly to maintain flow."
]
},
"emotionalImpact": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The sequence delivers emotional highs effectively, though deeper connections could be fostered.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Deepen emotional stakes to enhance audience resonance.",
"Amplify the impact of key moments to create lasting impressions."
]
},
"plotProgression": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence significantly advances the plot by introducing critical information about the financial crisis and the characters' motivations.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Clarify the characters' goals and obstacles to enhance narrative momentum.",
"Ensure that each scene builds on the previous one to maintain forward motion."
]
},
"subplotIntegration": {
"score": 6,
"explanation": "Secondary characters are present but could be better integrated into the main narrative.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Enhance character crossover to strengthen thematic alignment.",
"Weave subplots more seamlessly into the main arc."
]
},
"tonalVisualCohesion": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The tone is consistent and purposeful, effectively blending humor and drama.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Strengthen recurring visuals or mood to enhance thematic cohesion.",
"Align tone more closely with genre expectations."
]
},
"externalGoalProgress": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The characters make tangible progress toward their external goals, though clarity could be improved.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Clarify the external goals and obstacles to reinforce forward motion.",
"Ensure that each scene contributes to the characters' objectives."
]
},
"internalGoalProgress": {
"score": 6,
"explanation": "The characters begin to move toward their internal goals, though the emotional journey could be more pronounced.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Externalize the internal journey to deepen subtext.",
"Reflect growth or struggle more clearly in character interactions."
]
},
"characterLeveragePoint": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The sequence tests the characters' beliefs and motivations, leading to a shift in their understanding of the financial crisis.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Amplify the emotional or philosophical shifts occurring in the sequence.",
"Deepen character backstories to enhance their motivations."
]
},
"compelledToKeepReading": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence motivates the reader to continue with its engaging dialogue and rising tension.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Sharpen cliffhangers or unanswered questions to increase narrative drive.",
"Raise uncertainty to enhance the pull toward the next sequence."
]
}
}
Act two a — Seq 1: Decoding CDOs and Committing to the Bet
Through Anthony Bourdain's kitchen metaphor, the team grasps how toxic mortgages are repackaged into CDOs. In the office, Mark convinces skeptical colleagues Vinny and Danny to investigate big banks' vulnerability despite distrust of Jared Vennett. The sequence ends with the team united in pursuing the bet against the housing market.
Dramatic Question
- (40, 41) The use of metaphor through Bourdain's cooking analogy effectively simplifies complex financial concepts.high
- (41) The dialogue is sharp and engaging, showcasing the characters' personalities and motivations.high
- (42) The tension among the characters as they grapple with the implications of their findings adds depth to the narrative.high
- (41) Some dialogue feels overly expository; tightening it could enhance the flow and maintain engagement.high
- (42) The stakes of their investigation could be made clearer to heighten tension and urgency.high
- Pacing could be improved by reducing redundant dialogue and focusing on key revelations.medium
- More visual metaphors could enhance understanding and engagement with the financial concepts.medium
- Integrating more emotional stakes related to the characters' personal lives could deepen audience connection.medium
- A clearer emotional arc for Mark could enhance audience investment in his journey.high
- More background on the personal stakes for the characters could enrich the narrative.medium
{
"impact": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence is engaging and visually striking, particularly through the use of metaphor.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Incorporate more dynamic visuals to enhance the storytelling."
]
},
"pacing": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The pacing is generally good, but some scenes could be tightened.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Trim redundant dialogue to enhance flow."
]
},
"stakes": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The stakes are present but could be made more immediate and personal.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Clarify the consequences of failure to enhance urgency."
]
},
"escalation": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "Tension builds as the characters confront the reality of their findings, but could be heightened further.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Introduce more immediate consequences for their actions."
]
},
"originality": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence presents financial concepts in a fresh and engaging way.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Explore more unique angles on the financial crisis."
]
},
"readability": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence is clear and well-structured, with engaging dialogue.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Ensure consistent formatting for clarity."
]
},
"memorability": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The use of humor and metaphor makes this sequence stand out.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Strengthen the emotional stakes to enhance memorability."
]
},
"revealRhythm": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "Revelations come at a good pace, but could be spaced more effectively.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Adjust the timing of reveals to maintain suspense."
]
},
"narrativeShape": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence has a clear structure, but could benefit from a more defined climax.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Add a more pronounced turning point to enhance the narrative arc."
]
},
"emotionalImpact": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The emotional stakes are present but could be deepened.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Highlight the personal stakes for the characters more clearly."
]
},
"plotProgression": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence advances the plot by deepening the characters' understanding of the crisis.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Ensure each scene builds on the last to maintain momentum."
]
},
"subplotIntegration": {
"score": 6,
"explanation": "Subplots are present but could be more tightly woven into the main narrative.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Integrate subplots more seamlessly into the main action."
]
},
"tonalVisualCohesion": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The tone is consistent, blending humor with serious themes effectively.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Enhance visual motifs to reinforce the tone."
]
},
"externalGoalProgress": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The characters are actively pursuing their external goal of uncovering the truth.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Clarify the obstacles they face to enhance tension."
]
},
"internalGoalProgress": {
"score": 6,
"explanation": "Mark's internal journey is present but could be more pronounced.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Highlight his emotional struggles more clearly."
]
},
"characterLeveragePoint": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "Mark's character is tested as he grapples with the implications of their findings.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Deepen the internal conflict to enhance character development."
]
},
"compelledToKeepReading": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence maintains interest through humor and tension.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Introduce cliffhangers or unresolved questions to enhance momentum."
]
}
}
Act two a — Seq 2: Brownfield's Wall Street Hustle
Jamie and Charlie face humiliation at a club and JP Morgan, realizing their small fund lacks credibility. In Boulder, they leverage past success with unconventional bets and recruit paranoid ex-trader Ben Rickert to help navigate Wall Street barriers. The sequence concludes with their expulsion from JP Morgan, highlighting their outsider status.
Dramatic Question
- (43, 44) The humor in Charlie and Jamie's awkward attempts to connect with women adds a light-hearted tone that contrasts with the film's serious themes.high
- (44) The dialogue effectively conveys the characters' naivety and ambition, setting the stage for their journey in finance.high
- (46) The introduction of Jared Vennett's voiceover provides a narrative thread that connects the characters' actions to the larger financial crisis.medium
- (44, 46) The pacing feels uneven, particularly in the transition between scenes. Tightening dialogue and cutting unnecessary exposition could enhance flow.high
- (44) The stakes for Charlie and Jamie are not clearly defined. Establishing what they stand to lose or gain would heighten engagement.high
- (43, 44) The humor, while effective, sometimes detracts from the urgency of their situation. Balancing comedic elements with the gravity of their financial pursuits would strengthen the narrative.medium
- (46) The voiceover could be more integrated into the scenes rather than feeling like an afterthought. This would enhance narrative cohesion.medium
- (44) The introduction of Ben Rickert feels abrupt. A smoother transition or more buildup to his character would enhance the narrative flow.medium
- (44) A clear emotional arc for Charlie and Jamie is missing. Their motivations could be more deeply explored to create a stronger connection with the audience.high
- (46) The sequence lacks a strong climax or turning point that propels the characters into the next phase of their journey.medium
{
"impact": {
"score": 6,
"explanation": "The sequence has engaging moments but lacks a cohesive emotional arc, making it feel less impactful overall.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Enhance character development to create a stronger emotional connection.",
"Tighten dialogue to maintain engagement."
]
},
"pacing": {
"score": 5,
"explanation": "The pacing is uneven, with some scenes dragging while others feel rushed.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Tighten dialogue and transitions to improve pacing."
]
},
"stakes": {
"score": 4,
"explanation": "The stakes are not clearly defined, making it difficult for the audience to feel the urgency of the characters' situation.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Clarify the consequences of failure for the characters to enhance emotional stakes."
]
},
"escalation": {
"score": 4,
"explanation": "The tension and stakes do not build effectively throughout the sequence, leading to a lack of urgency.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Incorporate more conflict or obstacles to heighten tension."
]
},
"originality": {
"score": 5,
"explanation": "The sequence feels familiar in its approach to character introduction and financial themes.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Introduce unique elements or twists to enhance originality."
]
},
"readability": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The sequence is generally clear and well-formatted, but some technical jargon may confuse readers.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Simplify complex financial terms for broader audience accessibility."
]
},
"memorability": {
"score": 5,
"explanation": "While there are humorous moments, the sequence lacks a strong climax or memorable elements that stand out.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Create a more impactful climax or emotional shift to enhance memorability."
]
},
"revealRhythm": {
"score": 5,
"explanation": "Revelations are present but lack effective pacing, leading to a disjointed feel.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Space out reveals to maintain suspense and engagement."
]
},
"narrativeShape": {
"score": 5,
"explanation": "The sequence has a beginning and middle but lacks a clear ending or resolution.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Clarify the sequence's structure to ensure a clear arc."
]
},
"emotionalImpact": {
"score": 4,
"explanation": "The emotional stakes are not clearly defined, leading to a lack of resonance.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Clarify the emotional stakes for the characters to enhance impact."
]
},
"plotProgression": {
"score": 5,
"explanation": "The sequence introduces key characters and their motivations but does not significantly advance the main plot.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Introduce a clear conflict or challenge that propels the characters forward."
]
},
"subplotIntegration": {
"score": 4,
"explanation": "Subplots are not well integrated, making the narrative feel disjointed.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Weave subplots more seamlessly into the main narrative."
]
},
"tonalVisualCohesion": {
"score": 6,
"explanation": "The tone is generally consistent, but the humor sometimes clashes with the serious themes.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Balance comedic elements with the gravity of the situation."
]
},
"externalGoalProgress": {
"score": 5,
"explanation": "The characters' external goals are introduced but not significantly advanced.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Introduce challenges that push the characters toward their goals."
]
},
"internalGoalProgress": {
"score": 4,
"explanation": "The internal struggles of the characters are not clearly articulated, leading to a lack of emotional depth.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Explore the characters' internal conflicts more deeply."
]
},
"characterLeveragePoint": {
"score": 5,
"explanation": "The characters are introduced but do not experience significant growth or change within the sequence.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Develop character arcs to show growth or change."
]
},
"compelledToKeepReading": {
"score": 5,
"explanation": "While there are engaging moments, the lack of clear stakes may not compel readers to continue.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Introduce a cliffhanger or unresolved question to drive momentum."
]
}
}
Act two a — Seq 3: Miami Ground Zero Investigation
Danny and Porter explore abandoned subdivisions, attend a predatory real estate seminar, and interview distressed residents. They discover foreclosed homes, cryptic apology notes, and even an alligator-infested pool, uncovering human stories behind the crisis. The sequence climaxes with tangible proof of systemic failure.
Dramatic Question
- (52, 53) The dialogue between Porter and Danny effectively captures their contrasting attitudes, adding humor and character depth.high
- (54) The seminar scene highlights the absurdity of the real estate bubble, providing a satirical commentary on the financial crisis.high
- (57, 58) The abandoned houses serve as a powerful visual metaphor for the housing crisis, enhancing the thematic depth of the sequence.high
- (60) The discovery of the mortgage bill with 'SORRY' written on it adds an emotional layer, showcasing the human impact of the financial collapse.medium
- (62) The transition to the Cuban restaurant scene provides a moment of levity and character development, balancing the heavier themes.medium
- (55, 56) The scenes of checking empty houses feel repetitive and could be streamlined to maintain narrative momentum.high
- (54) The seminar scene could be more impactful with sharper dialogue that emphasizes the absurdity of the claims being made.medium
- (57, 58) The emotional stakes could be heightened by including more direct interactions with the homeowners to illustrate their struggles.high
- The pacing could be improved by varying the rhythm of the scenes, ensuring that moments of tension and humor are balanced effectively.medium
- Adding more visual motifs or recurring themes could enhance the cohesion of the sequence and reinforce its emotional impact.low
- A stronger emotional connection to the homeowners could deepen the audience's investment in the characters' journey.high
- Clearer stakes regarding the consequences of the characters' actions could enhance the tension and urgency of the sequence.high
- A more defined climax within the sequence could provide a stronger payoff and emotional resonance.medium
- Increased conflict or opposition during the investigation could heighten the stakes and tension.medium
- More character backstory or motivation could enrich the audience's understanding of their actions and decisions.low
{
"impact": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The sequence has strong visual elements and character interactions, but lacks a cohesive emotional arc.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Incorporate more emotional moments that connect the characters to the homeowners.",
"Strengthen the visual storytelling to enhance the overall impact."
]
},
"pacing": {
"score": 6,
"explanation": "The pacing is generally smooth but could benefit from more variation.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Vary the rhythm of scenes to maintain engagement.",
"Trim redundant scenes to enhance overall pacing."
]
},
"stakes": {
"score": 5,
"explanation": "The stakes are present but not clearly defined, making it difficult for the audience to feel the urgency.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Clarify the specific consequences of failure for the characters.",
"Tie emotional stakes to external risks to enhance resonance."
]
},
"escalation": {
"score": 6,
"explanation": "The tension builds as the characters uncover the reality of the housing market, but could be heightened further.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Add more dramatic revelations or conflicts to escalate the stakes.",
"Incorporate a sense of urgency to increase tension throughout the sequence."
]
},
"originality": {
"score": 6,
"explanation": "The sequence presents familiar themes but lacks unique twists.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Introduce unexpected elements or perspectives to enhance originality.",
"Explore unconventional storytelling techniques to elevate the narrative."
]
},
"readability": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence is well-formatted and clear, with a good flow of dialogue and action.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Ensure consistent formatting throughout the script.",
"Maintain clarity in scene descriptions to enhance readability."
]
},
"memorability": {
"score": 6,
"explanation": "While there are memorable moments, the sequence lacks a strong climax or emotional payoff.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Clarify the turning point or climax to create a more memorable impact.",
"Ensure the sequence builds to a strong emotional or thematic resolution."
]
},
"revealRhythm": {
"score": 6,
"explanation": "Revelations occur but could be spaced more effectively for impact.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Adjust the pacing of reveals to build suspense.",
"Ensure that important information is revealed at critical moments."
]
},
"narrativeShape": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The sequence has a clear structure but could benefit from a more defined climax.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Enhance the internal structure by adding a midpoint or climax.",
"Ensure each scene contributes to the overall narrative arc."
]
},
"emotionalImpact": {
"score": 5,
"explanation": "The emotional stakes are present but not fully realized.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Deepen the emotional connections between characters and their circumstances.",
"Incorporate moments of vulnerability to enhance emotional resonance."
]
},
"plotProgression": {
"score": 6,
"explanation": "The sequence advances the plot by showcasing the characters' investigation, but lacks significant turning points.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Introduce more conflict or obstacles to create a clearer narrative progression.",
"Clarify the stakes involved in their investigation to enhance plot momentum."
]
},
"subplotIntegration": {
"score": 5,
"explanation": "Subplots are present but feel somewhat disconnected from the main narrative.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Integrate subplots more effectively through character interactions.",
"Ensure that secondary characters contribute to the main arc."
]
},
"tonalVisualCohesion": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The tone is consistent, but visual motifs could be stronger.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Incorporate recurring visual elements to enhance thematic cohesion.",
"Ensure that the tone aligns with the emotional stakes of the sequence."
]
},
"externalGoalProgress": {
"score": 6,
"explanation": "The characters make progress in their investigation, but the stakes are not clearly defined.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Clarify the external goals and obstacles to enhance narrative momentum.",
"Ensure that the characters' actions lead to tangible consequences."
]
},
"internalGoalProgress": {
"score": 5,
"explanation": "The characters' internal journeys are present but not fully realized.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Externalize the internal conflicts to make them more visible.",
"Incorporate moments of reflection or realization for the characters."
]
},
"characterLeveragePoint": {
"score": 5,
"explanation": "The characters are tested through their investigation, but the emotional stakes could be clearer.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Deepen the emotional stakes to enhance character development.",
"Introduce more direct challenges that force the characters to confront their beliefs."
]
},
"compelledToKeepReading": {
"score": 6,
"explanation": "The sequence has engaging moments but lacks a strong cliffhanger or unresolved tension.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Introduce a cliffhanger or unresolved question to drive the narrative forward.",
"Heighten the stakes to create a stronger pull to the next sequence."
]
}
}
Act two a — Seq 4: Burry Under Fire
Investors confront Burry over Scion's losses and demand withdrawals. Burry argues the housing bubble is undeniable through data, refusing to back down despite threats to his fund. The sequence ends with investors pulling capital, isolating Burry.
Dramatic Question
- (63, 64) The dialogue effectively conveys the tension and skepticism surrounding Burry's investment strategy.high
- (63, 64) Burry's character is well-defined, showcasing his unique perspective and social awkwardness.high
- (63, 64) The use of humor amidst serious topics adds a layer of engagement and relatability.medium
- (63, 64) The stakes of Burry's investment need to be clearer to enhance audience engagement.high
- (63, 64) Emotional depth could be improved by exploring Burry's internal struggles more explicitly.medium
- (63, 64) The pacing could be tightened to maintain tension and avoid any lulls in the dialogue.medium
- () A clearer emotional arc for Burry would enhance audience connection.high
- () More visual metaphors could help illustrate complex financial concepts.medium
{
"impact": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The sequence is engaging and tense, but could benefit from stronger emotional beats.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Add moments that showcase Burry's internal conflict to deepen emotional engagement."
]
},
"pacing": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The pacing is generally good but could be tightened in places.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Trim any redundant dialogue to maintain momentum."
]
},
"stakes": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The stakes are present but could be more clearly defined.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Clarify the consequences of Burry's failure to strengthen audience investment."
]
},
"escalation": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "Tension builds as Burry defends his position, but could escalate further with more conflict.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Introduce more direct challenges to Burry's strategy to heighten stakes."
]
},
"originality": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The sequence presents familiar themes but with a unique perspective.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Introduce unexpected twists or character dynamics to enhance originality."
]
},
"readability": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence is clear and well-structured, making it easy to follow.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Ensure consistent formatting for clarity."
]
},
"memorability": {
"score": 6,
"explanation": "While the sequence is engaging, it lacks standout moments that would make it memorable.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Incorporate a key revelation or twist that leaves a lasting impression."
]
},
"revealRhythm": {
"score": 6,
"explanation": "Revelations come at a steady pace but could be more impactful.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Space out key revelations to build suspense."
]
},
"narrativeShape": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The sequence has a clear structure but could benefit from a more defined climax.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Add a moment of high tension or conflict to serve as a climax."
]
},
"emotionalImpact": {
"score": 6,
"explanation": "Emotional highs are present but could be amplified.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Deepen character relationships to enhance emotional stakes."
]
},
"plotProgression": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence advances the plot by highlighting the growing tension between Burry and his investors.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Ensure that each scene builds on the previous one to maintain momentum."
]
},
"subplotIntegration": {
"score": 6,
"explanation": "Subplots are present but could be better integrated into the main narrative.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Weave in subplot elements that enhance the main conflict."
]
},
"tonalVisualCohesion": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The tone is consistent, but visual motifs could be stronger.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Incorporate recurring visual elements that align with the themes."
]
},
"externalGoalProgress": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "Burry's external goal is clear, but the obstacles he faces could be more pronounced.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Introduce more direct opposition to Burry's strategy to clarify external challenges."
]
},
"internalGoalProgress": {
"score": 5,
"explanation": "Burry's internal conflict is present but not fully explored.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Highlight Burry's emotional struggles to create a more compelling internal journey."
]
},
"characterLeveragePoint": {
"score": 6,
"explanation": "Burry's character is tested, but the emotional stakes could be clearer.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Explore Burry's motivations and fears more deeply to enhance character development."
]
},
"compelledToKeepReading": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The tension and conflict create a strong motivation to continue reading.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"End the sequence with a cliffhanger or unresolved question to enhance drive."
]
}
}
Act two a — Seq 5: Unmasking Mortgage Fraud
Mark tours foreclosed luxury homes, then meets mortgage brokers who boast about NINJA loans and predatory lending. At a strip club, he discovers a dancer with multiple unsustainable mortgages, confirming widespread financial illiteracy. The sequence concludes with Mark having irrefutable proof of industry-wide fraud.
Dramatic Question
- (70, 72) The dialogue between Mark and the mortgage brokers is sharp and reveals critical information about the mortgage market's unethical practices.high
- (71) The setting of the hotel bar adds a layer of irony and humor, contrasting the serious subject matter with a light atmosphere.medium
- (73) The interaction with the dancer provides a unique perspective on the mortgage crisis, showcasing the personal impact of financial decisions.high
- (65, 66) The visual descriptions of the upscale neighborhood effectively set the stage for the contrast between wealth and the underlying financial issues.medium
- The blend of humor and serious themes keeps the audience engaged while addressing complex financial concepts.high
- (70, 72) The stakes of the characters' actions could be made clearer to enhance emotional engagement and urgency.high
- (71) The transition between scenes could be smoother to maintain narrative flow and coherence.medium
- (73) The emotional impact of the dancer's situation could be deepened to resonate more with the audience.high
- Some dialogue feels overly expository; tightening it could enhance naturalism and pacing.medium
- Adding more visual motifs could strengthen thematic cohesion throughout the sequence.low
- A clearer emotional arc for Mark could enhance audience connection and investment in his journey.high
- More tension-building moments could heighten the stakes and urgency of the characters' discoveries.medium
- A stronger climax within the sequence could provide a more impactful payoff for the buildup.high
- More character backstory could deepen the audience's understanding of their motivations.medium
- A clearer connection between the characters' actions and the impending crisis could enhance narrative cohesion.high
{
"impact": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence is engaging and visually striking, with strong character interactions that resonate emotionally.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Enhance emotional stakes to create a more profound impact.",
"Incorporate more visual storytelling elements to elevate the cinematic experience."
]
},
"pacing": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The pacing is generally good, but some scenes could be tightened for better flow.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Trim redundant dialogue or exposition.",
"Increase the tempo during key moments to heighten urgency."
]
},
"stakes": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The stakes are present but could be made more explicit to enhance tension.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Clarify the consequences of failure for the characters.",
"Tie emotional stakes to external risks to deepen engagement."
]
},
"escalation": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "Tension builds as characters uncover more about the mortgage industry, but could be heightened further.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Introduce more conflict or obstacles to increase stakes.",
"Create moments of urgency to escalate tension."
]
},
"originality": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The sequence presents familiar themes in a fresh way, but could push boundaries further.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Introduce unexpected twists or character choices.",
"Explore unique perspectives on the financial crisis."
]
},
"readability": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence is well-structured and easy to follow, with clear formatting and engaging dialogue.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Ensure consistent formatting throughout.",
"Maintain clarity in scene transitions."
]
},
"memorability": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The sequence has memorable moments, particularly in character interactions, but could benefit from a stronger climax.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Clarify the turning point to make it more impactful.",
"Ensure the sequence builds to a satisfying emotional payoff."
]
},
"revealRhythm": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "Revelations come at a good pace, but could be spaced for greater impact.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Adjust the timing of reveals to build suspense.",
"Create moments of reflection after key revelations."
]
},
"narrativeShape": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence has a clear structure, but could benefit from a more defined climax.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Enhance the climax to create a stronger narrative arc.",
"Ensure each scene contributes to the overall flow."
]
},
"emotionalImpact": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "Emotional highs are present but could be amplified for greater resonance.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Deepen character backstories to enhance emotional stakes.",
"Create moments that evoke stronger audience reactions."
]
},
"plotProgression": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence significantly advances the plot by revealing critical information about the mortgage market.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Ensure each scene builds on the previous one to maintain momentum.",
"Clarify character goals to enhance narrative clarity."
]
},
"subplotIntegration": {
"score": 6,
"explanation": "Subplots are present but could be more tightly woven into the main narrative.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Integrate subplots more seamlessly with the main arc.",
"Ensure character interactions enhance the overall story."
]
},
"tonalVisualCohesion": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The tone is consistent, blending humor and drama effectively.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Strengthen visual motifs to enhance thematic cohesion.",
"Ensure tone aligns with character arcs and narrative progression."
]
},
"externalGoalProgress": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The characters make significant progress in uncovering the truth about the mortgage market.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Clarify the external goals to enhance narrative focus.",
"Ensure obstacles are clearly defined to heighten tension."
]
},
"internalGoalProgress": {
"score": 6,
"explanation": "Mark's internal journey is present but could be more pronounced.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Deepen the exploration of Mark's motivations and fears.",
"Use dialogue and action to reflect his internal struggle."
]
},
"characterLeveragePoint": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "Mark's character is tested as he confronts the realities of the mortgage market, but his emotional journey could be deepened.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Highlight Mark's internal conflict more clearly.",
"Create moments that challenge his beliefs and motivations."
]
},
"compelledToKeepReading": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence maintains reader interest through engaging dialogue and revelations.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Introduce cliffhangers or unresolved questions to enhance suspense.",
"Create a stronger lead-in to the next sequence."
]
}
}
Act two a — Seq 6: Executing the Big Short
Mark orders a $50M swap on Garabaldi IV, prompting Vinny to negotiate with Jared. Simultaneously, Ben guides Jamie/Charlie through CDOs' dangers and brokers their ISDA agreement with Deutsche Bank. Both teams finalize swaps ($50M and $12M respectively), ending with them waiting for the collapse.
Dramatic Question
- (74, 75, 76) The dialogue effectively captures the urgency and tension of the characters' actions, showcasing their determination to act against the financial system.high
- (79, 80) The use of humor and metaphor, particularly through Bourdain's seafood stew analogy, makes complex financial concepts accessible and engaging.high
- (77, 78) The interactions between characters, especially the banter between Vinny and Jared, add a layer of personality and relatability to the financial discussions.medium
- (79, 80) The sequence effectively builds anticipation for the characters' next steps, creating a sense of urgency and excitement.high
- The overall pacing of the sequence maintains a good rhythm, balancing tension with moments of levity.medium
- (74, 75) Clarify the stakes involved in the characters' decisions to short the market, as the emotional weight of their actions could be more pronounced.high
- (79, 80) Enhance the emotional resonance of Ben's character arc, as his transition from disillusionment to engagement could be more impactful.medium
- (76, 77) Streamline the dialogue to avoid confusion about financial terms, ensuring that the audience remains engaged without feeling lost.medium
- (78, 79) Introduce more visual or auditory motifs to reinforce the themes of greed and corruption throughout the sequence.low
- Consider adding a moment of reflection for the characters to emphasize the moral implications of their actions.medium
- A stronger emotional connection to the broader impact of the financial crisis on everyday people is needed to heighten the stakes.high
- More internal conflict for characters, particularly Mark and Ben, could deepen their arcs and enhance audience investment.medium
- A clearer depiction of the consequences of their actions could provide a more compelling narrative drive.high
- Increased tension in the form of external pressures from investors or the financial system could elevate the stakes.medium
- A more pronounced climax within the sequence could enhance its memorability and impact.medium
{
"impact": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence effectively combines humor and tension, creating a memorable chapter that resonates with the audience.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Increase the emotional stakes to enhance the impact of the characters' decisions.",
"Add visual elements that reinforce the themes of greed and corruption."
]
},
"pacing": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The pacing is generally strong, maintaining momentum throughout the sequence.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Trim any redundant dialogue to enhance flow."
]
},
"stakes": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The stakes are present but could be more clearly defined to enhance audience engagement.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Clarify the consequences of failure to heighten emotional stakes."
]
},
"escalation": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "Tension builds effectively as characters uncover the truth about the financial crisis and prepare to act.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Introduce more external pressures to heighten the stakes."
]
},
"originality": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The sequence presents familiar themes in a fresh way, particularly through its humor and unique presentation.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Explore more unconventional narrative techniques to enhance originality."
]
},
"readability": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence is clear and well-structured, though some financial jargon may confuse readers.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Simplify complex financial terms to enhance clarity."
]
},
"memorability": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The sequence has strong moments but could benefit from a clearer climax to enhance its memorability.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Clarify the turning point within the sequence to create a more impactful moment."
]
},
"revealRhythm": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "Revelations about the financial crisis are spaced effectively, maintaining audience engagement.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Consider varying the pacing of reveals to heighten suspense."
]
},
"narrativeShape": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence has a clear structure, moving from character realization to action, but could use a stronger climax.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Enhance the climax to create a more pronounced narrative arc."
]
},
"emotionalImpact": {
"score": 6,
"explanation": "While there are emotional moments, the stakes could be heightened to create a stronger impact.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Deepen the emotional stakes to resonate more with the audience."
]
},
"plotProgression": {
"score": 9,
"explanation": "The sequence significantly advances the plot by showcasing the characters' decisions to act against the financial system.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Clarify the consequences of their actions to heighten narrative momentum."
]
},
"subplotIntegration": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "Subplots are present but could be more tightly woven into the main narrative.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Integrate subplots more effectively to enhance overall cohesion."
]
},
"tonalVisualCohesion": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The tone is consistent, blending humor with serious themes, but could benefit from stronger visual motifs.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Introduce recurring visual elements that reinforce the thematic content."
]
},
"externalGoalProgress": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The characters make significant strides toward their external goals, particularly in securing trades.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Clarify the obstacles they face to enhance narrative tension."
]
},
"internalGoalProgress": {
"score": 6,
"explanation": "Characters show some movement toward their internal goals, but this could be more pronounced.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Deepen the internal conflict to reflect their struggles more clearly."
]
},
"characterLeveragePoint": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "Characters are tested as they confront the implications of their actions, but deeper internal conflict could enhance their arcs.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Explore the emotional ramifications of their decisions more thoroughly."
]
},
"compelledToKeepReading": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence creates a strong pull to continue, driven by tension and unresolved questions.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Introduce cliffhangers or unresolved tensions to further compel the audience."
]
}
}
Act two a — Seq 7: Weathering the Storm
Mortgage delinquencies rise, but bond prices inexplicably climb. Mark/Vinny confront risk managers demanding collateral, refusing to sell. Burry watches dismissive news reports while struggling with family stress. The sequence ends with all protagonists holding their bets against growing opposition.
Dramatic Question
- (82, 83) The dialogue effectively captures the urgency and confusion surrounding the financial crisis, enhancing the tension.high
- (84, 86) The humor interspersed with serious themes provides a unique tone that keeps the audience engaged.high
- (85) The introduction of Kathy Tao adds a layer of conflict and highlights the internal struggles within the team.medium
- (89) Michael Burry's emotional state is effectively portrayed, adding depth to his character.high
- The pacing of the sequence maintains a strong momentum, driving the narrative forward.high
- (83, 84) Some dialogue could be tightened to enhance clarity and impact, particularly in the exchanges about bond values.high
- (85) The risk managers' motivations could be more clearly defined to enhance the stakes of their conflict with Mark.medium
- (89) Burry's home life could be more integrated into the main narrative to deepen the emotional stakes.medium
- (86) The cab driver's commentary, while humorous, could be streamlined to maintain focus on Mark's emotional journey.low
- Transitions between scenes could be smoother to enhance the flow of the sequence.medium
- A clearer emotional arc for Mark could enhance the audience's connection to his character.high
- More visual metaphors could be employed to reinforce the themes of corruption and greed.medium
- A stronger climax within the sequence could heighten the tension and stakes.high
- Additional character interactions could provide more depth to the team dynamics.medium
- A more explicit connection between the financial crisis and its human impact could enhance emotional resonance.high
{
"impact": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence effectively conveys the urgency and moral complexity of the characters' situation.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Increase emotional stakes through character backstories.",
"Enhance visual storytelling to create a more immersive experience."
]
},
"pacing": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The pacing is strong, maintaining momentum throughout the sequence.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Trim any redundant dialogue.",
"Ensure each scene drives the narrative forward."
]
},
"stakes": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The stakes are clear and rising, with tangible consequences for the characters' actions.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Tie emotional stakes to external risks.",
"Heighten urgency through time constraints."
]
},
"escalation": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "Tension builds as the characters confront the reality of the financial crisis, but could be heightened further.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Add more conflict between characters to increase stakes.",
"Introduce a ticking clock element to heighten urgency."
]
},
"originality": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The sequence presents familiar themes in a fresh way, but could push boundaries further.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Introduce unexpected twists.",
"Explore unique character dynamics."
]
},
"readability": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence is clear and well-structured, with effective dialogue and scene transitions.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Ensure consistent formatting.",
"Clarify any dense passages."
]
},
"memorability": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The sequence has memorable moments, particularly in its humor, but could benefit from a stronger climax.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Create a more impactful turning point.",
"Ensure key moments resonate emotionally with the audience."
]
},
"revealRhythm": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "Revelations are spaced effectively, but could be more impactful.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Increase the stakes of each revelation.",
"Ensure emotional beats land with greater weight."
]
},
"narrativeShape": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence has a clear structure, but could benefit from a more defined climax.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Enhance the buildup to a climactic moment.",
"Ensure each scene transitions smoothly to maintain flow."
]
},
"emotionalImpact": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "Emotional highs are present, but could be amplified for greater resonance.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Deepen character relationships.",
"Create moments of vulnerability."
]
},
"plotProgression": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence advances the plot by escalating the characters' awareness of the crisis.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Clarify the consequences of their actions to enhance narrative momentum.",
"Introduce a subplot that intertwines with the main plot for added depth."
]
},
"subplotIntegration": {
"score": 6,
"explanation": "Subplots are present but could be more tightly woven into the main narrative.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Ensure subplots enhance the main arc.",
"Create character interactions that tie subplots to the main story."
]
},
"tonalVisualCohesion": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The tone is consistent, blending humor with seriousness effectively.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Enhance visual motifs that reflect the themes.",
"Ensure humor complements the serious moments."
]
},
"externalGoalProgress": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The characters make tangible progress in their external goals, but clarity could be improved.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Clarify the stakes of their investments.",
"Introduce obstacles that challenge their progress."
]
},
"internalGoalProgress": {
"score": 6,
"explanation": "Characters show some progress in their internal journeys, but it could be more pronounced.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Highlight moments of self-reflection.",
"Create situations that force characters to confront their values."
]
},
"characterLeveragePoint": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The sequence tests the characters' beliefs and motivations, but could deepen their internal conflicts.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Explore characters' backstories to enhance emotional stakes.",
"Introduce more direct challenges to their beliefs."
]
},
"compelledToKeepReading": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence creates a strong pull to continue, driven by tension and unresolved questions.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Introduce cliffhangers at the end of scenes.",
"Raise stakes to maintain suspense."
]
}
}
Act two b — Seq 1: Rating Agency Revelation
Mark and Vinny confront a rating agency analyst (Georgia Hale) who reveals agencies compete to issue inflated AAA ratings. After realizing the system's cynicism, they confront Jared Vennett about their failing investment. Jared redirects them to gather intelligence at the Vegas finance forum to target 'dumb money'.
Dramatic Question
- (34, 36) The dialogue is sharp and reveals the systemic corruption in a compelling way, particularly in the confrontation with Georgia.high
- (34) The character dynamics between Mark, Vinny, and Georgia create tension and highlight their differing perspectives on the financial system.high
- (35) The humor interspersed with serious themes keeps the audience engaged while addressing complex financial concepts.medium
- (36) The escalation of tension as the characters confront Jared Vennett adds urgency and highlights their growing frustration.high
- (35) The sequence effectively showcases the characters' internal conflicts and motivations, particularly Charlie's desperation.medium
- (34) Clarify the stakes involved in the characters' actions to enhance emotional engagement.high
- (35) Deepen the emotional impact of Charlie's realization about the rigged system to heighten audience connection.medium
- (36) Ensure that the tension in the confrontation with Jared Vennett builds more dramatically to a clear climax.high
- (34, 36) Introduce more visual metaphors or motifs to reinforce the themes of corruption and greed.medium
- Consider tightening dialogue in some areas to maintain pacing and focus on key revelations.medium
- A clearer emotional arc for Mark could enhance the audience's connection to his moral struggle.high
- More explicit consequences for the characters' actions could heighten the stakes and urgency.medium
- A stronger visual representation of the financial concepts discussed could aid audience understanding.medium
- A more pronounced turning point in the characters' understanding of the crisis could add depth.medium
- Increased tension in the dialogue could amplify the urgency of the situation.medium
{
"impact": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence effectively engages the audience with its sharp dialogue and moral dilemmas, creating a vivid story beat.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Increase emotional stakes to enhance audience connection.",
"Add visual elements that reinforce the themes."
]
},
"pacing": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The sequence flows well but could benefit from tighter dialogue.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Trim redundancies to enhance pacing.",
"Add urgency to key scenes."
]
},
"stakes": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "Stakes are present but could be clearer and more pronounced.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Clarify specific losses if goals aren't met.",
"Tie external risks to internal costs for deeper resonance.",
"Escalate urgency to enhance stakes."
]
},
"escalation": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "Tension builds as the characters confront the realities of the financial crisis, but could be heightened further.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Introduce more conflict in character interactions.",
"Increase urgency in the dialogue."
]
},
"originality": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The sequence presents familiar themes but with a fresh perspective.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Introduce unique structural moves or twists.",
"Explore unexpected character dynamics."
]
},
"readability": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence is clear and well-formatted, with engaging dialogue and pacing.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Ensure transitions are smooth for better flow.",
"Maintain clarity in complex financial discussions."
]
},
"memorability": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The sequence has strong moments but could benefit from a clearer climax or emotional payoff.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Strengthen the climax to create a more memorable impact.",
"Ensure thematic through-lines are clear."
]
},
"revealRhythm": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "Revelations are spaced effectively, but could be more impactful.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Restructure reveals for better suspense.",
"Increase emotional weight of key moments."
]
},
"narrativeShape": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence has a clear structure with rising tension and resolution, but could be more pronounced.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Clarify the internal structure to enhance flow.",
"Add a stronger midpoint or climax."
]
},
"emotionalImpact": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "Emotional highs are present but could be amplified for greater resonance.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Deepen emotional stakes in character interactions.",
"Ensure key moments land with impact."
]
},
"plotProgression": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence advances the plot by revealing critical information about the financial system and the characters' motivations.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Clarify turning points to enhance narrative momentum.",
"Ensure each scene contributes to the overall plot trajectory."
]
},
"subplotIntegration": {
"score": 6,
"explanation": "Subplots are present but could be better woven into the main narrative.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Enhance character crossover to strengthen connections.",
"Align subplots thematically with the main arc."
]
},
"tonalVisualCohesion": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The tone is consistent, but visual motifs could be more pronounced.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Strengthen recurring visuals to enhance thematic cohesion.",
"Align tone with genre expectations."
]
},
"externalGoalProgress": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The characters make strides toward their external goals, but clarity could be improved.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Clarify goals and obstacles to reinforce forward motion.",
"Ensure each scene contributes to the external journey."
]
},
"internalGoalProgress": {
"score": 6,
"explanation": "The characters' internal conflicts are present but could be more explicitly developed.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Externalize internal journeys more clearly.",
"Reflect growth or struggle in character actions."
]
},
"characterLeveragePoint": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The sequence tests the characters' beliefs and motivations, leading to potential shifts in their arcs.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Amplify emotional or philosophical shifts.",
"Deepen character interactions to enhance conflict."
]
},
"compelledToKeepReading": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence maintains reader interest through tension and unresolved questions.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Sharpen cliffhangers to increase narrative drive.",
"Raise unanswered questions to enhance suspense."
]
}
}
Act two b — Seq 2: Vegas Truth Hunt
Teams converge in Vegas for the finance forum. Brownfield/FrontPoint investigate attendees, witnessing industry denial (Bear Stearns dismissal, CEO speech). Mark confronts CDO manager Mr. Chau, realizing synthetic CDOs dwarf actual mortgages. The sequence climaxes with Mark insulting Chau and vowing to short his portfolio, reinforced by Selena Gomez's synthetic CDO metaphor.
Dramatic Question
- (99, 100, 101) The humor and absurdity in the interactions at the trade show and shooting range effectively highlight the characters' naivety and the ridiculousness of the financial industry.high
- (108, 109) The use of celebrity cameos to explain complex financial concepts adds a unique and engaging layer to the narrative.high
- (105, 106) The dialogue effectively conveys the characters' growing realization of the risks involved in their investments, enhancing the dramatic tension.high
- (100, 101) Some scenes feel overly long and could be tightened to maintain momentum and engagement.high
- (102, 103) Clarifying the stakes and emotional weight of Burry's situation would enhance audience connection to his character.medium
- (108, 109) The transition between the restaurant scene and the blackjack table could be smoother to maintain narrative flow.medium
- (105, 106) Some dialogue is on-the-nose and could be more subtle to enhance realism and engagement.medium
- (107, 108) The pacing in the montage could be adjusted to better reflect the urgency of the characters' actions.medium
- () A clearer emotional arc for the characters, particularly Burry, would deepen audience investment.high
- () More exploration of the moral implications of their actions could enhance thematic depth.medium
{
"impact": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence is engaging and visually striking, with humor and tension effectively interwoven.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Incorporate more visual metaphors to enhance thematic resonance.",
"Strengthen character reactions to heighten emotional stakes."
]
},
"pacing": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The sequence flows well overall, but some scenes could be tightened for better pacing.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Trim redundant dialogue to maintain momentum.",
"Increase urgency in key scenes."
]
},
"stakes": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The stakes are clear and rising, particularly regarding the characters' financial bets.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Clarify the personal consequences of failure.",
"Increase urgency to enhance emotional stakes."
]
},
"escalation": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "Tension builds effectively, but some scenes could be more tightly woven to maintain urgency.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Add more conflict between characters to heighten stakes.",
"Introduce time constraints to increase pressure."
]
},
"originality": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence presents a fresh take on the financial crisis through humor and unique character interactions.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Introduce more unexpected twists to maintain originality.",
"Explore unconventional narrative structures."
]
},
"readability": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence is generally clear and well-structured, though some dialogue could be more concise.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Simplify complex dialogue for better clarity.",
"Ensure consistent formatting throughout."
]
},
"memorability": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence contains memorable moments, particularly the celebrity cameos and humorous exchanges.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Highlight key emotional beats to enhance resonance.",
"Create a stronger climax to leave a lasting impression."
]
},
"revealRhythm": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "Revelations are spaced effectively, but some could be more impactful.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Increase the stakes of each reveal to enhance tension.",
"Ensure reveals align with character arcs."
]
},
"narrativeShape": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The sequence has a clear structure, but some transitions could be smoother.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Ensure each scene flows logically into the next.",
"Clarify the beginning, middle, and end of each scene."
]
},
"emotionalImpact": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "Emotional highs and lows are present but could be amplified.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Deepen character backstories to enhance emotional stakes.",
"Create moments of vulnerability to resonate with the audience."
]
},
"plotProgression": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence advances the plot significantly, revealing key information about the financial crisis.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Clarify character motivations to enhance narrative momentum.",
"Ensure each scene builds logically on the previous one."
]
},
"subplotIntegration": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "Subplots are present but could be more tightly woven into the main narrative.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Ensure subplots enhance the main arc rather than feel disconnected.",
"Create crossover moments between main and subplot characters."
]
},
"tonalVisualCohesion": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The tone is consistent, blending humor with serious themes effectively.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Strengthen visual motifs to enhance thematic cohesion.",
"Ensure tone aligns with character emotions."
]
},
"externalGoalProgress": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The characters make significant strides toward their external goals, particularly in securing deals.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Clarify the stakes of their external goals to enhance tension.",
"Introduce obstacles that challenge their progress."
]
},
"internalGoalProgress": {
"score": 6,
"explanation": "Characters' internal struggles are present but could be more pronounced.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Highlight moments of doubt or realization.",
"Use visual cues to reflect internal states."
]
},
"characterLeveragePoint": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "Characters are tested through their interactions and decisions, but deeper emotional shifts could be explored.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Focus on internal conflicts to enhance character depth.",
"Show more vulnerability in key moments."
]
},
"compelledToKeepReading": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence maintains reader interest through humor and tension, though some moments could be more gripping.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"End with a stronger cliffhanger or unresolved question.",
"Raise the stakes to enhance urgency."
]
}
}
Act two b — Seq 3: Moral Reckonings & Market Moves
Mark confesses moral conflict to Cynthia, linking his brother's suicide to systemic greed. Simultaneously, Burry connects his son's Asperger's diagnosis to his own outsider perspective, empowering him to restrict investor withdrawals despite legal threats.
Dramatic Question
- (112, 113) The dialogue between Mark and Cynthia effectively conveys the emotional turmoil and moral conflict surrounding the financial crisis.high
- (114, 115) The introduction of Mike's personal struggles with his son's potential diagnosis adds a layer of complexity and relatability to his character.high
- (116, 117) The sequence captures the tension of Mike's decision-making process, showcasing his internal conflict and the stakes involved.high
- (118) The use of a quote to transition into the next sequence adds a thematic depth and resonates with the overall narrative.medium
- (112, 113) Some dialogue feels overly expository; tightening it could enhance the natural flow and emotional impact.high
- (114) The transition between scenes could be smoother to maintain narrative momentum and emotional continuity.medium
- (115) The pacing slows down significantly; consider trimming some of the exposition to keep the audience engaged.medium
- (116) The introduction of the med school friend feels abrupt; a smoother integration could enhance character connections.medium
- (117) The email scene could benefit from more visual storytelling elements to enhance engagement and tension.medium
- () A clearer connection between the characters' personal struggles and the overarching financial crisis could deepen emotional resonance.high
- () More visual metaphors or motifs could enhance thematic cohesion and reinforce the emotional stakes.medium
{
"impact": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence effectively engages the audience emotionally, particularly through the character interactions and moral dilemmas presented.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Increase visual storytelling elements to enhance emotional engagement."
]
},
"pacing": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The pacing is generally good, but some scenes could be tightened to maintain momentum.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Trim redundant dialogue or exposition to enhance flow."
]
},
"stakes": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The stakes are clear and emotionally resonant, particularly regarding the characters' personal losses and financial decisions.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Tie emotional stakes more closely to external consequences to enhance urgency."
]
},
"escalation": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "Tension builds through character interactions, but could be heightened with more immediate stakes.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Introduce more conflict or urgency in character decisions to escalate tension."
]
},
"originality": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "While the themes are familiar, the execution offers a fresh perspective on the financial crisis.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Explore unique narrative structures or twists to enhance originality."
]
},
"readability": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence is generally clear and well-structured, though some dialogue could be more concise.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Edit for clarity and brevity in dialogue to enhance readability."
]
},
"memorability": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The emotional depth and moral conflict make this sequence memorable, though some dialogue could be more impactful.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Strengthen key lines to enhance their emotional resonance."
]
},
"revealRhythm": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "Revelations are spaced effectively, though some could be more impactful.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Consider the timing of emotional beats to maximize their effect."
]
},
"narrativeShape": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence has a clear structure, with a beginning, middle, and end, though transitions could be smoother.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Refine transitions between scenes to enhance narrative flow."
]
},
"emotionalImpact": {
"score": 9,
"explanation": "The emotional stakes are high, particularly in Mark's and Cynthia's interactions, resonating deeply with the audience.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Deepen emotional connections through more nuanced dialogue."
]
},
"plotProgression": {
"score": 9,
"explanation": "The sequence significantly advances the plot by deepening character arcs and highlighting the moral implications of their actions.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Ensure that each scene clearly connects to the overarching narrative to maintain momentum."
]
},
"subplotIntegration": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "Subplots are present but could be more tightly woven into the main narrative for greater impact.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Ensure subplots enhance the main arc rather than feeling disconnected."
]
},
"tonalVisualCohesion": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The tone is consistent, but visual motifs could be more pronounced to enhance thematic depth.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Integrate recurring visual elements that reflect the themes of greed and loss."
]
},
"externalGoalProgress": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The characters face external pressures, but the stakes could be more pronounced to heighten tension.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Clarify the consequences of their decisions to reinforce urgency."
]
},
"internalGoalProgress": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "Both characters show progress in understanding their internal conflicts, though more externalization could enhance clarity.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Use visual cues to reflect their internal struggles more clearly."
]
},
"characterLeveragePoint": {
"score": 9,
"explanation": "The sequence effectively challenges Mark and Mike, prompting significant internal reflection and growth.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Amplify the emotional stakes in their decisions to deepen character arcs."
]
},
"compelledToKeepReading": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The emotional stakes and moral dilemmas create a strong pull to continue, though some areas could be more gripping.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Introduce cliffhangers or unresolved tensions to heighten anticipation."
]
}
}
Act two b — Seq 4: Collapse & Containment
Mortgage lender bankruptcy triggers panic (47). Teams monitor denial (Fed speech, Deutsche Bank lies). Mark refuses to sell shorts despite Morgan Stanley pressure (47). Brownfield fails to expose fraud via journalism (48). Burry outmaneuvers Goldman Sachs (49). Jared confirms market collapse (50), leading to Mark cornering Kathy Tao on Morgan Stanley's catastrophic risk (51).
Dramatic Question
- (119, 120, 121) The dialogue is sharp and engaging, effectively conveying the characters' tension and urgency.high
- (122, 123) The humor interspersed with serious themes adds depth and keeps the audience engaged.high
- (124, 125) The escalating tension and stakes are clearly communicated, enhancing the narrative drive.high
- (126, 128) The emotional weight of the characters' decisions is palpable, contributing to the overall impact of the sequence.high
- (122) The transition from the conversation with Casey to the hallway feels abrupt; adding a moment of reflection could enhance emotional depth.medium
- (121, 125) Some scenes could benefit from clearer visual descriptions to enhance the cinematic quality.medium
- (128) Kathy's character could be developed further to create a more nuanced portrayal of her fear and desperation.high
- (120, 121) The pacing could be tightened in some areas to maintain momentum and avoid any lulls in tension.medium
- Consider adding more internal conflict for the characters to deepen their emotional arcs.high
- A clearer emotional arc for Charlie and Jamie could enhance their stakes and engagement with the audience.high
- More exploration of the moral implications of profiting from the crisis could add depth to the narrative.medium
{
"impact": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence effectively conveys the emotional weight of the characters' decisions and the impending crisis.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Enhance visual storytelling to amplify emotional moments."
]
},
"pacing": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The pacing is generally strong, though some scenes could be tightened.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Trim redundant dialogue or exposition."
]
},
"stakes": {
"score": 9,
"explanation": "The stakes are high and clearly articulated, creating a sense of urgency and tension.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Tie emotional stakes to external consequences for greater resonance."
]
},
"escalation": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "Tension builds effectively as the characters uncover more about the crisis and its implications.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Add more conflict to heighten stakes."
]
},
"originality": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "While the themes are familiar, the execution offers a fresh perspective on the financial crisis.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Introduce more unique narrative elements."
]
},
"readability": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence is well-structured and easy to follow, with clear formatting and engaging dialogue.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Ensure consistent formatting for clarity."
]
},
"memorability": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "While impactful, some moments could be more distinctive to enhance memorability.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Create standout visual or thematic elements."
]
},
"revealRhythm": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "Revelations are spaced effectively, maintaining tension and engagement.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Consider pacing of reveals for maximum impact."
]
},
"narrativeShape": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence has a clear structure, with rising tension and a climax that effectively leads into the next act.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Ensure each scene transitions smoothly to maintain flow."
]
},
"emotionalImpact": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The emotional stakes are high, resonating with the audience effectively.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Deepen emotional connections to enhance impact."
]
},
"plotProgression": {
"score": 9,
"explanation": "The sequence significantly advances the plot by showcasing the characters' realization of the crisis and their decisions.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Ensure each scene clearly contributes to the overall narrative arc."
]
},
"subplotIntegration": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "Subplots are present but could be more tightly woven into the main narrative.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Ensure subplots enhance the main arc."
]
},
"tonalVisualCohesion": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The tone is consistent, blending humor with serious themes effectively.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Strengthen visual motifs to enhance cohesion."
]
},
"externalGoalProgress": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The characters make significant strides toward their external goals as they navigate the crisis.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Clarify the external stakes to enhance urgency."
]
},
"internalGoalProgress": {
"score": 6,
"explanation": "The characters' internal struggles are present but could be more pronounced.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Highlight emotional stakes more clearly."
]
},
"characterLeveragePoint": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The characters face moral dilemmas that challenge their beliefs and motivations.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Deepen internal conflicts to enhance character development."
]
},
"compelledToKeepReading": {
"score": 9,
"explanation": "The urgency of the characters' situation creates a strong pull to continue the story.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Introduce cliffhangers or unresolved questions to heighten suspense."
]
}
}
Act Three — Seq 1: Holding the Line
Mark Baum clashes with his team in a late-night restaurant debate as Morgan Stanley teeters near bankruptcy. Vinny pushes to sell their swaps for immediate bonuses, but Mark refuses, asserting they won't surrender their advantage or accept blame for the crisis. The confrontation escalates until Mark shuts down dissent, reinforcing his commitment to hold the position.
Dramatic Question
- The dialogue is sharp and reflects the characters' personalities and motivations, creating a compelling dynamic.high
- The tension between Mark and Vinny effectively showcases the moral dilemmas and stakes involved in their decisions.high
- The setting of a late-night restaurant adds to the atmosphere of urgency and secrecy, enhancing the scene's tension.medium
- The stakes of their decisions need to be clearer to enhance emotional engagement and urgency.high
- The internal conflict of Mark could be more explicitly tied to his past, deepening the audience's understanding of his motivations.medium
- Consider adding a moment of vulnerability for Mark to balance his aggressive stance, making him more relatable.medium
- The waitress's interruption could be used more effectively to heighten tension or provide a moment of levity.low
- The pacing could be tightened to maintain momentum and avoid any lulls in tension.medium
- A clearer emotional payoff or consequence for the characters' decisions is lacking, which could enhance the impact of the scene.high
- A stronger visual or thematic motif could help unify the sequence and reinforce its emotional stakes.medium
{
"impact": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The sequence effectively conveys tension and moral conflict, but could benefit from deeper emotional engagement.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Add moments of vulnerability to deepen character connections.",
"Use visual motifs to enhance thematic resonance."
]
},
"pacing": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The pacing is generally smooth, but some moments could be tightened for better flow.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Trim redundant dialogue to maintain momentum."
]
},
"stakes": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The stakes are present but could be more explicitly tied to the characters' emotional journeys.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Clarify the personal costs of their financial decisions."
]
},
"escalation": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "Tension builds effectively through dialogue, but could be heightened with more external pressures.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Introduce external stakes that threaten their plans."
]
},
"originality": {
"score": 6,
"explanation": "While the dialogue is sharp, the themes of greed and moral conflict are familiar.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Introduce unique elements or twists to freshen the narrative."
]
},
"readability": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence is well-formatted and clear, with strong dialogue that flows smoothly.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Ensure consistent formatting for character names and dialogue."
]
},
"memorability": {
"score": 6,
"explanation": "While the dialogue is engaging, the sequence lacks a standout moment that would make it truly memorable.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Create a climactic moment that encapsulates the moral conflict."
]
},
"revealRhythm": {
"score": 6,
"explanation": "Revelations come at a steady pace, but could be spaced for greater impact.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Vary the rhythm of reveals to maintain suspense."
]
},
"narrativeShape": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The sequence has a clear structure but could benefit from a more defined climax.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Enhance the climax to create a stronger emotional payoff."
]
},
"emotionalImpact": {
"score": 6,
"explanation": "The emotional stakes are present but could be heightened for greater resonance.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Deepen character backstories to enhance emotional connections."
]
},
"plotProgression": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence advances the plot by escalating the characters' moral dilemmas and decisions.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Clarify the consequences of their decisions to enhance narrative momentum."
]
},
"subplotIntegration": {
"score": 5,
"explanation": "Subplots are present but feel somewhat disconnected from the main arc.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Integrate subplots more tightly with the main narrative."
]
},
"tonalVisualCohesion": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The tone is consistent, but visual motifs could be more pronounced to enhance thematic depth.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Incorporate recurring visual elements to strengthen cohesion."
]
},
"externalGoalProgress": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The characters are actively making decisions that impact their financial goals, driving the plot forward.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Clarify the immediate consequences of their decisions."
]
},
"internalGoalProgress": {
"score": 6,
"explanation": "Mark's internal struggle is present but not fully explored, limiting emotional depth.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Highlight moments of doubt or reflection for Mark."
]
},
"characterLeveragePoint": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "Mark's internal conflict is evident, but could be more pronounced to enhance character development.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Deepen Mark's backstory to clarify his motivations."
]
},
"compelledToKeepReading": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The tension and moral conflict create a strong pull to continue, though clearer stakes would enhance this.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Clarify the consequences of their decisions to heighten urgency."
]
}
}
Act Three — Seq 2: Fire Sale Frenzy
Jamie and Charlie panic upon realizing they lack the expertise to sell their swaps as Bear Stearns crumbles. They recruit Ben Rickert (on vacation in England) who orchestrates a chaotic $200 million sale from a pub, battling poor reception and skeptical locals. The sequence concludes with them securing $80 million while Mike Burry independently unwinds his $1.3 billion position, erasing losses from his whiteboard.
Dramatic Question
- (130, 131) The dialogue effectively conveys the urgency and stakes of the financial situation, keeping the audience engaged.high
- (134, 135) The humor interspersed with serious themes adds a unique tone that enhances the viewing experience.high
- (132) The visual imagery of Mike's office and the abandoned desks powerfully conveys his isolation and the impending crisis.medium
- (136) The character interactions between Charlie, Jamie, and Ben effectively showcase their evolving relationships and the stakes of their investments.high
- The pacing of the sequence maintains a sense of urgency that aligns well with the overall narrative.high
- (132) Mike's emotional state could be more explicitly conveyed to deepen audience connection.high
- (135) Ben's motivations for helping Charlie and Jamie could be clarified to enhance character depth.medium
- (134) The humor in the pub scene could be better integrated with the tension of the financial stakes to maintain tonal cohesion.medium
- (136) The transition between scenes could be smoother to enhance flow and clarity.medium
- Some dialogue feels on-the-nose; refining it could enhance authenticity.medium
- A clearer emotional arc for Mike could enhance the audience's investment in his character.high
- More exploration of the moral implications of the characters' actions would deepen the narrative impact.medium
- A stronger sense of urgency in the stakes could heighten tension throughout the sequence.high
- A clearer connection between the characters' personal stakes and the financial crisis would enhance emotional resonance.medium
- More visual motifs could unify the sequence and enhance thematic depth.low
{
"impact": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence effectively conveys urgency and tension, engaging the audience through character dynamics.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Enhance emotional stakes to create a more profound impact.",
"Incorporate visual storytelling elements to elevate cinematic quality."
]
},
"pacing": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The pacing is generally strong, maintaining momentum throughout the sequence.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Trim any redundant dialogue or scenes to enhance flow.",
"Introduce moments of tension to create peaks and valleys in pacing."
]
},
"stakes": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The stakes are clear and rising, effectively engaging the audience.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Clarify the specific consequences of failure to enhance tension.",
"Tie emotional stakes to external risks for greater resonance."
]
},
"escalation": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "Tension builds as the characters confront the realities of the financial crisis, but could be heightened further.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Introduce more immediate conflicts to raise stakes.",
"Create a ticking clock scenario to amplify urgency."
]
},
"originality": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The sequence presents familiar themes in a fresh context, but could push boundaries further.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Introduce unique structural elements to enhance originality.",
"Explore unexpected character dynamics to surprise the audience."
]
},
"readability": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence is clear and well-structured, with effective dialogue and scene transitions.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Ensure consistent formatting for clarity.",
"Refine dialogue for authenticity and flow."
]
},
"memorability": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The sequence contains memorable moments, but could benefit from stronger emotional shifts.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Clarify the climax of the sequence for greater impact.",
"Strengthen thematic through-lines to enhance cohesion."
]
},
"revealRhythm": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "Revelations are spaced effectively, but could benefit from more impactful twists.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Introduce surprises that challenge character assumptions.",
"Pace reveals to maintain suspense and engagement."
]
},
"narrativeShape": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence has a clear structure, with a beginning, middle, and end that effectively convey the narrative.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Ensure each scene transitions smoothly to maintain flow.",
"Highlight key moments to enhance the narrative arc."
]
},
"emotionalImpact": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The sequence elicits emotional responses, but could deepen the stakes.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Heighten emotional stakes to create a more profound impact.",
"Incorporate moments of vulnerability to enhance connection."
]
},
"plotProgression": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence advances the plot significantly, showcasing critical decisions that affect the characters' futures.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Clarify turning points to enhance narrative momentum.",
"Ensure each scene builds on the previous one to maintain flow."
]
},
"subplotIntegration": {
"score": 6,
"explanation": "Subplots are present but could be more seamlessly integrated into the main narrative.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Weave subplots into the main arc to enhance cohesion.",
"Ensure character interactions reflect subplot developments."
]
},
"tonalVisualCohesion": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The tone is consistent, blending humor and drama effectively.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Enhance visual motifs to reinforce thematic elements.",
"Ensure humor aligns with the overall tone of the sequence."
]
},
"externalGoalProgress": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The characters make significant strides toward their external goals, showcasing their determination.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Clarify obstacles to reinforce the stakes.",
"Ensure each character's journey is distinct and impactful."
]
},
"internalGoalProgress": {
"score": 6,
"explanation": "Characters show some progress toward their internal goals, but could be more pronounced.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Externalize internal struggles to enhance audience connection.",
"Create moments of reflection to deepen character development."
]
},
"characterLeveragePoint": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "Characters face challenges that test their resolve, contributing to their arcs.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Deepen character motivations to enhance emotional stakes.",
"Highlight internal conflicts to create more dynamic character interactions."
]
},
"compelledToKeepReading": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence maintains reader interest through tension and character dynamics.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Introduce cliffhangers or unresolved questions to enhance narrative drive.",
"Raise stakes to create a stronger pull toward the next sequence."
]
}
}
Act Three — Seq 3: Truth Bombs on Wall Street
Mark Baum confronts bullish investor Bruce Miller at a financial conference, condemning systemic corruption as Bear Stearns' stock plummets live. His scathing critique of industry greed peaks when a young banker questions Miller's optimism mid-collapse, triggering chaos. Mark delivers a sardonic 'Boom,' crystallizing his vindication.
Dramatic Question
- (137) Mark's passionate speech effectively conveys the gravity of the situation and his emotional investment in the outcome.high
- (137) The humor interspersed throughout the dialogue provides a necessary levity that balances the serious subject matter.high
- (137) The dynamic between Mark and Bruce Miller creates a compelling contrast that highlights the differing perspectives on the crisis.medium
- (137) The use of real-world references and timely commentary enhances the authenticity and relevance of the narrative.high
- (137) The escalating tension as Bear Stearns stock plummets adds urgency and stakes to the sequence.high
- (137) Some dialogue could be tightened to maintain momentum and avoid redundancy, particularly in Mark's speech.high
- (137) The pacing could be improved by reducing the length of certain exchanges to keep the audience engaged.medium
- (137) Clarifying the stakes for the audience earlier in the sequence would enhance emotional engagement.high
- (137) Adding more visual cues or reactions from the audience could heighten the dramatic tension during Mark's speech.medium
- (137) The transition between Mark's speech and the audience's reaction could be smoother to maintain flow.medium
- (137) A clearer depiction of the audience's initial skepticism could enhance the impact of Mark's argument.medium
- (137) More background on the personal stakes for Mark could deepen the emotional resonance of his speech.high
- (137) A stronger visual metaphor to accompany Mark's argument could enhance the thematic depth.medium
- (137) Increased tension in the room as Mark speaks could amplify the stakes and urgency.high
- (137) A follow-up moment showing the immediate aftermath of the speech could provide closure and impact.medium
{
"impact": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence is emotionally engaging and visually striking, particularly during Mark's speech, which resonates with the audience.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Increase the emotional stakes by showing more audience reactions.",
"Add visual elements that symbolize the financial collapse."
]
},
"pacing": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The pacing is generally good but could benefit from tightening certain dialogue exchanges.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Trim redundant lines to maintain momentum."
]
},
"stakes": {
"score": 9,
"explanation": "The stakes are high, with the potential collapse of the financial system affecting millions.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Tie the stakes more closely to the characters' personal lives to enhance emotional weight."
]
},
"escalation": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The tension escalates effectively as Bear Stearns stock plummets, creating a sense of urgency.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Introduce more immediate consequences for the characters as the market reacts."
]
},
"originality": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "While the sequence is engaging, it follows familiar tropes of financial dramas.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Incorporate unique narrative devices or perspectives to enhance originality."
]
},
"readability": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence is well-structured and easy to follow, though some dialogue could be clearer.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Clarify complex financial terms for broader audience understanding."
]
},
"memorability": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "Mark's passionate speech and the audience's reactions create a memorable moment that stands out in the narrative.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Strengthen the emotional payoff at the end of the sequence."
]
},
"revealRhythm": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence reveals critical information about the financial crisis at effective intervals.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Space out revelations to maintain suspense."
]
},
"narrativeShape": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence has a clear beginning, middle, and end, with Mark's speech serving as the climax.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Enhance the transition between scenes to improve flow."
]
},
"emotionalImpact": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The emotional stakes are high, particularly in Mark's speech, but could be deepened.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Add more personal stakes for Mark to amplify emotional resonance."
]
},
"plotProgression": {
"score": 9,
"explanation": "This sequence significantly advances the plot by showcasing the growing tension and urgency surrounding the financial crisis.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Ensure that each character's reaction to Mark's speech is clearly tied to their individual arcs."
]
},
"subplotIntegration": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The subplot involving the audience's reactions could be more tightly woven into the main narrative.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Integrate more character interactions during the speech to enhance subplot relevance."
]
},
"tonalVisualCohesion": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The tone balances humor and seriousness effectively, though visual motifs could be more pronounced.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Introduce recurring visual elements that symbolize the crisis."
]
},
"externalGoalProgress": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "Mark's external goal of raising awareness about the crisis is advanced through his speech.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Clarify the immediate consequences of his speech on the market."
]
},
"internalGoalProgress": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "Mark's internal struggle with the moral implications of the crisis is evident but could be further developed.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Add moments of reflection for Mark to deepen his internal journey."
]
},
"characterLeveragePoint": {
"score": 9,
"explanation": "Mark's confrontation serves as a pivotal moment in his character arc, showcasing his moral stance.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Deepen the internal conflict by exploring Mark's motivations more explicitly."
]
},
"compelledToKeepReading": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The urgency of the financial crisis and Mark's passionate speech create a strong motivation to continue.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"End the sequence with a cliffhanger or unresolved tension to heighten anticipation."
]
}
}
Act Three — Seq 4: Lehman's Funeral & Cardiac Arrest
News of Lehman's collapse spreads, triggering mass panic. Charlie and Jamie infiltrate Lehman's abandoned HQ, disillusioned by the chaos. Simultaneously, Danny suffers a stress-induced health scare at FrontPoint as Morgan Stanley's stock nosedives. Vinny calls an ambulance while Mark processes the scale of the disaster in shock.
Dramatic Question
- (140, 141) The depiction of the Lehman Brothers' collapse effectively conveys the gravity of the situation and the chaos surrounding it.high
- (143, 144) The dialogue captures the urgency and panic among the characters, enhancing the tension of the sequence.high
- (148) Michael Burry's voiceover adds a personal touch and insight into his character, grounding the sequence in emotional reality.medium
- (141, 143) The stakes of the characters' actions could be made clearer to enhance emotional engagement and urgency.high
- (140, 145) The pacing could be tightened to maintain momentum and avoid any lulls in tension.medium
- (144, 147) More visual metaphors or motifs could be integrated to enhance thematic cohesion and visual storytelling.medium
- (145) The emotional impact of the characters' experiences could be deepened to resonate more with the audience.medium
- Consider adding a moment of reflection or realization for the characters to heighten the moral implications of their actions.low
- A clearer emotional arc for the characters could enhance audience connection and investment.high
- A stronger thematic exploration of the consequences of greed and corruption could deepen the narrative impact.medium
{
"impact": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The sequence captures the chaos of the financial crisis effectively, though it could benefit from deeper emotional engagement.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Enhance character moments that reveal their emotional states during the crisis.",
"Incorporate more visual storytelling to elevate the sequence's impact."
]
},
"pacing": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The pacing is generally effective, though some scenes could be tightened.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Trim any redundant dialogue or action to maintain momentum."
]
},
"stakes": {
"score": 6,
"explanation": "The stakes are present but could be more clearly defined to enhance tension.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Clarify the consequences of failure for the characters to heighten urgency."
]
},
"escalation": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "Tension builds effectively as the crisis escalates, but could be heightened with more immediate stakes.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Introduce more urgent conflicts or obstacles for the characters to navigate."
]
},
"originality": {
"score": 6,
"explanation": "The sequence follows familiar tropes but has moments of originality.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Explore unique narrative angles or character perspectives."
]
},
"readability": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence is well-formatted and clear, with a good flow of dialogue and action.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Ensure consistent formatting for character names and scene headings."
]
},
"memorability": {
"score": 6,
"explanation": "While the sequence is engaging, it lacks standout moments that would make it particularly memorable.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Identify key emotional beats that could be amplified for greater resonance."
]
},
"revealRhythm": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "Revelations are spaced effectively, but could be more impactful.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Consider the timing of reveals to maximize emotional impact."
]
},
"narrativeShape": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The sequence has a clear structure, but could benefit from a more defined climax.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Clarify the sequence's climax to enhance its narrative arc."
]
},
"emotionalImpact": {
"score": 5,
"explanation": "Emotional highs are present but not fully realized, limiting audience connection.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Enhance character moments that evoke empathy or reflection."
]
},
"plotProgression": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence significantly advances the plot by depicting the unfolding crisis and its effects on the characters.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Ensure that each scene builds on the previous one to maintain narrative momentum."
]
},
"subplotIntegration": {
"score": 6,
"explanation": "Subplots are present but could be more tightly woven into the main narrative.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Integrate subplot elements more seamlessly into the main action."
]
},
"tonalVisualCohesion": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The tone is consistent, but visual motifs could be more pronounced.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Incorporate recurring visual elements that reinforce the themes."
]
},
"externalGoalProgress": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The characters' external goals are clear and drive the narrative forward effectively.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Ensure that external conflicts align with internal struggles for greater cohesion."
]
},
"internalGoalProgress": {
"score": 5,
"explanation": "The internal conflicts are present but not fully explored, limiting emotional depth.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Highlight moments of introspection or realization for the characters."
]
},
"characterLeveragePoint": {
"score": 6,
"explanation": "Characters face challenges that test their beliefs, but the emotional stakes could be clearer.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Deepen character motivations to enhance their arcs."
]
},
"compelledToKeepReading": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The urgency of the financial crisis creates a strong pull to continue reading.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"End the sequence with a cliffhanger or unresolved tension to heighten anticipation."
]
}
}
Act Three — Seq 5: Aftermath Montage
A montage juxtaposes foreclosure-ravaged neighborhoods, predatory real estate seminars, and displaced families living in cars. Mike closes his fund while Jared Vennett celebrates disproportionate bonuses, highlighting systemic inequality. Voiceovers underscore personal and societal ruin.
Dramatic Question
- (150, 154) The use of voiceover provides insight into the characters' emotional states, enhancing audience connection.high
- (151, 152) The contrasting visuals of foreclosure signs and job fairs effectively depict the crisis's impact on everyday people.high
- (156) Jared's candid monologue adds a layer of complexity to his character, showcasing the moral ambiguity of the financial world.high
- (150, 151) The seminar scene feels disconnected from the emotional core of the sequence; integrating it more closely with the characters' arcs could enhance cohesion.high
- (154) The transition from Mike's email to the empty office could be smoother to maintain narrative flow.medium
- (156) Jared's monologue could benefit from a stronger emotional anchor to connect it more deeply with the audience's feelings about the crisis.medium
- () A clearer connection between the characters' personal stakes and the broader economic implications could enhance emotional resonance.high
- () More explicit consequences for the characters' actions could heighten the tension and stakes.medium
{
"impact": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence effectively conveys the emotional weight of the characters' decisions, resonating with the audience.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Enhance visual storytelling to amplify emotional moments."
]
},
"pacing": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The pacing is generally smooth, but some transitions could be tightened for better flow.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Trim redundant dialogue or scenes to maintain momentum."
]
},
"stakes": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The stakes are clear and emotionally resonant, particularly regarding the characters' moral choices.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Further emphasize the consequences of failure to enhance urgency."
]
},
"escalation": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "Tension builds as the characters confront the reality of their investments, but could be heightened further.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Introduce more immediate stakes to escalate tension."
]
},
"originality": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "While the themes are familiar, the execution offers a fresh perspective on the financial crisis.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Explore unique narrative angles or character dynamics to enhance originality."
]
},
"readability": {
"score": 9,
"explanation": "The sequence is well-structured and easy to follow, with clear formatting and engaging prose.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Maintain clarity in transitions and character motivations."
]
},
"memorability": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence contains strong emotional beats and impactful visuals that linger with the audience.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Focus on a climactic moment that encapsulates the sequence's themes."
]
},
"revealRhythm": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "Revelations are spaced effectively, but some could be more impactful.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Increase the emotional weight of key reveals to enhance tension."
]
},
"narrativeShape": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence has a clear structure, moving from character introspection to broader societal implications.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Ensure each scene transitions smoothly to maintain narrative flow."
]
},
"emotionalImpact": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence effectively elicits emotional responses, particularly through character introspection.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Deepen emotional connections through character interactions."
]
},
"plotProgression": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence advances the plot by illustrating the characters' moral dilemmas and the impending crisis.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Clarify character motivations to strengthen narrative momentum."
]
},
"subplotIntegration": {
"score": 6,
"explanation": "Subplots are present but feel somewhat disconnected from the main narrative arc.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Weave subplots more tightly into the main storyline to enhance cohesion."
]
},
"tonalVisualCohesion": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The tone balances humor and gravity well, though some scenes could benefit from stronger visual motifs.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Introduce recurring visual elements to reinforce thematic cohesion."
]
},
"externalGoalProgress": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "The characters make significant decisions that impact their external goals, but clarity could be improved.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Clarify the stakes of their decisions to enhance narrative drive."
]
},
"internalGoalProgress": {
"score": 6,
"explanation": "Characters' internal struggles are present but could be more explicitly tied to their external actions.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Use dialogue and action to reflect internal conflicts more clearly."
]
},
"characterLeveragePoint": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "Characters face moral dilemmas that challenge their beliefs, but the emotional shifts could be more pronounced.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Highlight key moments of realization or conflict for each character."
]
},
"compelledToKeepReading": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The moral dilemmas and impending crisis create a strong pull to continue the story.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Introduce cliffhangers or unresolved questions to heighten suspense."
]
}
}
Act Three — Seq 6: The Moral Reckoning
Mark debates the bailout's moral implications with Vinny, predicting public scapegoating of the poor. Under pressure, he reluctantly agrees to sell their nearly $1 billion position despite guilt over 'losing the moral high ground.' Text overlays then detail the aftermath, including minimal accountability for banks.
Dramatic Question
- (157, 158, 159, 160) The dialogue effectively conveys the characters' emotional turmoil and moral conflict, enhancing audience engagement.high
- (158) The montage of reform imagery provides a stark contrast to the characters' actions, emphasizing the irony of the situation.high
- (159) The use of humor in Jared's voiceover adds a layer of satire that underscores the absurdity of the situation.high
- (160) The emotional weight of Mark's decision to sell reflects the culmination of his character arc, providing a satisfying narrative payoff.high
- The overall pacing and structure of the sequence maintain tension and engagement, leading to a powerful conclusion.high
- (158, 159) The transition between the montage and the subsequent scenes could be smoother to maintain narrative flow.medium
- (159) The commentary on societal blame could be expanded to deepen the critique of systemic issues.medium
- (160) Mark's internal conflict could be more explicitly tied to his decision-making process to enhance emotional clarity.medium
- Some visual motifs could be reinforced throughout the sequence to create a stronger thematic cohesion.medium
- The stakes of the characters' decisions could be heightened to amplify tension and urgency.high
- A clearer resolution for secondary characters could enhance the overall narrative satisfaction.medium
- More explicit connections between the characters' actions and the broader societal impact could deepen the thematic resonance.high
- A stronger emotional payoff for Mark's character arc could enhance audience connection.high
{
"impact": {
"score": 9,
"explanation": "The sequence delivers a strong emotional punch, effectively engaging the audience with its blend of humor and gravity.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Incorporate more visual storytelling to enhance emotional resonance.",
"Strengthen character interactions to amplify impact."
]
},
"pacing": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The pacing is generally strong, though some scenes could be tightened.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Trim redundant dialogue or exposition.",
"Increase urgency in key moments."
]
},
"stakes": {
"score": 9,
"explanation": "The stakes are high, both financially and morally, creating a compelling narrative tension.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Clarify the specific losses at stake for characters.",
"Tie emotional stakes to external consequences."
]
},
"escalation": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "Tension builds effectively as the characters confront the implications of their actions.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Introduce more conflict to heighten stakes.",
"Create a clearer sense of urgency in the characters' decisions."
]
},
"originality": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence presents familiar themes in a fresh and engaging way.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Introduce unexpected twists to enhance originality.",
"Explore unique perspectives on the financial crisis."
]
},
"readability": {
"score": 9,
"explanation": "The sequence is well-structured and easy to follow, with clear dialogue and engaging visuals.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Ensure consistent formatting throughout.",
"Maintain clarity in scene transitions."
]
},
"memorability": {
"score": 9,
"explanation": "The sequence stands out for its emotional depth and thematic resonance, leaving a lasting impression.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Highlight key moments that encapsulate the characters' journeys.",
"Ensure the climax delivers a powerful emotional payoff."
]
},
"revealRhythm": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "Revelations are well-paced, though some could be more impactful.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Space out key reveals for greater tension.",
"Ensure each revelation builds on the previous one."
]
},
"narrativeShape": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence has a clear structure, though some transitions could be smoother.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Refine scene transitions for better flow.",
"Ensure each scene contributes to the overall arc."
]
},
"emotionalImpact": {
"score": 9,
"explanation": "The sequence elicits strong emotional responses, effectively conveying the characters' struggles.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Deepen emotional connections through character interactions.",
"Highlight the human cost of the financial crisis."
]
},
"plotProgression": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The sequence significantly advances the plot by showcasing the characters' decisions and their consequences.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Clarify the stakes of the characters' actions to enhance narrative momentum.",
"Ensure each scene builds on the previous one to maintain forward motion."
]
},
"subplotIntegration": {
"score": 6,
"explanation": "Secondary characters' arcs feel somewhat disconnected from the main narrative.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Weave subplots more tightly into the main story.",
"Ensure secondary characters' journeys enhance the primary arc."
]
},
"tonalVisualCohesion": {
"score": 9,
"explanation": "The tone is consistent, blending humor and seriousness effectively.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Reinforce visual motifs to enhance thematic cohesion.",
"Ensure tone aligns with character arcs."
]
},
"externalGoalProgress": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "The characters make significant progress toward their financial goals, but the emotional stakes could be clearer.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Clarify the consequences of their decisions.",
"Ensure external goals align with internal conflicts."
]
},
"internalGoalProgress": {
"score": 7,
"explanation": "Mark's internal journey is evident, but could be more pronounced.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Highlight moments of self-reflection.",
"Show how his experiences shape his beliefs."
]
},
"characterLeveragePoint": {
"score": 8,
"explanation": "Mark's internal conflict is well-explored, though it could be more explicitly tied to his decisions.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Deepen the emotional stakes in Mark's choices.",
"Clarify how his journey impacts his worldview."
]
},
"compelledToKeepReading": {
"score": 9,
"explanation": "The sequence maintains high stakes and emotional tension, compelling the audience to continue.",
"improvementSuggestions": [
"Introduce cliffhangers or unresolved questions.",
"Heighten the urgency of character decisions."
]
}
}
- Physical environment: The screenplay spans various locations across different time periods, primarily focusing on New York City's financial district and its surrounding areas, including upscale restaurants, strip clubs, suburban homes, offices (ranging from lavish to Spartan), a middle school football field, a pediatric psych center, an English pub, a casino in Las Vegas, and even a shooting range. The depiction shifts from the relatively laid-back atmosphere of the 1970s trading floor to the frantic, high-pressure environment of the 2007-2008 financial crisis. Locations also extend to Miami, Boulder, Colorado, and even an English pub, showcasing diverse physical settings that reflect the characters' geographical movements and social circles.
- Culture: The screenplay captures the cultural shifts from the relaxed, somewhat unprofessional culture of the 1970s bond trading floor to the high-stakes, high-pressure culture of Wall Street in the 2000s. Excess and risk-taking are prominent themes, particularly in the early scenes. However, the culture evolves to show a growing awareness of ethical dilemmas and the consequences of unchecked greed. There are also cultural elements present in the specific locations (e.g., the culinary world in Anthony Bourdain's kitchen, the heavy metal music in Michael Burry's basement, the diverse cultural mix of Manhattan streets).
- Society: The societal structure is hierarchical, especially within the financial industry. There's a clear distinction between the wealthy elite, the middle class struggling with financial difficulties (e.g., homeowners facing foreclosure), and the working class. Power dynamics are central to many interactions, notably between high-level investors and their analysts, bankers and their clients, and even within the various teams of traders. The screenplay also highlights the societal impact of the financial crisis on various groups, showing the broader consequences of Wall Street's actions.
- Technology: Technological advancements play a significant role, evolving from the rudimentary overhead projector in the 1970s to the sophisticated computer systems and Bloomberg terminals used for complex financial analysis and trading in later scenes. The use of cell phones, email, and financial news channels underscores the fast-paced, information-driven nature of the financial world. However, the screenplay also subtly contrasts this advanced technology with outdated practices and lack of transparency, which eventually lead to the crisis.
- Characters influence: The physical environment and societal structures directly influence the characters' experiences and actions. For instance, the high-pressure environment of Wall Street fuels the characters' ambition, risk-taking, and often, their moral compromises. The cultural emphasis on wealth and success shapes their motivations and decisions. The technological tools they use (or lack thereof) impact their ability to navigate the financial markets and influence their interactions with others.
- Narrative contribution: The diverse settings and shifting timelines contribute to a multi-faceted narrative. The screenplay utilizes flashbacks and time-lapses to connect the events of the 1970s to the 2008 financial crisis, effectively illustrating the causal relationship between the origins of mortgage-backed securities and the eventual collapse. The physical locations enhance the storytelling by providing context, atmosphere, and creating a sense of place that aids the viewer's understanding of the characters' situations.
- Thematic depth contribution: The world-building elements significantly enhance the thematic depth of the screenplay. The contrast between the exuberant celebration of wealth and the devastating consequences of the crisis underlines the theme of greed and its societal implications. The exploration of different societal strata adds layers of complexity, highlighting the unequal impact of the financial crisis. The cultural shifts throughout the timeline serve to contextualize the human cost of the financial crisis, showcasing the moral compromises individuals make, and the human toll taken on those affected.
| Voice Analysis | |
|---|---|
| Summary: | The writer's voice is characterized by a sharp, witty, and often cynical tone, blending dark humor with serious subject matter. The narrative is fast-paced and engaging, utilizing vivid imagery and detailed descriptions, particularly regarding the financial world. Dialogue is realistic yet insightful, conveying complex financial concepts in an accessible manner while revealing the characters' personalities and internal conflicts. The directorial choices suggest a dynamic and intense style, incorporating elements like freeze-frames and quick cuts to enhance the tension and urgency. |
| Voice Contribution | The writer's voice contributes to the script by creating a compelling and engaging narrative that is both intellectually stimulating and emotionally resonant. The blend of humor and seriousness allows the audience to connect with the characters while grappling with the complex themes of greed, deception, and the consequences of unchecked capitalism. The fast-paced narrative and sharp dialogue maintain audience engagement throughout the high-stakes financial world depicted in the screenplay, generating both suspense and insightful commentary on the industry's culture and ethical dilemmas. The vivid descriptions enhance the immersive quality of the narrative, transporting the audience to the various settings and emphasizing the atmosphere of each scene. |
| Best Representation Scene | 16 - From Fish to Financial Collapse |
| Best Scene Explanation | This scene is the best representation because it most effectively encapsulates the writer's unique blend of dark humor, sharp dialogue, and vivid imagery. The analogy of the seafood stew to the manipulation of CDOs is both clever and darkly funny, highlighting the absurdity of the financial situation. The use of the Jenga game to visually represent the instability of the CDOs enhances the dramatic tension and foreshadows the impending crisis. The scene masterfully balances lightheartedness with a sense of impending doom, mirroring the writer's overall stylistic approach. |
Style and Similarities
The screenplay predominantly employs a dialogue-driven style characterized by sharp, witty, and fast-paced exchanges. It focuses on high-stakes situations, often within the financial world, exploring complex moral dilemmas and power dynamics between characters. There's a consistent blend of humor and serious subject matter, with a focus on intense character interactions and intellectual conflict.
Style Similarities:
| Writer | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Aaron Sorkin | Aaron Sorkin's influence is overwhelmingly present across nearly every scene analysis. His signature sharp dialogue, complex characters grappling with moral dilemmas, and fast-paced storytelling are repeatedly cited as dominant features. The focus on high-pressure environments, particularly in the financial sector, also aligns strongly with Sorkin's frequent themes. |
| David Mamet | David Mamet's style is a strong secondary influence, frequently mentioned alongside Sorkin. His emphasis on intense conflict, power dynamics, and morally ambiguous situations in high-stakes settings complements Sorkin's style. The gritty realism and confrontational dialogue often attributed to Mamet appear in many scene analyses. |
Other Similarities: While Aaron Sorkin and David Mamet are the most prominent influences, other writers like Adam McKay (with his satirical and socially conscious approach) and Quentin Tarantino (with his unique blend of wit, drama, and action) are mentioned in several analyses, suggesting a potential eclectic mix of influences. The consistent presence of financial themes suggests a specific genre focus. The occasional mention of writers like Noah Baumbach, Diablo Cody, and the Coen Brothers indicates potential stylistic shifts or subplots that deviate from the core Sorkin/Mamet style.
Top Correlations and patterns found in the scenes:
| Pattern | Explanation |
|---|---|
| High Overall Grade Correlation with Dialogue and Emotional Impact | Scenes with higher overall grades (9 or 10) tend to have stronger dialogue (scores above 8) and higher emotional impact (scores above 7). This suggests that focusing on impactful dialogue and emotional resonance significantly contributes to the overall quality of the scenes. Conversely, scenes with lower scores in these two areas tend to have lower overall scores, even if other elements like concept or plot are strong. Consider revising scenes 2, 3, 18, 20, 23, and 33 to strengthen dialogue and emotional impact. |
| Tone Clusters and their Impact on Character Change | There are noticeable clusters of similar tones. Scenes with 'Intense', 'Confrontational', and 'Suspenseful' tones frequently feature high character development scores (above 8). This suggests that high-stakes conflicts and intense emotional moments drive significant character arcs. Conversely, scenes utilizing more 'Humorous,' 'Sarcastic,' or 'Light-hearted' tones often have lower character change scores. While these tones are valuable, consider ways to integrate them strategically to allow for more subtle character shifts within the context of intense scenes to avoid creating tonal inconsistencies. |
| Conflict and High Stakes Drive Emotional Impact | A strong correlation exists between high scores in 'Conflict' and 'High Stakes' and high scores in 'Emotional Impact'. Scenes with higher 'Conflict' and 'High Stakes' usually exhibit a greater emotional impact. This is a positive trend; however, maintaining this while diversifying the methods of creating conflict and stakes might enhance the overall narrative impact and avoid repetitiveness. |
| Concept and Plot Strength: A Consistent Element | The screenplay consistently receives high scores for 'Concept' and 'Plot' across almost all scenes (mostly 8 or 9). This indicates a strong underlying narrative structure. Maintaining this level of conceptual and plot strength is a significant strength, and further enhancement in other areas, as suggested above, could elevate the screenplay further. |
| Scene 18 - An outlier requiring attention | Scene 18 ('Nervous', 'Awkward', 'Light-hearted') is a significant outlier with considerably lower scores across multiple categories. While tonal shifts are crucial, this scene's lower performance may indicate a pacing issue, a need for stronger emotional impact, or a potential disconnect from the overall narrative flow. Re-evaluating its purpose and impact within the larger story arc is crucial. |
| Late Act Intensification | There's a notable increase in 'Intense,' 'Confrontational,' and 'Suspenseful' tones and high stakes in the latter half of the screenplay. This suggests a well-structured climax, however, ensure that this escalation is appropriately foreshadowed and that the pacing feels organic and not forced. Consider adding smaller hints of this intensity and suspense earlier to give the audience a sense of impending doom. |
| Dialogue and Tone: A Refinement Opportunity | While 'Dialogue' scores are generally good, they could be further improved in conjunction with tone. Consider how the dialogue reflects and enhances the tone of each scene. Scenes with lower dialogue scores are often also scenes with less intense and more reflective tones. Exploring opportunities to make dialogue more impactful in these scenes could improve the overall flow and audience engagement. |
Writer's Craft Overall Analysis
The screenplay demonstrates a strong foundation in creating tension, conflict, and engaging dialogue, particularly within a financial setting. The writer effectively uses sharp dialogue to convey complex themes and character motivations. However, there's a recurring need for deeper character development and exploration of moral dilemmas beyond the surface level. The consistent recommendation of 'The Big Short' screenplay suggests a stylistic affinity for blending humor, drama, and complex financial concepts, which should be further cultivated.
Key Improvement Areas
Suggestions
| Type | Suggestion | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Screenplay | 'The Big Short' (Charles Randolph & Adam McKay) | Repeatedly recommended, this screenplay excels at blending complex financial concepts with engaging characters and compelling narratives, directly addressing the writer's strengths and areas for improvement in balancing technical details with character-driven storytelling. |
| Screenplay | 'Glengarry Glen Ross' (David Mamet) | Provides a masterclass in sharp, dialogue-driven scenes and intense character interactions in a high-stakes corporate setting, addressing the need for improved dialogue and exploration of moral ambiguity. |
| Screenplay | 'Margin Call' (J.C. Chandor) | Offers a nuanced perspective on financial thrillers and the ethical dilemmas faced by characters within the financial industry, complementing the writer's existing style and providing alternative approaches to structure and character development. |
| Book | 'Save the Cat!' (Blake Snyder) | Provides practical guidance on screenplay structure and character development, assisting the writer in enhancing scene structure, narrative pacing, and character arcs to improve the overall impact and engagement of their scenes. |
| Book | 'The Art of Dramatic Writing' (Lajos Egri) | A classic text on character development and conflict, it will assist in deepening emotional depth and creating more authentic and compelling character arcs. |
| Book | 'Screenplay: The Foundations of Screenwriting' (Syd Field) | Provides a solid foundation in screenplay structure and techniques, addressing potential weaknesses in overall narrative construction and character development. |
| Video | Interviews with Adam McKay (on his writing process) | Provides valuable insights into the creative choices and techniques used by a successful screenwriter known for his work in blending humor, drama, and complex themes in a financial setting. |
| Video | Watch 'Margin Call' | Offers a visual study of a film that effectively explores similar themes and scenarios, providing valuable insights into the visual storytelling techniques used to create tension and suspense in financial thrillers. |
| Video | Interviews with real-life financial analysts and traders | Enhances authenticity in depicting financial characters and conflicts by providing real-world context and understanding of the industry’s dynamics. |
Here are different Tropes found in the screenplay
| Trope | Trope Details | Trope Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| The Rise and Fall | The screenplay chronicles the rise of mortgage-backed securities and the subsequent fall of the financial system, culminating in the 2008 financial crisis. | This trope involves a character or entity experiencing a significant rise to power or success, followed by a dramatic fall. An example is the story of Gordon Gekko in 'Wall Street', where his rise in the financial world leads to his eventual downfall due to greed and unethical practices. |
| The Anti-Hero | Characters like Michael Burry and Mark Baum operate outside traditional moral boundaries, driven by their own agendas in the financial world. | An anti-hero is a central character who lacks conventional heroic attributes. An example is Walter White from 'Breaking Bad', who turns to crime for personal reasons, blurring the lines between right and wrong. |
| The Voice of Reason | Characters like Michael Burry often serve as the voice of reason, warning others about the impending financial collapse. | This trope features a character who provides logical insights that others ignore, often leading to disaster. An example is Dr. Ian Malcolm in 'Jurassic Park', who warns about the dangers of playing God with nature. |
| The Big Short | The characters engage in short selling, betting against the housing market, which is a central theme of the screenplay. | This trope involves characters making risky financial bets against a failing system. An example is the film 'The Big Short', which directly addresses the financial crisis and the strategies used by investors to profit from it. |
| The Unlikely Genius | Michael Burry, with his unique perspective and obsessive nature, uncovers the flaws in the mortgage market. | This trope features a character who possesses extraordinary intelligence or insight, often in unexpected ways. An example is Will Hunting in 'Good Will Hunting', who uses his mathematical genius to solve complex problems. |
| The Corrupt System | The screenplay critiques the financial system, highlighting corruption and unethical practices within banks and rating agencies. | This trope involves a system that is fundamentally flawed or corrupt, often leading to negative consequences for society. An example is 'The Wire', which explores systemic corruption in law enforcement and politics. |
| The Foreshadowing | The screenplay uses voiceovers and visuals to foreshadow the impending financial crisis. | Foreshadowing involves hints or clues about future events in a story. An example is in 'Romeo and Juliet', where early references to fate hint at the tragic ending. |
| The Ensemble Cast | The screenplay features multiple characters, each with their own perspectives on the financial crisis. | An ensemble cast includes a diverse group of characters, each contributing to the story. An example is 'Love Actually', where various interconnected stories unfold simultaneously. |
| The Ironic Twist | The screenplay ends with a critique of the financial system, highlighting the irony of the situation. | An ironic twist involves an unexpected outcome that contrasts with what was anticipated. An example is 'Fight Club', where the protagonist's journey leads to a shocking revelation about his identity. |
Memorable lines in the script:
| Scene Number | Line |
|---|---|
| 1 | Lewis Ranieri: Risk? What risk? The only risk is that you get paid back too soon! |
| 15 | Jared Vennett: Basically I'm standing in front of a burning house and offering you fire insurance on it. |
| 41 | Ben: You just bet against the American economy. If we’re right it means people lose homes, jobs, retirement savings, pensions. These aren’t just numbers. For every point unemployment goes up, 40 thousand people die. Did you know that? |
| 55 | Mark: Wall Street took a good idea, Lewis Ranieri’s Mortgage Bond and turned it into an atomic bomb of fraud and stupidity that is on its way to decimating the world economy. |
| 39 | Mark: Zero! There is a zero percent chance your subprime losses stop at 5%! |
Some Loglines to consider:
| A group of outsiders, armed with unconventional methods, spot the flaws in the housing market and bet against the impending financial collapse. |
| Driven by sharp wit and a keen eye for absurdity, a diverse cast of characters unravel a massive financial deception that threatens to unravel the global economy. |
| In a game of high stakes and high risk, a band of maverick investors risks it all to expose the lies and corruption at the heart of the 2008 financial crisis. |
| When the housing market implodes, a handful of unorthodox investors reap the rewards of their foresight, while simultaneously bearing witness to the devastating consequences of their gamble. |
| A dark comedy about how a few outsiders saw the coming economic collapse and bet big against the financial system, exposing the greed and stupidity at the heart of the 2008 crisis. |
| In the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, a group of outsiders and mavericks see the cracks in the system and bet against the housing market, aiming to profit from the impending collapse. |
| A medical doctor with Asperger's Syndrome, a cynical hedge fund manager, and a pair of naive investors navigate the complex and deceptive world of mortgage-backed securities, uncovering a massive fraud that threatens to upend the global economy. |
| As the subprime mortgage market begins to unravel, a group of financial outsiders race against the clock to expose the systemic corruption underlying the American banking system and profit from the inevitable crisis. |
| Driven by their own personal motivations and moral compasses, a ragtag team of investors takes on the titans of Wall Street, betting against the housing market and confronting the ethical dilemmas of profiting from a global financial meltdown. |
| In the years leading up to the 2008 recession, a diverse group of characters - from a socially awkward doctor to a jaded hedge fund manager - uncover the shocking truth about the mortgage-backed securities market, setting off a chain of events that will change the world. |
| A group of misfit investors bet against the housing market, uncovering the corruption and greed that led to the 2008 financial crisis. |
| As the housing bubble bursts, a few outsiders see the impending disaster and take a stand against Wall Street's reckless behavior. |
| In a world of financial chaos, a doctor-turned-investor risks everything to expose the truth behind the mortgage crisis. |
| A darkly comedic exploration of the 2008 financial meltdown, told through the eyes of those who saw it coming. |
| When the housing market collapses, a band of unlikely heroes fights against the system to profit from its downfall. |
Help & FAQ
Frequently Asked Questions
After that, the high-level menu will offer insights into the story, themes, and characters.
The scene-by-scene analysis will demonstrate how each scene performs across various criteria, summarized in the column headings.
Click on any scene title to view the full analysis, including critiques and suggestions for improvement.
'Other Analyses' provides various insights into your writing and different perspectives, although it might not lead to significant rewrites of your script.
You can play it for free. If you have scripts analyzed, the AI might recommend exercises from SceneProv to help you improve your writing. Go to the craft tab to see what it recommended.
Let the AI take a turn when you're blocked or you want to riff on a scene. Each scene you create in SceneProv gets graded at the end.
- The email might have gone to your spam folder or is hidden in an email thread.
- The process might still be ongoing. Register/Login with the email you used during upload and look at the status. It sometimes takes as long as a couple hours. If it's been longer than that email us at [email protected]
Feature Request
Got an idea to improve our service? We'd love to hear it!
Scene by Scene Emotions
suspense Analysis
Executive Summary
Suspense in 'The Big Short' is effectively utilized to heighten tension during critical moments of financial decision-making. The screenplay builds suspense through character interactions, particularly when Mark Baum confronts various figures in the financial industry, such as CEOs and brokers, about the impending crisis. The uncertainty surrounding their responses and the potential fallout from their decisions keeps the audience engaged and on edge.
Usage Analysis
Critique
Suggestions
Questions for AI
fear Analysis
Executive Summary
Fear is a pervasive emotion throughout 'The Big Short,' effectively illustrating the anxiety surrounding the financial crisis. The screenplay captures the characters' fears about the impending collapse of the housing market and the broader implications for society. This fear is often tied to the characters' moral dilemmas and the consequences of their actions.
Usage Analysis
Critique
Suggestions
Questions for AI
joy Analysis
Executive Summary
Joy is a nuanced emotion in 'The Big Short,' often juxtaposed with the darker themes of the financial crisis. Moments of joy arise from character interactions and small victories, providing brief respites from the tension. However, these moments are often overshadowed by the impending doom of the financial collapse.
Usage Analysis
Critique
Suggestions
Questions for AI
sadness Analysis
Executive Summary
Sadness is a prominent emotion in 'The Big Short,' effectively conveying the human cost of the financial crisis. The screenplay captures the emotional toll on individuals and families affected by the collapse, creating a poignant narrative that resonates with viewers. This sadness is often tied to the characters' personal struggles and the broader implications of their actions.
Usage Analysis
Critique
Suggestions
Questions for AI
surprise Analysis
Executive Summary
Surprise is effectively utilized in 'The Big Short' to create impactful moments that catch both characters and viewers off guard. The screenplay employs unexpected revelations and twists to highlight the absurdity of the financial system and the disconnect between perception and reality.
Usage Analysis
Critique
Suggestions
Questions for AI
empathy Analysis
Executive Summary
Empathy is a central emotional thread in 'The Big Short,' allowing viewers to connect deeply with the characters and their struggles. The screenplay effectively portrays the emotional toll of the financial crisis on individuals and families, creating a poignant narrative that resonates with audiences.
Usage Analysis
Critique
Suggestions
Questions for AI